Time: Mon Nov 04 14:07:10 1996
To: 
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Letter to U.S. Senator Kyl, Arizona
Cc: 
Bcc: liberty lists, The Arizona Republic, Tucson Citizen, TV stations, Alfred Adask, Art Bell, Bernie Oliver, Bill Van Mastrigt, Chris Wilder, Dean, Denver newspapers, Electra, Harvey Wysong, Jean-Pierre Weingarten, Jim McCall, Marcia A. Armstrong, Nancy Lord, Neil Nordbrock, Richard Ginn, William Cooper

[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


SECOND REQUEST                        c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
                                         Tucson [zip code exempt]
                                                 ARIZONA REPUBLIC
                                                 November 3, 1996
Senator Jon Kyl
United States Senate
Washington 20510/tdc
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Subject:  Your letter to Me dated:
          September 12, 1996

Dear Senator Kyl:

If you  do believe, as you say, that the validity of the Internal
Revenue Code  is "well  established," will  you please provide Me
with your  legal interpretation  of IRC  7851(a)(6)(A),  "General
rule"?

You also  recommended that  I consult  with  an  attorney,  if  I
believe I  have a  strong  case.    Senator,  I  appreciate  your
consideration in  offering that  recommendation, but retaining an
"ATTORNey" is  the last  thing I  would ever  do if I should feel
that I "have a strong case," as you put it.

Please consult  with  a  good  historical  law  dictionary,  like
Bouvier's, for  the true language etymology of the term "ATTORN".
Do you  have one?   There  you will  find that  "to attorn" is to
supervise the  transfer of an estate from the old lord to the new
lord.   This is  a term  straight out  of feudal  law.  How about
that, Senator!   After  learning of  this etymology, I will never
look upon  the office  of the  "United States ATTORNeys" the same
ever again.  Do we really have a "feudal" government now?

For your  information, I am enclosing some additional information
about another  section of  the Internal  Revenue Code  which  you
might find  interesting.   It seems  that Representative  Barbara
Kennelly has let the cat out of the bag, so to speak.  Senator, I
don't know  about you,  but it  has been My experience that, once
you let  the cat  out of  the bag, it is awfully difficult to get
the cat back into the bag.  What has your experience been in this
aspect of life in America?  I am dying to know.

I will  look forward  to your  written  explanation  of  the  IRC
sections  discussed  above.    Thank  you  in  advance  for  your
consideration, and  your excellent service to Citizens of Arizona
state whom  you are  paid so  well to serve.  By the way, are you
the recipient of any "performance rewards" from PMRS?

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Counselor at Law, federal witness
and Citizen of Arizona state
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail