Time: Fri Apr 04 15:17:22 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA15286;
	Fri, 4 Apr 1997 12:17:29 -0700 (MST)
	by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA05357;
	Fri, 4 Apr 1997 12:16:21 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 15:14:30 -0800
To: rdb@labyrinth.net.au
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Notice of Libel and Demand for Retraction
References: <3.0.1.16.19970404132143.32df8d12@pop.primenet.com>
 <199704041757.DAA25756@minotaur.labyrinth.net.au>

I regard this as libel,
and I demand an immediate retraction.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



At 04:11 AM 4/5/97 +0900, you wrote:
>Loser, Paul Mitchell is now unsubscribed from the TL list.
>
>whether you care or not, I'd had enough of losers.
>
>> Refused for cause and
>> returned to sender, unread.
>> 
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> 
>> 
>> At 03:56 AM 4/5/97 +0900, you wrote:
>> >> Please do not send me any more private email.
>> >
>> >Please do not use the FWO or TL lists until you have a clue.
>> >
>> >> Thank you.
>> >
>> >Thank you.
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> At 02:23 AM 4/5/97 +0900, you wrote:
>> >> >> I didn't.  This was a public message, intended
>> >> >> for everyone.
>> >> >
>> >> >Your message (with lots of unsnipped quotes so you waste more space)
was 
>> >> >basically:
>> >> >
>> >> >"Ask me privately, and I will tell you privately."
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >So you wanted to tell everyone that you want him to email you
privately!?
>> >> >
>> >> >Only one person asked.  Reply to that one person.
>> >> >
>> >> >Stop being full of shit.
>> >> >Read the Tl-stuff like you should.
>> >> >Get a life!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> At 01:57 AM 4/5/97 +0900, you wrote:
>> >> >> >DON'T post private messages (or messages that are only intended for
>> >> >> >one person) in the list!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> ================[ Distributed Message ]================
>> >> >> >>          ListServer: fwolist (Free World Order)
>> >> >> >>                Type: Not Moderated
>> >> >> >>      Distributed on: 04-APR-97, 07:33:34
>> >> >> >> Original Written by: IN:pmitch@primenet.com.
>> >> >> >> =======================================================
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Ask me privately, and I will tell you privately.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> At 06:49 AM 4/4/97 -0700, you wrote:
>> >> >> >> >================[ Distributed Message ]================
>> >> >> >> >         ListServer: fwolist (Free World Order)
>> >> >> >> >               Type: Not Moderated
>> >> >> >> >     Distributed on: 04-APR-97, 06:48:46
>> >> >> >> >Original Written by: IN:SWasher1@aol.com.
>> >> >> >> >=======================================================
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Steve: This is becoming an interesting thread, people.  Witness:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >In a message dated 97-04-03 22:36:58 EST, you write:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> ><< >For the Freedom Technologist, when is it best to use the tool
>> >> >> >> > called
>> >> >> >> > > >"UCC"?
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Wangrud:
>> >> >> >> > > NEVER
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Interesting!!  Do you care to elaborate?
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > I've seen refs. to the UCC in letters that supposedly re-butt
IRS
>> >> >> >> > form-letters.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > What "status" does a Bureaucrazy presume the
individual-who-cites
>> >> >> >> > -UCC-in-a-letter  is?  Did the authors of the UCC intend the
UCC to
>> >> be 
>> >> >> >> > used only for individuals of a so-called "particular status"?
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > "1-207, 1-207" :  is it some sort of "trap" for the user?
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Pmitch:  Out of all due respect,  why should we take this
>> discussion
>> >> >> >> > off line?
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Does anyone care to respond to the questions below?
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > > Do bankers who "cash FRN-denominated checks"  stamp any
>> >> >> >> > > words on the back of these checks that clearly reference the
>> >> >> >> > > so-called "U.C.C."?  If so, then why do they do this?
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Do so-called "IRS officials" who "cash FRN-denominated checks"
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > > stamp any words on the back of these checks that clearly
>> >> >> >> > reference
>> >> >> >> > > the so-called "U.C.C."?  If so, then why do they do this?
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Do trustees or managing directors of Trusts who "cash
>> >> >> >> > > FRN-denominated checks"  stamp any words on the back of these
>> >> >> >> > > checks that clearly reference the so-called "U.C.C."?  If so,
>> then
>> >> >> >> > why
>> >> >> >> > > do they do this?
>> >> >> >> >  
>> >> >> >> >Steve:  Should we assume by the forgoing questions that there is
>> some
>> >> >> benefit
>> >> >> >> >to utilizing the U.C.C. code after all?  Certainly you would
>> consider
>> >> >> it if
>> >> >> >> >you had read "Vultures in Eagle's Clothing" and had no other
>> >> background in
>> >> >> >> >this subject area indicating to the contrary.  How about being a
>> little
>> >> >> more
>> >> >> >> >plain for us, the untutored, and tell us what you really think?
>> >> Thanks.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >>
>========================================================================
>> >> >> >> >To subscribe: send a message to the fwolist@sportsmen.net
>> >> >> >> >with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field.  Use
>> UNSUBSCRIBE to
>> >> >> >> >remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
>> >> >> >> >    email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net
>> >> >> >> >For info about this system and its lists email:
info@sportsmen.net
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >>
>======================================================================== 
>> >> >> >> >via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 -
www.sportsmen.net
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >>
>> ========================================================================
>> >> >> >> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal
>> witness
>> >> >> >> email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel
>> 586 CPU
>> >> >> >> web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school
>> registration
>> >> >> >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at
>> its best
>> >> >> >>              Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the
>> federal zone
>> >> >> >>              Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class
>> w/o this
>> >> >> >>
>> ========================================================================
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >>
>> ========================================================================
>> >> >> >> To subscribe: send a message to the fwolist@sportsmen.net
>> >> >> >> with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field.  Use
>> UNSUBSCRIBE to
>> >> >> >> remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
>> >> >> >>     email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net
>> >> >> >> For info about this system and its lists email: info@sportsmen.net
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >>
>> >>
======================================================================== 
>> >> >> >> via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 - www.sportsmen.net
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> 
>> >> >>
========================================================================
>> >> >> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal
witness
>> >> >> email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel
586 CPU
>> >> >> web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school
registration
>> >> >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at
its best
>> >> >>              Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the
federal zone
>> >> >>              Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class
w/o this
>> >> >>
========================================================================
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >> ========================================================================
>> >> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>> >> email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
>> >> web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
>> >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
>> >>              Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
>> >>              Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
>> >> ========================================================================
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> ========================================================================
>> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>> email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
>> web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
>>              Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
>>              Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
>> ========================================================================
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================


      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail