Time: Wed Oct 30 19:52:55 1996 To: ncrepub@u.washington.edu From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Harvard conservative harrassed. Cc: Bcc: demand equal time /s/ Paul Mitchell The Kick-Back Racket: Performance Management and Recognition System by Paul Andrew Mitchell All Rights Reserved (October 1996) It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of a conspiracy of silence which has descended upon the District of Columbia in recent months, that President Clinton has a lot of explaining to do, in quite a few departments. One of the best suppressed stories of his administration thus far is evidence of White House kick-backs from the IRS for each and every indictment issued by federal grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are. The term itself is an oxymoron, because protest has never been illegal in America. Protest is even recognized by the federal government's precious Uniform Commercial Code for repudiating presentments in a lawful manner. So, for the phrase "illegal tax protestor" to withstand the obvious constitutional challenge (yes, the First Amendment is still the supreme Law in America), the adjective "illegal" must modify the noun "tax." This is a telling admission on the part of our vaulted Congress of what many Americans have known for a long time, namely, the federal income tax is a total and utter fraud, from stem to stern. Our Ship of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with loop-holes and sinking fast. What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak the truth. A key page from the Internal Revenue Manual clearly shows that the President routinely receives $35,000 from the Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"). We have a political prisoner in federal custody right now who is prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and every time a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any illegal tax protestor ("ITP"). U.S. Attorneys receive a mere $25,000 per indictment of ITP's. Now, if the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task force in place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the former Pilot Connection Society which has been reported to have over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if his hench-persons in the DOJ succeed in bringing grand jury indictments against all 5,000. Let's see, 5,000 times $35,000 equals $175,000,000. The bad news for President Clinton is that the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM") provides absolutely no authority for these "performance recognition rewards" (read "kick-backs"). Courts have consistently ruled that the IRM has no more authority than a pizza recipe, when it comes to authorizing salaries and other compensation for federal government employees. Federal employee salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a far cry from that high standard of law. Furthermore, the Constitution forbids the President from receiving any other "emoluments" during his term of office. See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them." This is bad enough. But, when you couple these kick-backs with the perjury racket now rampant within the Department of Just US, and with a grand jury system which badly needs a complete overhaul, you quickly find that the indictments issuing from federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the Internal Revenue Code, are really threats, engineered by the biggest extortion racket this planet has ever seen. Jury tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do a far better job of describing what is really going on. In one recent grand jury case, involving a subpoena for certain books and records, a federal judge in Arizona conspired with the Assistant U.S. Attorney to commit 27 counts of mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice, and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above. When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to investigate probable violations of federal law by the AUSA, the judge intercepted this certified request, and all subsequent pleadings which were then directed to the grand jury, in order to keep them informed of what was really going on. These pleadings contained crucial evidence -- you guessed it -- of the PMRS kick-back racket, and of a pattern of pathological lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for repeatedly lying to a federal court in Phoenix. This was unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own. Last but not least, the evidence is now overwhelming that the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries, both grand and trial, is horribly defective for exhibiting obvious class bias against state Citizens who are not also federal citizens. The courts have consistently ruled that Americans can be state Citizens without also being federal citizens, whether or not the federal government's precious Fourteenth Amendment was properly approved and adopted (and we now know that it was not). Unfortunately for Congress, this class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title 28 United States Code Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each and every federal grand jury indictment, and each and every federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War. The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so many Americans in federal prisons, with absolutely no lawful authority whatsoever to do so. Couple that with the fact that the U.S. incarceration rate is twice as high as South Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita. Do you think maybe that the federal government may be running an extortion racket here, just for money? I think so. I know so. I can prove it. I am appalled. # # # At 06:16 PM 10/30/96 -0800, you wrote: > >Note: It isn't often I allow stuff forwarded from other lists onto the >lists which I own, but in this case I am making an exception because it >can relate to many CR clubs. > >EC > >From: "Mark W. Lee IV" <leeiv@ix.netcom.com> >Subject: Harvard conservative harrassed. > >>Date: 29 Oct 1996 15:48:17 -0000 >>From: "CRNC LD Mark Fletcher" <mfletch@hotmail.com> >>To: crnc@umich.edu >>Cc: crnc2@umich.edu >>Subject: CRNC ONLINE: P.C. strikes again, Please help me clear my name. (fwd) >> >> >> >>>---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 21:09:44 -0500 (EST) >>>From: Jose' Padilla <jpadilla@husc.harvard.edu> >>>To: Undisclosed recipients: ; >>>Subject: Please help me clear my name. >>> >>> >>>Hello all! >>> >>>I apologize for not being in contact for awhile. Anyway, the >>>reason I write has to do with an unfortunate situation I have been thrust >>>into here at Harvard. I'll keep my story to the point. Last week, an >>>editorial appeared in the school newspaper which saying that I was a >>>racist, bigoted, anti-intellectual, anti-religious, anti-semitic "freakish >>>fascist". I was labeled these things for no good reason, other than the >>>fact that I'm an hispanic and a conservative republican. The editorial >>>then proceeded to list where I lived and Harvard students were told to >>>"let me know how they feel." The next day, a swastika was found on my >>>door. >>>Currently, The Crimson, the school newspaper, is unwilling to >>>print a letter of apology since the editorial was COMPLETELY inaccurate >>>and done for the express purpose of humiliating me. Also, the >>>administration here has been relatively uncooperative. It seems as if >>>there is nothing I can do since I cannot afford to get a lawyer. >>>Thus, I write to y'all in order to ask to gain some publicity. I >>>am asking for anyone out there to tell whoever you can about this story, >>>especially anyone in the media. The Crimson and the administration seem >>>to think that they can get away with endangering my safety and dishonoring >>>my name and character completely. A dose of publicity, I think, will show >>>them how terrible a thing it was which happened to me. >>>Here is some background info on me which I think makes this >>>situation a great media story. For one, I'm an hispanic republican. >>>My parents were immigrants from Honduras, and my father is a Teamster. >>>Nevertheless, I stand firm in my conservative convictions . . . >>>unfortunately, here liberals need to correlate conservatism with hatred, >>>in order to shut down a true dialogue of ideas. Also, I'm from Dallas, >>>Texas, and I interned this summer with House Majority Leader Dick Armey. >>>Well, thanks for reading this message. I hope I don't sound too >>>pathetic or anything. I don't know where this will go, but it sucks to be >>>slandered and I can't let it stand. However, I apologize for bothering >>>you with this mess. >>> >>>Jose' Padilla '97 >>>jpadilla@fas.harvard.edu >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------- >>Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com >>--------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >Mark W. Lee IV >Publisher >The Washington Spectator >mleeiv@u.washington.edu > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail