Time: Mon Jun 02 09:44:05 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA05510; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 07:56:32 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 10:56:22 -0400 Originator: heritage-l@gate.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] To: pmitch@primenet.com Subject: Re: FW: Read It and Weep! Dean et al., With tables and such, I usually publish a one-liner describing the font I used, e.g: [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] Which works out to be exactly the same length as a standard line of Courier text using the DOS screen font and Supreme Court mar- gins. In this way, you end up with Esperanto: even TYPE and EDIT can be used to view simple ASCII text, and it looks great. Just a thought ... /s/ Paul Mitchell p.s. Supreme Court margins are: 0.75" top and bottom 1.60" left margin (auto line #'s are okay) 0.40" right margin headers and footers @ 0.50" from paper edge At 11:30 PM 6/1/97 -0400, you wrote: > > >---------- > Dean Stanton[SMTP:deanstan@mcp.cybertron.com] >Sent: Saturday, May 31, 1997 9:21 PM >Subject: Read It and Weep! > >Read It and Weep! > > We all know -- most of us from unpleasant personal experience -- how > oppressive the federal income tax is today. But what would you pay if > rates had remained the same as when the tax was first passed by > Congress in 1913? The following chart shows that -- and is a shocking > example of how, in just a few generations, government has grown > exponentially. It's an eye-opener! > > 1913 Personal Income Tax System > >+----------+-------------------+---------------------------+ >| TAX RATE | 1913 INCOME LEVEL | ADJUSTED FOR 1994 DOLLARS | >+----------+-------------------+---------------------------+ >| 1% | Up to $20,000 | Up to $298,507 | >| 2% | 20,000- 50,000 | 298,507- 746,269 | >| 3% | 50,000- 75,000 | 746,269-1,119,403 | >| 4% | 75,000-100,000 | 1,119,403-1,492,537 | >| 5% | 100,000-250,000 | 1,492,537-3,731,343 | >| 6% | 250,000-500,000 | 3,731,343-7,462,687 | >| 7% | Over 500,000 | Over 7,462,687 | >| Exempt: | | | >| Single | $3,000 | $44,776 | >| Married | $4,000 | $59,701 | >+----------+-------------------+---------------------------+ > > (Source: American Institute for Economic Research, as reported by > Conservative Consensus newsletter: > http://www.eskimo.com/~ccnrs/news.html.) > > > >TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT > (o?o) Dean Howard Stanton (o?o) >mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm >subscribe: mailto:deanstan@cybertron.com >home page: http://www.cybertron.com/~standean/ >voice email: http://www.vocaltec.com >www pager: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/127748 >mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm > >As an interesting note to the above, how many are aware of the action of President >Thomas Jefferson during his first term on taxes? > >He eliminated a considerable list of taxes that were in effect when he took office, >not adjusted percentages, exemptions or other smoke and mirrors, just plain ole >eliminated them. Said that the expected revenues of the government from the >remaining taxes were more than enough to cover the required activities of the >central government and expected retirement of the national debt. > >If anyone is interested I can dig up a copy of his speech at the end of his first >year in office and post the section on taxes and government expenditures. > >Mike Crane > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail