Time: Wed Nov 06 04:45:38 1996 To: Nancy Lord <defense@macon.mindspring.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: such a deal Cc: Bcc: At 01:46 AM 11/6/96 -0500, you wrote: >At 01:25 PM 11/5/96 -0700, you wrote: >>Hi Nancy, >> >>I am busy prepping for Kenneth Starr. >>I am off to the post office right now. >>You needed to see that email. >>It's OK to fall in love, you know. >>In fact, I think it's a great idea. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell > >Hi Paul, > >Glad you understand, that's sweet. >I only told you because we're friends. >Please don't re-post it, I knew you >wouldn't. > >I've been hit with a bunch of messages >about JJ today. Don't know why. > >Don went home. Another friend, Joe, is >here to stay with me. Don't tell anyone, >especially Don, that his leaving puts me >in more danger than I was in. > >Still waiting. May go to Joe's place. >Do you think the army alert has anything >to do with me? I've had like 5 re-posts >on it. > >Will you still take me to Reno? I still >need to get there. > >Nancy As John F. Kennedy once said, "A deal is a deal." We have a deal, Nancy. Deal includes obedience school for Lord Gideon. :) /s/ Paul Mitchell P.S. "Lord Gideon, such a deal!" >> >> >> >>At 03:11 PM 11/5/96 -0500, you wrote: >>>At 07:37 AM 11/5/96 -0700, you wrote: >>>>Nancy, >>>> >>>>You are mentioned in here. >>>>The transmission got garbled >>>>in places. >>> >>> Dear Paul, >>> >>> Thank you enormously. I had avoided >>>looking at JJ's wages of sin because I knew it >>>would upset me. >>> The truth: We fell madly in love. I refused >>>to be a mistress & would not continue unless he >>>left. Fraud. I should have told him to leave, get >>>set up on his own, then date me but I was so >>>freaked out by the whole situation I just needed >>>him, that's all. >>> Unfortunately this occured 2 days after Bob >>>was indicted on 30 year counts. I got very pre- >>>occupied with my work and was in the law library, >>>or with Bob, more than I was home. On top of >>>that there was the problem with the Vipers . . . >>>Arizona, remember? We've talked about this to, >>>and this is one of the "two relationships" that >>>was destroyed because I cannot go to Arizona. >>> My brother did not want me on the case. I >>>needed a new name & fast. Pressure on JJ to >>>get divorced quick & he just wasn't ready to do >>>it, especially not for an over-achieving trial >>>lawyer like me. I had warned him that I'd never >>>had a man around during a big case, but he really >>>didn't know what he was getting into. >>> So he got lonely & guilty and went back to Helen. >>>I would not have risked it if I'd been her - - men >>>who stick around for the sake of the family have >>>a propensity to leave when kids grow up. But >>>we all have our choices to make. >>> Read my piece on fraud again. This is the >>>kind of human stuff that gets lost when assholes >>>like this Ramon wail on & on about sin, instead >>>of just trying to understand us mere mortŐ€Ö > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail