Time: Tue Oct 29 15:44:55 1996
To: Nancy Lord
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: FOR YOUR EYES ONLY
Cc: 
Bcc: 

FOR YOUR EYES ONLY

>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:42:04
>To: "Harvest" <harvest@whitemtns.com>
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: A Personal Request
>
>Dear Mr. Cooper,
>
>When I was a research associate at the
>University of California, I had the good
>fortune of working under a former Navy
>Captain who helped bombard Iwo Jima.
>He was an unusually kind man, who was 
>also a great boss.  He once told me that
>he was the one who did ALL the aiming and
>firing for all four triple-gun turrets
>which bombarded that island.  He didn't
>want a miss to fall on the shoulders of
>any of his sailor subordinates.  The
>Marines, one of whom was my father, 
>later remarked how precise the bombardment
>was:  he could drop 12-inch shells right
>down a chimney, and this from a battleship
>listing and recoiling 5 feet from every
>salvo.  
>
>I have a very urgent reason to contact him,
>because I believe we are approaching a
>high water mark of judicial corruption in
>America, and I need to brief supportive
>personnel in the Pentagon as to what is
>really going on.  I am an eyewitness to
>quite a few incidents of judicial tyranny,
>and Title 18, U.S.C. Section 4, gives me
>the authority I need to approach military
>personnel.  The FBI is doing nothing but
>push paper.  The Justice Department is 
>complicit.  The Board of Governors of the 
>U.S. Postal Service are sitting on their
>hands.  On and on it goes.
>
>If we need to show some of these people
>that we can overpower the U.S. Marshals,
>particularly when they are covering for
>the felonies of certain federal judges,
>the only way to do that is to make a 
>"presence" felt, preferably in some 
>very subtle, but genuine ways.  My first
>thought is to recommend that a number of
>undercover ONI personnel become eyewitnesses
>to similar events.  Such events now happen with
>such a high frequency, they would not really need
>to depend on hearsay or even affidavits to
>witness personally what I am talking about.
>
>So, my request is this:  if I needed to 
>reach this Captain in the Pentagon, would
>you be willing to be a go-between so that
>the Captain will know that my reason for
>contacting him is genuine, and that I do really
>need to meet privately with him, pursuant 
>to 18 USC 4?  It has been many years since
>I have had any contact with him, but he will
>recognize me immediately, and will certainly
>give us an audience, if only to catch up on
>news from our respective lives.
>
>I would be most appreciative, Mr. Cooper.
>
>The only downside here is that the Captain
>has probably retired already, but that should
>be easy enough to find out.  He still would
>be able to suggest a number of contacts to
>us, once he hears the entire story.
>
>I am standing by.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell 
>
>
>P.S.  I will be happy to learn PGP,
>in order to encrypt subsequent email
>messages on this subject.  Over and out.
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail