Time: Wed Nov 06 10:40:15 1996 To: Bill Ulrich <bill@netus.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Hello Via Eddie Kahn Cc: Bcc: Nancy Lord, Neil Nordbrock, Richard Ginn, Richard McDonald, Jean-Pierre Weingarten, Chris Wilder, Bernie Oliver, Dean, Electra, Harvey Wysong, Jim McCall, Marcia A. Armstrong At 09:19 AM 11/6/96 -0800, you wrote: >Paul, > >1). I have some of your written information I received from Eddie Kahn and at >his suggestion, I have composed a FOIA (please see attachment) request along >the same lines as your current situation with Kennelley. I was wondering if >you could critique and tweak it to specify the desired result? I have a >number of associates that will then clone and send this letter once it is >"perfected". For legal work, I must tell you that I charge $75 per hour, charged against an earnest $500 retainer, which is deposited with the Treasurers of the Supreme Law Firm, Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock. > >2). How do I receive the sample briefs that are mentioned your "Juries In >Check Around The Nation"? You ask for them, and tell me what email encoding(s) you can handle. Choose either MIME, BinHex, or Uuencode. > >3). How do I obtain more information about The Supreme Law Firm, the work >you do, materials offered and planned speaking engagements? I would be very >interested to see what you have relating to the California State, Franchise >Tax Board (FTB). Send email to <neilnord@primenet.com> and express interest in joining the firm. We are in throes of massive planning project, which will produce a big Big BIG web page on our secure server. There will be various levels of Firm participation ("no mail fraud here" is our motto, unlike the "other" Firm"). > >Sorry to have so many requests on my first contact with you and I hope you >can provide the answers. I tried calling 520-320-1514, but no one answered >the phone. I discourage phone calls, because it is tapped. Let them wiretap the Internet. I have plans for such invasions of privacy (a fundamental Right, per Act of Congress). See 18 U.S.C. 242 for hints. :-) /s/ Paul Mitchell P.S. We plan to subpoena Rep. Kennelly to discover names and titles of people upon whom she relied for the IRC definition of "State" at 3121(e); this will be done in the case of People v. United States et al., just recently removed from Garfield county court, Jordan, Montana, to federal court in Billings, Montana state. More later, ok? > >Thank you very much, and I look forward to hearing from you. > >Bill Ulrich >William H Ulrich >129 Corsica Drive >Newport Beach, California > >714-721-1371 > >November 6, 1996 > >Internal Revenue Service >Chief, FOIA/PA Section >P.O. Box 795 >Franklin Station >Washington, D.C. 20044 >(202) 622-6260 > > >Dear FOI Officer: > >Pursuant to the federal Freedom of Information Act, >5 U.S.C. s. 552, I request access to and copies of the >documentation that clearly shows that the legal definition >of the term "State" at Internal Revenue Code (Title 26) >3121 (e) means only the named federal territories and >possessions of the federal District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, >the Virgin Islands, Guam and American Soma. > >I agree to pay reasonable duplication fees for the >processing of this request in an amount not to exceed $15.00. >However, please notify me prior to your incurring any expenses >in excess of that amount. If my request is denied in whole >or part, I ask that you justify all deletions by reference to >specific exemptions of the act. I will also expect you to release >all segregable portions of otherwise exempt material. I, of >course, reserve the right to appeal your decision to withhold >any information or to deny a waiver of fees. > >I look forward to your reply within 10 business days, >as the statute requires. > >Thank you for your assistance. > >Very truly yours, > > >____________________________ > William H Ulrich >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail