Time: Sat May 31 15:52:09 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA24550; Sat, 31 May 1997 12:42:15 -0700 (MST) by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA07441; Sat, 31 May 1997 12:42:09 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 15:43:15 -0700 To: "John R. Hockman" <jhockman@citizen.infi.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Kennelly Letter (fwd) Hello John, My personal opinion is that you may be wasting your time. If you consider Kennelly's letter to be one gram, there is a comparable ton of similar evidence in the book "The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue." If people are not willing to pay a modest $25 for an electronic copy of this book, then I am not interested in spoon-feeding them anything which they will just reject anyway. I can tell you this, the letter is bona fide, but much of the evidence I was collecting prior to 1993 was taken from me, as was the original of the Zolton letter; the latter was "stolen" from me by the Montana Freemen. Since I never had the original of the Kennelly letter, I took that as my cue to write her directly; she fell silent, when she had a moral obligation to inform me if I did, in fact, have a forgery. Silence is a fraud, where there is a legal or a moral duty to speak, pursuant to U.S. v. Tweel. I argue that a U.S. Representative's oath of office creates a legal AND a moral duty to speak. The price of your daughter's ignorance is a future filled with Forms W-4 and 1040 (read "wage slavery" [sic]). I choose freedom. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com p.s. Please show your daughter the documents in the Supreme Law Library; these are free to everyone, except the People who paid dearly to bring this documentation to you. I would point her to Treasury Decision 2313, and then change the subject. At 02:50 PM 5/31/97 -0400, you wrote: >Showed my daughter the Kennelly letter. Since she is sceptical and in multimedia as well she said that anyone could paste up something that looks like a letter she signed and send it out to unsuspecting people to further a point. Who has the original? The recipient, no? Can it be verified by a notary as real? Can copies of this verified letter be made available? >Thanks for your reply, <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail