Time: Tue Oct 29 09:46:16 1996
To: Tim Richardson <timr@efn.org>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: The Kick-Back Racket (fwd)
Cc:
Bcc:
Tim,
See my comments below:
/s/ Paul Mitchell
At 08:16 AM 10/29/96 -0800, you wrote:
>Forwarded message:
>> The Kick-Back Racket:
>> Performance Management and
>> Recognition System
>>
>> by
>>
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell
>> All Rights Reserved
>> (October 1996)
>>
>>
>> It is becoming increasing apparent, in large
>> part because of a conspiracy of silence which
>> has descended upon the District of Columbia
>> in recent months, that President Clinton has
>> a lot of explaining to do, in quite a few
>> departments. One of the best suppressed stories
>> of his administration thus far is evidence
>> of White House kick-backs from the IRS for each
>> and every indictment issued by federal grand
>> juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever
>> they are.
>
>
> Dear Paul Mitchell,
>
> I need whatever help you may have to offer... you may have contacts
> with the law and information which could help mitigate, to some
> degree, what the IRS is doing to us. To wit:
>
> A couple of weeks ago a very good friend of mine, Steve Riley,
> (Steve is former law enforcement and has several good contacts
> locally) that they (the FBI) had heard that the IRS here was
> setting me up for a violent, armed confrontation so that I could
> be killed and gotten out of the way... obviously I have
> irritated someone -- 'course I teach the law to those evil
> "constitutionalists" and the like, so perhaps I'm doing
> something right!
If these allegations are correct,
they should be documented in an
affidavit, and you should file
immediately for a Temporary Restraining
Order (TRO) against the suspects,
to chill them out a little bit.
Do this in your local county court;
it will lie, and do it NOW!!
>
> But right or not, we don't need a violent, armed confrontation
> here or anywhere in the country right now...we are too close to
> a major revelation in the judiciary. There are several cases
> sitting before the supreme Court right now, Dan Meador's being
> just one of them which, when heard, will result in a major change
> in the way the judiciary does "business". If they rule against
> these plaintiffs, we will all know that the Constitution is
> dead, and that there is NO remedy within the law; and if they
> rule in favor of these plaintiffs, we will have a remedy within
> the law by being able to bring the real Constitution for the united
> States of America into the courtrooms and force the judges and
> prosecutors to live up to it and their oaths of office.
>
> But, for now what I need is some "protection" and the only
> good protection I know of is the law and the enforcement of
> that.
You may also need to flee.
Be realistic here; you
have an obligation to protect
your own life. Are you a
federal witness?
If there is anything you can do to help, I would be
> most appreciative -- we are using the law here in Deprivation
> of Rights suits and criminal complaints against corrupt local
> officials at the county, state and federal levels, but what
> is needed is more.
See above.
I would also go to the
local police; dress up
and be very polite and
concerned. The cops
know when people are
lying, usually.
>
> Micaela Dutson, a licensed attorney is meeting with the IRS on
> Tuesday morning, today, in an attempt to get them to start
> obeying the law -- God! what a novel concept that might be!!! But
> Paula (my wife) and I won't be there since the IRS told Ms. Dutson
> that they didn't have sufficient security to be able to meet with
> us present, since, I guess the inference is, that we are armed
> and dangerous individuals... we have been vilified and demonized
> in the local press as being "freeman" and the like, despite not
> a single shred of evidence to support such a fallacious contention.
You probably have been misclassified
as Illegal Tax Protestors, or worse,
Potentially Dangerous Taxpayers.
The application of these mis-classifications
is a matter which we are currently
litigating.
>
> But if Micaela's not successful, the IRS will try to sell our
> house on the following day, Wed, the 30th.
File for a Quiet Title action
immediately. You will get
an automatic stay against
foreclosure.
Subsequent to that
> I'd kind of expect the SWAT teams out here to "evict" us, hoping
> that I'll resist and they can then shoot me and be done with it.
> So PLEASE make phone calls or whatever you can and lets see if we
> can invoke the law this time -- God willing!
> you can generate.
I like to stay in the shadows
during this kind of thing.
Again, get a Quiet Title action
into state Superior Court
right away. This will buy time
to let things cool down.
>
> Hold in mind of course that "selling" our house is a strange
> proposition since 1) it has never been titled to Paula and/or I
> and it has always been in the name of "techNET, Inc." Of course
> if the IRS wants to pierce the corporate veil, they are welcome
> to try, but it has to be done in court -- a small oversight on
> the part of the collection agent I'm sure.
Due process of law is a
fundamental Right, and
deprivation of fundamental
Rights is a serious felony
in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242.
Again, are you a federal witness?
If so, they may be violating
18 U.S.C. 1513: retaliation
against a federal witness.
The IRS has never
> filed a notice of lien, much less a lien, against techNET, Inc.,
> only ever against Paula and I.
You can sort this all out
in the Quiet Title action ("QT").
And 2), there is a 70,000 dollar
> first mortgage and back county taxes due and payable on sale,
> and there is a $190,000 UCC-1 financing statement of lien filed
> in the recorders office about 2 1/2 years ago against "techNET,
> Inc., and Paula and I" by a company in California to which techNET
> owed money...making the total $$liability about 300,000 for a
> house worth, at best, about $$210,000. So like I said, selling
> what???
Your QT can get to motive(s) later.
>
> Feel 100% free to use this letter or any part of it you wish in
> any communication of any nature you want to; Internet, phone
> calls, letters, personal meetings, etc. You have our explicit
> permission to use our names or other names contained herein,
> or which you discover in connection with this matter.
My standard rate is $75.00 per hour,
with a standard retainer of $500
payable in advance in cash or blank
U.S. Postal Money Order. I work
against the retainer, and then require
additional advances in minimal
increments of $250.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>--
> ********************************************************************
> "The strength and power of despotism consists wholly in the fear
> of resistance."
> --Thomas Paine
> ********************************************************************
> "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom,
> It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
> -- William Pitt, to the House of Commons, 18th November, 1783.
> ********************************************************************
>
> timr@efn.org
> Timothy Lee, Richardson
> (541) 895-4681 (FAX)
> (541) 895-4417 (VOICE)
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail