Time: Tue Apr 15 19:23:03 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA17694; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:45:10 -0700 (MST) by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA02912; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:44:58 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:21:09 -0700 To: PatrickMalone <malone@ids2.idsonline.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: recent posting At 09:19 PM 4/15/97 -0400, you wrote: >"Ninth Circuit docketed a similar removal, >but feds put an undercover agent in my >living room, who then threatened my life >twelve times and followed that by telling >my client that I was the government agent. >She believed him, because it gave her an >excuse not to pay my fees. So, I had to >pull off the case." >--- >quoting your latest above. >now really, that's either a joke with an obscure sense of humor or a >classic sign of paranoid schizophrenia. Keep going: can you fabricate any additional hypotheses? Since I was there, and you were not, your attempt at ad hominem argumentation has failed. The man threatened me; that is a fact, whether you like it or not. You can, of course, request a copy of the police report on your own. You can take your psychiatrist friends for a long walk off a short pier. The man is part of the property conversion racket inside DOJ, which is using successor software to Inslaw's PROMIS program, with many improvements. Morris Dees refers to it as the "Freeman Tentacle." I must applaud him for his acute insight, but he is barking up the wrong tree. The racket is being orchestrated inside DOJ, using front men of varying talents. And I think Dees knows this. For details, speak with the current company president of Inslaw. The point of all this is, of course, that the FRCP usually works if, and only if, DOJ and the federal judges want it to work, and it does not work when they do not want it to work ("work" means "put money into their pockets"). You can see the pattern: government agents are now accusing others of the crimes they are committing. This pattern is now rampant, and quite obvious to the trained eye. /s/ Paul Mitchell
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail