Time: Fri Nov 08 10:18:34 1996
To: chiobec@azstarnet.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: PMRS update
Cc: 
Bcc: 

>Date: Fri, 08 Nov 1996 10:16:31
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: PMRS update
>Bcc: "Walter Bowart" <freetht@azstarnet.com>,         "The Space Between" <lperyer@snet.net>,         "Radio Resistors League / Michael Braunstein" <mbrauns1@passage.net>,         "Paul Andrew Mitchell" [address in tool bar],         "Kelly Richey" <FredHenry@aol.com>, "Kelly Yaksich" <Kelyak@aol.com>,         "Keith A. Seifried" <info@majesco.net>,         "Kathy Kasten" <KKASTEN@pathology.medsch.ucla.edu>,         "Jonny Ozone" <ozone@iftech.net>,         "Joe Zychik" <jzychik@pacificnet.net>,         "David Weisner" <d.wiesner@genie.com>,         "Dale Stevens" <dstevens@tso.cin.ix.net>,         "Brian Redman" <bigred@duracef.shout.net>,         "Alex Constantine" <alex@directnet.com>, "Alan Porkolab" <abp@one.net>,         "Al Stann" <astann@one.net>, "2 Bob McCoy" <rmccoy@one.net>
>
>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>
>
>For Immediate Release                            November 4, 1996
>
>                      The Kick-Back Racket:
>                   Performance Management and
>                       Recognition System
>
>                               by
>
>                      Paul Andrew Mitchell
>                       All Rights Reserved
>                         (October 1996)
>
>
>     It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of
>a conspiracy  of silence which has descended upon the District of
>Columbia in  recent months,  that President  Clinton has a lot of
>explaining to  do, in  quite a few executive departments.  One of
>the best  suppressed stories  of his  administration thus  far is
>evidence of  White House  kick-backs from  the  Internal  Revenue
>Service ("IRS")  for each  and every indictment issued by federal
>grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are.
>
>     The term  itself is  an oxymoron,  because protest has never
>been illegal  in America.   Protest  is even  recognized  by  the
>federal  government's   precious  Uniform   Commercial  Code  for
>repudiating presentments  in a lawful manner.  So, for the phrase
>"illegal tax  protestor" to  withstand the obvious constitutional
>challenge (yes,  the First  Amendment is still the supreme Law in
>America), the  adjective "illegal"  must modify  the noun  "tax."
>This is  a telling  admission on the part of our vaulted Congress
>of what  many Americans  have known  for a long time, namely, the
>federal income  tax is  a total  and utter  fraud, from  stem  to
>stern.   Our Ship  of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with
>loop-holes and sinking fast.
>
>     What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which
>the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak
>the truth.   A  key page from the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM")
>clearly shows  that the President routinely receives $35,000 from
>the Performance  Management and  Recognition System ("PMRS").  We
>have a  political prisoner  in federal  custody right  now who is
>prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and
>every time  a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any
>illegal tax  protestor ("ITP").   U.S.  Attorneys receive  a mere
>$25,000 per indictment of ITP's.
>
>     Now, if  the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task
>force in  place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the
>former Pilot  Connection Society  which has been reported to have
>over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if
>his hench-persons  in the  DOJ succeed  in  bringing  grand  jury
>indictments against  all 5,000.   Let's  see, 5,000 times $35,000
>equals $175,000,000.   The bad news for President Clinton is that
>the IRM  provides absolutely  no authority for these "performance
>recognition  rewards"   (read   "kick-backs").      Courts   have
>consistently ruled  that the  IRM has  no more  authority than  a
>pizza recipe,  when it  comes to  authorizing salaries  and other
>
>
>               The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 1 of 3
>
>compensation for  federal government employees.  Federal employee
>salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a
>far cry from that high standard of law.
>
>     Furthermore, the  Constitution forbids  the  President  from
>receiving any  other "emoluments" during his term of office.  See
>Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within
>that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of
>them."   A FOIA  request by  this author  for  all  PMRS  records
>produced an  admission, on  Treasury Department  letterhead, that
>some records  do not exist because the rewards were paid in cash.
>This is  bad enough.   But, when you couple these kick-backs with
>the perjury  racket now rampant within the Department of Just US,
>and with  a grand  jury system  which badly needs either complete
>overhaul or  abolition, you  quickly find  that  the  indictments
>issuing from  federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the
>Internal Revenue  Code, are  really threats,  engineered  by  the
>biggest extortion  racket  this  planet  has  ever  seen.    Jury
>tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do
>a far better job of describing what is really going on.
>
>     In one  recent grand  jury case,  involving a  subpoena  for
>certain books  and records,  a federal judge in Arizona conspired
>with the  Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") to commit 27 counts of
>mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction
>of justice,  and 27  counts of  conspiracy to  commit all  of the
>above.  When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to
>investigate probable  violations of  federal law by the AUSA, the
>judge intercepted  this certified  request,  and  all  subsequent
>pleadings which  were then  directed to the grand jury by Counsel
>in order  to keep  them informed  of what  was really  going  on.
>These pleadings  contained crucial  evidence -- you guessed it --
>of the  PMRS kick-back  racket, and  of a pattern of pathological
>lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for
>repeatedly lying  to a  federal  court  in  Phoenix.    This  was
>unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own.
>
>     Last but  not least,  the evidence  is now overwhelming that
>the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries,
>both grand  and  trial,  is  horribly  defective  for  exhibiting
>obvious class  bias against  state  Citizens  who  are  not  also
>federal citizens.    The  courts  have  consistently  ruled  that
>Americans can  be  state  Citizens  without  also  being  federal
>citizens,  whether  or  not  the  federal  government's  precious
>Fourteenth Amendment  was properly  approved and  adopted (and we
>now know  that it  was not).   Unfortunately  for Congress,  this
>class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title
>28 United  States Code  Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each
>and every  federal grand  jury indictment,  and  each  and  every
>federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War.
>
>     The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so
>many Americans  in federal  prisons, with  absolutely  no  lawful
>authority whatsoever  to do  so.   Couple that with the fact that
>the U.S.  incarceration rate  is twice  as high as it is in South
>Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita.
>
>
>
>               The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 2 of 3
>
>     Do you  think maybe  that  the  federal  government  may  be
>running an extortion racket here, just for money?  I think so.  I
>know so.  I can prove it.  I am appalled.
>
>
>Common Law Copyright
>Paul Andrew Mitchell
>Counselor at Law, federal witness
>and Citizen of Arizona state
>All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
>November 4, 1996
>
>
>                             #  #  #
>
>
>               The Kick-Back Racket:  Page 3 of 3
>
>>
>>
>>                                      c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
>>                                         Tucson [zip code exempt]
>>                                                 ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>>
>>                                                 November 5, 1996
>>Mr. Kenneth Starr
>>Independent Counsel
>>1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
>>Suite 490-North
>>Washington, D.C.
>>Postal Zone <20004>
>>
>>Subject:  IRS Kick-Backs to President from the
>>          Performance Management and Recognition System
>>          ("PMRS")
>>
>>Dear Mr. Starr:
>>
>>I have  evidence in  my  possession  which  implicates  President
>>William Jefferson  Clinton in  the receipt  of illegal  IRS kick-
>>backs  from   a  defunct   federal  program   called  Performance
>>Management and Recognition System ("PMRS").  As of yesterday, the
>>Alta Vista  search engine found some 20 documents on the Internet
>>which mention this system.
>>
>>To obtain more information about PMRS, I have already submitted a
>>Freedom of  Information Act ("FOIA") request to the Department of
>>the Treasury  for all financial records of the PMRS.  Quite to my
>>surprise, Mr.  Mark L.  Zolton wrote  back to  explain that  some
>>records do not exist, because the rewards were paid in cash.
>>
>>For your information, I have decided to become rather politically
>>active in  this matter.   Enclosed  please find my essay entitled
>>"The Kick-Back  Racket: Performance  Management  and  Recognition
>>System," which I enclose for your consideration and review.
>>
>>Please accept this as my firm offer to testify before a competent
>>and qualified  federal grand  jury in  this matter.   I wish this
>>matter to  be investigated fully, and that is the main reason why
>>I have brought it to your attention at this time.
>>
>>If I  can assist you, or any others in your office, in the course
>>of investigating PMRS, please contact me immediately.
>>
>>Thank you very much for your consideration.
>>
>>Sincerely yours,
>>
>>/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>
>>Counselor at Law, federal witness
>>and Citizen of Arizona state
>>
>>enclosures
>>
>>copy:  Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit
>>
>>
>>                           #  #  #
>>
>>                                      c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
>>                                         Tucson [zip code exempt]
>>                                                 ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>>
>>                                                 November 5, 1996
>>Mr. Gerald R. Ryan
>>Special Assistant
>>Assistant Chief Counsel
>>Disclosure Litigation
>>Department of the Treasury
>>"Internal Revenue Service"
>>Washington, D.C.
>>
>>Subject:  FOIA for PMRS records        Control Number:  249346-96
>>
>>Dear Mr. Ryan:
>>
>>Thank you for your letter to me, dated October 24, 1996.
>>
>>As you  can see  from my  original FOIA  request, dated  July 26,
>>1996, (copy  attached), I  requested certified copies of the PMRS
>>records.     My  FOIA   appeal  was   based,  in  part,  on  your
>>organization's failure  to provide  certified copies,  so  as  to
>>render them admissible in a court of law, if necessary.
>>
>>Secondly, Mr.  Mark L.  Zolton, Tax  Law Specialist  in the  FOIA
>>Branch, wrote  to me  on September  12, 1996,  explaining that my
>>original FOIA  request was  not specific  enough to  allow you to
>>conduct a  search for  the records that are of interest to me.  A
>>transcription of  his letter  is attached,  for your information.
>>Evidently, Mr.  Zolton needed  specific years  for  which  I  was
>>interested in  obtaining records.   I  timely  responded  to  Mr.
>>Zolton in writing on September 19, 1996 (see attached).
>>
>>Thirdly, Mr.  Zolton's letter contained an amazing admission that
>>awards made  under PMRS took the form of cash payments or quality
>>step in-grade  promotions.   If there are no records of said cash
>>payments, this  raises the  ugly specter  of  widespread  federal
>>income  tax   evasion  by  recipients  of  these  cash  payments,
>>including possibly  the President.   The  American People  have a
>>right to  know who  received these  cash payments,  when, and how
>>much.   The FOIA  imposes no  requirement upon  me to demonstrate
>>relevance or materiality of these records, however.
>>
>>Therefore, I am entirely unsatisfied with the response(s) of your
>>organization to  date, and  demand that  you refrain from closing
>>your administrative appeal file in this matter.
>>
>>Finally, please  be advised  that I  do not accept U.S. mail from
>>the federal  government, or  from any  of its  agencies, assigns,
>>colorable trusts,  or instrumentalities,  with two-letter federal
>>abbreviations (e.g.  "AZ") or  with unqualified ZIP codes.  Since
>>you may  not have known this, I have made an exception solely for
>>the purpose  of explaining  my position and future intent to you.
>>This is  to inform  you that I will refuse any such mail from you
>>in the  future, unless  it is  directed to  the  correct  mailing
>>location shown  above.   Please see  USPS  Publication  #221  for
>>details.
>>
>>Thank you  very much for your consideration.  I will look forward
>>to your continued cooperation in this matter.
>>
>>Sincerely yours,
>>
>>/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>
>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
>>and Counselor at Law
>>
>>
>>copies:  The Internet
>>         Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit
>>
>>
>>                             #  #  #
>>
>>                   Department of the Treasury                    Internal Revenue Service
>>                     Washington, D.C. 20224
>>                                
>>                                
>>                       September 12, 1996
>>                                
>>Mr. Paul A. Mitchell                           Person to Contact:
>>2509 North Campbell - #1776                    M. Zolton
>>Tucson, AZ 85719                               Telephone Number:
>>                                               (202) 622-6250
>>                                               Refer Reply to:
>>                                               96-1911
>>
>>Dear Mr. Mitchell:
>>
>>     This is in reponse to your July 26, 1996, Freedom of
>>Information Act (FOIA) request for all financial records of the
>>Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS).  Your
>>request was forwarded to us by the Office of Disclosure Services,
>>Department of the Treasury, so that we can respond to you
>>directly.  We apologize for the delay in responding.
>>
>>     Unfortunately, your request is not specific enough to allow
>>us to conduct a search for the records that are of interest to
>>you.  For example, you have not stated the years for which you
>>are interested in obtaining records.  Please be advised that the
>>PMRS has not existed for the last 3 years.  In addition, it is
>>our understanding that awards made under PMRS took the form of
>>cash payments or quality step in-grade promotions.  Therefore,
>>the types of financial records associated with awards made under
>>PMRS did not include the kinds of records mentioned in your
>>request.  It would be helpful if you could be more specific in
>>descibing the desired records.
>>
>>     Accordingly, you may wish to reformulate your request to
>>assist us in finding the responsive material.  If you decide to
>>do so, your perfected request will receive our close attention.
>>
>>                                               Sincerely yours,
>>
>>                                               /s/ Mark L. Zolton
>>
>>                                               Tax Law Specialist
>>                                               FOIA Branch
>>
>>                             #  #  #
>>
>>                                      c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776                                                     Tucson [zip code exempt]
>>                                                 ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>>
>>                                               September 19, 1996
>>Mark L. Zolton
>>Tax Law Specialist
>>FOIA Branch
>>"Internal Revenue Service"
>>Washington [zip code exempt]
>>DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
>>
>>Subject:  FOIA for PMRS Records
>>          Your Ref. No. 96-1911
>>
>>Dear Mr. Zolton:
>>
>>Thank you for your letter to Me, dated September 12, 1996.
>>
>>In that  letter, you  say that  We failed  to state the years for
>>which We  are interested in obtaining records.  In answer to that
>>point:   We want  records for  the years 1776 Anno Domini through
>>and including  2020 Anno  Domini.  The latter year (2020) appears
>>on the  IRS assessment records for a client of mine.  Under oath,
>>the IRS  agent who  signed these records testified that this date
>>(2020) was not a mistake.
>>
>>We are  desirous of  obtaining  any  and  all  financial  records
>>associated with  the PMRS, including but not limited to the names
>>of all  persons who  received any kind of "recognition" from this
>>system, e.g.  the President  as mentioned in the Internal Revenue
>>Manual page in question, employees of the federal government, and
>>all others,  without exception.   We presume the IRM reference is
>>to the  President of  the United  States.   Your  records  should
>>confirm whether  or not  any Presidents of the United States have
>>received any  "recognition" from this system, how much, when, and
>>which ones.  See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7.
>>
>>Thank you very much for your consideration.
>>
>>
>>Sincerely yours,
>>
>>/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>
>>Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
>>and Counselor at Law
>>
>>
>>                             #  #  #
>>
>>
>>
>>At 08:41 AM 11/8/96 -0600, you wrote:
>>>         Paul:
>>>
>>>Where did you get my address from?  Does the bottom of this sugget you are 
>>>an attorney?  Is there any recourse for this?  And one thing I would really 
>>>like to know.  When they put up Arizona for Clinton, I almost messed my 
>>>drawers.  How the heck could that happen?
>>>
>>>	             The Kick-Back Racket:
>>>                   Performance Management and
>>>                       Recognition System
>>>
>>>                               by
>>>
>>>                      Paul Andrew Mitchell
>>>                       All Rights Reserved
>>>                         (October 1996)
>>>
>>>
>>>Larry Perrault
>>>
>>>
>>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail