Time: Thu Apr 17 17:59:16 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA01738;
Thu, 17 Apr 1997 14:54:20 -0700 (MST)
by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA05349;
Thu, 17 Apr 1997 14:52:29 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 17:53:27 -0700
To: fwolist@sportsmen.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: IRC is "Void for Vagueness"
The Sixth Amendment "nature and cause" clause
guarantees laws which are clear, and unambiguous.
The pertinent case law, which is rich and
well developed, provides ample justification
for ignoring vague and ambiguous laws, particularly
when their vagueness and ambiguities were intentional,
for violating this fundamental Right. Violations
of fundamental Rights are felonies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 242. Unconstitutional laws are null and
void ab initio (from their beginning), because
unconstitutionality dates from enactment, not from
the decision so branding them. Appendix Z in
"The Federal Zone" contains a wealth of pertinent
citations in this area. One of my law mentors,
a former municipal court judge in California, told
me that the key to busting the IRC was to be found
in the "nature and cause" clause. He was right,
in this matter, as in many others.
For a great authority, see U.S. v. De Cadena,
105 F.Supp. 202, 204 (1952), which case lists
a number of other excellent authorities on
the "void for vagueness doctrine," as it is called,
e.g. Connally et al. v. General Construction Co.,
269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926).
"Criminal statutes which fail to give due notice
that an act has been made criminal before it is done
are unconstitutional deprivations of due process of law."
[U.S. v. De Cadena supra]
"Unconstitutional Deprivations of Due Process of Law"!!
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
>
>John Freeman
>
>Are you then claiming that some law such as Income tax is thus
interfearing with
>a basic right and is therefore invalid? If so what law or statute
specifically
>is interfearing and can the system be held accountable to obey the rulings
your
>quoted?
>
>Conservatively yours April 1997 my 2c from the Sovereign State of California,
>Carl William Spitzer IV All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
>Long live the legacy of the Great Ronald Reagan
>Pray for Bill and Gore - Psalm 109:8-9
>The only people who seem to have nothing to do with the education of the
>children are the parents. == G.K. Chesterton
>
>
>
>========================================================================
>To subscribe: send a message to the fwolist@sportsmen.net
>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
> email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net
>For info about this system and its lists email: info@sportsmen.net
>
>========================================================================
>via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 - www.sportsmen.net
>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail