Time: Tue Apr 15 19:23:03 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA17694;
	Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:45:10 -0700 (MST)
	by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA02912;
	Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:44:58 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 19:21:09 -0700
To: PatrickMalone <malone@ids2.idsonline.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: recent posting

At 09:19 PM 4/15/97 -0400, you wrote:
>"Ninth Circuit docketed a similar removal,
>but feds put an undercover agent in my
>living room, who then threatened my life
>twelve times and followed that by telling
>my client that I was the government agent.
>She believed him, because it gave her an
>excuse not to pay my fees.  So, I had to
>pull off the case."
>---
>quoting your latest above.
>now really, that's either a joke with an obscure sense of humor or a
>classic sign of paranoid schizophrenia.

Keep going:  can you fabricate any
additional hypotheses?

Since I was there, and you were not,
your attempt at ad hominem argumentation
has failed.  The man threatened me;  that
is a fact, whether you like it or not. 
You can, of course, request a copy of the 
police report on your own.

You can take your psychiatrist friends for
a long walk off a short pier.

The man is part of the property conversion racket 
inside DOJ, which is using successor software 
to Inslaw's PROMIS program, with many improvements.  
Morris Dees refers to it as the "Freeman Tentacle."  

I must applaud him for his acute insight, but he 
is  barking up the wrong tree. The racket is being 
orchestrated inside DOJ, using front men of 
varying talents.  And I think Dees knows this.

For details, speak with the current company 
president of Inslaw.

The point of all this is, of course, that 
the FRCP usually works if, and only if, DOJ and the 
federal judges want it to work, and 
it does not work when they do not want it 
to work ("work" means "put money into their pockets").

You can see the pattern:  government agents are
now accusing others of the crimes they are committing.
This pattern is now rampant, and quite obvious to
the trained eye.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail