Time: Thu Nov 07 05:41:00 1996
To: Nancy Lord
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: take the high ground
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Exact same thing happened in U.S.A. v. Wallens.
Here is the sequence I recommend.  We must
stay the course, however;  flinching will
scuttle the plan:

Step 1:  file challenge to Jury Selection and Service
Act;  this can be used to prove that the grand and
trial juries were not legal bodies.

Step 2:  if judge denies the motion to stay, pending
final resolution of challenge to constitutionality
of JSSA, petition for reconsideration and possibly
also clarification

Step 3:  reserve your right to refuse any ORDER on
this question for fraud and other causes.

Step 4:  if judge does not rule, go to Circuit Court
for Mandamus to compel him to rule

Step 5:  file Final Notice and Demand for proof of
Power (of attorney), Standing (of "United States of
America"), and Jurisdiction (of USDC), with 10-day
deadline

Step 6:  with Step 5, file FOIA request for published
regulations promulgating 18 USC 3231 (there are none);
this invokes the DCUS.  See 5 USC 552(a)(4)(B).  Also
request powers of attorney for Office of U.S. Attorney
to represent plaintiff USA.  Also request all Acts of
Congress granting standing to USA.

Step 7:  petition for clarification should point out
that JSSA makes no mention of the USDC, so this is
how you activate the collateral attack.

Step 8:  when they default beyond deadline for Notice and
Demand for Proof of Power, Standing, and Jurisdiction,
file Notice of Removal and of Petition for Warrant of
Removal to 3-Judge Panel in the DCUS;  you will petition
that court for TRO and permanent injunction to force a
stay, for lack of criminal jurisdiction in the USDC.

Step 9:  at this point, beginning with the removal
petition, switch parties:  defendants become the new
plaintiffs;  United States et al. become the respondents;
use the same docket number, but remove "CR" because that
is a fraud (USDC has no criminal jurisdiction, which you
will establish via equitable estoppel)

Step 10:  there is currently no federal judge who is
competent or qualified to sit on the DCUS, because they
are all paying federal income taxes on their compensation;
so, file Notice and Demand on the Chief Judge of the 
Circuit Court of Appeals for a Certificate of Necessity
to be served upon the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
of the United States for Temporary Assignment of 3 judges
from the Court of International Trade (an Article III
forum) to Preside on the DCUS.

Step 11:  execute and file an Affidavit of Non-Waiver of
Extradition, because the defendants were unlawfully 
extradited into a foreign jurisdiction (the territorial
USDC court) without an express waiver, in violation of
the Tenth Amendment

Step 12:  petition the DCUS for an Order to the Office of
the United Attorney to show cause why its alleged agents
should not be charged with a laundry list of federal 
crimes, such as piracy, extortion, perjury, and so on.
Import state law to show that they also violated numerous
state laws, e.g. trespass, entrapment, etc.

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail