Time: Wed Apr 16 09:32:30 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA25889; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:19:57 -0700 (MST) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA11808; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:19:26 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:20:47 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Forwarded from Dave Rydel (3 of 3) >Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 10:24:44 -0400 >From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net> > >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> >>>From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net> >>>Subject: SLS: People v. United States et al. (update: 2 of 2) >>> >>>>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:07:30 -0700 >>>>To: (Recipient list suppressed) >>>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>>>Subject: SLS: People v. United States et al. (update: 2 of 2) >>>> >>>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >>>> >>>> >>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. >>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness, >>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator >>>>c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776 >>>>Tucson [zip code exempt] >>>>ARIZONA STATE >>>> >>>>Under Protest, Necessity, and >>>>by Special Visitation >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES >>>> >>>> JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MONTANA >>>> >>>> BILLINGS DIVISION >>>> >>>>People of the United States ) Case No. CV-96-163-BLG >>>>of America, ex relatione ) >>>>Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF >>>> ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OF >>>> Petitioners, ) CHALLENGE TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY >>>> ) OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE: >>>> vs. ) >>>> ) 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) >>>>United States et al., ) >>>> ) >>>> Respondent. ) >>>>____________________________) >>>> >>>> >>>>COME NOW the People of the United States of America (hereinafter >>>> >>>>"Petitioners"), ex relatione Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., >>>> >>>>Citizen of Arizona state, expressly not a citizen of the United >>>> >>>>States, federal witness, and Counselor at Law (hereinafter >>>> >>>>"Relator"), to present this, Their MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT >>>> >>>>OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OF CHALLENGE TO THE >>>> >>>>CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE filed concurrently >>>> >>>>with Their MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Plaintiffs hereby >>>> >>>>challenge the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. 1447(d). >>>> >>>> In the ORDER of Chief United States District Judge Jack D. >>>> >>>>Shanstrom, dated and filed in the instant case on April 8, 1997, >>>> >>>>the following plain error is manifest, to wit: >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 1 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>> ... [T]he removal statutes do not afford a >>>> petitioner/plaintiff the power to remove a case to federal >>>> court. >>>> >>>> Petitioners respectfully request this honorable District >>>> >>>>Court of the United States (hereinafter "DCUS") to compare two >>>> >>>>important removal statutes which are available to all civil >>>> >>>>litigants. Section 1441(b) of Title 28, United States Code, >>>> >>>>contains a general restatement of the original jurisdiction of >>>> >>>>the DCUS, without any requirement that the removing party(s) be >>>> >>>>defendant(s), to wit: >>>> >>>> (b) Any civil action of which the district courts have >>>> original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising >>>> under the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United >>>> States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship >>>> or residence of the parties. >>>> >>>> >>>>The above statute makes absolutely no mention whatsoever of a >>>> >>>>"defendant", or "defendants". In clear contrast to the above >>>> >>>>statute, the companion statute at section 1441(a) does explicitly >>>> >>>>restrict its availability to civil defendant(s) only, to wit: >>>> >>>> (a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of >>>> Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which >>>> the district courts of the United States have original >>>> jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the >>>> defendants, to the district court of the United States for >>>> the district and division embracing the place where such >>>> action is pending. >>>> [emphasis added] >>>> >>>> Petitioners rely upon the maxim of construction: inclusio >>>> >>>>unius est exclusio alterius, in order to show that Congress >>>> >>>>omitted any references to the "defendant" or "defendants" in >>>> >>>>section 1441(b), because the omission was intentional; >>>> >>>>specifically, it is the intent of Congress to allow plaintiffs to >>>> >>>>remove civil action(s) from state courts into the DCUS, >>>> >>>>particularly when the DCUS has original jurisdiction that is >>>> >>>>founded on a claim or right arising under a law of the United >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 2 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>>States. See Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). The FOIA is a >>>> >>>>law of the United States. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B) for the >>>> >>>>grant of original jurisdiction to the DCUS to enjoin the >>>> >>>>withholding of documents properly requested under FOIA, and to >>>> >>>>order the production of documents improperly withheld. >>>> >>>> Accordingly, the USDC's ORDER of April 8, 1997, is in error >>>> >>>>for remanding the instant case back to the Montana Sixteenth >>>> >>>>Judicial District Court ("State Court"), because it is based on >>>> >>>>the false premise that a petitioner/plaintiff does not have the >>>> >>>>power to remove a case to federal court, under any removal >>>> >>>>statutes in Chapter 89 of Title 28, United States Code. In so >>>> >>>>doing, said ORDER would effectively deny a judicial remedy which >>>> >>>>is Petitioners' right in the instant case, because the FOIA >>>> >>>>creates a federal cause of action in the case of all FOIA >>>> >>>>requests properly submitted and improperly withheld by the >>>> >>>>agency(s) in question. Moreover, the State Court has no >>>> >>>>jurisdiction whatsoever, either original or appellate, to enjoin >>>> >>>>the withholding of documents properly requested under FOIA and/or >>>> >>>>to order the production of documents improperly withheld. >>>> >>>> >>>> CHALLENGE TO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATUTE >>>> >>>> Petitioners hereby also challenge the constitutionality of >>>> >>>>28 U.S.C. 1447(d), to wit: >>>> >>>> (d) An order remanding a case to the State court from which >>>> it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, >>>> except that an order remanding a case to the State court >>>> from which it was removed pursuant to section 1443 of this >>>> title shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise. >>>> >>>> >>>>Petitioners hereby deny any reliance whatsoever upon section >>>> >>>>1443, thus rendering moot the second half of section 1447(d). >>>> >>>>However, Petitioners argue that the first half of said section is >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 3 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>>overly broad for permitting arbitrary, capricious, erroneous, >>>> >>>>and/or injurious orders to be sustained artificially, and for >>>> >>>>depriving litigants of remedies which are their fundamental >>>> >>>>Right, under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. >>>> >>>> The USDC's ORDER of April 8, 1997, is a classic case in >>>> >>>>point. The instant case arose from Petitioners' desire to obtain >>>> >>>>a temporary restraining order ("TRO") preventing the use of >>>> >>>>lethal force against the Montana Freeman [sic], and also to >>>> >>>>obtain a permanent injunction preventing any deprivations, by >>>> >>>>Respondents, of the life, liberty, or property of Citizens of >>>> >>>>Montana state without due process of law. See Fifth Amendment. >>>> >>>> After the Montana Freemen surrendered peacefully, without >>>> >>>>any loss of life, the application for TRO was rendered moot. >>>> >>>>However, the permanent injunction against Respondents is still an >>>> >>>>open question, and it has yet to be decided finally by this >>>> >>>>honorable Court, or by the State Court from whence the instant >>>> >>>>case originated. Petitioners submit, therefore, that the >>>> >>>>application of due process of law is quite salient in the instant >>>> >>>>case, as a remedy still available not only to the Citizens of >>>> >>>>Montana state, but also to the respective litigants in the >>>> >>>>instant case, who are not necessarily Citizens of Montana state. >>>> >>>> It was only after the instant case was filed in State Court, >>>> >>>>that Petitioners then decided to submit a proper FOIA request to >>>> >>>>the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") for the >>>> >>>>credentials of all six hundred thirty-three (633) alleged federal >>>> >>>>agents who rotated in and out of the Freeman Standoff. When DOJ >>>> >>>>failed to produce the requested documents, after receipt of >>>> >>>>proper FOIA requests and appeals, and after expiration of the >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 4 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>>statutory deadlines for same, Petitioners had then exhausted all >>>> >>>>administrative remedies and were then faced with an immediate >>>> >>>>need to invoke the court of original jurisdiction over the FOIA; >>>> >>>>that court is the DCUS. No other court fits the bill. >>>> >>>> Accordingly, Petitioners are now faced with the very real >>>> >>>>prospect of being forever deprived of their procedural Right to >>>> >>>>enforce the FOIA upon DOJ. Should the USDC'S ORDER of April 8 be >>>> >>>>permitted to stand and thereby to remove the instant case back to >>>> >>>>the State Court, there will have been, in that event, no >>>> >>>>litigation whatsoever on the federal questions which arise from >>>> >>>>the original FOIA request and appeal. This result directly >>>> >>>>contravenes the explicit legislative intent of 28 U.S.C. 1441(e): >>>> >>>> (e) The court to which such civil action is removed is not >>>> precluded from hearing and determining any claim in such >>>> civil action because the State court from which such civil >>>> action is removed did not have jurisdiction over that claim. >>>> >>>> >>>> Petitioners submit, for the careful consideration of this >>>> >>>>honorable Court, that section 1441(e) applies directly, and >>>> >>>>unequivocally, to the instant case, particularly with respect to >>>> >>>>the judicial enforcement of the FOIA. This is so, precisely >>>> >>>>because the State Court from which the instant civil action was >>>> >>>>removed does not have any jurisdiction over FOIA enforcement. >>>> >>>> Therefore, this honorable DCUS is not precluded from hearing >>>> >>>>and determining Petitioners' claim upon judicially compelled >>>> >>>>discovery of the documents requested in the original FOIA request >>>> >>>>and appeal, i.e. credentials, such as Appointment Affidavits >>>> >>>>and/or Oaths of Office. See, in particular, Article VI, Clause 3 >>>> >>>>and 5 U.S.C. 3331. >>>> >>>> When examined against this clear and unequivocal right, >>>> >>>>which is enforceable by the FOIA, the restriction found at >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 5 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>>section 1447(d) cannot stand on its own, nor can it be applied in >>>> >>>>the instant case, because said section confounds, if it does not >>>> >>>>directly contradict, the procedural Right(s) which are recognized >>>> >>>>by section 1441(e). >>>> >>>> Section 1447(d) is particularly offensive in that it >>>> >>>>prohibits review on appeal or otherwise. Petitioners submit that >>>> >>>>this additional qualifier -- "or otherwise" -- would logically >>>> >>>>prohibit judicial review of Petitioners' MOTION FOR >>>> >>>>RECONSIDERATION, filed concurrently with this MEMORANDUM. >>>> >>>>Petitioners are now entirely confident that They, as Plaintiffs, >>>> >>>>have every Right under section 1441(b) to remove the State Case >>>> >>>>into this honorable DCUS, to enforce FOIA, if nothing else. >>>> >>>> The USDC's ORDER of April 8, 1997, is based on the erroneous >>>> >>>>premise that a petitioner/plaintiff does not have the power to >>>> >>>>remove a case to federal court. If allowed to stand, upon >>>> >>>>authority of section 1447(d), said ORDER would work a grave >>>> >>>>injustice upon Petitioners and result in barratry upon their >>>> >>>>efforts to compel discovery of the requisite credentials of all >>>> >>>>633 federal agents who participated in the Freeman Standoff. >>>> >>>>This is not a small number. Without federal review by this >>>> >>>>honorable Court in the instant case, Petitioners would then be >>>> >>>>faced with exorbitant legal costs to mount still more law suits >>>> >>>>in State Court, under applicable state discovery laws. >>>> >>>> However, the separation of powers doctrine casts serious >>>> >>>>doubt on the ability of state courts to compel discovery of >>>> >>>>federal employees' credentials, via Mandamus or otherwise. See >>>> >>>>the plaintiffs' pleadings on that subject in People v. Boxer, >>>> >>>>California Supreme Court case number S-030016, December 1992. >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 6 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>> It is by no means settled that state courts can compel >>>> >>>>specific performance by federal employees. So, remanding the >>>> >>>>case back to State Court raises the very real prospect that >>>> >>>>Relator could not afford to prosecute the same subject matter all >>>> >>>>over again, a second time, due to additional legal costs which >>>> >>>>would otherwise be unnecessary. Lex non cogit impossibilia. >>>> >>>> It is also clear that section 1441(e) contemplates cases in >>>> >>>>which the DCUS is empowered to remove and hear state cases in >>>> >>>>which there is a federal cause of action, and to remand all other >>>> >>>>causes of action which properly belong back in state court. >>>> >>>> As applied to the instant case, it would be proper, for >>>> >>>>example, for this honorable DCUS to remand certain injunctive >>>> >>>>remedies back to the State Court, with a recommendation to stay >>>> >>>>that proceeding, pending final judgment in the matter of >>>> >>>>compelling discovery of the credentials which have been >>>> >>>>requested. In that way, the outcome of the state case could then >>>> >>>>pivot on whether, or not, the credentials existed in the first >>>> >>>>instance and, if they did, whether or not said credentials should >>>> >>>>be enforced in equity; if they did not exist, then the State >>>> >>>>Court would then be the proper forum to adjudicate probable >>>> >>>>violations of applicable state laws, e.g. trespass, extortion, >>>> >>>>kidnap, perjury, and impersonating an officer. >>>> >>>> But, such a pivotal determination would necessarily be >>>> >>>>required to await FOIA enforcement in the DCUS, because that is >>>> >>>>the court of original jurisdiction, and it would possibly also be >>>> >>>>required to await appellate review, by the federal appeals court >>>> >>>>(Ninth Circuit) and possibly also the Supreme Court of the United >>>> >>>>States, of all relief granted by the DCUS. >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 7 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>> SUMMARY >>>> >>>> Petitioners hereby challenge 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) for being >>>> >>>>overly broad, for conflicting with 28 U.S.C. 1441(e), and for >>>> >>>>depriving Petitioners of an essential remedy when a federal cause >>>> >>>>of action is clearly present by virtue of the Freedom of >>>> >>>>Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq. >>>> >>>> Petitioners also conclude that the USDC's ORDER of April 8, >>>> >>>>1997, in the instant case, is erroneous for basing a remand upon >>>> >>>>a false premise, namely, that a civil petitioner/plaintiff does >>>> >>>>not have the power to remove a case to federal court. >>>> >>>> If allowed to stand, said ORDER will deny a remedy which >>>> >>>>belongs to Petitioners, and thereby cause irreparable damage(s) >>>> >>>>to Petitioners, for all the reasons stated above. >>>> >>>> >>>>Dated: April 14, 1997 >>>> >>>> >>>>Respectfully submitted, >>>> >>>>/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. >>>> >>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness, >>>>(expressly not a citizen of the United States), >>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator on behalf of >>>>the People of the United States of America >>>>All Rights Reserved without Prejudice >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 8 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>> PROOF OF SERVICE >>>> >>>>I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona state, >>>> >>>>federal witness, and Counselor at Law, do hereby certify, under >>>> >>>>penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of >>>> >>>>America, without the "United States", that I am at least 18 years >>>> >>>>of age, a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and >>>> >>>>that I personally served the following document(s): >>>> >>>> MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF >>>> MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OF >>>> CHALLENGE TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY >>>> OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE: >>>> 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) >>>> >>>>by placing one true and correct copy of same in first class U.S. >>>> >>>>Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to: >>>> >>>> >>>>Attorney General William H. Rehnquist, C.J. >>>>Department of Justice Supreme Court of the U.S. >>>>10th and Constitution, N.W. 1 First Street, N.E. >>>>Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. >>>> >>>>Solicitor General Warren Christopher >>>>Department of Justice U.S. Secretary of State >>>>10th and Constitution, N.W. Department of State >>>>Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. >>>> >>>>James M. Burns LeRoy Michael; Schweitzer >>>>United States District Court c/o Yellowstone County Jail >>>>316 North 26th Street 3165 King Avenue, East >>>>Billings, Montana state Billings, Montana state >>>> >>>>Office of the U.S. Attorneys Judge J. Clifford Wallace >>>>United States District Court Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals >>>>Federal Building c/o P.O. Box 193939 >>>>Billings, Montana state San Francisco, California >>>> >>>>Chief Judge Judge Alex Kozinski >>>>Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals >>>>c/o P.O. Box 193939 125 South Grand Avenue, #200 >>>>San Francisco, California state Pasadena, California state >>>> >>>> >>>>Executed on April 14, 1997: >>>> >>>>/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. >>>> >>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness, >>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator >>>> >>>> >>>> Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes: Page 9 of 9 >>>> >>>> >>>> # # # >>>> >>>> >>>>======================================================================== >>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness >>>>email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU >>>>web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration >>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best >>>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone >>>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this >>>>======================================================================== >>>> >>>> >> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word >>"subscribe" in the subject box. >>================================================================== >> EAGLEFLIGHT >> ///, //// >> \ /, / >. David E. Rydel >> \ /, _/ /. ***** >> \_ /_/ /. United States Theatre Command >> \__/_ < Voice-810-391-0798 >> /<<< \_\_ Fax-810-391-6785 >> /,)^>>_._ \ Alt.Fax-810-391-3528 >> (/ \\ /\\\ E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET >> // ```` >> ==============((`=================================================== >> A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA >> >>To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the >>phrase "I NEED TO KONFORM". >> >> >>From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net> >>To: "70277.2502" <70277.2502@compuserv.com> >>Subject: Re: Foreign Troops >>Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:10:08 +0200 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> >>>From: Ralph <ralph@teaminfinity.com> >>>Subject: Re: Foreign Troops >>>To: eagleflt@flash.net (Dave Rydel) >>>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 21:36:02 -0400 (EDT) >>>Cc: MoKan99@aol.com >>> >>>Here is some of what I have. I will send more if you remind me. Also please >>>look at BORDER XXI. Please share whatever you have. >>> >>> ralph@TeamInfinity.com >>> >>>http://TeamInfinity.com/bible >>>http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html (updated) >>>http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/irs.audit.html <-SCATHING GAO Audit of IRS >>>http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/STW.ALL.html >>>http://www.epa.gov/region09/cross_pr/usmex/index.htm <-- BORDER XXI (21) >>>http://www.stw.ed.gov <---- GOVERNMENT's School to WORK Site >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- >>> >>> >>>What you are about to read I obtained from David J. Smith who can be reached >>>at 1420 West Ross, Waxahachie Texas 75165. Would love more details from >>>anyone who has them and VERIFICATION. ralph@TeamInfinity.com I basically >>>have paraphrased what I saw on a raw Satellite broadcast of David's over 6 >>>months ago. The reason I bring it up now is that as time has passed David's >>>report herein paraphrased by me only seems to ring more and more true with >>>COSCO border 21, Panama canal being controled by chinese, Luftwaffe in NEw >>>Mexico etc etc. The details in the paraphrase by me of david's work are >>>quite alarming to say the least. please excuse the spelling and grammatical >>>probs, I wish we all had more time. Toodleloo, ralph@TeamInfinity.com >>> >>> >>>11/94 Hawaian Islands: >>> >>> State S.W.A.T. team, against orders, came out to investigate 4 >>> Russian Generals conducting military maneavers involving Russian >>> secret Speksnaz forces, Nepalese Gurkas all over the 5 Hawaian >>> Islands. >>> >>> >>>Speksnaz are highly trained forces who specialize in nuclear power, >>>electrical power, and communications sabotage, and infiltration. >>> >>>Speksnaz for several years have been seen coming into US via Alaska, first >>>one at a time, then 10 at atime, now, 100s at a time, to preassigned jobs >>>here in the US. >>> >>>JFK in 1961 and 62, signed into law State Department Document 7277, a three >>>step plan to completely and generally disarm the United States, we are now >>>in step 2. >>> >>> 9/2/1992 - George Bush said: "US is prepared to make available our >>> bases and lands for multinational field exercises. " Formerly >>> defunct Fort Dix, in New Jersey is turned over for use by the United >>> Nations and converted into a base for UN "Peace" keeping training. >>> There are signs on the base pointing to a Prisoner of War Compound. >>> I have seen video of this. Brand new razor wire on the ground >>> surrounds many parts of this UN base. >>> >>>UN Charter - No such thing as "Peace Keeping" forces. They have the >>>EXCLUSIVE "right" to declare ware anywhere in the world. Peace Keepers or >>>War Mongerers ? If they have all the guns who can make war against the >>>beast. (see rev 13:4). No one can of course. >>> >>> Fort Dix NJ, is a 50 sq mile base handed over to the United Nations >>> Organization to train foreign troops there RENT FREE !! >>> >>> There are 19,000 United Nations Organization Troops in Fort Polk >>> Louisiana, French and Pakastani, 2 Battalions of Russian soldiers, >>> on war footing according to an insider of that compound who told his >>> parents, who also says this same compound has VAST underground >>> facilities storing equipment and other materiel. >>> >>>NAPA California Sentinel reports 50,000 National Guard and United Nations >>>Organization Troops based near Barstow California. Forces are held on stand >>>by in case of rioting in Los Angeles area. >>> >>> There are 40,000 United Nations Organization Foreign troops based near >>> Sacremento California. Thes anti american Foriegn Soldiers are >>> based nearby in El Dorado National Forest. >>> >>>Southern California, another hot bead of United Nations Organization >>>military activity, bases more than 40,000 United Nations Organization Troops >>>in San Diego, another 22,000 combat ready UN troops stationed just south of >>>Los Angeles. >>> >>>Thousands of Russian troops are stationed in secret military bases in >>>Nevada, people have heard of Area 51 and there are other areas. They are >>>under the auspices of the United Nations Organization, and a special >>>instruction manual has already been written and passed out for russian >>>soldiers in the United States. It teaches them how to do door to door >>>siezures and searches and the correct procedure for weapons siezure. The >>>manual is written for the russians. >>> >>>Can there be any doubt why the TROJAN horse, the united Nations, is on the >>>soil of America ? It was placed here to takeover, subvert our soveriegnty >>>for world government. The ONLY way they could get troops and equipment on >>>American soil was through the United Nations Organization. >>> >>>Supposedly, by brainwashing the American people to believe that it was an >>>organization to bring world peace instead of world tyranny and slavery. >>> >>>There is a 43,000 man United NAtions Organization battle group whihc is >>>stationed in the Texas Pan Handle by Oklahoma and New Mexico, Anchorage >>>Alaska has 14,000 United NAtions Troops dispersed throughout the area. And >>>more are coming in every week. These Antiamerican soldiers wear black >>>uniforms, they usually drive dark unmarked military vehicles. >>> >>>United Nations Organization Gurka troops from Nepal can be found near Yakima >>>Washington. These are very ruthless individuals known to be merciless >>>killers. They are stationed at a U.S. military reservation known as the >>>Yakima Firing Range. >>> >>>A 20,000 man contingent, once again UN Troops were kept in a state of alert >>>during the Ruby Ridge siege on the Weaver family in Idaho. The plan was to >>>have them to join with the US Marshalls if called upon by their bosses. Why >>>should our US leaders TREASONOUSLY offer to house and equip a hostile >>>standing United NAtions Organization Standing army on an American Military >>>base ? It's because NO ONE has called it treason against the people of this >>>country. This opened the flood gates for 10s of thousands of Foreign troops >>>to pour into our country because no one says anything against it. >>> >>>Russian NAval transport ships have been spotted numerous times in the Gulf >>>of California. Part of the Russian fleet is anchored with 4 floating dry >>>docks near Gulf Port Mississippi. 4 Russian subs are docked with normal >>>shipping in Alabama's Mobile Bay. These are equipped with 22 >>>Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles and each of these can hit 10 different >>>targets in the United States. >>> >>>United States Service Personell are seeing foreign troops on military bases >>>all over the nation. There are foreign military personnel on our bases and >>>foreign troop movement and activity is going on in the Gulf of Mexico >>>coastal region west of Gulf Port in Mississippi near the border of >>>Louisiana, to be exact, United NAtions Organization troops wear vietnamese >>>style uniforms, no insignias or emblems in some areas, these soldiers ride >>>armed guard on barges going north of the Gulf up the Pearl River. the Pearl >>>River is a river that one would cross to get to Alabama or Florida from that >>>area. These barges are loaded with military equipment vehicles and >>>supplies, their destination is the HUGE NASA Test Facility which borders the >>>Pearl River. United Nations Organization mercanaries, all of whom despise >>>Americans such as you and me, because they are not in general Christian or >>>moral, and have no conscious will to stop any orders against the American >>>people who might be Christian or moral. They are quartered and undergoing >>>special training at the NASA facility attached to the Pearl River. Included >>>are Russian, East German, Koreans and other nationalities. The Spotlight >>>newspaer obtained several years ago irrefutable evidence, photographs, 100 >>>of photographs, showing THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of foreign military vehicles >>>and armour going ALL over the United States, including vehiles being used by >>>the UN. We even have film footage we have taken ourselves in Gulf Port >>>Mississippi, and Beumont Texas, showing United NAtions Organization vehicles >>>on trucks being transported in this country. >>> >>>Our president Bill Clinton, has signed Executive Orders as well as other >>>presidents before him, giving very wide ranging powers to the United Nations >>>Organizationto command our military forces. This means the National >>>Security Council has now delegated these powers to the United NAtions >>>Organization. Bill Clinton signed on July 15, 1996, Executive Order 13010. >>>Within the context of this Exective Order it states VERY CLEARLY that if >>>there is ANY type of emergency whatsover of terrorism, especially like a >>>black out of electricity, that DOD has all the powers of the president. >>>Well our nation basiclly has 9 separate power grids like TVA (Tennessee >>>Valley Authority) that supply all the electrical power in the US. So 9 key >>>positions need to be taken out and we will have the conditions necessary for >>>take over by law. (Who forgot about the massive power outs that occurred >>>last year in the West ?) >>> >>>100s of Railroad flat cars bearing Russian military vehicles and armour and >>>even some United NAtions Organization vehicles (painted white with UN >>>letters) all over America, especially Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, >>>Pennsylvania, Florida, and Nashville Tennessee, along Interstate 24, west >>>of NAshville we recieved two calls telling us of HUGE fuselages with UN >>>letters heading toward a military base. So yes they are all over. >>> >>>In Mississippi, 100s of Russian built military vehicles obtained from what >>>was East Germany are, according to officials on the base (we attempted to >>>tape the facilities when we were confronted by an official who explained to >>>us the specifics herein) the vehicles were being refurbished under the >>>auspices of the United Nations Organization. Without doubt. This MASSIVE >>>depot in Gulf Port Mississippi, behind barbed wire, anybody can go there can >>>see it from Highway 49, 6-8 miles north of Interstate 10. >>> >>>20 miles of newly built road lead directly from this MASSIVE depot directly >>>into NASA's Stennis Space Center. WHY ? Every American needs to know why. >>>Why are our representatives silent ? Many of the vehicles have been spotted >>>(we have pictures) are for chemical and biological warfare purposes. Why >>>when this is banned by treaty ? >>> >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>>El Jeffe, El Capiton, Generalissimo Klintonista speaks out >>> about the US Constitution: >>> >>> >>>"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical >>>Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of >>>individual freedom to Americans ..." >>> >>>"And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When >>>personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what >>>we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing >>>projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like >>>that to try to make people safer in their communities." >>> >>>President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough" >>> >>>"We can't be so fixated on our desire >>> to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..." >>> >>> Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A) >>> >>> >>> Why cant any of these be considered a violation of the oath of >>> office to uphold the Constitution and qualify as TREASON !! >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- >>> >>> ralph@TeamInfinity.com (I can get you SAPF films/tapes/materials, >>> "Harry's War" the suppressed film, Tragedy & Hope the book, >>> US/UN/DontTreadonMe FLAGS, bumperstickers YardSigns & T-Shirts, >>> inquire) >>> >>> http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/code/t26.html >>> >>> http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html >>> >>> >>> This correspondence in NO WAY represents Save A Patriot Fellowship >>> (SAPF), but feel free to contact them thru RALPH & Andrew C. Earp >>> >>> 1-800-677-1207 ext. 1800 RALPH and ANDREW C. EARP >>> Andrew C. Earp is NATIONAL DIRECTOR of SEMINAR SERVICES >>> >>> Let me know if you want to receive email on a regular basis >>> >>> CALL 703-904-7770 ask for document 777 >>>######################################################################### >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >Return-Path: <MoKan99@aol.com> >>>> >From: MoKan99@aol.com >>>> >Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 16:15:51 -0400 (EDT) >>>> >To: Eagleflt@flash.net >>>> >Subject: Foreign Troops >>>> > >>>> >Writer seeks information on the following topics: >>>> > >>>> >1) Foreign troops on US soil >>>> >2) Biosphere program >>>> >3) Federal detention centers >>>> > >>>> >Looking for specifics; i.e. locations, dates, numbers, recent >activities - >>>> >who, what, when, where, why... >>>> > >>>> >Contact B. Menninger >>>> >PH. 816-561-5527 >>>> >E-Mail MoKan99@AOL.COM >>>> > >>>> > >>>> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word >>>> "subscribe" in the subject box. >>>> ================================================================== >>>> EAGLEFLIGHT >>>> ///, //// >>>> \ /, / >. David E. Rydel >>>> \ /, _/ /. ***** >>>> \_ /_/ /. United States Theatre Command >>>> \__/_ < Voice-810-391-0798 >>>> /<<< \_\_ Fax-810-391-6785 >>>> /,)^>>_._ \ Alt.Fax-810-391-3528 >>>> (/ \\ /\\\ E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET >>>> // ```` >>>> ==============((`=================================================== >>>> A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA >>>> >>>> To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the >>>> phrase "I NEED TO KONFORM". >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word >>"subscribe" in the subject box. >>================================================================== >> EAGLEFLIGHT >> ///, //// >> \ /, / >. David E. Rydel >> \ /, _/ /. ***** >> \_ /_/ /. United States Theatre Command >> \__/_ < Voice-810-391-0798 >> /<<< \_\_ Fax-810-391-6785 >> /,)^>>_._ \ Alt.Fax-810-391-3528 >> (/ \\ /\\\ E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET >> // ```` >> ==============((`=================================================== >> A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA >> >>To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the >>phrase "I NEED TO KONFORM". >> >> >> > To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word >"subscribe" in the subject box. >================================================================== > EAGLEFLIGHT > ///, //// > \ /, / >. David E. Rydel > \ /, _/ /. ***** > \_ /_/ /. United States Theatre Command > \__/_ < Voice-810-391-0798 > /<<< \_\_ Fax-810-391-6785 > /,)^>>_._ \ Alt.Fax-810-391-3528 > (/ \\ /\\\ E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET > // ```` > ==============((`=================================================== > A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA > >To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the >phrase "I NEED TO KONFORM". > > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail