Time: Mon Mar 31 07:07:38 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA09812;
Mon, 31 Mar 1997 06:29:38 -0700 (MST)
by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA11309;
Mon, 31 Mar 1997 06:29:33 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 06:34:55 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Slavery and the weasel clause (fwd)
>Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 13:30:30 -0800
>From: Bill VanMastrigt <BillV@noller.com>
>Cc: pmitch@primenet.com
>Subject: Slavery and the weasel clause
>
>"The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful
>Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property
>belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so
>construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any
>particular State." Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of U.S. Constitution.
>
>The United States has determined that the first ten Amendments to the
>Constitution may be prejudicial to its claims against you. Any wonder
>why constitutional arguments, from the right to keep and bear arms to the
>right to be secure in one's person, house, papers, and effects, are very
>often summarily dismissed by the courts?
>
>Yes, Federal Reserve Notes are the property of the United States (there
>is no point to the argument whether the United States is principle or
>agent.) The United States exercises jurisdiction over its property
>wherever it may be found, whether in the District of Columbia or in one
>of the several states of the union.
>
>It is soley by way of this two-name commercial paper that the United
>States presumes to exercise its jurisdiction where none appeared
>before. This commercial paper is the ticket into public servitude
>(remember, only private servitude is against the law; also check out the
>definitions of substantive due process and distributed liability.)
>
>There is one huge problem though with this "Property belonging to the
>United States". And that is, this commercial paper that circulates as
>money, flies in the face of the Constitution.
>
>Article I, Section 10 states in part, "No State shall . . . coin money; emit
>bills of credit;"
>
>Article I, Section 8, states in part "The Congress shall have power . . . to
>coin Money".
>
>The States are strictly forbidden to coin money or emit bills of credit in
>their individual capacity. In their collective capacity as the United States,
>they are only given a positive power to coin money. What the States are
>forbidden to do in their individual capacity, they are also forbidden to do
>in their collective capacity as the United States, outside the grant of a
>positive power. This absolutely closes the door on any argument that
>FRNs have constitutional standing.
>
>FRNs are bills of credit, but are not money. By the FED's own definition,
>money is a store of future value. An FRN is not a store of future value,
>because it is a representation (of value), that is subject to diminution over
>time. So, what is this value that the FRN represents? It is the value
>attached to the present and future performance of energy. Energy is the
>credit that this bill is drawn on and underwritten by.
>
>Energy is a true value store. It is energy alone that creates and sustains
>life. It is energy that produces. Who owns the energy? Who owns these
>bills of credit?
>
>Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail