Time: Wed Nov 06 04:45:38 1996
To: Nancy Lord <defense@macon.mindspring.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: such a deal
Cc:
Bcc:
At 01:46 AM 11/6/96 -0500, you wrote:
>At 01:25 PM 11/5/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>Hi Nancy,
>>
>>I am busy prepping for Kenneth Starr.
>>I am off to the post office right now.
>>You needed to see that email.
>>It's OK to fall in love, you know.
>>In fact, I think it's a great idea.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>Hi Paul,
>
>Glad you understand, that's sweet.
>I only told you because we're friends.
>Please don't re-post it, I knew you
>wouldn't.
>
>I've been hit with a bunch of messages
>about JJ today. Don't know why.
>
>Don went home. Another friend, Joe, is
>here to stay with me. Don't tell anyone,
>especially Don, that his leaving puts me
>in more danger than I was in.
>
>Still waiting. May go to Joe's place.
>Do you think the army alert has anything
>to do with me? I've had like 5 re-posts
>on it.
>
>Will you still take me to Reno? I still
>need to get there.
>
>Nancy
As John F. Kennedy once said,
"A deal is a deal."
We have a deal, Nancy.
Deal includes obedience school
for Lord Gideon. :)
/s/ Paul Mitchell
P.S. "Lord Gideon, such a deal!"
>>
>>
>>
>>At 03:11 PM 11/5/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>>At 07:37 AM 11/5/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>>>Nancy,
>>>>
>>>>You are mentioned in here.
>>>>The transmission got garbled
>>>>in places.
>>>
>>> Dear Paul,
>>>
>>> Thank you enormously. I had avoided
>>>looking at JJ's wages of sin because I knew it
>>>would upset me.
>>> The truth: We fell madly in love. I refused
>>>to be a mistress & would not continue unless he
>>>left. Fraud. I should have told him to leave, get
>>>set up on his own, then date me but I was so
>>>freaked out by the whole situation I just needed
>>>him, that's all.
>>> Unfortunately this occured 2 days after Bob
>>>was indicted on 30 year counts. I got very pre-
>>>occupied with my work and was in the law library,
>>>or with Bob, more than I was home. On top of
>>>that there was the problem with the Vipers . . .
>>>Arizona, remember? We've talked about this to,
>>>and this is one of the "two relationships" that
>>>was destroyed because I cannot go to Arizona.
>>> My brother did not want me on the case. I
>>>needed a new name & fast. Pressure on JJ to
>>>get divorced quick & he just wasn't ready to do
>>>it, especially not for an over-achieving trial
>>>lawyer like me. I had warned him that I'd never
>>>had a man around during a big case, but he really
>>>didn't know what he was getting into.
>>> So he got lonely & guilty and went back to Helen.
>>>I would not have risked it if I'd been her - - men
>>>who stick around for the sake of the family have
>>>a propensity to leave when kids grow up. But
>>>we all have our choices to make.
>>> Read my piece on fraud again. This is the
>>>kind of human stuff that gets lost when assholes
>>>like this Ramon wail on & on about sin, instead
>>>of just trying to understand us mere mortŐ€Ö
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail