Time: Wed Oct 30 19:53:33 1996
To: jpadilla@fas.harvard.edu
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Harvard conservative harrassed.
Cc:
Bcc:
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 19:53:13
>To: ncrepub@u.washington.edu
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Harvard conservative harrassed.
>
>demand equal time
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
> The Kick-Back Racket:
> Performance Management and
> Recognition System
>
> by
>
> Paul Andrew Mitchell
> All Rights Reserved
> (October 1996)
>
>
>It is becoming increasing apparent, in large
>part because of a conspiracy of silence which
>has descended upon the District of Columbia
>in recent months, that President Clinton has
>a lot of explaining to do, in quite a few
>departments. One of the best suppressed stories
>of his administration thus far is evidence
>of White House kick-backs from the IRS for each
>and every indictment issued by federal grand
>juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever
>they are.
>
>The term itself is an oxymoron, because
>protest has never been illegal in America. Protest
>is even recognized by the federal government's
>precious Uniform Commercial Code for repudiating
>presentments in a lawful manner. So, for the
>phrase "illegal tax protestor" to withstand the
>obvious constitutional challenge (yes, the First
>Amendment is still the supreme Law in America),
>the adjective "illegal" must modify the noun "tax."
>This is a telling admission on the part of our
>vaulted Congress of what many Americans have known
>for a long time, namely, the federal income tax
>is a total and utter fraud, from stem to stern.
>Our Ship of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled
>with loop-holes and sinking fast.
>
>What makes this term even more obnoxious is the
>way in which the IRS now attacks American "rebels"
>who dare to learn and speak the truth. A key page
>from the Internal Revenue Manual clearly shows
>that the President routinely receives $35,000
>from the Performance Management and Recognition
>System ("PMRS"). We have a political prisoner in federal
>custody right now who is prepared to testify that
>the President receives this sum each and every time
>a federal grand jury issues an indictment against
>any illegal tax protestor ("ITP"). U.S. Attorneys
>receive a mere $25,000 per indictment of ITP's.
>
>Now, if the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task
>force in place to attack ITP's who've become organized,
>like the former Pilot Connection Society which has
>been reported to have over 5,000 members, the President
>stands to rake in a tidy sum if his hench-persons in the
>DOJ succeed in bringing grand jury indictments against
>all 5,000. Let's see, 5,000 times $35,000 equals
>$175,000,000. The bad news for President Clinton is
>that the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM") provides absolutely
>no authority for these "performance recognition rewards"
>(read "kick-backs"). Courts have consistently ruled that
>the IRM has no more authority than a pizza recipe,
>when it comes to authorizing salaries and other
>compensation for federal government employees.
>Federal employee salaries must be determined by
>Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a far cry from that
>high standard of law.
>
>Furthermore, the Constitution forbids the President
>from receiving any other "emoluments" during his term
>of office. See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7:
>"... he shall not receive within that Period any other
>Emolument from the United States, or any of them."
>This is bad enough. But, when you couple these kick-backs
>with the perjury racket now rampant within the
>Department of Just US, and with a grand jury system
>which badly needs a complete overhaul, you quickly find
>that the indictments issuing from federal grand juries,
>for alleged violations of the Internal Revenue Code,
>are really threats, engineered by the biggest extortion
>racket this planet has ever seen. Jury tampering,
>perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which
>do a far better job of describing what is really going on.
>
>In one recent grand jury case, involving a subpoena
>for certain books and records, a federal judge in Arizona
>conspired with the Assistant U.S. Attorney to commit
>27 counts of mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering,
>27 counts of obstruction of justice, and 27 counts
>of conspiracy to commit all of the above. When a
>formal request was submitted to that grand jury to
>investigate probable violations of federal law by
>the AUSA, the judge intercepted this certified request,
>and all subsequent pleadings which were then directed
>to the grand jury, in order to keep them informed
>of what was really going on. These pleadings
>contained crucial evidence -- you guessed it --
>of the PMRS kick-back racket, and of a pattern of
>pathological lying by the AUSA dating back to a
>$4,797 fine imposed on him for repeatedly lying to a
>federal court in Phoenix. This was unprecedented
>for federal courts who almost never eat their own.
>
>Last but not least, the evidence is now overwhelming
>that the law which Congress enacted to qualify and
>convene all juries, both grand and trial, is horribly
>defective for exhibiting obvious class bias against
>state Citizens who are not also federal citizens.
>The courts have consistently ruled that Americans can
>be state Citizens without also being federal citizens,
>whether or not the federal government's precious
>Fourteenth Amendment was properly approved and adopted
>(and we now know that it was not). Unfortunately for
>Congress, this class discrimination in the Jury Selection
>and Service Act, Title 28 United States Code Sections
>1861 thru 1865, invalidates each and every federal grand
>jury indictment, and each and every federal trial jury
>verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War.
>
>The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting
>so many Americans in federal prisons, with absolutely
>no lawful authority whatsoever to do so. Couple that
>with the fact that the U.S. incarceration rate is twice
>as high as South Africa, which is second world-wide in
>prisoners per capita.
>
>Do you think maybe that the federal government may be running
>an extortion racket here, just for money? I think so.
>I know so. I can prove it. I am appalled.
>
>
> # # #
>
>
>
>
>At 06:16 PM 10/30/96 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>Note: It isn't often I allow stuff forwarded from other lists onto the
>>lists which I own, but in this case I am making an exception because it
>>can relate to many CR clubs.
>>
>>EC
>>
>>From: "Mark W. Lee IV" <leeiv@ix.netcom.com>
>>Subject: Harvard conservative harrassed.
>>
>>>Date: 29 Oct 1996 15:48:17 -0000
>>>From: "CRNC LD Mark Fletcher" <mfletch@hotmail.com>
>>>To: crnc@umich.edu
>>>Cc: crnc2@umich.edu
>>>Subject: CRNC ONLINE: P.C. strikes again, Please help me clear my name. (fwd)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 21:09:44 -0500 (EST)
>>>>From: Jose' Padilla <jpadilla@husc.harvard.edu>
>>>>To: Undisclosed recipients: ;
>>>>Subject: Please help me clear my name.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hello all!
>>>>
>>>>I apologize for not being in contact for awhile. Anyway, the
>>>>reason I write has to do with an unfortunate situation I have been thrust
>>>>into here at Harvard. I'll keep my story to the point. Last week, an
>>>>editorial appeared in the school newspaper which saying that I was a
>>>>racist, bigoted, anti-intellectual, anti-religious, anti-semitic "freakish
>>>>fascist". I was labeled these things for no good reason, other than the
>>>>fact that I'm an hispanic and a conservative republican. The editorial
>>>>then proceeded to list where I lived and Harvard students were told to
>>>>"let me know how they feel." The next day, a swastika was found on my
>>>>door.
>>>>Currently, The Crimson, the school newspaper, is unwilling to
>>>>print a letter of apology since the editorial was COMPLETELY inaccurate
>>>>and done for the express purpose of humiliating me. Also, the
>>>>administration here has been relatively uncooperative. It seems as if
>>>>there is nothing I can do since I cannot afford to get a lawyer.
>>>>Thus, I write to y'all in order to ask to gain some publicity. I
>>>>am asking for anyone out there to tell whoever you can about this story,
>>>>especially anyone in the media. The Crimson and the administration seem
>>>>to think that they can get away with endangering my safety and dishonoring
>>>>my name and character completely. A dose of publicity, I think, will show
>>>>them how terrible a thing it was which happened to me.
>>>>Here is some background info on me which I think makes this
>>>>situation a great media story. For one, I'm an hispanic republican.
>>>>My parents were immigrants from Honduras, and my father is a Teamster.
>>>>Nevertheless, I stand firm in my conservative convictions . . .
>>>>unfortunately, here liberals need to correlate conservatism with hatred,
>>>>in order to shut down a true dialogue of ideas. Also, I'm from Dallas,
>>>>Texas, and I interned this summer with House Majority Leader Dick Armey.
>>>>Well, thanks for reading this message. I hope I don't sound too
>>>>pathetic or anything. I don't know where this will go, but it sucks to be
>>>>slandered and I can't let it stand. However, I apologize for bothering
>>>>you with this mess.
>>>>
>>>>Jose' Padilla '97
>>>>jpadilla@fas.harvard.edu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------
>>>Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>>---------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>Mark W. Lee IV
>>Publisher
>>The Washington Spectator
>>mleeiv@u.washington.edu
>>
>>
>>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail