Time: Mon Nov 11 14:42:42 1996 To: Parity Tech Support <TECH@paritysw.COM> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: WALLENS.EXE Cc: Bcc: Reed, The WALLENS briefs can be sequenced by the date last modified, using the DS command in the Norton Utilities, or you can go by the dates above the signatures, on the very last page of each brief (not counting the Proof of Service page). No, there is no table of contents. I seem to recall making minor clerical updats to some of her briefs, so the date-last-modified will not correspond to chronological sequence. Use the dates above the signature lines, on the last page of each brief (or the Proof of Service date is also close enough). /s/ Paul Mitchell At 10:13 AM 11/11/96, you wrote: > >Dear Paul, > >Thank you for Wallens.exe I can use BinHex readily. > >I got the file at home on Saturday, as I recall, and expanded it into its >directory. I printed 3 or 5 of the documents and read Browning.doc, >affidav.doc and browsed some others (cover, header, counnad1 ...). There is one header for the USDC and another for the DCUS. These are just templates, so I don't have to re-type them every time I start a new pleading. > >I am wondering if there is a sequence to read them in? chronological, always. there are file >dates but some of them seem (to me to be) out of order based on my >reading of the content. go by the dates above the signature lines. Is there available a table of contents, like your >once before routing table for SSAFF... documents, no. or shall I just print >them and start reading, alphabetically by filename I suppose? print them all, then pencil the upper-right of the first page of any brief, using the date above the signature line > >Pegasus took about 20 minutes to download the 3 emails that were there, >Wallens and FOIAGUID were the big ones. I'm glad to get any large files at work >(this email address) and take the contents home on a floppies. Please make it simple on me: tell me where you want all of this stuff. It is extra work for me to customize routing (e.g. small here, large there). Occam's Razor helps here. > >WinWord6 converts them fine into Courier font (monospaced) and 12-point size. >Seems to preserve the bold and underline but the commas are ugly in >courier, looking very much like periods, but otherwise easy to read. >Comparing with the 17-18 page document you mailed a hard copy of my print >is pageed properly but not as elegant/proper as yours. I've been looking >for Word for DOS for over a year, for times I want to print and don't want >to launch Windows to do it, and have been unable, in my casual style, to >locate a set. I see. This is a problem which Microsoft has created; call them and see if you can pay them to use my copy. Upon receipt of your receipt, I will email you the entire thing, in .EXE self-extracting archive format. > >Questions: >1. There was one doc that referred to the "attachment" for the Browning letter >but I don't know what the attachment was. Is it one of the docs that I >have? I don't remember. I will look at it. > >2. Where is the "original Thirteenth Amendment" available? Write to the Colorado State Records Custodian, and ask for the copy of the U.S. Constitution extant as of the year 1867. They will show you a version with the original 13th, and the 14th is the slavery ban; that's it (no more amendments as of 1867). > >Love, >Reed > >ps: our email style: I'll chop older commented-out messages when I >notice them, unless there is (is there?) a reason to keep them. When you get 14MB of inbound email in the space of 18.5 days, you don't always have the luxury of tidying each and every response. Sorry, Reed, but I have had several clients stiff me for over $25,000 of legal work in the past 8 months, because they have chosen to believe that I am some kind of deep-cover federal or state government agent. People will rationalize anything; but, unfortunately, I am very strapped for time and funds right now. Yes, luxuries are nice, but necessities come first. By the way, I just REPLY to the origin email address; if you want me to route answers to your home, then originate your request from there; if you want me to route answers to your work, then originate your request from there. Fair enough? /s/ Paul Mitchell > > >> To: tech@PARITYSW >> Date: 09-Nov-96 07:19:11 -0700 >> From: pmitch@UUCP (Paul Andrew Mitchell) {pmitch@primenet.com} >> Subject: WALLENS.EXE > >> WALLENS.EXE attached in BinHex encoding. >> I can also encode with MIME and Uuencode. >> Please advise if you cannot run and read >> the attached. >> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail