Time: Wed Oct 30 00:04:52 1996
To: Ninth.Wave@concentric.net, "Inc." <nwave@ninthw.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: The Purpose of the Philadelphia Experiment
Cc:
Bcc:
Dean/Stefani,
Thanks. The videotape has been
quite thoroughly trashed by
subsequent posts. It was a
scam, evidently. But I do
believe something quite incredible
happened in Philadelphia harbor
that day. The movie goes into
some detail.
Thanks for the update on the web
page. Security is shaping up to
be a very high priority. Hang
in there; this is a roller coaster
like no other. The whole nation
now hangs in the balance. A very
black storm cloud is forming
on the near horizon. It will take
about 3 to 4 years to blow by.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
At 10:59 PM 10/29/96 -0700, you wrote:
>Hey Paul:
>
>Most intriguing. I am both a fan of possibility and a diehard
>skeptic. I always listen to evidence, but always hold
>judgement until I have sufficient facts.
>
>Carl Sagan said that "Extraordinary claims require
>extraordinary evidence." I totally agree.
>
>I have never seen
>a compelling account of this experiment. Srong magnetic fields
>will bend CHARGED particles, but photons are not charged. What might
>have been expected is that the strong magnetic field would ionize the
>air near the ship, changing the refractive index and thus creating
>the bedning of light. This would seem to support other things
>I've heard about the arora or glow supposedly seen on the ship.
The crew who survived tell a
wild story about jumping
overboard into the future,
some 40 years hence. See
the movie for a fairly
faithful account, at least
the first half-hour. The
love story was made up for
audience interest. Al Bielek
(sp?) was a survivor.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>I'm quite certain that most if not all of the paranormal, UFO, X-files
>type stuff is to some extent real. I'm also sure that the fed knows
>quite a bit. The radiations tests on humans, the Iraq nerve gas... etc.
>are just some examples.
>
>Cheers,
>Dean
>
>BTW - new stuff is being downloaded to the website tonight and tomorrow.
>
>>Dear Geoffrey,
>>
>>I may ramble a bit here, but I thought
>>this might be pertinent, if not
>>directly on point. I once saw a neat
>>videotape of a young scientist from
>>Area 51. He was in his 30's, maybe
>>early 40's. He began the tape by
>>driving up to a desert location in
>>his Corvette Stingray. He gets out
>>and begins to describe the physics of
>>interstellar travel. He went into detail
>>about the propulsion system: a special
>>element, very high on the periodic chart,
>>which has such a dense nucleus, the
>>strong force actually radiates out beyond
>>the geometry of the nucleus itself. This
>>strong force can be amplified, mostly
>>through the use of decaying anti-matter
>>and special devices which are currently
>>being developed at Area 51. Once the
>>strong force is amplified, like any FM
>>signal is amplified, the time-space
>>continuum begins to warp. In this fashion,
>>very distance places, like the Alpha
>>Centauri, can be "brought here", without
>>having to wait the incredibly long periods
>>of time it would take to reach such distant
>>places, moving at normal light speed.
>>When the amplifier is no longer necessary,
>>it is turned off, and the space ship
>>finds itself at the new location.
>>This all happens in a rather short period
>>of time, say 5 minutes or less.
>>
>>Can it be that the Philadelphia Experiment
>>was dealing with the exact same kind of
>>generators and amplifiers?
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Dean C. Hines, Ph.D. | Disclaimer: My views don't necessarily
> |
>Steward Observatory | reflect those of Steward Observatory
> |
>933 N. Cherry Ave. | or the University of Arizona...
> |
>Tucson, AZ 85721 (520)621-3445 |
>http://nimbus.as.arizona.edu:8000/~dhines |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail