Time: Mon Mar 31 17:49:04 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA19941
for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 13:53:57 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 15:35:22 -0500 (EST)
To: GovtAware-L@citadel.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: GovtAware: RED ALERT: NATIONAL ID CARD NOW LAW !!!
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Is it municipal or general law?
Citizens of the several States
are not subject to the municipal
legislation of Congress. See
"The Two United States and the Law"
in the Supreme Law Library at URL:
http://www.supremelaw.com
/s/ Paul Mitchell
At 02:37 PM 3/31/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Check this out...
>--
>Christopher Darrow
>http://www.softcom.net/users/colanaha/
>mailto:colanaha@softcom.net
>mailto:CADarrow@aol.com
with ESMTP id colanaha for <colanaha@softcom.net>; Mon, 31 Mar 1997
11:21:14 -0800
> by smtp.clever.net with SMTP; 31 Mar 1997 19:09:31 -0000
OAA23137; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 14:06:15 -0500 (EST)
>Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 14:06:01 -0500 (EST)
>Comments: Authenticated sender is <citadel@citadel.net>
>From: "Dr. Manion" <CEO@citadel.net>
>Organization: Audio Informercial Marketing (tm)
>To: GovtAware-L@citadel.net
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>Priority: normal
>Subject: GovtAware: RED ALERT: NATIONAL ID CARD NOW LAW !!!
>
>Subject: Fwd: New Georgia/National ID Article
>
>Please post and repost. Take issue up with your local representatives. These
>representatives do not necessarily know what legislation they pass.
>---------------------
>Forwarded message:
>From: robertabob@mindspring.com (Bob or Cyndee)
>To: robertabob@mindspring.com
>Date: 97-03-31 00:53:07 EST
>
>***NOTICE: Copyrighted article. Permission to place in newspapers, re-send,
>post and place on web sites, if shown only in its entirety with no changes
>or additions. This notice must accompany all re-posting unless express
>permission is given by the author.*** It is strongly suggested that this be
>sent to legislators in all states to warn them of impending legislation on
>their state levels.
>
>
>National ID Card Is Now Federal Law and Georgia Wants To Help Lead the Way
>By: Cyndee Parker
>
>In September of 1996, President Clinton signed into law, the Illegal
>Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. Buried at
>approximately page 650 of the new national Defense Bill, also known as
>Public Law 104-208, Part B, Title IV, the American public was given a
>national ID card. With no fanfare, no publicity and no scrutiny, the bill
>easily avoided the watchful eyes of even its most aggressive opponents.
>
>The Coalition to Repeal the Fingerprints Law, a Georgia grassroots movement
>trying to rid the state of the new requirement to give digital fingerprints
>in order to obtain a state ID or driver's license, recently found the
>national ID tie. The group found that the national law not only mandates a
>national ID card, but found how it is to be used.
>
>In Section 401-403, pilot programs have been initiated by the U.S. Attorney
>General, one of which is the "Machine Readable Document Pilot Program". In
>this particular program, employers would have to "procure" a document reader
>linked to the federal government's Social Security Administration in order to
>have the potential employee swipe their new driver's license/national ID card
>through the reader. Then, it would be up to the federal government to either
>approve or disapprove the applicant for employment.
>
>Section 326 and 327 provide $5,000,000 per year grants to each state
>participating in any of the three pilot programs. The money has been
>allocated through the Criminal Alien Tracking Center and is called the
>Criminal Alien Identification System. The "automated identification
>system", which is to be used by "Federal, State, and local law enforcement"
>and will "provide for recording of fingerprints of aliens previously
>arrested and removed". The grants run from "fiscal years 1997 through 2001".
>
>Additionally, Section 656 of the new law states that "after October 1, 2000,
>Federal agencies may only accept as proof of identity driver's licenses that
>conform to standards developed by the Secretary of the Treasury", after
>consultation with state motor vehicle officials and the American Association
>of Motor Vehicle Administrators. The AAMVA sees digital fingerprinting as
>the best way to go in driver's license identifiers.
>
>Fearing that all Americans were about to be digitally tattooed under the
>government's paranoiac guise of catching everything from aliens to dead beat
>dads, Congressman Dick Armey (R-TX) was one of the first to voice his
>opinion. Armey called the move, "an abomination and wholly at odds with the
>American tradition of individual freedom". Senator Spencer Abraham (R-MI)
>joined Armey in signing a letter denouncing the computer registry and
>tracking system and Jack Kemp announced in the New York Times that this was,
>"an anti-privacy, anti-business and anti-American approach" and that "it was
>no way to run immigration policy". Of course, all this was said before the
>bills were snuck through in the last defense bill. There is a possibility
>at this time, they don't even know the proposed legislation became law.
>
>For the first time in American history and reminiscent of Communist
>countries, our government would have the ability to grant approval before a
>private company enters into private employment contracts with private
>citizens. Because of the nature of the employment system alone, personal
>information would be accessible to local agencies and anyone who even claims
>to be an employer. The government would have comprehensive files of all
>American citizen's names, dates of birth, place of birth, mother's maiden
>names, Social Security numbers, gender, race, driving records, child support
>payments, divorce status, hair color, eye color, height, weight, and
>anything else they may dream up in the future.
>
>On May 10, 1995, a hearing was held by the Senate Subcommittee on
>Immigration entitled, "Verification of Applicant Identity for the Purposes of
>Employment and Public Assistance". The hearing was chaired by Senator Alan
>Simpson (R-WY) and attended by Senators Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Dianne
>Feinstein (D-CA), and John Kyl (R-AZ). Robert Razor of the Secret Service
>Financial Crimes Division gave the Subcommittee an explanation of the
>emerging biometric technological role in personal identification. He said,
>"The use of biometrics is the means by which an individual may be
>conclusively identified. There are two types of biometric identifiers:
>physical and behavioral characteristics. Physiological biometrics include
>facial features, hand geometry, retinal and iris patterns, DNA, and
>fingerprints. Behavioral characteristics include voice characteristics and
>signature analysis."
>
>Now the people of America not only must have digital tattoos on their
>driver's licenses, we must also give information to the government when
>boarding commercial aircraft, called personality profiles, along with a
>government ID card. Of course, this guise is in order to catch some would
>be terrorist. Dianne Feinstein, author of the national ID law, explained in
>a Capitol Hill magazine that it was her intention to see Congress
>immediately implement a national identity system where every American is
>required to carry a card with a "magnetic strip on it which the bearer's
>unique voice, retina pattern, or fingerprint is digitally encoded." She
>also stated that "fifteen years ago, they would have torn the building
>down". We probably would have if we had known about it. I hope she doesn't
>mind that Georgia left out the magnetic strip and replaced it with two
>dimensional bar-coding.
>
>During closing remarks of the May 10 Subcommittee meeting, Senator Alan
>Simpson stated, "There is much to do here, but I was just saying to Ted
>[Kennedy] before he left, a hearing like this fifteen years ago, would have
>torn the building down. And here we are today, just a bunch of us, kind of
>sitting around and no media, no nothing. This is fine with me. I get tired
>of them on this issue."
>
>Based on other federal mandates, the Associated Press reported in the Wichita
>Eagle on March 6, 1997 that the "Federal government mandates a registry of
>new employees: State lawmakers balk at bill required by Congress to ease
>child support collection. A bill designed to increase state collection of
>child support payments was described as a "Big Brother" move and drew little
>support from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. But
>the federal government says the legislature must pass it or the state could
>lose as much as $29 million in federal funds." The bill referred to
>requires the state to set up a "new hires directory" that would require all
>employers to report to the state information about every newly hired
>employee. The directory would be made available to the Department of Social
>and Rehabilitation Services for child support collections. In the article,
>they reported that "the date in Kansas and other states, although
>confidential, would be available to a national directory of new hires."
>They further reported that all people would be listed, regardless of age and
>even those that have no child support obligation.
>
>The Senate Judiciary Committee in Kansas was quick to offer comments
>condemning the federal mandate. Senator Mike Harris from Wichita, the
>committee chairman said, "This is the most potentially significant,
>far-reaching piece of legislation that has come through this committee".
>The legislators from both parties referred to "Big Brother" and George
>Orwell's novel, "1984". Kansas State Senator Paul Feleciano of Wichita
>said, "If ever we give witness to Big Brother watching over us, this is the
>beginning of it". Sen. Ed Pugh of Wamego had sharper words for the bill.
>He said, "I don't see how it can be drafted by someone in a free society.
>It's a perfect example of the ends justifying the means." These Kansas
>lawmakers are not referring to the Immigration Act, but to another new
>federal law, the Welfare Reform Act. If Kansas refuses to have a state
>bill in place later this year, they will loose as much as $29 million in
>federal funds for child support collection. Senator Pugh said it is a
>"wholesale assault on Constitutional rights".
>
>The new driver's license requirement mandating fingerprints for Georgia
>driver's and those wanting ID cards passed the state legislature with
>virtually no public or media attention in April of 1996. The first known
>announcement was on the local Atlanta news announcing an October 1996 date
>to begin fingerprinting. Cyndee Parker, now a coordinator for the Coalition
>to Repeal the Fingerprint Law in Georgia began the campaign to repeal the
>egregious law.
>
>Many Georgia lawmakers joined in on the repeal efforts. Representatives
>Mitchell Kaye, Brian Joyce, Vernon Jones and Senator Pam Glanton were the
>first to help lead the repeal efforts in the General Assembly of Georgia.
>Eight bills were drawn by the House and one by the Senate. Mitchell Kaye
>refers to the law as, "tracking us like a can of dog food".
>
>Due to the Governor's and House Speaker's manipulations, all eight House
>bills were held hostage by the House Motor Vehicle's Committee and were
>never voted on. The Senate overwhelmingly passed a Senate Bill, only to
>find it placed as hostage, along with the other bills in Motor Vehicles. On
>the last night of the Georgia Session, Senator Glanton amended another
>driver's license related bill and it also was never voted on by the House
>due to the same manipulations, illegal rule changes and an incredible amount
>of confusion on the House Floor. Governor Miller stated numerous times
>during the year that he would veto any repeal effort. House Speaker Tom
>Murphy was happy to see that the Governor did not have to get out his veto
>pen.
>
>The Coalition will now take their story around the state using town hall
>meetings. The repeal effort has made very strange political bedfellows,
>with such groups as the ACLU, Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the
>Libertarian Party of Georgia, the Christian Coalition, American's for Lawful
>Government, ABATE a motorcycle rider's education group, and many other
>diverse groups, totaling about 20 in all and growing rapidly. The Coalition
>believes that once Georgian's know about the federal implications, the
>groundswell will grow so large that the Governor will have no choice but rid
>the state of the obviously federally mandated bill. The group says that at
>least the State of Washington was honest with its citizens when proposing
>the same fingerprinting legislation. Right in Section 1 of the Washington
>bill, they state this is a national ID card in conformity with federal
>mandates.
>
>Georgia just slipped theirs through unnoticed by lawmakers and the public,
>the same way the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
>was. The group also had to notify their United States Congressional
>Representatives and Senators, as they were unaware of the facts as well.
>Both State and Federal Representatives and Senators had absolutely no
>knowledge they had passed the new laws until the Coalition brought it to
>their attention.
>
>The Coaltion to Repeal the Fingerprints Law can be reached at 404-250-8105
>or visit their web site at www.mcwebs.com/repeal/
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>El Jeffe, El Capiton, Generalissimo Klintonista speaks out
> about the US Constitution:
>
>
>"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical
>Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of
>individual freedom to Americans ..."
>
>"And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When
>personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what
>we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing
>projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like
>that to try to make people safer in their communities."
>
>President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough"
>
>"We can't be so fixated on our desire
> to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..."
>
> Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)
>
>
> Why cant any of these be considered a violation of the oath of
> office to uphold the Constitution and qualify as TREASON !!
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ralph@TeamInfinity.com (I can get you SAPF films/tapes/materials,
> "Harry's War" the suppressed film, Tragedy & Hope the book,
> US/UN/DontTreadonMe FLAGS, bumperstickers YardSigns & T-Shirts,
> inquire)
>
> http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/code/t26.html
>
> http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html
>
>
> This correspondence in NO WAY represents Save A Patriot Fellowship
> (SAPF), but feel free to contact them thru RALPH & Andrew C. Earp
>
> 1-800-677-1207 ext. 1800 RALPH and ANDREW C. EARP
> Andrew C. Earp is NATIONAL DIRECTOR of SEMINAR SERVICES
>
> CALL 703-904-7770 ask for document 777
>#########################################################################
>
>
>
>
>________________________________________________________________
> Sponsored by Audio Informercial Marketing (tm)
>Want to implement Audio Infomercial Marketing for your business? We handle
>everything from market need analysis, script writing, editing, voice talent,
>music, graphics, covers, production, duplication and support. Ideal for
>attorneys, consultants, accountants, and other professionals who want to
>"Master The Art of Networking". Email for FREE details and consultation,
>email: <mailto:AIMInfo@Citadel.Net>
>==============================================================
>To unsubscribe> TO: Listserv@Citadel.Net Txt Area: signoff GovtAware-L
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
________________________________________________________________
Sponsored by Audio Informercial Marketing (tm)
Want to implement Audio Infomercial Marketing for your business? We handle
everything from market need analysis, script writing, editing, voice talent,
music, graphics, covers, production, duplication and support. Ideal for
attorneys, consultants, accountants, and other professionals who want to
"Master The Art of Networking". Email for FREE details and consultation,
email: <mailto:AIMInfo@Citadel.Net>
==============================================================
To unsubscribe> TO: Listserv@Citadel.Net Txt Area: signoff GovtAware-L
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail