Time: Sat Nov 09 13:48:06 1996 To: snetnews@alterzone.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Baby-Killing Vaccine Cc: Bcc: FYI, Jeffrey Thayer and Richard McDonald made a videotape some years ago, in which they discussed evidence that the U.S. Court of Claims had updated their local rules to reflect a ton of new court rules to handle the anticipated surge in wrongful death claims due to a "planned" innoculation program. Does anybody have anything more on these rules? /s/ Paul Mitchell At 01:49 AM 11/9/96 -0600, you wrote: > >-> SearchNet's snetnews Mailing List > >From: dsale@users.southeast.net (Danny Sale) >Subject: Baby-Killing Vaccine being tested(fwd) >Date: Sat, 09 Nov 1996 06:57:16 GMT > > >Baby-killing vaccine: Is it being stealth tested? >by James A. Miller > >During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been overseeing >massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among >them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a >communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comit Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding >that country's anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign >protocols, the Comit obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them >analyzed by chemists. Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic >gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a >pregnancy. > >hCG and anti-hCG antibodies. > >In nature the hCG hormone alerts the women's body that she is pregnant and >causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the >implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after >conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a >woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but >for the elevated presence of hCG. However, when introduced into the body >coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only >against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize >hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. These antibodies will >attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a >pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is >rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.1 > > HLI reported the sketchy facts regarding the Mexican tetanus vaccines to its >World Council members and affiliates in more than 60 countries.2 Soon additional >reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones began to drift in from the >Philippines, where more than 3.4 million women were recently vaccinated. Similar >reports came from Nicaragua, which had conducted its own vaccination campaign in >1993. > >The known facts here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination >campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines: > >Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. >(In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49). But aren't men at least as likely as >young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why >are they excluded? > > Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It >does not belong there -- in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the >vaccine has been "contaminated." > >The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections -- three within three >months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide >protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for? > >WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an >anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier -- the >exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua >vaccines. > >The anti-fertility gang > >Allied with the WHO in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine (AFV) using >hCG with tetanus and other carriers have been UNFPA, the UN Development >Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller >Foundation, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and a number of >universities, including Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State.5 The U.S. National >Institute of Child Health and Human Development (part of NIH) was the supplier >of the hCG hormone in some of the AFV experiments.6 The WHO began its "Special >Programme" in human reproduction in 1972, and by 1993 had spent more than $356 >million on "reproductive health" research.7 It is this "Programme" which has >pioneered the development of the abortifacient vaccine. Over $9 million of this >Programme's funds were contributed by Sweden; Great Britain donated more than >$52 million, while Norway, Denmark and Germany kicked in for $41 million, >$27 million, and $12 million, respectively. The U.S., thanks to the cut-off of >such funding during the Reagan-Bush administrations, has contributed "only" >$5.7 million, including a new payment in 1993 by the Clinton administration of >$2.5 million. > > Other major contributors to the WHO Programme include UNFPA, $61 million; the >World Bank, $15.5 million; the Rockefeller Foundation, $2.5 million; the Ford >Foundation, over $1 million; and the IDRC (International Research and Development >Centre of Canada), $716.5 thousand. > >WHO and Philippine Health Department excuses > >When the first reports surfaced in the Philippines of tetanus toxoid vaccine >being laced with hCG hormones, the WHO and the Philippine Department of Health >(DOH) immediately denied that the vaccine contained hCG. Confronted with the >results of laboratory tests which detected its presence in three of the four >vials of tetanus toxoid examined, the WHO and DOH scoffed at the evidence >coming from "right-to-life and Catholic" sources. Four new vials of the tetanus >vaccine were submitted by DOH to St. Luke's (Lutheran) Medical Center in Manila >-- and all four vials tested positive for hCG! From outright denial the stories >now shifted to the allegedly "insignificant" quantity of the hCG present; the >volume of hCG present is insufficient to produce anti-hCG antibodies. But new >tests designed to detect the presence of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of >women vaccinated with the tetanus toxoid vaccine were undertaken by Philippine >pro-life and Catholic groups. Of thirty women tested subsequent to receiving >tetanus toxoid vaccine, 26 tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG >antibodies! If there were no hCG in the vaccine, or if it were present in only >"insignificant" quantities, why were the vaccinated women found to be harboring >anti-hCG antibodies? > > The WHO and the DOH had no answers. New arguments surfaced: hCG's apparent >presence in the vaccine was due to "false positives" resulting from the >particular substances mixed in the vaccine or in the chemicals testing for hCG. >And even if hCG was really there, its presence derived from the manufacturing >process. But the finding of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of vaccinated >women obviated the need to get bogged down in such debates. It was no longer >necessary to argue about what may or may not have been the cause of the hCG >presence, when one now had the effect of the hCG. There is no known way for the >vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been >artificially introduced into their bodies! > >Why a tetanus toxoid "carrier"? > >Because the human body does not attack its own naturally occurring hormone hCG, >the body has to be fooled into treating hCG as an invading enemy in order to >develop a successful anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG antibodies. A paper >delivered at the 4th International Congress of Reproductive Immunology (Kiel, >West Germany, 26-29 July 1989) spelled it out: "Linkage to a carrier was done >to overcome the immunological tolerance to hCG." > >Vaccine untested by Drug Bureau > >After the vaccine controversy had reached a fever pitch, a new bombshell >exploded: none of the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used had >ever been licensed for sale and distribution or registered with the Philippine >Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD), as required bylaw. The head of the BAFD lamely >explained that the companies distributing these brands "did not apply for >registration."9 The companies in question are Connaught Laboratories Ltd. And >Intervex, both from Canada, and CSL Laboratories from Australia. It seemed that >the BAFD might belatedly require re-testing, but the idea was quickly rejected >when the Secretary of Health declared that, since the vaccines had been >certified by the WHO -- there they are again! -- there was assurance enough >that the "vaccines come from reputable manufacturers."10 Just how "reputable" >one of the manufacturers might be is open to some question. In the mid-'80s >Connaught Laboratories was found to be knowingly distributing vials of >AIDS-contaminated blood products. > >Epilogue > >At this juncture, evidence is beginning to appear from Africa.12 HLI has called >for a Congressional investigation of the situation, inasmuch as nearly every >agency involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine is funded, at >least in part, with U.S. monies. > >Notes > >1 "Abortifacient vaccines loom as new threat," HLI Reports, November >1993,pp.1-2. > >2 World Council Reports, 28 November 1994, pp. 4-5. > >3 A call placed by this writer on 5 May 1995 to the Montgomery County (Maryland) >Health Department, Epidemiology Division Infectious Diseases Adult Immunizations, >elicited the following information: Q. For how long a time does the tetanus >vaccination offer protection? A. 10 years. Q. Have you ever heard of any adult >requiring three tetanus vaccinations within a 3 or 4 month time period, and a >total of 5 vaccinations in all within a year or so? A. Whaaaat! Never. No way! >Reports from the Philippines appear to confirm the 10-year immunity afforded by >tetanus toxoid vaccinations: prior to the campaigns begun in 1993, the so-called >booster shots were given only every 10-years. > >4 More than a score of articles, many written by WHO researchers, document >WHO's attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid as >a carrier. Some leading articles include:"Clinical profile and Toxicology >Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT,"Contraception, February, >1976, pp. 253-268."Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a >candidate antipregnancy vaccine: --subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin >linked to tetanus toxoid," Fertility and Sterility,October 1980, pp. >328-335."Phase 1 Clinical Trials of a World Health Organization Birth Control >Vaccine," The Lancet, 11 June 1988, pp. 1295-1298."Vaccines for Fertility >Regulation," Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction, >Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and >Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988)."Anti-hCG Vaccines >are in Clinical Trials," Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Vol. 36,1992, >pp. 123-126. > >5 These institutional names are garnered from the journal articles cited in the >previous footnote.6 Lancet, 11 June 1988, at p. 1296. Challenges in Reproductive >Health Research, Biennial Report 1992-1993, World Health Organization, Geneva, >1994, p. 186. G.P. Talwar, et al, "Prospects of an anti-hCG vaccine inducing >antibodies of high affinity...(etc)," Reproductive Technology 1989, Elsevier >Science Publishers, 1990, Amsterdam, New York, p. 231. "3 DOH vaccines untested >by BFAD," The Philippine Star, 4 April 1995, pp. 1, 12 10 "BFAD junks re-testing >of controversial shot," Manila Standard, 7 April 1995; "DOH: Toxoid vaccines are >safe," The Philippine Star, 7 April 1995. 11 "Ottawa got blood tainted by HIV." >Ottawa Citizen, 4 April 1995.12 A nearly two-year old communique from Tanzania >tells a familiar story: tetanus toxoid vaccinations, five in all, given only to >women aged 15-45. Nigeria, too, may have been victimized; see The Lancet, 4 June >1988, p. 1273. > > > > > > > > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@alterzone.com >-> Posted by: rlawler@dfw.net (Rick Lawler) > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail