Time: Sat Nov 09 15:20:58 1996
To: tab@hollyent.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: numbers
Cc: 
Bcc: 

What was the voter turnout?
Maybe those who didn't show
are really with us, but too
bitter and/or jaded to bother
any longer.  Then, of course,
there is the problem of 
Vote Scam.  Maybe the numbers
are a total lie.  It wouldn't
be the first time.  What bothers
me no end is that I attempted
to raise this question in a few
Libertarian email lists, and
I got shouted out by a pack of
wolves.  Maybe they are heavily
infiltrated too.  It wouldn't
be the first time, or the last.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


>>I must agree with Bob Knauer -- the libertarian vote total needs a really
>>honest examination by the LP -- and all of the third parties need to do the
>>same.
>>
>>All signs pointed to a hugh defection from the D&R -- seldom have BOTH
>>candidates been so rejected, yet the third party totals were miserable.
>>
>>Perhaps we are strangers in our own land?
>>
>>Regards,
>> Frank T. Brady
>
>I'll ask around.
>Doc
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>Browne didn't even get as many votes as Nader??? Ralph Nader???
>>>>>Good Grief! It's hopeless.
>>
>>>>No...it's name recognition.
>>
>>
>>>Whatever - I am really surprised that Browne did so poorly. From all I was
>>>led to believe by the 20 or so Libertarian Party members on the Internet
>>>(which I now suspect comprise the entire LP membership), Browne was going to
>>>get at least 25% of the vote. Remember?
>>>
>>>Something is seriously wrong with the LP if Nader can out draw its candidate.
>>>
>>>At least the LP vote did not re-elect klintoon as I had feared - those few
>>>votes for Browne were lost in the rounding error for the other two candidates.
>>>
>>>It was Perot who re-elected klintoon, again.
>>>
>>>When the JBGTs come to take your guns from you, recall this sad day in
>>>American history.
>>>
>>>Bob Knauer
>>>
>>>--
>>>       
>>>**************************************************
>>>    A I M N E T       Advanced Internet Marketing
>>>    Corporation        World Wide Web Publishing 
>>>
>>> <websales@aimtec.com>   http://www.aimtec.com/
>>>**************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>========================================================================
>>>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com
>>>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field.  Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>>>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
>>>    email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com
>>>For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com
>>>======================================================================== 
>>>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>========================================================================
>>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com
>>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field.  Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
>>    email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com
>>For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com
>>======================================================================== 
>>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>========================================================================
>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com
>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field.  Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
>    email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com
>For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com
>======================================================================== 
>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com
>
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail