Time: Tue Nov 12 22:57:58 1996
To: PawlRevere@aol.com, militia-request@atype.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: Depopulation
Cc: 
Bcc: 

>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 22:57:35
>To: JOhm999@aol.com
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Re: Depopulation
>
>As I have said before,
>they are accusing us of crimes
>which they are committing.
>Speak for yourself, Ted!
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
>
>At 12:52 AM 11/13/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>Dear friends:
>>
>>Here is up-to-date news on D E P O P U L A T I O N....
>>Downloaded from the Michael Reagan web page.  This is especially important
>>given the fact that at Gorbachev's "State of the World Forum" one of the
>>scientists [sorry forgot name and don't have time to look it up.] said, "We
>>don't have an environmental problem, we have a population problem.  Get rid
>>of 9 out of 10 people by the year 2000 and there won't be an environmental
>>problem."  They call us "useless eaters."  Ted Turner who was one of the
>>attendees at the "State of the World Forum," keeps calling the Aerican people
>>"stupid"  because people are unaware of what they are doing. [I can provide
>>documentation on their depopulation plans.]
>>                                                MARYLOU (LULU) IN RENO
>>
>>                 "STOP THE SIGNING"
>> 
>>Tell your congressman and the White House not to sign the silly document!
>>Susan
>>Roylance, of United Families International urged on the Michael Regean show
>>today from the Rome World Food Summit. The document does not address
>>increased food
>>production for the world. It will, however, provide hundreds of millions of
>>dollars to
>>governments PROVIDED they agree to eliminate people.
>>
>>Tomorrow Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman arrives in Rome to sign, for
>>the
>>260,000,000 people of the United States, the Rome World Food Security and
>>Plan of
>>Action document. This document will become part of the United Nations' body
>>of
>>International law which will impact families for generations to come, Susan
>>noted.
>>
>>This is no promotion in the document of the free enterprise method of helping
>>a country grow and become able to take care of itself. The idea of the
>>conference, she said, is to teach, in fact to demand by government action,
>>population control instead of teaching them how to grow food effectively. The
>>first three rows of delegates to the conference, she noted today, all
>>introduced themselves as representatives of population control organizations
>>throughout the world. Delegates who have come from all over the world to
>>share their knowledge of effective food production are not only being
>>ignored, they are, in effect, considered hindrances in the drive to push
>>governmental, Chinese style population control, and extreme environmentalist
>>viewpoints which consider modern farms, like those in America which feed the
>>nation with plenty to spare, evils to be stopped.
>>
>>No one is promoting the system that has helped America become the breadbasket
>>of the world. In fact, it is being OPPOSED here by our own government! Susan
>>Roylance reported. This planet can do much more than it is doing to feed
>>people. We don't need to eliminate people. We need to feed them. There are
>>people here who can teach the rest of the world how to do it - and they are
>>not being allowed to share their knowledge!
>>
>>She urges that people call the Dept. of Agriculture at 202-720-3631 to urge
>>that Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman not sign the document. Also, call
>>the White House at 202-456-1414 and your members of Congress to demand that
>>the document not be signed until it better reflects America's values and its
>>successful methods of food production.
>>                                                        ----0----
>>

>>
>>                                  At Issue at the UN World Food Summit:  
>>                More Food Production versus Elimination of Hungry People? 
>>                                    by: Mary Mostert
>>
>>The twenty four page Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food
>>Summit Plan of Actions that will be adopted at the UN Conference in Rome next
>>week declares:
>>
>>Reaching sustainable world food security is part and parcel of achieving the
>>social,
>>economic, environmental and human development objectives agreed upon in
>>recent
>>international conferences.
>>
>>The World Food Summit Plan of Action builds on consensus reached in these
>>forums and is based on the conviction that although the world is faced with
>>major food insecurity, solutions to these problems exist. If all parties at
>>local, national, regional and international levels make determined and
>>sustained efforts, then the overall goal of food for all, at all times, will
>>be achieved.
>>
>>No one is going to object to the goal of getting people fed. "Food
>>insecurity" is a problem on our front pages daily - in Bosnia, in Rwanda, now
>>in Zaire - it very often is caused by war.
>>
>>The first paragraph of the document states: "We, the Heads of State and
>>Government, or our representatives, gathered at the World Food Summit at the
>>invitation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,
>>reaffirm the right of everyone to have access to safe and nutritious food,
>>consistent with the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of
>>everyone to be free from hunger."
>>
>>In effect, those countries that sign the document are accepting the notion
>>that a full
>>stomach is a "right."  In implementing that "right," just exactly what will
>>all the
>>governments of the world pledge?  
>>To stop wars?  Unlikely.  
>>To take from the haves and give to the have-nots?  Likely.
>>To eliminate unwanted people one way or the other?  Very likely.
>>
>>Population Control is buried in the document with the words:
>> 15.  Objective 1.2:
>> To ensure stable economic conditions and implement  development strategies
>>which
>>encourage the full  potential of private and public, individual and
>> collective initiatives for sustainable, equitable,  economic and social
>>development which also integrate  population and environmental concerns. To
>>this end,  governments, and as appropriate, in partnership with  all actors
>>of civil society, will:
>>
>> a. Promote policies in order to foster a national and international
>>environment that is
>>more conducive to sustainable, equitable economic and social development;
>> b. Establish legal and other mechanisms, as appropriate, that advance land
>>reform,
>>    recognize and protect property, water, and user rights, to enhance access
>>for the
>>poor and women to resources. Such mechanisms should also promote conservation
>>and sustainable use of natural resources (such as land, water and forests),
>>lower risks, and encourage investment;
>> c. Fully integrate population concerns into development strategies, plans,
>>and
>>decision-making, including factors affecting migration, and devise
>>appropriate 
>>population policies, programmes and family planning services, consistent with
>>the
>>Report and the   Programme of Action of the International Conference on
>>Population and Development (Cairo, 1994).
>>
>>So, it seems, this document, which will become part of a vast body of
>>international law, proposes to provide "food security" via standard socialism
>>on an international basis:  Land reform (which already has caused nations
>>like Zimbabwe to move from a food exporting country, to a food importing
>>country), population control, violation of individual and even NATIONAL
>>property rights.
>>
>>Susan Roylance, president of United Families International, who participated
>>in the
>>planning sessions for the document had success in getting into the document
>>language which would recognize the importance of "families'in growing food
>>and abolishing hunger.
>> 
>>Somewhere between the writing of the document and the opening of the
>>Conference, that language has again been taken out and strong pro-population
>>control, anti-property rights language inserted.
>>
>>Julia Mavimbela, of Soweto South Africa, who has taught generations of
>>children and
>>adults gardening methods which provide better nutrition for very little
>>money, will be a
>>key member of the United Families International delegation. Robert Roylance,
>>general manager for Farm Management Company, with the responsibility for
>>managing numerous farms throughout the United States and is associated with a
>>number of foreign farming operations, will present his paper  "Population
>>Control or Sustainable Agriculture?"  at the World Food Summit.
>>
>>                                             ----0----
>>
>>    Practical Food Production Knowledge Is Ignored
>>                 At Food Summit 
>>        Robert Roylance - A Professional Farmer
>>
>>Robert C. Roylance grew up on a family farm, with four brothers and sisters.
>>He has a degree in Agronomy and Agriculture Economics from Brigham Young
>>University and owned his own farm when he was asked to become General Manager
>>of Prior Land Company in Washington State. Currently he is a General Manager
>>for Farm Management Company where he is responsible for managing numerous
>>farms throughout the United States and is associated with foreign farming
>>operations.
>>
>>A perfect resume for anyone interested in really learning how to increase
>>food production?
>>You'd think so. The United Nations delegates at the World Food Summit don't.
>>They don't seem to be interested in those, like Bob Roylance, who not only
>>know how to increase food production, but have a lifetime of experience doing
>>it. The mind set in Washington DC, and at the Rome World Food Summit is that
>>we MUST have fewer people.
>>Especially those dark skinned ones. Roylance is expert in both small scale
>>farming, family farming, and large scale commercial farming. In his report
>>"Population Control or Sustainable Agriculture notes that through education
>>of better agricultural practices, agriculture educators and government policy
>>makers should encourage and train small scale farmers to become self
>>sufficient. Many times it is difficult to maintain small scale farming when
>>striving for free trade and promoting a higher standard of living for the
>>population at large. An example of this in the financial difficulty the small
>>rural Mexican farmer is currently faced with. They cannot compete on the
>>world market due to their lack of (1)economically sized farm, (2) operating
>>capital and (3) understanding the technical aspects of modern farming."
>>
>>All the problems he mentions are solvable. Many nations, including the United
>>States and Canada, have solved them to such an extent "government's problem"
>>is trying to stop them from producing too much. In America and Canada the
>>people would not tolerate a Chinese style forced abortion policy to control
>>population. Yet, that is the choice America is, in effect, giving the
>>undeveloped nations. In order to receive "help" from the Western governments
>>for increasing food production, they must first agree to a governmental
>>policy on population control.
>>
>>Bob Roylance notes in his research paper: "It has been projected that the
>>world population will double sometime around the year 2050, with the
>>population growth rate stabilizing thereafter. This will require that the
>>world food production be increased 2.5 to 3 times the current food
>>production. This challenge can be achieved if the following actions are
>>implemented:
>>
>>Utilize proven agriculture technologies that will optimize food production
>>without
>>compromising the environment. This includes the judicious use of fertilizers
>>and
>>pesticides.
>>
>>Support scientific research that will continue providing improvements in
>>technologies used for crop and livestock production.
>>Support and encourage the improved education of farm families in developing
>>countries.
>>Reduce trade barriers that will allow food to flow freely to all countries at
>>lower prices.
>>This will:
>>allow food to be produced in areas that have a comparative advantage.
>>result in more affordable food products, and improve the standard of living
>>for the world - especially for the developing countries.
>>
>>The adoption of these actions will assure the world of an adequate supply of
>>food well
>>into the future without jeopardizing the sensitive nature of rural families.
>>When policy
>>makers come to the realization that the farmers of the world can provide
>>ample food
>>supplies, the energy they have been using to promote population control can
>>be used to help strengthen existing families.
>>
>>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail