Time: Mon Nov 04 14:20:05 1996
To: bigd@i2020.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: PMRS: heating up 
Cc: 
Bcc: liberty lists

Dear Sir,

I didn't see your name in the 
email you sent.  I can't speak
for the other gentleman you 
mentioned.  I can only speak
for myself here, and for the
research methods which I have
utilized to date.  I can send
you a scanned copy of the page
in question.

My data is to be found at Internal
Revenue Manual ("IRM"), page 1229, and also
in the Act of Congress terminating
the Performance Management and 
Recognition System in 1993.  You can
find some twenty (20) documents on
the Internet which refer to the
"Performance Management and Recognition
System" if you use the Alta Vista
search engine, which I did this morning.
I invite you to cruise the net yourself.

Evidently, Congress attempted to abolish
the "system" because of the widespread
abuses which crept in.  Please also see
U.S. v. Lopez, U.S. Supreme Court (1995),
where that court utilized "the federal
zone" as a household word.  The letter
I received from the Treasury Department,
in response to my FOIA request for all
PMRS records, admitted, in black and
white, that some records do not exist
because some payments were made in cash.
Go figure.  The letter was written by a 
Mr. Zolton in Treasury, Washington, D.C.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


At 04:04 PM 11/4/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Where the hell have you guys been sleeping. Are you trying to play Rip Van 
>Wrinkle. What's new? Money talks. BS walks. With the USA with more prisoner than 
>any other country, you both should have observed and realized the political 
>correctness laws many years ago. The trouble with many (who disagree) is the 
>fact that they are blown away by faulty information. Ralph, you have been guilty 
>of this several times in the last few months, therefore your data is always 
>suspect all times.
>
>Paul Andrew Mitchell, good luck as you try to get your message out. Prove your 
>data before you go spouting off.

I have.  See above.

 
>
>Regards from a former leader in the taxpayer's movement. (some 20 years ago) 
>Nothing has changed. It's great to see you young bucks getting near the real 
>issues. Build your base of support with credibility. Once you are wrong you 
>loose your following.

Did you mean "lose your following"?

What following would that be?

/s/ Paul Mitchell


>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail