Time: Tue Nov 12 01:08:58 1996
To: nwlibertarians@teleport.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: NWLibs> Re: STUNG
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Don't blame me.
I tried to vote,
and they wouldn't let me!

/s/ Paul Mitchell



At 11:08 PM 11/11/96 -0800, you wrote:
>Another Linda Thompson hater! Cool!
>
>RogErick@aol.com wrote:
>> 
>> re: your post of Linda Tompson.
>>   She is already a proven liar from previous posts.
>>    She is a proven liar from her videos, discrediting
>> otherwise very ponient points, like why CS gas was used
>> against American children by our poliece 8 months after
>> teh Paris January agreement not to use in in 'enclosed
>> environs' against even Iraqui soldiers...with subtile
>> lies, later proven by media reporters, to show how
>> 'stupid' the patriots and libertarians are.
>>    She is the one who advocated an armed march on the
>> District of Criminals, to take the go vernment by force.
>> 
>>   Now she discredits Nancy Lord, who has defended successfully
>> many cases that are making SC precedents in our favor.
>>   I often wonder about her motivations.  Is she just rabidly
>> blind in her rage against injustice, or is it a deliberate
>> disinformation to discredit and expose patriots and sympathisers
>> with victims of government tyrany?
>>   Remember the progression of the Establishment to threats to
>> it's power:  First, ignore, then discredit.  Then spread disinformation.
>> Then attack and remove the source of power (ususally money, and
>> usually by IRS.)   Finally, jail or kill them, like Gordon Kahl,
>> if they still threaten the monetary base of the beast.
>>   Have you ever wondered why counterfieters get more time than
>> murders?
>> Roger
>
>-- 
>>>---------------------------------CUT------------------------------------------<<
>
>How long will it take Clinton's lies to to put him where he belongs?
>(he belongs in line for welfare as the door closes with a sign that says
>"closed due to lack of funds".) Let somebody who can stomach him support 
>him. 
>
>
>Don't blame me, I voted for Harry Browne!
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail