Time: Sun Apr 20 12:35:58 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA27935; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 11:14:46 -0700 (MST) id OAA02678; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:06:03 -0400 (EDT) id OAA02667; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:06:01 -0400 (EDT) id AA14269; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:05:54 -0400 by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA26899; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 11:04:33 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 12:10:47 -0700 To: <fwolist@sportsmen.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SNET: SLS: IRC is "Void for Vagueness" -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List And now we have elevated this debate one step higher: Some are convinced it is void for vagueness. Some are convinced it is NOT void for vagueness. I mean, REALLY CONVINCED! You know, like: C-O-N-vinced Will the real "void for vagueness" please stand up! Laughing all the way to my reward!! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com <snip> >>> >>>How do you expect to enforce the void for vagueness against the IRC? >>> >>>"The Federal Zone" By whom and is this book still in print? >>> >>>Conservatively yours April 1997 my 2c from the Sovereign State of California, >>>Carl William Spitzer IV All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice >>>Long live the legacy of the Great Ronald Reagan >>>Pray for Bill and Gore - Psalm 109:8-9 >>>They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety >>>deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin >> >>Wangrud: >>I don't think the IRC is void for vagueness, I understand it. >>I believe its void because it extends the LAW-Martial power. >>See Martial-LAW rule by Robert Wangrud > >Paul Milne's interpretation of the IRC found at >http://members.tripod.com/~fedinfo/tax_page.html >indicates that he doesn't think it's void for vagueness >either. Paul hasn't left a rock unturned in his offering, >for those who are interested. > >Sam Jarvis > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ======================================================================== -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com -> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail