Time: Mon Nov 04 15:58:44 1996
To: For Immediate Release                            November 4, 1996                        The Kick-Back Racket:                    Performance Management and                        Recognition System                                 by                        Paul Andrew Mitchell                        All Rights Reserved                          (October 1996)        It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of a conspiracy  of silence which has descended upon the District of Columbia in  recent months,  that President  Clinton has a lot of explaining to  do, in  quite a few executive departments.  One of the best  suppressed stories  of his  administration thus  far is evidence of  White House  kick-backs from  the  Internal  Revenue Service ("IRS")  for each  and every indictment issued by federal grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are.       The term  itself is  an oxymoron,  because protest has never been illegal  in America.   Protest  is even  recognized  by  the federal  government's   precious  Uniform   Commercial  Code  for repudiating presentments  in a lawful manner.  So, for the phrase "illegal tax  protestor" to  withstand the obvious constitutional challenge (yes,  the First  Amendment is still the supreme Law in America), the  adjective "illegal"  must modify  the noun  "tax." This is  a telling  admission on the part of our vaulted Congress of what  many Americans  have known  for a long time, namely, the federal income  tax is  a total  and utter  fraud, from  stem  to stern.   Our Ship  of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with loop-holes and sinking fast.       What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak the truth.   A  key page from the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM") clearly shows  that the President routinely receives $35,000 from the Performance  Management and  Recognition System ("PMRS").  We have a  political prisoner  in federal  custody right  now who is prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and every time  a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any illegal tax  protestor ("ITP").   U.S.  Attorneys receive  a mere $25,000 per indictment of ITP's.       Now, if  the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task force in  place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the former Pilot  Connection Society  which has been reported to have over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if his hench-persons  in the  DOJ succeed  in  bringing  grand  jury indictments against  all 5,000.   Let's  see, 5,000 times $35,000 equals $175,000,000.   The bad news for President Clinton is that the IRM  provides absolutely  no authority for these "performance recognition  rewards"   (read   "kick-backs").      Courts   have consistently ruled  that the  IRM has  no more  authority than  a pizza recipe,  when it  comes to  authorizing salaries  and other                  The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 1 of 3  compensation for  federal government employees.  Federal employee salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a far cry from that high standard of law.       Furthermore, the  Constitution forbids  the  President  from receiving any  other "emoluments" during his term of office.  See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them."   A FOIA  request by  this author  for  all  PMRS  records produced an  admission, on  Treasury Department  letterhead, that some records  do not exist because the rewards were paid in cash. This is  bad enough.   But, when you couple these kick-backs with the perjury  racket now rampant within the Department of Just US, and with  a grand  jury system  which badly needs either complete overhaul or  abolition, you  quickly find  that  the  indictments issuing from  federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the Internal Revenue  Code, are  really threats,  engineered  by  the biggest extortion  racket  this  planet  has  ever  seen.    Jury tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do a far better job of describing what is really going on.       In one  recent grand  jury case,  involving a  subpoena  for certain books  and records,  a federal judge in Arizona conspired with the  Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") to commit 27 counts of mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice,  and 27  counts of  conspiracy to  commit all  of the above.  When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to investigate probable  violations of  federal law by the AUSA, the judge intercepted  this certified  request,  and  all  subsequent pleadings which  were then  directed to the grand jury by Counsel in order  to keep  them informed  of what  was really  going  on. These pleadings  contained crucial  evidence -- you guessed it -- of the  PMRS kick-back  racket, and  of a pattern of pathological lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for repeatedly lying  to a  federal  court  in  Phoenix.    This  was unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own.       Last but  not least,  the evidence  is now overwhelming that the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries, both grand  and  trial,  is  horribly  defective  for  exhibiting obvious class  bias against  state  Citizens  who  are  not  also federal citizens.    The  courts  have  consistently  ruled  that Americans can  be  state  Citizens  without  also  being  federal citizens,  whether  or  not  the  federal  government's  precious Fourteenth Amendment  was properly  approved and  adopted (and we now know  that it  was not).   Unfortunately  for Congress,  this class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title 28 United  States Code  Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each and every  federal grand  jury indictment,  and  each  and  every federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War.       The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so many Americans  in federal  prisons, with  absolutely  no  lawful authority whatsoever  to do  so.   Couple that with the fact that the U.S.  incarceration rate  is twice  as high as it is in South Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita.                   The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 2 of 3       Do you  think maybe  that  the  federal  government  may  be running an extortion racket here, just for money?  I think so.  I know so.  I can prove it.  I am appalled.   Common Law Copyright Paul Andrew Mitchell Counselor at Law, federal witness and Citizen of Arizona state All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice November 4, 1996                                #  #  #                                                             The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 3 of 3 
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: 
Cc: 
Bcc: 


      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail