Time: Sat May 24 08:04:53 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA10742; Sat, 24 May 1997 07:34:00 -0700 (MST) by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA13056; Sat, 24 May 1997 07:23:13 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 07:45:04 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: "The Cooper File" is now on the Internet See below: At 11:22 PM 5/23/97 -0400, you wrote: >Sir: > >Thank you for updating and informing me on these developments. I must >now make time to review and understand the materials you are providing >in a more comprehensive manner. > >What are your suggestions in airing these issues in my campaign for the >U.S. Senate? I can get some coverage here in Connecticut and my work on >the original Thirteenth is getting some small measure of notice. The >Thirteenth omitted, the Fourteenth unlawful, but the Anti-Slavery >section is lawful and so is the Fifteenth Amendment: can you help me >mold a "media/political strategy" to make this stuff TV friendly. > >Richard Hello Richard: The motive is money: there are two classes of citizenship in America: one is free, the other enslaved. We have a choice. It's called the Right of Election, and it is guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment. Just say NO to slavery! The Civil War was fought as much to establish a precedent for paper money. Once established, the government could enrich itself by printing as much of it as necessary. All of this is explained in detail in "Return to Constitutional Money" in the Supreme Law Library at URL: http://www.supremelaw.com But, after the Civil War, Congress botched the 14th amendment. The proof is to be found in the case of Dyett v. Turner, Utah Supreme Court (1968). So, there is no constitutional authority for a second class of citizenship, a/k/a federal citizenship. The Alabama Supreme Court has already ruled that one can be a state Citizen without also being a federal citizen, a/k/a "citizen of the United States", regardless of whether or not the so-called 14th amendment was properly ratified. Other courts have ruled the same way. The movement back to state Citizenship is a fundamental one, which embraces strict obedience by the federal government to the restrictions and guarantees of the U.S. Constitution. The rub was aggravated in 1901 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States, as such, does not extend beyond the limits of the states which are united by and under it. Then, in 1945, the Supreme Court extended this doctrine by ruling that the guarantees of the Constitution extend to the federal zone only as Congress makes those guarantees applicable, by statutes. If you are a federal citizen, then you belong to a political association which owes its allegiance to a jurisdiction where the Constitution is not operative, because citizenship is a term of municipal law. Congress can enact two kinds of laws: general, and municipal. Since the federal zone has no states in the Union (no stars on the flag), Congress is the "state" government, and Congress passes all local, "municipal" laws there. The Internal Revenue Code is a municipal code for the federal zone, and for citizens of that zone, regardless of where they may reside. Last, but not least, the so-called 16th amendment is another total fraud, which was proven to the California Supreme Court in 1992. Therefore, the IRS cannot impose a direct tax on Citizens of the several states unless it is apportioned, according to two separate clauses in the Constitution. Even if it had been enacted properly, the 16th amendment never repealed these clauses, and repeals by implication are not favored. Last but not least, the Grace Commission proved that the income tax collections do not pay for any federal government services. This is further proof that the IRS is a money laundry, extorting funds from the American People for the benefit of foreign banks and their alien owners. The solution is to abolish the federal income tax on labor, by abolishing the W-4 Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate, and by replacing it with nothing else. This will cause a resurgence in the American economy, which will lead to a windfall in excise taxes for Congress, as the economy moves into high gear. There you have it. That is only part of the platform. But, this is an excellent place to start. It is time to abolish the IRS completely, and to assay the manifold damages which they have inflicted upon our entire nation. As a United States Senator, you will be in a very powerful position to make these essential changes happen, with all deliberate speed. Good luck to you, and Godspeed, always! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.surpemelaw.com p.s. Be sure to see "Congresswoman Suspected of Income Tax Evasion," in the Supreme Law Library at the URL above, concerning Rep. Barbara B. Kennelly from Connecticut. I can supply you with a copy of her letter concerning the meaning of "State" in the Internal Revenue Code. This admission is rather earth-shaking. ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail