Time: Wed Oct 30 13:27:46 1996
To: Electra
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Missouri prospect
Cc:
Bcc: defense@mindspring.com,pmitch@primenet.com,richard@caprica.com
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 15:13:42 -0500
>To: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>From: Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com>
>Subject: Re: The Constitution
>
>At 01:09 PM 10/30/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>Dear William,
>>
>>Because of a long string of clients
>>who have chosen to believe a vicious
>>lie that I am some kind of government
>>"agent", and other such nonsense, I
>
>Dear Paul,
>
> I think I talked to them too, at a rally
>for Bob last April, just before I moved back.
>Same problem. Can't travel to & fro Missouri
>on my own dime. But if they want me to work
>from here I can, we traded messages awhile
>& I'm not as busy now.
Let's see what they do with
the FOIA idea. If they want
us to litigate, using the DCUS
idea, then they can come up
with some money for us. Now
that Neil & Evelyn are on-line,
we can begin to share Supreme
Law Firm business without
leaving the comfort of our
living rooms. That was always
one of my major objectives for
any Principal or Firm Member.
I have had some minor success so
far with this business plan, but
the first ones to retain me had
no idea how to spell Eudora,
and still don't, even after buying it.
I must be underestimating my 25
years of computer experience.
I will keep you in the loop.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
P.S. I am copying this to Electra,
Richard, and Neil & Evelyn.
> Your forward from Electra: Still getting
>bounces? Experiment: Try sending something
>to me and somebody else. Those seem to be
>getting through. This is getting scary, it seems
>to be targeted at you and me and nobody else.
> Gids time. If you don't get a quick response,
>I'm out.
>Nancy.
Neal Kelsey will figure it out,
even if it takes him a week.
Here's a buck to say he is not
challenged by this problem.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
P.S. 0000 = I Pobot, I "smOOOOches"
>
>
>
>>am currently out a rather substantial
>>sum of fees which were never paid.
>>It is now getting difficult to pay
>>my rent, believe it or not. So, I will
>>share this mail with my colleagues
>>in the Supreme Law Firm, and see if
>>we can come up with some recommendations
>>for you. I would begin, as I always
>>do with government personnel, by filing
>>immediate FOIA requests for their credentials,
>>including but not necessarily limited to
>>their oaths of office, delegations of
>>authority, fidelity bond (or surety),
>>and licenses to practice law in the state(s)
>>whey they operated (if any). Once these
>>FOIA requests are filed, the clock starts
>>running on the responses. After 10 working
>>days (no weekends or federal holidays), a
>>timely FOIA appeal is filed. After 20
>>working days, all administrative remedies
>>are exhausted, and you are eligible to
>>compel production of the requested documents
>>in the District Court of the United States,
>>the court of original jurisdiction under
>>5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). I can share with
>>you here an electronic copy of the Citizen's
>>Guide to the FOIA/PA, published by Congress
>>in a rare moment of sanity. Be advised that
>>this Citizen's Guide is wrong about the court
>>of original jurisdiction; we have this on
>>authority of a federal judge in Arizona,
>>late last spring.
>>
>>I hope this helps. Please pass this message
>>along to the people who need it.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>
>>
>>At 02:39 PM 10/30/96 -0600, you wrote:
>>>Mr. Paul Andrew, Mitchell
>>>
>>>Dear Sir:
>>>
>>>This is something that may or may not be of
>>>interest.
>>>
>>>An incident occurred in Southwest Missouri
>>>last year and I believe was September 19th
>>>1995, to a Mother of four children home alone,
>>>who were terrorized by the Sheriff's deputies
>>>dressed in black and armed with automatic weapons.
>>>It also included one Highway Patrol Officer,
>>>and later the BATF were brought in.
>>>
>>>In the end result she was vindicated and all
>>>charges were dropped.
>>>
>>>She has tried to find a competent counselor to
>>>initiate a class action lawsuit. The couple is
>>>underfunded as lost their property fighting corrupt
>>>first attorney and subsequent cost. The story is
>>>quite lengthy and all documentation is available.
>>>
>>>The Rutherford Institute says that her case is a
>>>good one but they themselves cannot find an attorney
>>>who will or has time to take the case as it will require
>>>a large amount of time and as usual there is no money
>>>to advance to cover start up cost.
>>>
>>>Do you know of anyone who would be willing to tackle
>>>this case and will provide the Lady's phone and fax
>>>and address for contact and she will send all of the
>>>necessary portfolio for review.
>>>
>>>I broke the story on the Internet and got her on the
>>>airwaves for protection -- this is a story of abuses
>>>of every amendment and would appreciate any advice or
>>>assistance that can be offered. The Rutherford Institute
>>>thought they had some firm in Arkansas that would take the
>>>case but were covered until April before being able to
>>>handle. She has an attorney here in Missouri that will
>>>take the case but needs assistance.
>>>
>>>I know time constraints in this hectic world have everyone
>>>grid locked. If you can find the time and have anyone who
>>>might consider looking at the documentation and will
>>>provide a mail address will see that the paperwork is sent.
>>>
>>>Respectfully
>>>
>>>William C. Beeler
>>>Central Missouri Network
>>>3801 Grace Ellen Dr.
>>>Columbia, MO 75202
>>>(573) 474 - 3083
>>>(573) 886 - 8527 Fax
>>>"William Beeler"<cenmonet@socketis.net>
>>>***************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>****************************************************
>>>>Objection. The Constitution is more
>>>>than adequate for today's world.
>>>>The States are empowered sufficiently
>>>>to legislate for all the matters
>>>>which are not within the power of
>>>>Congress to legislate for the inhabitants
>>>>and land of the state zone. A major
>>>>"problem" with the Constitution, however,
>>>>is that we cannot seem to agree on the
>>>>exact provisions contained therein.
>>>>But, that is not a problem with the
>>>>Constitution, but with ourselves.
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>===========================================================
>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>>===========================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@alterzone.com
>>>>-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>===========================================================
>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>===========================================================
>>
>>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail