Time: Mon Nov 11 23:58:53 1996 To: minutemn@pcl.net (Mike Kemp) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Pony Express Cc: Richard McDonald Bcc: Mike, Great! Thanks!! Let's start thinking about "federal questions." My latest one, for application in state cases, is the research which Richard McDonald and I have done on the subordination of Union States (de facto versions) beneath the District of Columbia, by accommodation of the bankruptcy secretly declared in 1933. This means, for example, that there must be two sets of state district courts, one de jure and the other de facto. In California, they are even titled differently: Superior Court of the State of California and superior Court of California state There are cites in 31 CFR which support this finding: 31 CFR 51.2 and 52.2. So, if the Corporate State and its agents have moved against you, and if this Corporate State is a political subdivision of the District of Columbia, then you have an important question, a la the Buck Act, to remove into federal court. Having said this, I can confidently say that all the research is done to prove that the correct court, into which you should remove your case, is the District Court of the United States, NOT the United States District Court. Since there are no judges currently qualified or competent to sit on the DCUS, you stand a very good chance of effectively staying your case indefinitely, or until such time as this collateral challenge to the federal courts is worked out, probably via some grand compromise. I am willing to stipulate that federal citizens do not have standing to make this challenge; that would be an acceptable compromise to me, but I have no idea if it would be an acceptable compromise to the Supreme Court, particularly since these findings require quite a full disclosure of the Saran Wrap fraud which has been stretched out over the entire Union. More on this later. I am sharing this with Richard McDonald, who will be happy to assist us at this very point. Did you send me the indictments and other pertinent papers? /s/ Paul Mitchell >Paul: > Though the Express is not riding today, it is in their hands. > >Mike > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail