Time: Tue Oct 29 16:01:17 1996
To: 
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: One Worthy Proposal (was "Dole Bulemics!")
Cc: 
Bcc: Liberty Law, Nancy Lord

<snip>
>>   The present administration has corrupted and politicized every
>>aspect of the national government.  This is especially true of the secret
>>police agencies.  It is also true of the courts and the justice
>>department.  If the present gang of thugs are re-elected, there is not
>>going to be any check on their activities.  This bodes very ill for
>>ourselves and our liberties.  We saw the Brady's there on the podium.  We
>>saw Waco.  If we let them stay, we are next.  This bunch has already
>>shaken off scandals that would have brought down any previous government.
>>After this election, we will have no other check on them.  They will call
>>all the shots.  The press covers their butts like a diaper.  The
>>investigative agencies are corrupted.  The courts are corrupted.  It even
>>appears that the intelligence agencies are in the same sorry fix.  How
>>then, are the Clintons to be brought to justice?  How are we going to
>>maintain what little remains of our liberties?
>>
>
>I would add the following modifier:  this is the base problem.
>A lot of people whine about corruption in politics, but the vast majority 
>of people do not care.  
>
>I believe that we are at a juncture where the rule of law is at stake.
>
>Do the laws of the land apply to all, irrespective of individual
>party politics and individual power?  
>
>Do they apply to the intelligence agencies, when gross moral violations,
>like massive drug-running, have occurred?   (We aren't talking fine points
>of covert operations here.)
>
>I think that for the long term health of the Republic, the best thing 
>that could happen would be a Clinton victory, re-election of Republican
>majorities in House and Senate, and full scale investigations into the
>CIA drug running, drug money corruption in the banking and political 
>systems, and the Clinton's felonious behaviour in raising political funds,
>burying bodies, and just plain doing what it takes to consolidate power.
>
>What happened to Vince Foster, Ron Brown, and William Colby?   Why is 
>Clinton's Lasater connection brushed under the rug?   What about the 
>bit players (Furgeson and Jerry Parks) who have turned up dead?
>
>If Bush (former CIA director) gets dragged into this mess, then so be it.
>Ditto for Ronnie Reagan.   If Ollie North's diaries implicate others, then
>too bad.   Nothing but a fully energized Republican Party, willing to push
>the law to the brink of a Constitutional crisis is going to resolve any
>of this.  If he has got the evidence, let Starr step up and bring down 
>a standing President.
>
>The legislative control of the TLA's is an issue that has recurred for the
>past 40 years or so.   Its time for a gloves off rehash of these issues,
>with at least the threat of impeachment raised as a real possibility.
>The Agency was making so much money on their cover operations and running
>so many private airlines that they were totally outside Congressional control
>in the late 60's and 70's.   Well, its happened again in the 80's and 90's.
>
>The alternative is to slip a little closer to Banana Republic status, with
>two or three classes of people, all unequal before the law, "disappearances"
>and large flow of illegal money the norm.
>
>Remember, Nixon was re-elected by a landslide and Colson went to jail for 
>improperly viewing *one* FBI file.
>
>ciao,
>
>Jack Curtis
>
>P.S. I agree totally on the AR15 toting wannabees.   The examples we've seen
>thusfar are a bunch of thoroughly infiltrated nitwits.   I'll state right now
>that I know enough history to *run* from anyone expousing any kind of 
>"revolution".
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail