Time: Thu May 29 22:38:46 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA16845; Thu, 29 May 1997 22:23:50 -0700 (MST) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA02227; Thu, 29 May 1997 22:23:37 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 22:34:22 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Pentagon Report confirms bombs inside building at Oklahoma <snip> > >Secret Pentagon Report on Oklahoma City > Bombing--Evidence of an Inside Job? > > by J. Orlin Grabbe > > U.S. government attempts to portray Timothy McVeigh as the >"lone bomber" (with assistance from Terry Nichols) in the April 19, >1995, bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City have >completely collapsed with recent revelations of McVeigh's associations >with individuals connected to the Aryan Republican Army,as well as with a >BATF informant and an agent of German military intelligence. > > This has lead some to conclude that there has been a U.S. >government (primarily BATF and FBI) cover-up motivated by the >desire to destroy evidence of a "government sting gone bad," much as >with the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City. > > The secret Pentagon report shows, however, that such a judgment may > be too kind to the agencies concerned. The principal damage to the >Alfred P. Murrah Building was brought about by explosives placed on >five columns of the Murrah Building, according to the Pentagon report, >and not by the ANFO bomb in the truck supposedly driven by McVeigh. >Thus, until the individuals who placed the explosives on the >columns of the Murrah Building are identified, any proposed >explanation of how the bombing came about is woefully inadequate. The > existence of demolition charges placed on some columns at the >third-floor level of the Murrah Building is strongly suggestive of >inside participation by at least some federal employees. > > The Pentagon commissioned nine explosive experts to write >independent reports on the bombing, and adopted two of the nine reports >as the "official" report. I spoke to both experts, but they declined to >be interviewed, citing confidentiality agreements with the Pentagon. >Sources familiar with the Pentagon report, however, have >confirmed that the conclusions were similar in nature to those of a >private report prepared by General Benton K. Partin, dated July 30, >1995, except that the Pentagon report concludes there were demolition >charges placed on five columns, not four as concluded by General Partin. > > Partin's report showed that the pattern of damage to the >Murrah Building was inconsistent with the ANFO truck bomb as a point >source for the explosion, and that the damage sustained by the > columns could not possibly have come from this source. > > Explosive pressure drops off approximately with the cube of >the distance. Double the distance, and you reduce the explosive pressure >(pounds per square inch) to one-eighth its original value. > > If the 4800 pounds of ammonium nitrate in the Ryder truck bomb >were in a compressed sphere and detonated from the center, it would have >generated a blast wave with an initial pressure of about 500,000 pounds >per square inch. By the time the nearest Murrah Building column was >reached, that pressure would have fallen to about 375 pounds per square >inch. > > The rows of columns in the Murrah building can be labeled from front > to back as rows A, B, and C. The rows are about 35 feet apart. The >columns in each row can be labeled from left to right (as seen by an >individual facing the front of the building) as numbers 1 through 11. The >third column in the first row would thus be labeled "A3". The columns >are 20 feet apart within each row. > > The concrete in the columns had a compressible yield strength of at >least (and probably higher than) 3500 pounds per square inch. Since this >value is almost ten times the strength of the blast wave hitting the >columns from the truck bomb, the blast wave is insufficient to >produce a wave of deformation in the concrete (and thus to turn it >back into its sand, gravel, and clay components). > > However, a high detonation velocity contact explosive attached to a >column would have generated pressure of 1 to 1.5 million pounds per >square inch-- about 300 times the yield strength of the concrete, and > thus would have pulverized it into sand until the blast wave front had >dropped below the yield strength of the concrete. Left behind would be a >smooth granular surface with protruding steel reinforcement rods (which > have a much higher yield strength). > > General Partin's report shows strong evidence of such >contact explosive charges placed on columns B3, A3, A5, and A7. While the >truck bomb itself was insufficient to destroy columns, it was >responsible for ripping out some floors at the second and third > >floor levels, Partin concluded. > > The notion of a government-sting gone awry would at best suggest >the idea that BATF or FBI agents planned to arrest McVeigh in a dramatic >flourish of publicity when he pulled up in front of the Murrah Building >in his rented Ryder truck containing the ANFO bomb. But this story > becomes faintly ridiculous when you consider that demolition >charges were placed on five Murrah Building columns well before >McVeigh's arrival. If there was a government sting in operation, >then someone was using their knowledge of the sting as cover for >the actual bombing. Either way, it suggests an inside job. > > Finally, McVeigh was not arrested prior to the bombing. Which leads >one to ask, What government sting? We are basically left with >evidence of government complicity and government cover-up, but with >no evidence of a government sting. Did some government agency take >advantage of the general expectation that something would happen that >day, and, for its own reasons, ensure these fears were realized? > > > Prior Knowledge of the Explosion > > There are several sources of evidence of a prior expectation >of a bombing to take place on April 19, 1995. > > Executed on the day of the Oklahoma bombing was Richard >Wayne Snell for murder of a black Arkansas trooper. Snell had been >involved in a plot to blow up the Murrah Building in 1983. And, >according to Alan Ables, an Arkansas prison official quoted by the Denver >Post, "Snell repeatedly said that there would be a bombing or >explosion the day of his death." The explosion took place at the >Murrah Building, the previous focus of Snell's attention. > > Snell's information would appear to have come from Robert Millar, >who was in attendance as Snell's spiritual advisor. Millar was the >founder of Elohim City, a religious commune in Oklahoma near the >border with Arkansas. Timothy McVeigh had made numerous visits to >Elohim City in the weeks before the bombing (see, for example, William >F. Jasper, "More Pieces to the OKC Puzzle," The New American, June 24, >1996). > > A BATF informant named Carol Howe wrote her BATF case officer in >Tulsa that the Elohim City group, or its operational arm the "Aryan >Republican Army", was planning to blow up a building with a possible >date of April 19, 1995 (McCurtain Daily Gazette, February 11, 1997). > Howe said there were three possible targets, two in Tulsa, and one >in Oklahoma City. > > (Members of the Aryan Republican Army are currently charged with >bank robberies in Ohio and Pennsylvania. This includes Peter Langan, on >trial in Columbus, Ohio, and Michael Brescia, indicted in >Philadelphia. Witnesses have identified Brescia as "John Doe II", >originally sought by the FBI in the Oklahoma City bombing.) > > The BATF says the warnings were too vague to prompt any actions. >Too vague, apparently, to warn security guards at the Murrah >Building, who overlooked all the activity involved in placing demolition >explosives on the building columns. > > But not too vague not to warn BATF employees to stay home for the day. > No BATF employee was among the 168 killed in the bombing. > >February 11, 1997 >Web Page: http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ > > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail