Time: Thu Oct 31 07:14:06 1996 To: From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Traveling is a right [7/7] Cc: Bcc: liberty lists <snip> >--------- Begin forwarded message ---------- >From: autarchic >To: libertylaw@www.ultimate.org >Subject: Traveling is a right [7/7] >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 10:21:56 EST >Message-ID: <19961030.141741.4327.20.autarchic@juno.com> > > >>> Part 7 of 7... > > Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43. > >95. The Emphasized statement is also consistent with North >Carolina statute. In the statute reads: Common law in force. The >common law of England, as far as it is not repugnant to or >inconsistent with the Constitution or laws of the United States in all >cases not provided for in these compiled laws, is the rule of decision >in all courts in this state. Since the statutes of the North Carolina >General Statutes cannot apply to this Sovereign, he becomes subject to >the Common Law that maintains that he owes nothing to the public while >he does not trespass upon their "RIGHTS." > >96. Is it the contention of this Sovereign that because the >statutes contained in the North Carolina General Statutes do not apply >to him that the statutes are unconstitutional? Absolutely not. There >is a class of persons in North Carolina to whom these statutes apply >without reservation. Members of this class include corporations and >those who do the corporation business on the streets or highways in >North Carolina. A corporation is the creation of the State. > > 96.1 A corporation is a creature of the State. It is > presumed to be incorporated for the benefit of the public. > It receives certain special privileges and franchises and > holds them, subject to the laws of the State and the > limitations of its charter. Its "RIGHTS" to act as a > corporation are only preserved to it while it obeys the laws > of its creation. (Emphasis added). > See: > Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914 p. 684 > >97. It is a person in the eyes of the law but it lacks >character, no morals, no conscience. It's every activity must be >directed and supervised by the State. Under the definition of Due >Process of Law, Bouvier's Law Dictionary states in part: > > 97.1 The liberty guaranteed is that of a natural person > and not of artificial persons; Western Turf Assn. v. > Greenberg, 204 U.S. 359 where it was said "a corporation > cannot be deemed a Citizen within the meaning of the clause > of the Constitution of the United States which protects the > privileges and immunities of Citizens of the United States > against being abridged or impaired by the law of a state." > (See also 203 U.S. 243). > >98. The statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes are >designed to direct the activities of the class of persons of which a >corporation is a member. Corporations are absolutely bound by these >statutes. It is imperative that a conscienceless entity not be allowed >to roam the streets or highways in North Carolina and jeopardize the >Sovereigns. It is for this purpose that the statutes of the North >Carolina General Statutes were enacted and not for the control of a >Free and Natural Sovereign. > > CONCLUSION > >99. There is no Court in This Land that could Lawfully execute >an Order that would or could cause, or work to compel, One to become a >servant or slave of any city, county or state without a conviction and >with full due process of law, and for any city, county or state to >pretend otherwise is an absurdity. > > There you have it folks. What do you think? Have you been lied to >by our public servants again? I would bet big money that we have! > >Steadfastly, John Freeman >... A seminar on Time Travel will be held two weeks ago! >--------- End forwarded message ----------
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail