Time: Wed Oct 30 12:27:22 1996
To: pmitch@primenet.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
Cc:
Bcc:
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:00 -0700 (MST)
>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>
>>From: tab@hollyent.com
>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:41:24 -0700
>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>>
>>================[ Distributed Message ]================
>> ListServer: TAB (Take America Back Mail List)
>> Type: Not Moderated
>> Distributed on: 30-OCT-96, 11:41:10
>>Original Written by: IN:ftbrady@cosmoslink.net.
>>=======================================================
>>
>>
>>OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>Insights & Strategies for the New Individualist Left
>>October 30, 1996
>>Editor: Wally Conger
>>============================================
>>
>>THE STARR INDICTMENTS II
>>
>>by J. Orlin Grabbe
>>
>>It looks like the mainstream media was right and I was wrong. Though perhaps
>>not for the reason they think.
>>
>>I had followed the progress of the Starr probe carefully and knew when the
>>first (unannounced) indictment was handed down in Arkansas. I also knew how
>>angry Starr was at press reports he had "promised" not to announce anything
>>prior to the November election, and how eager he was to get the indictment
>>particulars out into the public domain. I also knew of at least five people
>>who were indictment targets.
>>
>>But there were two glitches that affected the original timing. The first one
>>was good: more walk-in witnesses. (More accurately, the witnesses were
>>dragged in.) Their testimony greatly improved the conviction probability of
>>the charges against Hillary Rodham Clinton. The second glitch was legal in
>>nature. An outside review of the indictments as signed by the grand juries
>>both in Arkansas and New York made important criticisms of the wording. So
>>the indictments were rewritten both in Arkansas and New York earlier this
>>month. The revised indictments had to be re-presented to the grand juries.
>> But the revised versions had been signed in both locations by the end of day
>>Friday, October 18.
>>
>>I anticipated the indictment particulars would be made public the following
>>week. But no news was forthcoming. The first intimation I received there
>>might be a change in plans was when an individual connected to the Starr
>>investigation observed that the election wasn't really over until the state
>>electors had cast their votes in December. This was offered as a simple
>>observation, without elaboration.
>>
>>The second indication was when the Fifth Column said they would not be giving
>>Bob Dole a second incriminating financial package prior to the election.
>> (The first package induced Dole to resign from the Senate.) Explanation:
>> "So as to not be seen as playing politics." Of course, it wouldn't be
>>playing partisan politics if Clinton and Dole went out together.
>>
>>The final indication was the incarceration of Charles Hayes in Kentucky.
>> Hayes had reminded me more than once: "Before this is over, it's going to
>>get rough. Mark my words: It's going to get rough."
>>
>>I knew how rough it had already become. A silent war had been in existence
>>for the past two months. A committee formed under the Emergency Powers Act
>>was negotiating with Bill Clinton over his resignation, and Clinton was using
>>his powers as President to fight them every step of the way. And I knew that
>>this committee, not Starr, was in charge of the timing of the indictment
>>announcements. The committee was trying to deal with a Criminal Presidency,
>>on a neutral bi-partisan basis--but to keep things silently in the
>>background. Hayes, as a participant in this fight, had deflected so many
>>attempts on his life as to seem invulnerable. His incarceration showed how
>>massive the battle had become.
>>
>>Of course, it is times like this that give definition to the term
>>"fair-weather friends". But for the rest, here is what is important to keep
>>in mind: This is only a temporary setback. It is not the end of the war.
>>
>>And battleship-size Roto-rooters have been prepared both for Bill Clinton and
>>the U.S. Department of Justice.
>>
>>(October 27, 1996)
>>
>>
>>
>>========================================================================
>>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com
>>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>>remove yourself from the list. Use HELP for a list of all commands.
>>Questions/comments/problems?
>> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com
>>For information about this system email: info@hollyent.com
>>========================================================================
>>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>===========================================================
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>===========================================================
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail