Time: Tue Apr 22 05:53:41 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA04046;
Tue, 22 Apr 1997 05:40:44 -0700 (MST)
by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA21607;
Tue, 22 Apr 1997 05:39:52 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 05:51:46 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Washington Post auto-responder (fwd)
>From: "DI -- Cust. Care -- Content" <webnews@washpost.com>
>To: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: RE: First Amendment Triumphs (1 of 5)
>Date: Mon, 21 Apr 97 15:53:00 PDT
>
>
>Thank you for taking the time to write us and sharing your comments and
>thoughts with us. Please be advised that this mailbox is designated for
>comments and questions from our washingtonpost.com Web site.
>
>If you wish send comments in regard to a news story or article ,or a
>suggested news story it is best to send them to the attention of the
>editor to which the comments pertain.
>
>There is a list of editors with e-mail accounts on our site, under Site
>Index.
>
>Letters to the Editor at The Washington Post must be sent through postal
>mail; e-mail messages and faxes are not
> accepted. Letters must be exclusive to The Post, must be signed and
>must include the writer's home address and
> business telephone numbers. Because of space limitations, letters
>that are published may be abridged. The Post is
> unable to acknowledge letters that are not published, but it
>appreciates the interest and values the views of those
> who take the time to send comments. Letters intended for publication
>should be sent to:
>
> Letters to the Editor
> The Washington Post
> 1150 15th Street, NW
> Washington, DC 20071
>
>Please remove this address from mass distribution lists. Such e-mails
>prevents us from providing fast service to our site users. Your
>compliance in this matter is appreciated.
>Sincerely
>
>Gayle Seletsky
>Customer Care
>washingtonpost.com
>
> ----------
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell[SMTP:pmitch@primenet.com]
>Sent: Friday, April 18, 1997 9:56 PM
>Subject: SLF: First Amendment Triumphs (1 of 5)
>
>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>
>
> "First Amendment Triumphs"
>
> by
>
> Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
> Counselor at Law and Federal Witness
> All Rights Reserved
> (1997)
>
>
> Introduction
>
>
>The prototype pleadings which follow this introduction are part
>of a much larger strategy which is based on the latest knowledge
>about the law of federal court jurisdiction.
>
>
>Here is the general sequence:
>
>1. Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests are submitted
> for the credentials of all government actors, including the
> judge, followed by timely FOIA appeals.
>
>
>2. Then, Final Notice and Demand for Proof of Power, Standing,
> and Jurisdiction in the particulars (aka Bill of
> Particulars), with same deadline as FOIA appeals:
>
> a. Power of Attorney, if any, to represent the Plaintiffs
> "United States of America" ("U.S.A.").
>
> b. Standing to sue, if any, of Plaintiffs "U.S.A."
>
> c. Original criminal jurisdiction, if any, of the United
> States District Court ("USDC").
>
> d. Regulations published in the Federal Register, if any,
> for key statutes, e.g. Jury Selection and Service Act.
>
>
>3. Affidavits of Default and of Probable Cause, if and when the
> Department of Justice (and all other agencies) fail to
> produce the certified evidence demanded above:
>
> a. Testifies to DOJ's (or other agency's) failure to
> produce certified evidence, on or before the stated
> deadline
>
> b. Testifies to existence of probable cause to charge
> government actors with deprivations of fundamental
> Rights under 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242, e.g. due process of
> law as guaranteed by Fifth Amendment
>
> c. Activates estoppel by acquiescence
>
>
>4. Verified Petition for Warrant of Removal by 3-Judge Panel
>
> a. seeks ORDER by three (3) qualified federal judges,
> removing case from USDC, which has no jurisdiction, to
> DCUS, which has jurisdiction
>
> i. 3-judge panel requires challenge to apportionment
> of congressional districts, based on two classes
> of citizenship
>
> b. Criminal defendant becomes civil Plaintiff.
>
> c. New civil Respondents become "United States et al."
>
>
>4. Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief
>
> a. names USDC judge as civil Respondent (Doe #1)
>
> b. compels production of admissible copies of the
> credentials of the USDC judge, and entry into evidence
>
> i. Oath of Office is most important
>
> ii. Commission from President to be federal judge is
> next in importance
>
> c. provides prototype to compel production of all other
> credentials, from all other actors
>
> d. forces recusal of USDC judge for adverse and/or
> pecuniary interest(s), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455
>
>
>5. Subsequent pleadings contest the payment of federal income
> taxes by any federal judge assigned to the DCUS, in
> violation of Article III, Section 1, and Evans v. Gore.
>
> a. O'Malley v. Woodrough is refuted for false premises,
> namely:
>
> i. there are two classes of citizenship, not one
>
> ii. there is no law requiring federal judges to be
> citizens of either class
>
>
>6. Supplemental brief details rich history of Petition Clause,
> as a fundamental federal question.
>
> a. U.S. Supreme Court has held that Petition Clause
> guarantees a Right conservative of all other rights
>
>
>7. Other special pleadings are timely submitted, to:
>
> a. refute the constitutionality of Jury Selection and
> Service Act ("JSSA")
>
> b. establish Plaintiff's Right to assistance of Counsel
>
> c. petition for leave to institute Quo Warranto
> proceedings
>
> d. and all other federal questions arising under the
> Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States
>
>
>8. New Plaintiff has option to stay the DCUS proceeding,
> pending final resolution of challenge to constitutionality
> of JSSA (if matter has not already been finally settled).
>
> a. Rebuttal to first response of the United States is
> available, via incorporation of Exhibit, by reference
>
> b. History of related cases is recited
>
>
> # # #
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail