Time: Mon Jun 02 21:19:08 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA12644;
Mon, 2 Jun 1997 16:16:46 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 16:13:41 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Public Law 103-2
sgsrv99.srv.pacbell.com>
see attached;
Bill Benson dropped the idea
after reading this application
for Writ of Prohibition.
Congress served up a Silver Platter,
but hardly anybody noticed!
See also the corresponding entry
in the Congressional Record.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 08:29 AM 6/2/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Paul,
>I have an interesting tidbit: public law 103-2, Jan. 15, 1993.
>
>To wit:
>"(b)(1) Any person aggrieved by an action of the Secretary of the
>Treasury may bring a civil action in the United States District Court
>for the District of Columbia to contest the constitutionality of the
>appointment and continuance in office of the Secretary of the Treasury
>on the ground that such appointment and continuance in office is in
>violation of article 1, section 6, clause 2, of the Constitution. The
>United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have
>exclusive jurisdiction over such a civil action, without regard to the
>sum or value of the matter in controversy." . . .
>
>"(3)(A) An appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court of the
>United States from any interlocutory of final judgment, decreee, or
>order upon the valididty of the apointment and continuance in office of
>the Secretary of the Treasury under article 1, section 6, clause 2, of
>the Constitution, entered in any action brought under this subsection. .
>. ."
>
>Could this be used to challenge the Sect. of Treas. as a foreign agent
>(IMF), etc. I do not have the knowledge of the possibilities of this
>public law.
>
>Would appreaciate your comments.
>
>Thanks,
<snip>
Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\NOTICE.doc"
Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\PETITION.doc"
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail