Time: Tue Nov 12 22:57:58 1996 To: PawlRevere@aol.com, militia-request@atype.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Re: Depopulation Cc: Bcc: >Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 22:57:35 >To: JOhm999@aol.com >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: Re: Depopulation > >As I have said before, >they are accusing us of crimes >which they are committing. >Speak for yourself, Ted! > >/s/ Paul Mitchell > > > >At 12:52 AM 11/13/96 -0500, you wrote: >>Dear friends: >> >>Here is up-to-date news on D E P O P U L A T I O N.... >>Downloaded from the Michael Reagan web page. This is especially important >>given the fact that at Gorbachev's "State of the World Forum" one of the >>scientists [sorry forgot name and don't have time to look it up.] said, "We >>don't have an environmental problem, we have a population problem. Get rid >>of 9 out of 10 people by the year 2000 and there won't be an environmental >>problem." They call us "useless eaters." Ted Turner who was one of the >>attendees at the "State of the World Forum," keeps calling the Aerican people >>"stupid" because people are unaware of what they are doing. [I can provide >>documentation on their depopulation plans.] >> MARYLOU (LULU) IN RENO >> >> "STOP THE SIGNING" >> >>Tell your congressman and the White House not to sign the silly document! >>Susan >>Roylance, of United Families International urged on the Michael Regean show >>today from the Rome World Food Summit. The document does not address >>increased food >>production for the world. It will, however, provide hundreds of millions of >>dollars to >>governments PROVIDED they agree to eliminate people. >> >>Tomorrow Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman arrives in Rome to sign, for >>the >>260,000,000 people of the United States, the Rome World Food Security and >>Plan of >>Action document. This document will become part of the United Nations' body >>of >>International law which will impact families for generations to come, Susan >>noted. >> >>This is no promotion in the document of the free enterprise method of helping >>a country grow and become able to take care of itself. The idea of the >>conference, she said, is to teach, in fact to demand by government action, >>population control instead of teaching them how to grow food effectively. The >>first three rows of delegates to the conference, she noted today, all >>introduced themselves as representatives of population control organizations >>throughout the world. Delegates who have come from all over the world to >>share their knowledge of effective food production are not only being >>ignored, they are, in effect, considered hindrances in the drive to push >>governmental, Chinese style population control, and extreme environmentalist >>viewpoints which consider modern farms, like those in America which feed the >>nation with plenty to spare, evils to be stopped. >> >>No one is promoting the system that has helped America become the breadbasket >>of the world. In fact, it is being OPPOSED here by our own government! Susan >>Roylance reported. This planet can do much more than it is doing to feed >>people. We don't need to eliminate people. We need to feed them. There are >>people here who can teach the rest of the world how to do it - and they are >>not being allowed to share their knowledge! >> >>She urges that people call the Dept. of Agriculture at 202-720-3631 to urge >>that Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman not sign the document. Also, call >>the White House at 202-456-1414 and your members of Congress to demand that >>the document not be signed until it better reflects America's values and its >>successful methods of food production. >> ----0---- >> >> >> At Issue at the UN World Food Summit: >> More Food Production versus Elimination of Hungry People? >> by: Mary Mostert >> >>The twenty four page Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food >>Summit Plan of Actions that will be adopted at the UN Conference in Rome next >>week declares: >> >>Reaching sustainable world food security is part and parcel of achieving the >>social, >>economic, environmental and human development objectives agreed upon in >>recent >>international conferences. >> >>The World Food Summit Plan of Action builds on consensus reached in these >>forums and is based on the conviction that although the world is faced with >>major food insecurity, solutions to these problems exist. If all parties at >>local, national, regional and international levels make determined and >>sustained efforts, then the overall goal of food for all, at all times, will >>be achieved. >> >>No one is going to object to the goal of getting people fed. "Food >>insecurity" is a problem on our front pages daily - in Bosnia, in Rwanda, now >>in Zaire - it very often is caused by war. >> >>The first paragraph of the document states: "We, the Heads of State and >>Government, or our representatives, gathered at the World Food Summit at the >>invitation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, >>reaffirm the right of everyone to have access to safe and nutritious food, >>consistent with the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of >>everyone to be free from hunger." >> >>In effect, those countries that sign the document are accepting the notion >>that a full >>stomach is a "right." In implementing that "right," just exactly what will >>all the >>governments of the world pledge? >>To stop wars? Unlikely. >>To take from the haves and give to the have-nots? Likely. >>To eliminate unwanted people one way or the other? Very likely. >> >>Population Control is buried in the document with the words: >> 15. Objective 1.2: >> To ensure stable economic conditions and implement development strategies >>which >>encourage the full potential of private and public, individual and >> collective initiatives for sustainable, equitable, economic and social >>development which also integrate population and environmental concerns. To >>this end, governments, and as appropriate, in partnership with all actors >>of civil society, will: >> >> a. Promote policies in order to foster a national and international >>environment that is >>more conducive to sustainable, equitable economic and social development; >> b. Establish legal and other mechanisms, as appropriate, that advance land >>reform, >> recognize and protect property, water, and user rights, to enhance access >>for the >>poor and women to resources. Such mechanisms should also promote conservation >>and sustainable use of natural resources (such as land, water and forests), >>lower risks, and encourage investment; >> c. Fully integrate population concerns into development strategies, plans, >>and >>decision-making, including factors affecting migration, and devise >>appropriate >>population policies, programmes and family planning services, consistent with >>the >>Report and the Programme of Action of the International Conference on >>Population and Development (Cairo, 1994). >> >>So, it seems, this document, which will become part of a vast body of >>international law, proposes to provide "food security" via standard socialism >>on an international basis: Land reform (which already has caused nations >>like Zimbabwe to move from a food exporting country, to a food importing >>country), population control, violation of individual and even NATIONAL >>property rights. >> >>Susan Roylance, president of United Families International, who participated >>in the >>planning sessions for the document had success in getting into the document >>language which would recognize the importance of "families'in growing food >>and abolishing hunger. >> >>Somewhere between the writing of the document and the opening of the >>Conference, that language has again been taken out and strong pro-population >>control, anti-property rights language inserted. >> >>Julia Mavimbela, of Soweto South Africa, who has taught generations of >>children and >>adults gardening methods which provide better nutrition for very little >>money, will be a >>key member of the United Families International delegation. Robert Roylance, >>general manager for Farm Management Company, with the responsibility for >>managing numerous farms throughout the United States and is associated with a >>number of foreign farming operations, will present his paper "Population >>Control or Sustainable Agriculture?" at the World Food Summit. >> >> ----0---- >> >> Practical Food Production Knowledge Is Ignored >> At Food Summit >> Robert Roylance - A Professional Farmer >> >>Robert C. Roylance grew up on a family farm, with four brothers and sisters. >>He has a degree in Agronomy and Agriculture Economics from Brigham Young >>University and owned his own farm when he was asked to become General Manager >>of Prior Land Company in Washington State. Currently he is a General Manager >>for Farm Management Company where he is responsible for managing numerous >>farms throughout the United States and is associated with foreign farming >>operations. >> >>A perfect resume for anyone interested in really learning how to increase >>food production? >>You'd think so. The United Nations delegates at the World Food Summit don't. >>They don't seem to be interested in those, like Bob Roylance, who not only >>know how to increase food production, but have a lifetime of experience doing >>it. The mind set in Washington DC, and at the Rome World Food Summit is that >>we MUST have fewer people. >>Especially those dark skinned ones. Roylance is expert in both small scale >>farming, family farming, and large scale commercial farming. In his report >>"Population Control or Sustainable Agriculture notes that through education >>of better agricultural practices, agriculture educators and government policy >>makers should encourage and train small scale farmers to become self >>sufficient. Many times it is difficult to maintain small scale farming when >>striving for free trade and promoting a higher standard of living for the >>population at large. An example of this in the financial difficulty the small >>rural Mexican farmer is currently faced with. They cannot compete on the >>world market due to their lack of (1)economically sized farm, (2) operating >>capital and (3) understanding the technical aspects of modern farming." >> >>All the problems he mentions are solvable. Many nations, including the United >>States and Canada, have solved them to such an extent "government's problem" >>is trying to stop them from producing too much. In America and Canada the >>people would not tolerate a Chinese style forced abortion policy to control >>population. Yet, that is the choice America is, in effect, giving the >>undeveloped nations. In order to receive "help" from the Western governments >>for increasing food production, they must first agree to a governmental >>policy on population control. >> >>Bob Roylance notes in his research paper: "It has been projected that the >>world population will double sometime around the year 2050, with the >>population growth rate stabilizing thereafter. This will require that the >>world food production be increased 2.5 to 3 times the current food >>production. This challenge can be achieved if the following actions are >>implemented: >> >>Utilize proven agriculture technologies that will optimize food production >>without >>compromising the environment. This includes the judicious use of fertilizers >>and >>pesticides. >> >>Support scientific research that will continue providing improvements in >>technologies used for crop and livestock production. >>Support and encourage the improved education of farm families in developing >>countries. >>Reduce trade barriers that will allow food to flow freely to all countries at >>lower prices. >>This will: >>allow food to be produced in areas that have a comparative advantage. >>result in more affordable food products, and improve the standard of living >>for the world - especially for the developing countries. >> >>The adoption of these actions will assure the world of an adequate supply of >>food well >>into the future without jeopardizing the sensitive nature of rural families. >>When policy >>makers come to the realization that the farmers of the world can provide >>ample food >>supplies, the energy they have been using to promote population control can >>be used to help strengthen existing families. >> >> >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail