Time: Sun Jun 01 09:03:08 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA06716; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 08:26:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 09:02:53 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Votesmart (fwd) >Date: Sat, 31 May 97 13:25:14 PST >From: ocs@xpresso.seaslug.org (Bill Vance) >To: pmitch@primenet.com >Subject: Re: SLS: Dismantling the IRS: a formula for success > >"On May 31, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:" > >>Bill, >> >>I may be mistaken here, but I had trouble >>reaching their website several weeks ago. >>Can you share the particulars with us? >>I am copying this message to the Supreme >>Law School. Those clients may want to >>contact you directly. >> >>Many thanks! > >Had a little trouble getting in their myself at first. Then I got ahold of >the following. Let me know if it still works. I only have an email >connect at the moment, but I'm working on getting an OS upgrade so I can get >the latest networking stuff going. That limits me at the moment, but >hopefully I'll be able to do better soon. > > >> To all 'fap': >> >> If you are truly interested in receiving perhaps the least biased - >>non judgemental accounts of all of the candidates...go to: >>http://www.vote-smart.org/ >> Incidentally, try the address as I've posted it first. The '-' >>between "vote" and "smart" may have been editors' doing. If so, go again >>without the hyphen and 'votesmart' as one word. >> I've yet to tap into the page, but I intend too. I do understand >>that it is purely factual...documentation provided. Of course, if your >>candidate is quoted as saying something that you personally disagree with, >>well then I suppose you'll claim its NOT true and that the page is bogus! >> >> At any rate, give it a try! Remember:>> http://www.vote-smart.org/ >> >> Good luck to all! >> >> Sincerely: >> Don >> dking@netdoor.com > >Hope that does the trick for you. > >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >>http://www.supremelaw.com >> >> >> >>>Date: Sun, 25 May 97 14:12:23 PST >>>Organization: (N.) To be organized. But that's not important right now..... >>>From: ocs@xpresso.seaslug.org (Bill Vance) >>>To: pmitch@primenet.com >>>Subject: Re: SLS: Dismantling the IRS: a formula for success >>> >>>Paul; >>> >>>On reading your following post(s), I was reminded of another organization >>>that has seen quite a bit of success. They have quite a number of >>>volunteers helping to keep them updated on a continual basis, and a fairly >>>well organized system of multiple access, voice, web, gopher, etc., etc. >>>You might check out how they set it up for helpful pointers. I'm refering >>>of course to, "Project Vote Smart", originally set up by President Carter >>>and a bunch of others. Within their operating perameters, they're doing a >>>land office business getting the info out to everyone. >>> >>>Good Luck. >>> >>>"On May 25, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:" >>> >>>>Dear America, >>>> >>>>Here is a formula for success. >>>> >>>>How can we apply these techniques >>>>to dismantling the IRS extortion >>>>racket? >>>> >>>>Many thanks to Clifford A. Schaffer >>>>for these important insights. >>>> >>>>I am all ears. >>>> >>>> >>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell >>>>http://www.supremelaw.com >>>> >>>>copy: Clifford A. Schaffer >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>From: "Clifford A. Schaffer" <schaffer@smartlink.net> >>>>>To: "Paul Andrew Mitchell" [address in tool bar] >>>>>Subject: Re: SLS: Arthur, can we pick your brain, please? >>>>>Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 16:04:01 -0700 >>>>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>FYI, >>>>> >>>>> MAP was an outgrowth of a strategy I defined a long time ago as the >>>>>means to defeat the drug warriors. >>>>> The original elements of the strategy can be found in the Persuasive >>>>>Strategies and related materials, and the Hoover Resolution under >>>>>http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer -- Information for Activists. >>>>> >>>>> The strategy is based upon the simple realization that the drug war is >>>>>founded upon ignorance and requires ignorance to survive. The information >>>>>age will ultimately kill the drug war. >>>>> The strategy, at this point is straightforward; >>>>> >>>>> 1) build the online libraries as a resource to all those who would >>>>>help us throughout the world -- and as the "stopper" where all the >>>>>arguments are settled. >>>>> >>>>> 2) hammer the media >>>>> >>>>> The MAP program is of limited use without the available resources to >>>>>back it up. MAP only exists because we had previously created the >>>>>resources that people would come to as an organizing point. That includes: >>>>> >>>>>1) the rhetoric to make the arguments in the terms that non-believers can >>>>>understand (Persuasive Strategies), and that will allow your supporters to >>>>>win the argument when it comes up. >>>>> >>>>>2) a statement of position that can be the focus for broad-spectrum >>>>>support (The Hoover Resolution), >>>>> >>>>> Note: These first two items were important because they were what >>>>>allowed us to achieve a complete dominance of the debate forums in the >>>>>online world -- years before MAP came along. >>>>> >>>>>3) an online organization for activism (DRCNet), >>>>> >>>>>4) online resources so all your supporters everywhere can know the facts >>>>>and make the best arguments, (http://www.druglibrary.org) and finally, -- >>>>> >>>>>5) A media awareness project to bring those resources to the attention of >>>>>the media. >>>>> >>>>>The MAP project you are looking at is really the tail end of several years >>>>>of work that came before it -- laid out by yours truly. >>>>> >>>>>I would also point out that, while MAP gets a lot of letters to the editor >>>>>published, the real grunt work of changing minds is done by downloads from >>>>>the online library. A letter to the editor is really just an attention >>>>>getter and they are so short that it is difficult to make a conclusive >>>>>argument either way. To really seal the issue, you have to lead someone >>>>>into the online library where the arguments are made completely and >>>>>coherently. Most people can brush off a letter to the editor. The online >>>>>library is the real killer. The online library, at last estimate, serves >>>>>up at least half a million documents per month from my web site alone, and >>>>>much of that is copied and distributed to others off the net in great >>>>>quantities. I get logins from more than 1,000 colleges per month, for >>>>>example. >>>>> >>>>>As far as what it would take to get me to do it for another project? Lots. >>>>> I make an hourly consulting rate of 75 an hour as a computer consultant, >>>>>and I can sell every hour I have at that rate. But I am always open to >>>>>offers. >>>>> >>>>>---------- >>>>>> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>>>>> To: maptalk@mapinc.org >>>>>> Subject: MAP: SLS: Arthur, can we pick your brain, please? >>>>>> Date: Friday, May 23, 1997 11:23 AM >>>>>> >>>>>> Arthur, >>>>>> >>>>>> I just had a great idea. >>>>>> >>>>>> You guys in MAP are doing such a superb >>>>>> job of informing the media of the real >>>>>> WOD, it occurs to me that the rest of us >>>>>> in the freedom movement could do no better >>>>>> than to imitate your techniques, in order >>>>>> to abolish the IRS, permanently. >>>>>> >>>>>> I do mean that as a high-level compliment, >>>>>> if not THE highest! >>>>>> >>>>>> One theme I wish to repeat, until it sinks >>>>>> in, is the Grace Commission finding that >>>>>> federal income taxes do not pay for ANY >>>>>> government services. The obvious conclusion, >>>>>> then, is to abolish the federal income tax, >>>>>> and do nothing else, whereupon the American >>>>>> economy will resurge into a renaissance, and >>>>>> Congress will thereby experience a windfall >>>>>> in excise taxes from the increased economic >>>>>> activity. >>>>>> >>>>>> Another theme is the recent research which >>>>>> shows that the IRS is a three-tiered trust, >>>>>> domiciled in Puerto Rico under the Federal >>>>>> Alcohol Administration, which was declared >>>>>> unconstitutional in 1935. "IRS" is not listed >>>>>> in Title 31, United States Code, the laws >>>>>> which create the U.S. Treasury Department. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, here's the big question: what would it >>>>>> take to retain you, and others with talent(s) >>>>>> similar to yours, to educate the rest of >>>>>> us about the productive and obviously >>>>>> successful techniques you are utilizing >>>>>> in the Media Awareness Project ("MAP")? >>>>>> >>>>>> I am all ears, and eagerly await your >>>>>> careful and considerate response. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am taking the liberty of sharing this >>>>>> request far and wide, because I believe that >>>>>> you richly deserve the recognition, and I >>>>>> also believe that our paths will be crossing >>>>>> down the road apiece, because Trust #62 grew >>>>>> out of the China Trade Act, which was enacted >>>>>> to deal with opium, cocaine, and citric wines >>>>>> shipping out of China. This Act was administered >>>>>> in the Philippines by the "Bureau of Internal >>>>>> Revenue," the predecessor to the "IRS". >>>>>> >>>>>> I am standing by. If we don't hear from you >>>>>> in the very near future, I will continue to >>>>>> pound on your front door (with or without >>>>>> a warrant :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> /s/ Paul Mitchell > > >-- >An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | If Guns are | Let he who hath no | Keep >weapon in every | by COLT; | outlawed, only | weapon sell his | Your >hand = Freedom | DIAL | RIGHT WINGERS | garment and buy a | Powder >on every side! | 1911-A1. | will have Guns. | sword. Jesus Christ | Dry. > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail