Time: Wed Oct 30 12:28:54 1996 To: pmitch@primenet.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 Cc: Bcc: >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:29:09 -0700 (MST) >To: pmitch@primenet.com >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 > >>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:35 -0700 (MST) >>To: pmitch@primenet.com >>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 >> >>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:00 -0700 (MST) >>>To: pmitch@primenet.com >>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 >>> >>>>From: tab@hollyent.com >>>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:41:24 -0700 >>>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 >>>>To: pmitch@primenet.com >>>> >>>>================[ Distributed Message ]================ >>>> ListServer: TAB (Take America Back Mail List) >>>> Type: Not Moderated >>>> Distributed on: 30-OCT-96, 11:41:10 >>>>Original Written by: IN:ftbrady@cosmoslink.net. >>>>======================================================= >>>> >>>> >>>>OUT OF STEP Online #18 >>>>Insights & Strategies for the New Individualist Left >>>>October 30, 1996 >>>>Editor: Wally Conger >>>>============================================ >>>> >>>>THE STARR INDICTMENTS II >>>> >>>>by J. Orlin Grabbe >>>> >>>>It looks like the mainstream media was right and I was wrong. Though perhaps >>>>not for the reason they think. >>>> >>>>I had followed the progress of the Starr probe carefully and knew when the >>>>first (unannounced) indictment was handed down in Arkansas. I also knew how >>>>angry Starr was at press reports he had "promised" not to announce anything >>>>prior to the November election, and how eager he was to get the indictment >>>>particulars out into the public domain. I also knew of at least five people >>>>who were indictment targets. >>>> >>>>But there were two glitches that affected the original timing. The first one >>>>was good: more walk-in witnesses. (More accurately, the witnesses were >>>>dragged in.) Their testimony greatly improved the conviction probability of >>>>the charges against Hillary Rodham Clinton. The second glitch was legal in >>>>nature. An outside review of the indictments as signed by the grand juries >>>>both in Arkansas and New York made important criticisms of the wording. So >>>>the indictments were rewritten both in Arkansas and New York earlier this >>>>month. The revised indictments had to be re-presented to the grand juries. >>>> But the revised versions had been signed in both locations by the end of day >>>>Friday, October 18. >>>> >>>>I anticipated the indictment particulars would be made public the following >>>>week. But no news was forthcoming. The first intimation I received there >>>>might be a change in plans was when an individual connected to the Starr >>>>investigation observed that the election wasn't really over until the state >>>>electors had cast their votes in December. This was offered as a simple >>>>observation, without elaboration. >>>> >>>>The second indication was when the Fifth Column said they would not be giving >>>>Bob Dole a second incriminating financial package prior to the election. >>>> (The first package induced Dole to resign from the Senate.) Explanation: >>>> "So as to not be seen as playing politics." Of course, it wouldn't be >>>>playing partisan politics if Clinton and Dole went out together. >>>> >>>>The final indication was the incarceration of Charles Hayes in Kentucky. >>>> Hayes had reminded me more than once: "Before this is over, it's going to >>>>get rough. Mark my words: It's going to get rough." >>>> >>>>I knew how rough it had already become. A silent war had been in existence >>>>for the past two months. A committee formed under the Emergency Powers Act >>>>was negotiating with Bill Clinton over his resignation, and Clinton was using >>>>his powers as President to fight them every step of the way. And I knew that >>>>this committee, not Starr, was in charge of the timing of the indictment >>>>announcements. The committee was trying to deal with a Criminal Presidency, >>>>on a neutral bi-partisan basis--but to keep things silently in the >>>>background. Hayes, as a participant in this fight, had deflected so many >>>>attempts on his life as to seem invulnerable. His incarceration showed how >>>>massive the battle had become. >>>> >>>>Of course, it is times like this that give definition to the term >>>>"fair-weather friends". But for the rest, here is what is important to keep >>>>in mind: This is only a temporary setback. It is not the end of the war. >>>> >>>>And battleship-size Roto-rooters have been prepared both for Bill Clinton and >>>>the U.S. Department of Justice. >>>> >>>>(October 27, 1996) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>======================================================================== >>>>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com >>>>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >>>>remove yourself from the list. Use HELP for a list of all commands. >>>>Questions/comments/problems? >>>> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com >>>>For information about this system email: info@hollyent.com >>>>======================================================================== >>>>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>=========================================================== >>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>>=========================================================== >>> >>> >>> >> >>=========================================================== >>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>=========================================================== >> >> >> > >=========================================================== >Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >=========================================================== > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail