Time: Wed Apr 16 09:32:30 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA25889;
	Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:19:57 -0700 (MST)
	by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA11808;
	Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:19:26 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:20:47 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Forwarded from Dave Rydel (3 of 3)

>Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 10:24:44 -0400
>From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net>
>
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>>>From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net>
>>>Subject: SLS: People v. United States et al. (update: 2 of 2)
>>>
>>>>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:07:30 -0700
>>>>To: (Recipient list suppressed)
>>>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>>>Subject: SLS: People v. United States et al. (update: 2 of 2)
>>>>
>>>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
>>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator
>>>>c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
>>>>Tucson [zip code exempt]
>>>>ARIZONA STATE
>>>>
>>>>Under Protest, Necessity, and
>>>>by Special Visitation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>               DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
>>>>
>>>>                  JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MONTANA
>>>>
>>>>                        BILLINGS DIVISION
>>>>
>>>>People of the United States ) Case No. CV-96-163-BLG
>>>>of America, ex relatione    )
>>>>Paul Andrew Mitchell,       ) MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF
>>>>                            ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OF
>>>>               Petitioners, ) CHALLENGE TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY
>>>>                            ) OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE:
>>>>          vs.               )
>>>>                            ) 28 U.S.C. 1447(d)
>>>>United States et al.,       )
>>>>                            )
>>>>               Respondent.  )
>>>>____________________________)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>COME NOW  the People of the United States of America (hereinafter
>>>>
>>>>"Petitioners"), ex  relatione Paul  Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,
>>>>
>>>>Citizen of  Arizona state,  expressly not a citizen of the United
>>>>
>>>>States,  federal  witness,  and  Counselor  at  Law  (hereinafter
>>>>
>>>>"Relator"), to  present this,  Their MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
>>>>
>>>>OF  MOTION   FOR  RECONSIDERATION   AND  OF   CHALLENGE  TO   THE
>>>>
>>>>CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE filed concurrently
>>>>
>>>>with  Their   MOTION  FOR  RECONSIDERATION.    Plaintiffs  hereby
>>>>
>>>>challenge the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. 1447(d).
>>>>
>>>>     In the  ORDER of  Chief United States District Judge Jack D.
>>>>
>>>>Shanstrom, dated  and filed in the instant case on April 8, 1997,
>>>>
>>>>the following plain error is manifest, to wit:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 1 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     ...   [T]he    removal   statutes    do   not    afford    a
>>>>     petitioner/plaintiff the  power to  remove a case to federal
>>>>     court.
>>>>
>>>>     Petitioners respectfully  request  this  honorable  District
>>>>
>>>>Court of  the United  States (hereinafter  "DCUS") to compare two
>>>>
>>>>important removal  statutes which  are  available  to  all  civil
>>>>
>>>>litigants.   Section 1441(b)  of Title  28, United  States  Code,
>>>>
>>>>contains a  general restatement  of the  original jurisdiction of
>>>>
>>>>the DCUS,  without any  requirement that the removing party(s) be
>>>>
>>>>defendant(s), to wit:
>>>>
>>>>     (b)  Any civil  action of  which the  district  courts  have
>>>>     original jurisdiction  founded on  a claim  or right arising
>>>>     under the  Constitution, treaties  or  laws  of  the  United
>>>>     States shall  be removable without regard to the citizenship
>>>>     or residence of the parties.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The above  statute makes  absolutely no  mention whatsoever  of a
>>>>
>>>>"defendant", or  "defendants".   In clear  contrast to  the above
>>>>
>>>>statute, the companion statute at section 1441(a) does explicitly
>>>>
>>>>restrict its availability to civil defendant(s) only, to wit:
>>>>
>>>>     (a)  Except  as  otherwise  expressly  provided  by  Act  of
>>>>     Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which
>>>>     the district  courts of  the  United  States  have  original
>>>>     jurisdiction,  may  be  removed  by  the  defendant  or  the
>>>>     defendants, to  the district  court of the United States for
>>>>     the district  and division  embracing the  place where  such
>>>>     action is pending.
>>>>                                                 [emphasis added]
>>>>
>>>>     Petitioners rely  upon the  maxim of construction:  inclusio
>>>>
>>>>unius est  exclusio alterius,  in order  to  show  that  Congress
>>>>
>>>>omitted any  references to  the "defendant"  or  "defendants"  in
>>>>
>>>>section  1441(b),   because   the   omission   was   intentional;
>>>>
>>>>specifically, it is the intent of Congress to allow plaintiffs to
>>>>
>>>>remove  civil   action(s)  from   state  courts  into  the  DCUS,
>>>>
>>>>particularly when  the DCUS  has original  jurisdiction  that  is
>>>>
>>>>founded on  a claim  or right  arising under  a law of the United
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 2 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>States.   See Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA").  The FOIA is a
>>>>
>>>>law of  the United  States.   See 5  U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B)  for the
>>>>
>>>>grant  of  original  jurisdiction  to  the  DCUS  to  enjoin  the
>>>>
>>>>withholding of  documents properly  requested under  FOIA, and to
>>>>
>>>>order the production of documents improperly withheld.
>>>>
>>>>     Accordingly, the  USDC's ORDER of April 8, 1997, is in error
>>>>
>>>>for remanding  the instant  case back  to the  Montana  Sixteenth
>>>>
>>>>Judicial District  Court ("State  Court"), because it is based on
>>>>
>>>>the false  premise that  a petitioner/plaintiff does not have the
>>>>
>>>>power to  remove a  case to  federal  court,  under  any  removal
>>>>
>>>>statutes in  Chapter 89  of Title  28, United States Code.  In so
>>>>
>>>>doing, said  ORDER would effectively deny a judicial remedy which
>>>>
>>>>is Petitioners'  right in  the instant  case,  because  the  FOIA
>>>>
>>>>creates a  federal cause  of action  in  the  case  of  all  FOIA
>>>>
>>>>requests  properly  submitted  and  improperly  withheld  by  the
>>>>
>>>>agency(s)  in  question.    Moreover,  the  State  Court  has  no
>>>>
>>>>jurisdiction whatsoever,  either original or appellate, to enjoin
>>>>
>>>>the withholding of documents properly requested under FOIA and/or
>>>>
>>>>to order the production of documents improperly withheld.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            CHALLENGE TO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATUTE
>>>>
>>>>     Petitioners hereby  also challenge  the constitutionality of
>>>>
>>>>28 U.S.C. 1447(d), to wit:
>>>>
>>>>     (d)  An order remanding a case to the State court from which
>>>>     it was  removed is  not reviewable  on appeal  or otherwise,
>>>>     except that  an order  remanding a  case to  the State court
>>>>     from which  it was  removed pursuant to section 1443 of this
>>>>     title shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Petitioners hereby  deny any  reliance  whatsoever  upon  section
>>>>
>>>>1443, thus  rendering moot  the second  half of  section 1447(d).
>>>>
>>>>However, Petitioners argue that the first half of said section is
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 3 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>overly broad  for permitting  arbitrary,  capricious,  erroneous,
>>>>
>>>>and/or injurious  orders to  be sustained  artificially, and  for
>>>>
>>>>depriving litigants  of  remedies  which  are  their  fundamental
>>>>
>>>>Right, under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.
>>>>
>>>>     The USDC's  ORDER of  April 8,  1997, is  a classic  case in
>>>>
>>>>point.  The instant case arose from Petitioners' desire to obtain
>>>>
>>>>a temporary  restraining order  ("TRO")  preventing  the  use  of
>>>>
>>>>lethal force  against the  Montana Freeman  [sic],  and  also  to
>>>>
>>>>obtain a  permanent injunction  preventing any  deprivations,  by
>>>>
>>>>Respondents, of  the life,  liberty, or  property of  Citizens of
>>>>
>>>>Montana state without due process of law.  See Fifth Amendment.
>>>>
>>>>     After the  Montana Freemen  surrendered peacefully,  without
>>>>
>>>>any loss  of life,  the application  for TRO  was rendered  moot.
>>>>
>>>>However, the permanent injunction against Respondents is still an
>>>>
>>>>open question,  and it  has yet  to be  decided finally  by  this
>>>>
>>>>honorable Court,  or by  the State  Court from whence the instant
>>>>
>>>>case  originated.     Petitioners  submit,  therefore,  that  the
>>>>
>>>>application of due process of law is quite salient in the instant
>>>>
>>>>case, as  a remedy  still available  not only  to the Citizens of
>>>>
>>>>Montana state,  but also  to  the  respective  litigants  in  the
>>>>
>>>>instant case, who are not necessarily Citizens of Montana state.
>>>>
>>>>     It was only after the instant case was filed in State Court,
>>>>
>>>>that Petitioners  then decided to submit a proper FOIA request to
>>>>
>>>>the  United   States  Department   of  Justice  ("DOJ")  for  the
>>>>
>>>>credentials of all six hundred thirty-three (633) alleged federal
>>>>
>>>>agents who  rotated in and out of the Freeman Standoff.  When DOJ
>>>>
>>>>failed to  produce the  requested  documents,  after  receipt  of
>>>>
>>>>proper FOIA  requests and  appeals, and  after expiration  of the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 4 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>statutory deadlines  for same, Petitioners had then exhausted all
>>>>
>>>>administrative remedies  and were  then faced  with an  immediate
>>>>
>>>>need to  invoke the court of original jurisdiction over the FOIA;
>>>>
>>>>that court is the DCUS.  No other court fits the bill.
>>>>
>>>>     Accordingly, Petitioners  are now  faced with  the very real
>>>>
>>>>prospect of  being forever  deprived of their procedural Right to
>>>>
>>>>enforce the FOIA upon DOJ.  Should the USDC'S ORDER of April 8 be
>>>>
>>>>permitted to stand and thereby to remove the instant case back to
>>>>
>>>>the State  Court,  there  will  have  been,  in  that  event,  no
>>>>
>>>>litigation whatsoever  on the  federal questions which arise from
>>>>
>>>>the original  FOIA request  and appeal.    This  result  directly
>>>>
>>>>contravenes the explicit legislative intent of 28 U.S.C. 1441(e):
>>>>
>>>>     (e)  The court  to which such civil action is removed is not
>>>>     precluded from  hearing and  determining any  claim in  such
>>>>     civil action  because the  State court from which such civil
>>>>     action is removed did not have jurisdiction over that claim.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Petitioners submit,  for the  careful consideration  of this
>>>>
>>>>honorable Court,  that  section  1441(e)  applies  directly,  and
>>>>
>>>>unequivocally, to  the instant case, particularly with respect to
>>>>
>>>>the judicial  enforcement of  the FOIA.   This  is so,  precisely
>>>>
>>>>because the  State Court  from which the instant civil action was
>>>>
>>>>removed does not have any jurisdiction over FOIA enforcement.
>>>>
>>>>     Therefore, this honorable DCUS is not precluded from hearing
>>>>
>>>>and determining  Petitioners'  claim  upon  judicially  compelled
>>>>
>>>>discovery of the documents requested in the original FOIA request
>>>>
>>>>and appeal,  i.e. credentials,  such  as  Appointment  Affidavits
>>>>
>>>>and/or Oaths of Office.  See, in particular, Article VI, Clause 3
>>>>
>>>>and 5 U.S.C. 3331.
>>>>
>>>>     When examined  against this  clear  and  unequivocal  right,
>>>>
>>>>which is  enforceable by  the  FOIA,  the  restriction  found  at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 5 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>section 1447(d) cannot stand on its own, nor can it be applied in
>>>>
>>>>the instant  case, because said section confounds, if it does not
>>>>
>>>>directly contradict, the procedural Right(s) which are recognized
>>>>
>>>>by section 1441(e).
>>>>
>>>>     Section  1447(d)   is  particularly  offensive  in  that  it
>>>>
>>>>prohibits review on appeal or otherwise.  Petitioners submit that
>>>>
>>>>this additional  qualifier --  "or otherwise"  -- would logically
>>>>
>>>>prohibit   judicial    review   of    Petitioners'   MOTION   FOR
>>>>
>>>>RECONSIDERATION,  filed   concurrently  with   this   MEMORANDUM.
>>>>
>>>>Petitioners are  now entirely confident that They, as Plaintiffs,
>>>>
>>>>have every  Right under  section 1441(b) to remove the State Case
>>>>
>>>>into this honorable DCUS, to enforce FOIA, if nothing else.
>>>>
>>>>     The USDC's ORDER of April 8, 1997, is based on the erroneous
>>>>
>>>>premise that  a petitioner/plaintiff  does not  have the power to
>>>>
>>>>remove a  case to  federal court.   If  allowed  to  stand,  upon
>>>>
>>>>authority of  section 1447(d),  said ORDER  would  work  a  grave
>>>>
>>>>injustice upon  Petitioners and  result in  barratry  upon  their
>>>>
>>>>efforts to  compel discovery  of the requisite credentials of all
>>>>
>>>>633 federal  agents who  participated in  the  Freeman  Standoff.
>>>>
>>>>This is  not a  small number.   Without  federal review  by  this
>>>>
>>>>honorable Court  in the  instant case,  Petitioners would then be
>>>>
>>>>faced with  exorbitant legal  costs to mount still more law suits
>>>>
>>>>in State Court, under applicable state discovery laws.
>>>>
>>>>     However, the  separation of  powers doctrine  casts  serious
>>>>
>>>>doubt on  the ability  of state  courts to  compel  discovery  of
>>>>
>>>>federal employees'  credentials, via  Mandamus or otherwise.  See
>>>>
>>>>the plaintiffs'  pleadings on  that subject  in People  v. Boxer,
>>>>
>>>>California Supreme Court case number S-030016, December 1992.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 6 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     It is  by no  means settled  that state  courts  can  compel
>>>>
>>>>specific performance  by federal  employees.   So, remanding  the
>>>>
>>>>case back  to State  Court raises  the very  real  prospect  that
>>>>
>>>>Relator could not afford to prosecute the same subject matter all
>>>>
>>>>over again,  a second  time, due  to additional legal costs which
>>>>
>>>>would otherwise be unnecessary.  Lex non cogit impossibilia.
>>>>
>>>>     It is  also clear that section 1441(e) contemplates cases in
>>>>
>>>>which the  DCUS is  empowered to  remove and  hear state cases in
>>>>
>>>>which there is a federal cause of action, and to remand all other
>>>>
>>>>causes of action which properly belong back in state court.
>>>>
>>>>     As applied  to the  instant case,  it would  be proper,  for
>>>>
>>>>example, for  this honorable  DCUS to  remand certain  injunctive
>>>>
>>>>remedies back  to the  State Court, with a recommendation to stay
>>>>
>>>>that  proceeding,   pending  final  judgment  in  the  matter  of
>>>>
>>>>compelling  discovery   of  the   credentials  which   have  been
>>>>
>>>>requested.  In that way, the outcome of the state case could then
>>>>
>>>>pivot on  whether, or  not, the  credentials existed in the first
>>>>
>>>>instance and, if they did, whether or not said credentials should
>>>>
>>>>be enforced  in equity;   if  they did  not exist, then the State
>>>>
>>>>Court would  then be  the proper  forum  to  adjudicate  probable
>>>>
>>>>violations of  applicable state  laws, e.g.  trespass, extortion,
>>>>
>>>>kidnap, perjury, and impersonating an officer.
>>>>
>>>>     But, such  a  pivotal  determination  would  necessarily  be
>>>>
>>>>required to  await FOIA  enforcement in the DCUS, because that is
>>>>
>>>>the court of original jurisdiction, and it would possibly also be
>>>>
>>>>required to  await appellate review, by the federal appeals court
>>>>
>>>>(Ninth Circuit) and possibly also the Supreme Court of the United
>>>>
>>>>States, of all relief granted by the DCUS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 7 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                             SUMMARY
>>>>
>>>>     Petitioners hereby  challenge 28  U.S.C. 1447(d)  for  being
>>>>
>>>>overly broad,  for conflicting  with 28  U.S.C. 1441(e),  and for
>>>>
>>>>depriving Petitioners of an essential remedy when a federal cause
>>>>
>>>>of action  is  clearly  present  by  virtue  of  the  Freedom  of
>>>>
>>>>Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.
>>>>
>>>>     Petitioners also  conclude that the USDC's ORDER of April 8,
>>>>
>>>>1997, in  the instant case, is erroneous for basing a remand upon
>>>>
>>>>a false  premise, namely,  that a civil petitioner/plaintiff does
>>>>
>>>>not have the power to remove a case to federal court.
>>>>
>>>>     If allowed  to stand,  said ORDER  will deny  a remedy which
>>>>
>>>>belongs to  Petitioners, and  thereby cause irreparable damage(s)
>>>>
>>>>to Petitioners, for all the reasons stated above.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dated:  April 14, 1997
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Respectfully submitted,
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>>>
>>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
>>>>(expressly not a citizen of the United States),
>>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator on behalf of
>>>>the People of the United States of America
>>>>All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 8 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                        PROOF OF SERVICE
>>>>
>>>>I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona state,
>>>>
>>>>federal witness,  and Counselor  at Law, do hereby certify, under
>>>>
>>>>penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of
>>>>
>>>>America, without the "United States", that I am at least 18 years
>>>>
>>>>of age,  a Citizen  of one  of the  United States of America, and
>>>>
>>>>that I personally served the following document(s):
>>>>
>>>>                 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF
>>>>                MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OF
>>>>               CHALLENGE TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY
>>>>                  OF A FEDERAL REMOVAL STATUTE:
>>>>                        28 U.S.C. 1447(d)
>>>>
>>>>by placing  one true and correct copy of same in first class U.S.
>>>>
>>>>Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Attorney General                   William H. Rehnquist, C.J.
>>>>Department of Justice              Supreme Court of the U.S.
>>>>10th and Constitution, N.W.        1 First Street, N.E.
>>>>Washington, D.C.                   Washington, D.C.
>>>>
>>>>Solicitor General                  Warren Christopher
>>>>Department of Justice              U.S. Secretary of State
>>>>10th and Constitution, N.W.        Department of State
>>>>Washington, D.C.                   Washington, D.C.
>>>>
>>>>James M. Burns                     LeRoy Michael; Schweitzer
>>>>United States District Court       c/o Yellowstone County Jail
>>>>316 North 26th Street              3165 King Avenue, East
>>>>Billings, Montana state            Billings, Montana state
>>>>
>>>>Office of the U.S. Attorneys       Judge J. Clifford Wallace
>>>>United States District Court       Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
>>>>Federal Building                   c/o P.O. Box 193939
>>>>Billings, Montana state            San Francisco, California
>>>>
>>>>Chief Judge                        Judge Alex Kozinski
>>>>Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals     Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
>>>>c/o P.O. Box 193939                125 South Grand Avenue, #200
>>>>San Francisco, California state    Pasadena, California state
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Executed on April 14, 1997:
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>>>
>>>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
>>>>Counselor at Law, and Relator
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reconsider and Challenge Removal Statutes:  Page 9 of 9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                             #  #  #
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>========================================================================
>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>>>>email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
>>>>web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
>>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
>>>>             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
>>>>             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
>>>>========================================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word 
>>"subscribe" in the subject box.
>>==================================================================
>>          EAGLEFLIGHT
>>        ///,        ////
>>        \  /,      /  >.             David E. Rydel
>>         \  /,   _/  /.                  *****
>>          \_  /_/   /.        United States Theatre Command        
>>           \__/_   <               Voice-810-391-0798         
>>           /<<< \_\_                Fax-810-391-6785
>>          /,)^>>_._ \             Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
>>          (/   \\ /\\\           E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET
>>                // ````           
>> ==============((`===================================================
>>                    A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA 
>>
>>To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the
>>phrase  "I NEED TO KONFORM".
>>
>>
>>From: Dave Rydel <eagleflt@flash.net>
>>To: "70277.2502" <70277.2502@compuserv.com>
>>Subject: Re: Foreign Troops
>>Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:10:08 +0200
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>>>From: Ralph <ralph@teaminfinity.com>
>>>Subject: Re: Foreign Troops
>>>To: eagleflt@flash.net (Dave Rydel)
>>>Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 21:36:02 -0400 (EDT)
>>>Cc: MoKan99@aol.com
>>>
>>>Here is some of what I have. I will send more if you remind me.  Also
please
>>>look at BORDER XXI.  Please share whatever you have.
>>>
>>>	ralph@TeamInfinity.com
>>>
>>>http://TeamInfinity.com/bible  
>>>http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html (updated)   
>>>http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/irs.audit.html <-SCATHING GAO Audit of IRS
>>>http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/STW.ALL.html
>>>http://www.epa.gov/region09/cross_pr/usmex/index.htm  <-- BORDER XXI (21)
>>>http://www.stw.ed.gov  <---- GOVERNMENT's School to WORK Site
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>>>
>>>
>>>What you are about to read I obtained from David J. Smith who can be
reached
>>>at 1420 West Ross, Waxahachie Texas 75165.  Would love more details from
>>>anyone who has them and VERIFICATION.  ralph@TeamInfinity.com I basically
>>>have paraphrased what I saw on a raw Satellite broadcast of David's over 6
>>>months ago.  The reason I bring it up now is that as time has passed
David's
>>>report herein paraphrased by me only seems to ring more and more true with
>>>COSCO border 21, Panama canal being controled by chinese, Luftwaffe in NEw
>>>Mexico etc etc.  The details in the paraphrase by me of david's work are
>>>quite alarming to say the least. please excuse the spelling and grammatical
>>>probs, I wish we all had more time. Toodleloo, ralph@TeamInfinity.com
>>>
>>>
>>>11/94 Hawaian Islands:
>>>
>>>	State S.W.A.T. team, against orders, came out to investigate 4
>>>        Russian Generals conducting military maneavers involving Russian
>>>        secret Speksnaz forces, Nepalese Gurkas all over the 5 Hawaian
>>>        Islands.
>>>
>>>
>>>Speksnaz are highly trained forces who specialize in nuclear power,
>>>electrical power, and communications sabotage, and infiltration.
>>>
>>>Speksnaz for several years have been seen coming into US via Alaska, first
>>>one at a time, then 10 at atime, now, 100s at a time, to preassigned jobs
>>>here in the US.
>>>
>>>JFK in 1961 and 62, signed into law State Department Document 7277, a three
>>>step plan to completely and generally disarm the United States, we are now
>>>in step 2.
>>>
>>>	9/2/1992 - George Bush said: "US is prepared to make available our
>>>        bases and lands for multinational field exercises. " Formerly
>>>        defunct Fort Dix, in New Jersey is turned over for use by the
United
>>>        Nations and converted into a base for UN "Peace" keeping training. 
>>>        There are signs on the base pointing to a Prisoner of War
Compound. 
>>>        I have seen video of this.  Brand new razor wire on the ground
>>>        surrounds many parts of this UN base.
>>>
>>>UN Charter - No such thing as "Peace Keeping" forces.  They have the
>>>EXCLUSIVE "right" to declare ware anywhere in the world.  Peace Keepers or
>>>War Mongerers ?  If they have all the guns who can make war against the
>>>beast. (see rev 13:4).  No one can of course.  
>>>
>>>	Fort Dix NJ, is a 50 sq mile base handed over to the United Nations
>>>	Organization to train foreign troops there RENT FREE !!
>>>
>>>	There are 19,000 United Nations Organization Troops in Fort Polk
>>>        Louisiana, French and Pakastani, 2 Battalions of Russian soldiers,
>>>        on war footing according to an insider of that compound who told
his
>>>        parents, who also says this same compound has VAST underground
>>>        facilities storing equipment and other materiel.
>>>
>>>NAPA California Sentinel reports 50,000 National Guard and United Nations
>>>Organization Troops based near Barstow California.  Forces are held on
stand
>>>by in case of rioting in Los Angeles area.
>>>
>>>	There are 40,000 United Nations Organization Foreign troops based near
>>>	Sacremento California.  Thes anti american Foriegn Soldiers are
>>>	based nearby in El Dorado National Forest.
>>>
>>>Southern California, another hot bead of United Nations Organization
>>>military activity, bases more than 40,000 United Nations Organization
Troops
>>>in San Diego, another 22,000 combat ready UN troops stationed just south of
>>>Los Angeles.  
>>>
>>>Thousands of Russian troops are stationed in secret military bases in
>>>Nevada, people have heard of Area 51 and there are other areas. They are
>>>under the auspices of the United Nations Organization, and a special
>>>instruction manual has already been written and passed out for russian
>>>soldiers in the United States.  It teaches them how to do door to door
>>>siezures and searches and the correct procedure for weapons siezure.  The
>>>manual is written for the russians.
>>>
>>>Can there be any doubt why the TROJAN horse, the united Nations, is on the
>>>soil of America ?  It was placed here to takeover, subvert our soveriegnty
>>>for world government.  The ONLY way they could get troops and equipment on
>>>American soil was through the United Nations Organization.
>>>
>>>Supposedly, by brainwashing the American people to believe that it was an
>>>organization to bring world peace instead of world tyranny and slavery.
>>>
>>>There is a 43,000 man United NAtions Organization battle group whihc is
>>>stationed in the Texas Pan Handle by Oklahoma and New Mexico,  Anchorage
>>>Alaska has 14,000 United NAtions Troops dispersed throughout the area.  And
>>>more are coming in every week.  These Antiamerican soldiers wear black
>>>uniforms, they usually drive dark unmarked military vehicles. 
>>>
>>>United Nations Organization Gurka troops from Nepal can be found near
Yakima
>>>Washington.  These are very ruthless individuals known to be merciless
>>>killers.  They are stationed at a U.S. military reservation known as the
>>>Yakima Firing Range.
>>>
>>>A 20,000 man contingent, once again UN Troops were kept in a state of alert
>>>during the Ruby Ridge siege on the Weaver family in Idaho.  The plan was to
>>>have them to join with the US Marshalls if called upon by their bosses.
Why
>>>should our US leaders TREASONOUSLY offer to house and equip a hostile
>>>standing United NAtions Organization Standing army on an American Military
>>>base ? It's because NO ONE has called it treason against the people of this
>>>country.  This opened the flood gates for 10s of thousands of Foreign
troops
>>>to pour into our country because no one says anything against it.
>>>
>>>Russian NAval transport ships have been spotted numerous times in the Gulf
>>>of California.  Part of the Russian fleet is anchored with 4 floating dry
>>>docks near Gulf Port Mississippi.  4 Russian subs are docked with normal 
>>>shipping in Alabama's Mobile Bay. These are equipped with 22
>>>Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles and each of these can hit 10 different
>>>targets in the United States.
>>>
>>>United States Service Personell are seeing foreign troops on military bases
>>>all over the nation.  There are foreign military personnel on our bases and
>>>foreign troop movement and activity is going on in the Gulf of Mexico
>>>coastal region west of Gulf Port in Mississippi near the border of
>>>Louisiana, to be exact, United NAtions Organization troops wear vietnamese
>>>style uniforms, no insignias or emblems in some areas, these soldiers ride
>>>armed guard on barges going north of the Gulf up the Pearl River.  the
Pearl
>>>River is a river that one would cross to get to Alabama or Florida from
that
>>>area.  These barges are loaded with military equipment vehicles and
>>>supplies, their destination is the HUGE NASA Test Facility which borders
the
>>>Pearl River.  United Nations Organization mercanaries, all of whom despise
>>>Americans such as you and me, because they are not in general Christian or
>>>moral, and have no conscious will to stop any orders against the American
>>>people who might be Christian or moral.  They are quartered and undergoing
>>>special training at the NASA facility attached to the Pearl River.
Included
>>>are Russian, East German, Koreans and other nationalities.  The Spotlight
>>>newspaer obtained several years ago irrefutable evidence, photographs, 100
>>>of photographs, showing THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of foreign military
vehicles
>>>and armour going ALL over the United States, including vehiles being
used by
>>>the UN.  We even have film footage we have taken ourselves in Gulf Port
>>>Mississippi, and Beumont Texas, showing United NAtions Organization
vehicles
>>>on trucks being transported in this country.
>>>
>>>Our president Bill Clinton, has signed Executive Orders as well as other
>>>presidents before him, giving very wide ranging powers to the United
Nations
>>>Organizationto command our military forces.  This means the National
>>>Security Council has now delegated these powers to the United NAtions
>>>Organization.  Bill Clinton signed on July 15, 1996, Executive Order
13010. 
>>>Within the context of this Exective Order it states VERY CLEARLY that if
>>>there is ANY type of emergency whatsover of terrorism, especially like a
>>>black out of electricity, that DOD has all the powers of the president. 
>>>Well our nation basiclly has 9 separate power grids like TVA (Tennessee
>>>Valley Authority) that supply all the electrical power in the US.  So 9 key
>>>positions need to be taken out and we will have the conditions necessary
for
>>>take over by law.  (Who forgot about the massive power outs that occurred
>>>last year in the West ?)
>>>
>>>100s of Railroad flat cars bearing Russian military vehicles and armour and
>>>even some United NAtions Organization vehicles (painted white with UN
>>>letters) all over America, especially Colorado, Wyoming, Montana,
>>>Pennsylvania, Florida,  and Nashville Tennessee, along Interstate 24, west
>>>of NAshville we recieved two calls telling us of HUGE fuselages with UN
>>>letters heading toward a military base.  So yes they are all over.  
>>>
>>>In Mississippi, 100s of Russian built military vehicles obtained from what
>>>was East Germany are, according to officials on the base (we attempted to
>>>tape the facilities when we were confronted by an official who explained to
>>>us the specifics herein) the vehicles were being refurbished under the
>>>auspices of the United Nations Organization.  Without doubt. This MASSIVE
>>>depot in Gulf Port Mississippi, behind barbed wire, anybody can go there
can
>>>see it from Highway 49, 6-8 miles north of Interstate 10.
>>>
>>>20 miles of newly built road lead directly from this MASSIVE depot directly
>>>into NASA's Stennis Space Center.  WHY ?  Every American needs to know
why. 
>>>Why are our representatives silent ?  Many of the vehicles have been
spotted
>>>(we have pictures) are for chemical and biological warfare purposes.  Why
>>>when this is banned by treaty ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>El Jeffe, El Capiton, Generalissimo Klintonista speaks out 
>>>			 	about the US Constitution:
>>>
>>>
>>>"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical
>>>Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of
>>>individual freedom to Americans ..."
>>>
>>>"And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom.  When
>>>personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it.  That's what
>>>we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing
>>>projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like
>>>that to try to make people safer in their communities."
>>>
>>>President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough"
>>>
>>>"We can't be so fixated on our desire
>>> to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..."
>>>
>>>  Bill Clinton  (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)
>>>
>>>
>>>	Why cant any of these be considered a violation of the oath of
>>>        office to uphold the Constitution and qualify as TREASON !!
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>>>   
>>>	ralph@TeamInfinity.com  (I can get you SAPF films/tapes/materials,
>>>        "Harry's War" the suppressed film, Tragedy & Hope the book,
>>>        US/UN/DontTreadonMe FLAGS, bumperstickers YardSigns & T-Shirts,
>>>        inquire)
>>>
>>>	http://TeamInfinity.com/~ralph/code/t26.html
>>>
>>>	http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html
>>>
>>>
>>>	This correspondence in NO WAY represents Save A Patriot Fellowship
>>>        (SAPF), but feel free to contact them thru RALPH & Andrew C. Earp
>>> 	
>>>	1-800-677-1207 ext. 1800 RALPH and ANDREW C. EARP
>>>	Andrew C. Earp is NATIONAL DIRECTOR of SEMINAR SERVICES
>>>
>>>	Let me know if you want to receive email on a regular basis
>>>
>>>	CALL 703-904-7770 ask for document 777
>>>#########################################################################
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 
>>>> >Return-Path: <MoKan99@aol.com>
>>>> >From: MoKan99@aol.com
>>>> >Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 16:15:51 -0400 (EDT)
>>>> >To: Eagleflt@flash.net
>>>> >Subject: Foreign Troops
>>>> >
>>>> >Writer seeks information on the following topics:
>>>> >
>>>> >1) Foreign troops on US soil
>>>> >2) Biosphere program
>>>> >3) Federal detention centers
>>>> >
>>>> >Looking for specifics; i.e. locations, dates, numbers, recent
>activities -
>>>> >who, what, when, where, why...
>>>> >
>>>> >Contact B. Menninger
>>>> >PH.           816-561-5527
>>>> >E-Mail       MoKan99@AOL.COM
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>  To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word 
>>>> "subscribe" in the subject box.
>>>> ==================================================================
>>>>           EAGLEFLIGHT
>>>>         ///,        ////
>>>>         \  /,      /  >.             David E. Rydel
>>>>          \  /,   _/  /.                  *****
>>>>           \_  /_/   /.        United States Theatre Command        
>>>>            \__/_   <               Voice-810-391-0798         
>>>>            /<<< \_\_                Fax-810-391-6785
>>>>           /,)^>>_._ \             Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
>>>>           (/   \\ /\\\           E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET
>>>>                 // ````           
>>>>  ==============((`===================================================
>>>>                     A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA 
>>>> 
>>>> To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With
the
>>>> phrase  "I NEED TO KONFORM".
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>
>>>
>> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word 
>>"subscribe" in the subject box.
>>==================================================================
>>          EAGLEFLIGHT
>>        ///,        ////
>>        \  /,      /  >.             David E. Rydel
>>         \  /,   _/  /.                  *****
>>          \_  /_/   /.        United States Theatre Command        
>>           \__/_   <               Voice-810-391-0798         
>>           /<<< \_\_                Fax-810-391-6785
>>          /,)^>>_._ \             Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
>>          (/   \\ /\\\           E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET
>>                // ````           
>> ==============((`===================================================
>>                    A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA 
>>
>>To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the
>>phrase  "I NEED TO KONFORM".
>>
>>
>>
> To receive posts from this list send an E-MAIL to me with the word 
>"subscribe" in the subject box.
>==================================================================
>          EAGLEFLIGHT
>        ///,        ////
>        \  /,      /  >.             David E. Rydel
>         \  /,   _/  /.                  *****
>          \_  /_/   /.        United States Theatre Command        
>           \__/_   <               Voice-810-391-0798         
>           /<<< \_\_                Fax-810-391-6785
>          /,)^>>_._ \             Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
>          (/   \\ /\\\           E-MAIL: EAGLEFLT@FLASH.NET
>                // ````           
> ==============((`===================================================
>                    A VOICE OF THE MILITIAS IN NORTH AMERICA 
>
>To subscribe to The Konformist, send an email to Robalini@aol.com With the
>phrase  "I NEED TO KONFORM".
>
>
>
>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================


      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail