Time: Mon Nov 04 17:05:47 1996 To: Nancy Lord <defense@macon.mindspring.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: No Verdict Yet Cc: Bcc: Nancy, They're looking for evidence to convict, but they cannot seem to find it, so they are double-checking their tentative consensus. Not guilty tomorrow, on all counts. That is my belief, anyway, FWIW. /s/ Paul Mitchell At 06:16 PM 11/4/96 -0500, you wrote: >To: Macon Court List >From: Liberty Defense League >Date: November 4, 1996 >-------------------------------------------------------- > >At 5:00 pm, the jury returned to their hotel >without delivering a verdict. They will >re-convene at 8:30 tomorrow. > >Two questions were asked this afternoon: > >1) What is the difference between counts > 2 & 3 (Mr. Spicer & I had tried to get > count 3 dismissed on multiplicity and > the Court's distinction was obscure). > >2) Could the tape recording of the 4/23 > conversation to be re-played to listen > for mention of the BATF? > (It was not heard, according to a source) > >Past postings of Macon Court Update are available >on http://home.megalinx.net/pandar > >Please understand that the delay, while usual, >was unexpected in light of how the case progressed. >We are very tense and scared. Please understand >this and do not call this office with questions. News >will be broadcast as quickly as possible. > >Thank you. Please keep Bobby, Jimmy & Troy in >all your prayers. And Mike Kemp, whose trial also >started today. > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail