Time: Sun Nov 10 06:08:51 1996
To: tab@hollyent.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Liberty Town or Patriot Heartland, etc.
Cc: 
Bcc: 

The federal government will be leaving
the Arizona Republic within five years.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



At 12:35 AM 11/10/96 -0700, you wrote:
>================[ Distributed Message ]================
>         ListServer: TAB (Take America Back Mail List)
>               Type: Not Moderated
>     Distributed on: 10-NOV-96, 00:35:04
>Original Written by: IN:ewolfe@involved.com.
>=======================================================
>
>
>Erin and I were discussing something that turned up in a thread
>on Liberty & Justice mailing list (liberty-and-justice@pobox.com)
>and we want to move our discussion to that list and TAB (Take America
>Back, tab@hollyent.com) so others can discuss this with us. Here's
>how it started, and I've added a few things in brackets:
>
>Erin wrote:
>
>> I'm also trying to figure which
>> State would be the best to live in and be a State citizen of.
>> It would be helpful if there was a WebSite that graded States on
>> it's Constitutional merits and adherences, like members of
>> Congress are listed on how they vote on gun issues in the excellent
>> GOA brochures.  Let me know if you find a State by State Constitutional
>> Grading Page, or make one, hint, hint, :)
>
>Excellent idea! I'll ask a couple militias if they have anything on
>this, and if not, if they can get anyone to work on it. In addition,
>I'll put something on my web page requesting reports from people in
>different states as far as they can advise.
>
>It makes a lot of sense when you consider that we *know* what is
>coming.
>And we know we're going to resist it. I'm not taking any Mark of the
>Beast, I'm not giving up my guns or children (I've got one on the way)
>to the damned State.
>
>When one faces the prospect of a war, one prepares. In a war on the
>Republic and the freedoms within, we need to scope out the best terrain
>that will fortify our position and lend to our defense. Constitutionally
>speaking.
>
>Locating a state that is most in alignment with the const'n would
>logically be the best place to attempt holding out in the long run and
>attempting local and national reform in the short run.
>
>If there was to be a literal war, soldiers would not be scattered all
>over the place, concentrated only in a few pockets and working
>independent of the others. They would be centralized, co-ordinated and
>in communication.
>
>[People gravitate toward where their interests are best served. If I
>named
>some types of people, I bet you'd come up with geographical locations.
>Try it:
>Mormons.....Cowboys.....Hippies/Granola People....Homosexuals.....
>Actors.....Models.   Get the idea? When these people have a political
>interest, they know they can best accomplish it where they have a
>majority.]
>
>Now imagine if we took the cyber-patriot community and made it a real
>live community.
>And yet here we are all over the place with a powerful but ethereal
>connection.
>
>Would Patriots and True Americans not flock to our state and communities
>as soon as it became known that we existed?
>
>And when the time comes that we are to be incorporated into a U.N.
>Nation State, we could do like the Republic of Texas and opt out of the
>Union.
>
>The World Government would either ignore us for a while, since they have
>an entire planet to incorporate, and besides they have to maintain their
>pretenses of civility until they are fully established.  [If World Gov't
>is going
>to start voluntarily at first, there will be no retribution for not
>joining. If it is
>going to be mandatory and all dissidents eliminated, we're doomed
>anyway.]
>Or our gov't would simply drop a bomb on us, but I don't see why. The
>rest of the
>country can march off to be damned, what difference would it make if one
>little state said, "I want out."
>
>We would merely be one of hundreds of other nations not yet members of
>the U.N. Global Federation.
>
>I'm gonna work on this. It's a lot more realistic, sensible, necessary,
>and attainable a goal than Poley's Culture X. And it isn't as "extreme"
>as the Republic of Texas. [Although it may lead to that. And if it did,
>having
>state where the majority of the people were of a like mind, it would be
>much more successful.]
>
>
>And no patriot has an excuse not to move to a state determined to be the
>most constitutionally sound.
>
>We can create the last outpost of Freedom. I hope others see this the
>way I do. We don't have a lot of time left. I won't spend any time on
>convincing people that it's a good idea. It will have to be obvious. The
>idea will have to be self-selling and attract people to it. Time has to
>be spent determining  the right state, making contacts there, planning
>the move, and then making the money to get there.
>
>[Constructive criticism is welcome. Discussing possiblities, problems,
>etc.,
>is fine and needed. But I'm not interested in anyone who wants to tell
>me what an idealistic fool I am. Feel free to do so, but attacks on the
>idea or attempts to consume time and energy with argument will for
>the most part, be ignored. I'm not paranoid enough to think that
>everyone
>who disagrees with me is a plant,  but if someone takes away from
>something
>more than they can or will add to it, they may as well be if their
>product is
>the same.]
>
>Once there is a network established of the current and new residents, it
>will be extremely easy to bring in new families if people would agree to
>host a newcomer to ease their cost of transplant expenses until they are
>established. Ofcourse, we'd want to set up jobs and houses or apt.s in
>advance as much as possible. But if someone I know wanted to join up
>a.s.a.p. I'd take 'em.
>
>And if I can establish my business there, I might be able to help people
>out with a temporary job to get started.
>
>[So, this is the basic idea. Establish which state is the most in
>alignment
>with the constitution. Move to that state and add to the base of people
>that
>have already made the state as good as it is. Start an organization
>there
>like something called, "Freedom Foundation." This would be a place for
>people to get information, to network and meet each other. Like a
>townhall-coffeeshop-library-bookstore rolled into one. There could also
>be
>Resource center there where people would call to co-ordinate moving to
>the state, finding patriots with places to rent, jobs to offer, etc.
>
>This would also be a place to establish political activism like the
>repeal of
>unconstitutional laws and politicians who have violated their oaths.
>ETC.
>The goal would be to bring the state, (maybe starting with counties or
>cities
>first, whatever scope we're capable of at first,)  in perfect alignment
>with
>the constitution. I foresee a place with a low crime rate and a high
>standard
>of living.
>
>With a patriot community establishing itself, and becoming known by
>various methods, it will naturally attract people. Not even just
>patriots.
>Christians, elderly, people who just want a decent place to live and see
>that there will soon no longer be an American Way.
>
>If you knew that a place like this existed right now, would you be
>interested
>in moving there?   I would.   If you know of such a place, I'd love to
>hear
>about it.  If you like the idea and would like to help make it happen,
>please
>reply on this list (L&J or TAB) or contact me at liberty@involved.com,
>pnet@uscom.com (Tom Paine) Erin donelle@snowcrest.net (Erin Donelle.)
>
>I'm sorry if this is kind of disorganized, disjointed, and too brief
>while being
>too long. I'm trying to convey something big in a small amount of space
>and
>my daughter would rather have me look at pictures of "doggies" with her
>than
>type on my computer and keeps dragging me away.
>
>Erin has had more to say on this this that I'll post in a follow up for
>the sake
>of brevity.]
>
>
>-- 
>
>
>Nation In Distress
>http://www.involved.com/ewolfe/index2.htm
>Free the Macon Three!
>
>
>
>
>========================================================================
>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com
>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field.  Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
>    email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com
>For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com
>======================================================================== 
>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com
>
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail