Time: Tue Apr 22 05:53:41 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA04046; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 05:40:44 -0700 (MST) by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA21607; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 05:39:52 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 05:51:46 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Washington Post auto-responder (fwd) >From: "DI -- Cust. Care -- Content" <webnews@washpost.com> >To: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: RE: First Amendment Triumphs (1 of 5) >Date: Mon, 21 Apr 97 15:53:00 PDT > > >Thank you for taking the time to write us and sharing your comments and >thoughts with us. Please be advised that this mailbox is designated for >comments and questions from our washingtonpost.com Web site. > >If you wish send comments in regard to a news story or article ,or a >suggested news story it is best to send them to the attention of the >editor to which the comments pertain. > >There is a list of editors with e-mail accounts on our site, under Site >Index. > >Letters to the Editor at The Washington Post must be sent through postal >mail; e-mail messages and faxes are not > accepted. Letters must be exclusive to The Post, must be signed and >must include the writer's home address and > business telephone numbers. Because of space limitations, letters >that are published may be abridged. The Post is > unable to acknowledge letters that are not published, but it >appreciates the interest and values the views of those > who take the time to send comments. Letters intended for publication >should be sent to: > > Letters to the Editor > The Washington Post > 1150 15th Street, NW > Washington, DC 20071 > >Please remove this address from mass distribution lists. Such e-mails >prevents us from providing fast service to our site users. Your >compliance in this matter is appreciated. >Sincerely > >Gayle Seletsky >Customer Care >washingtonpost.com > > ---------- >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell[SMTP:pmitch@primenet.com] >Sent: Friday, April 18, 1997 9:56 PM >Subject: SLF: First Amendment Triumphs (1 of 5) > >[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > > > "First Amendment Triumphs" > > by > > Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. > Counselor at Law and Federal Witness > All Rights Reserved > (1997) > > > Introduction > > >The prototype pleadings which follow this introduction are part >of a much larger strategy which is based on the latest knowledge >about the law of federal court jurisdiction. > > >Here is the general sequence: > >1. Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests are submitted > for the credentials of all government actors, including the > judge, followed by timely FOIA appeals. > > >2. Then, Final Notice and Demand for Proof of Power, Standing, > and Jurisdiction in the particulars (aka Bill of > Particulars), with same deadline as FOIA appeals: > > a. Power of Attorney, if any, to represent the Plaintiffs > "United States of America" ("U.S.A."). > > b. Standing to sue, if any, of Plaintiffs "U.S.A." > > c. Original criminal jurisdiction, if any, of the United > States District Court ("USDC"). > > d. Regulations published in the Federal Register, if any, > for key statutes, e.g. Jury Selection and Service Act. > > >3. Affidavits of Default and of Probable Cause, if and when the > Department of Justice (and all other agencies) fail to > produce the certified evidence demanded above: > > a. Testifies to DOJ's (or other agency's) failure to > produce certified evidence, on or before the stated > deadline > > b. Testifies to existence of probable cause to charge > government actors with deprivations of fundamental > Rights under 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242, e.g. due process of > law as guaranteed by Fifth Amendment > > c. Activates estoppel by acquiescence > > >4. Verified Petition for Warrant of Removal by 3-Judge Panel > > a. seeks ORDER by three (3) qualified federal judges, > removing case from USDC, which has no jurisdiction, to > DCUS, which has jurisdiction > > i. 3-judge panel requires challenge to apportionment > of congressional districts, based on two classes > of citizenship > > b. Criminal defendant becomes civil Plaintiff. > > c. New civil Respondents become "United States et al." > > >4. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief > > a. names USDC judge as civil Respondent (Doe #1) > > b. compels production of admissible copies of the > credentials of the USDC judge, and entry into evidence > > i. Oath of Office is most important > > ii. Commission from President to be federal judge is > next in importance > > c. provides prototype to compel production of all other > credentials, from all other actors > > d. forces recusal of USDC judge for adverse and/or > pecuniary interest(s), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455 > > >5. Subsequent pleadings contest the payment of federal income > taxes by any federal judge assigned to the DCUS, in > violation of Article III, Section 1, and Evans v. Gore. > > a. O'Malley v. Woodrough is refuted for false premises, > namely: > > i. there are two classes of citizenship, not one > > ii. there is no law requiring federal judges to be > citizens of either class > > >6. Supplemental brief details rich history of Petition Clause, > as a fundamental federal question. > > a. U.S. Supreme Court has held that Petition Clause > guarantees a Right conservative of all other rights > > >7. Other special pleadings are timely submitted, to: > > a. refute the constitutionality of Jury Selection and > Service Act ("JSSA") > > b. establish Plaintiff's Right to assistance of Counsel > > c. petition for leave to institute Quo Warranto > proceedings > > d. and all other federal questions arising under the > Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States > > >8. New Plaintiff has option to stay the DCUS proceeding, > pending final resolution of challenge to constitutionality > of JSSA (if matter has not already been finally settled). > > a. Rebuttal to first response of the United States is > available, via incorporation of Exhibit, by reference > > b. History of related cases is recited > > > # # # > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail