Time: Tue Oct 29 05:31:55 1996
To: autarchic@juno.com (John H. Freeman)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: LLAW: LeRoy
Cc: 
Bcc: 

At 12:44 AM 10/29/96 EST, you wrote:
>
>Tuesday, October 29, 1996, 12:40 a.m.
>
>Greeting,
>  
>On Mon, 28 Oct 1996 18:56:21 -0700 (MST) Paul Andrew Mitchell
>[address in tool bar] writes:  
>
>This is my first knowledge of this case.
>
>>13. if the District Court of the United States cannot be  
>>    convened with any federal judges who are currently  
>>    having their compensation be diminished by  
>>    federal income taxes, and  
>
>>17. if one qualified federal judge cannot be found whose  
>>    compensation is not being diminished by federal income  
>>    taxes, then 3 such judges certainly cannot be found  
>>    whose compensation is not being diminished by federal  
>>    income taxes; and  
>
>The two paragraphs above are inconsequential in any case.
>
>1)   Judge, voluntarily applies signature to tax return.
>2)   Judge, voluntarily seals the signed instrument in correctly
>     addressed
>     envelope and voluntarily affixes correct postage.
>3)   Judge, voluntarily deposits said envelopes in out-going United
>     StatesvPostal Service box.
>
>Non-existent compiling law, regulation, rule, or statute.

You are forgetting the Public Salary
Tax Act, yes?  See also Lord v. Kelley,
in which judge admitted extortion and
undue influence by the IRS upon the
court's decision.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


>
>Unwavering,
>
>/s/ John Freeman, <autarchic@juno.com>
>With the help of my God I shall leap over the wall. - Psalm 18:29
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail