Time: Mon Nov 04 17:05:47 1996
To: Nancy Lord <defense@macon.mindspring.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: No Verdict Yet
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Nancy,

They're looking for evidence to convict,
but they cannot seem to find it, so
they are double-checking their tentative
consensus.  Not guilty tomorrow, 
on all counts.

That is my belief, anyway, FWIW.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



At 06:16 PM 11/4/96 -0500, you wrote:
>To: Macon Court List
>From:  Liberty Defense League
>Date:  November 4, 1996
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>At 5:00 pm, the jury returned to their hotel
>without delivering a verdict.   They will
>re-convene at 8:30 tomorrow.
>
>Two questions were asked this afternoon:
>
>1) What is the difference between counts
>        2 & 3 (Mr. Spicer & I had tried to get
>        count 3 dismissed on multiplicity and
>        the Court's distinction was obscure).
>
>2) Could the tape recording of the 4/23
>        conversation to be re-played to listen
>        for mention of the BATF?
>        (It was not heard, according to a source)
>
>Past postings of Macon Court Update are available
>on http://home.megalinx.net/pandar
>
>Please understand that the delay, while usual,
>was unexpected in light of how the case progressed.
>We are very tense and scared.  Please understand
>this and do not call this office with questions.  News
>will be broadcast as quickly as possible.
>
>Thank you.  Please keep Bobby, Jimmy & Troy in
>all your prayers.  And Mike Kemp, whose trial also
>started today.
>
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail