Time: Wed Oct 30 12:28:54 1996
To: pmitch@primenet.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
Cc:
Bcc:
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:29:09 -0700 (MST)
>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>
>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:35 -0700 (MST)
>>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>
>>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:00 -0700 (MST)
>>>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>>
>>>>From: tab@hollyent.com
>>>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:41:24 -0700
>>>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>>>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>>>>
>>>>================[ Distributed Message ]================
>>>> ListServer: TAB (Take America Back Mail List)
>>>> Type: Not Moderated
>>>> Distributed on: 30-OCT-96, 11:41:10
>>>>Original Written by: IN:ftbrady@cosmoslink.net.
>>>>=======================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>>>Insights & Strategies for the New Individualist Left
>>>>October 30, 1996
>>>>Editor: Wally Conger
>>>>============================================
>>>>
>>>>THE STARR INDICTMENTS II
>>>>
>>>>by J. Orlin Grabbe
>>>>
>>>>It looks like the mainstream media was right and I was wrong. Though perhaps
>>>>not for the reason they think.
>>>>
>>>>I had followed the progress of the Starr probe carefully and knew when the
>>>>first (unannounced) indictment was handed down in Arkansas. I also knew how
>>>>angry Starr was at press reports he had "promised" not to announce anything
>>>>prior to the November election, and how eager he was to get the indictment
>>>>particulars out into the public domain. I also knew of at least five people
>>>>who were indictment targets.
>>>>
>>>>But there were two glitches that affected the original timing. The first one
>>>>was good: more walk-in witnesses. (More accurately, the witnesses were
>>>>dragged in.) Their testimony greatly improved the conviction probability of
>>>>the charges against Hillary Rodham Clinton. The second glitch was legal in
>>>>nature. An outside review of the indictments as signed by the grand juries
>>>>both in Arkansas and New York made important criticisms of the wording. So
>>>>the indictments were rewritten both in Arkansas and New York earlier this
>>>>month. The revised indictments had to be re-presented to the grand juries.
>>>> But the revised versions had been signed in both locations by the end of day
>>>>Friday, October 18.
>>>>
>>>>I anticipated the indictment particulars would be made public the following
>>>>week. But no news was forthcoming. The first intimation I received there
>>>>might be a change in plans was when an individual connected to the Starr
>>>>investigation observed that the election wasn't really over until the state
>>>>electors had cast their votes in December. This was offered as a simple
>>>>observation, without elaboration.
>>>>
>>>>The second indication was when the Fifth Column said they would not be giving
>>>>Bob Dole a second incriminating financial package prior to the election.
>>>> (The first package induced Dole to resign from the Senate.) Explanation:
>>>> "So as to not be seen as playing politics." Of course, it wouldn't be
>>>>playing partisan politics if Clinton and Dole went out together.
>>>>
>>>>The final indication was the incarceration of Charles Hayes in Kentucky.
>>>> Hayes had reminded me more than once: "Before this is over, it's going to
>>>>get rough. Mark my words: It's going to get rough."
>>>>
>>>>I knew how rough it had already become. A silent war had been in existence
>>>>for the past two months. A committee formed under the Emergency Powers Act
>>>>was negotiating with Bill Clinton over his resignation, and Clinton was using
>>>>his powers as President to fight them every step of the way. And I knew that
>>>>this committee, not Starr, was in charge of the timing of the indictment
>>>>announcements. The committee was trying to deal with a Criminal Presidency,
>>>>on a neutral bi-partisan basis--but to keep things silently in the
>>>>background. Hayes, as a participant in this fight, had deflected so many
>>>>attempts on his life as to seem invulnerable. His incarceration showed how
>>>>massive the battle had become.
>>>>
>>>>Of course, it is times like this that give definition to the term
>>>>"fair-weather friends". But for the rest, here is what is important to keep
>>>>in mind: This is only a temporary setback. It is not the end of the war.
>>>>
>>>>And battleship-size Roto-rooters have been prepared both for Bill Clinton and
>>>>the U.S. Department of Justice.
>>>>
>>>>(October 27, 1996)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>========================================================================
>>>>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com
>>>>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>>>>remove yourself from the list. Use HELP for a list of all commands.
>>>>Questions/comments/problems?
>>>> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com
>>>>For information about this system email: info@hollyent.com
>>>>========================================================================
>>>>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>===========================================================
>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>===========================================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>===========================================================
>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>===========================================================
>>
>>
>>
>
>===========================================================
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>===========================================================
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail