Time: Wed Nov 13 19:11:37 1996
To: John Burr
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: People v. United States
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Dear John Edward,

I will send to you immediately
what I do have here, under my
control.  The Freedom Center
has failed to return my personal
belongings, including all the
backup ZIP disks which I wrote
when I was there, using the ZIP
drive I bought specifically for
that purpose.  The ZIP drive sits
in Billings too. 

This means that the removal brief,
which was allowed by the Garfield
county judge, will need to be
scanned and sent to you in .BMP
or .PCX format.  This I can do
right away;  it is better than not
having it at all.

The really big loss is the Notice
of Application for Intervention of
Right, which was based on a key
FOIA request and appeal, both of
which have failed to elicit the
requested documents, because we
already knew the answers to our
questions.  The Memorandum of
Law in support of that Intervention
was the best single statement I have
written to date on the matters
now before us in People v. United States.

I have a preliminary draft of this
Memorandum, but it now has the wrong
parties and other errors which were
corrected in the final version which
now is being held hostage in Billings.
Again, it is better than having nothing.

One thing you could do is to send $100
to The Freedom Center, and ask them to
send you the latest copies, either hard
or electronic, of the Intervention
documents I prepared and left up there.
Don't tell them you got this idea from me!!
You could say that you learned about it
by reading one of the two press releases
I wrote when I was up there.  I just
yesterday re-located that release in my
gigantic email inbox, and it is now
back to its original format (.DOC).  

So, John Edward, if you want to jump in,
please bear with me as I dump my brains
all over your kitchen table, in what may
at first appear to be a jumble of disconnected
chess pieces and equally disconnected tactics.
The Holy Spirit has informed me that the white
supremacists and apartheid supporters at The
Freedom Center are now facing a real run for
their money, because I have made up my mind
to compete directly with them in every way
possible, by focusing my efforts on the
important case before us:  People of the United
States of America ex relatione Paul Andrew
Mitchell versus the United States et alii,
including Does 1 thru 1000.

To expedite things, please tell me at once
what email encoding(s) you can handle, and
I will remember to override my default as
needed;  that default is BinHex, using
Eudora Pro Version 2.2(16) on a Pentium
with MS-DOS Version 6.22 and Windows
Version 3.11.  Everything about my PC-clone
is very standard and vanilla;  I keep it that
way to expedite technical support.

Thanks.  Are you ready to help with the helm?
The Ship of State is furling her sails again,
and we are underway.  Thank God.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



At 03:37 PM 11/13/96 U, you wrote:
>=======================================================================
>LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
>Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
>=======================================================================
>There is a formula for calculation of the inflation rate that is specified in
>statute...I also believe that it is accumulative since 1968 when the
>government totally debased the currency and took all the silver backing and
>silver out of the treasury.  That is the point when the judges salary was
>diminished.  This also means that there are ZERO Article III justices unless
>they are paid in specie or United States currency backed by gold or silver.  I
>will try to locate the statute for you on this.
>
>Send me your brief for  People v United States et al so I can look at what you
>have so far.
>
>John Edward
>------------------------------
>Date: 11/13/96 10:42 AM
>To: John Burr
>From: libertylaw@www.ultimate.org
>
>
>John Edward,
>
>Excellent insights here.
>
>In People v. United States et al.,
>would you recommend that we add
>these criteria as barriers to
>any candidates which C.J. Rehnquist
>might temporarily appoint to the
>3-judge panel which we have
>convened?  Putting those criteria
>on the table is "only a brief away."
>Do you want to take a stab at
>drafting such a brief, publishing
>it here, and allowing me to make my
>usual edits?  This would be an 
>excellent example for everyone else
>on the list.  As we say down here
>in the arid zone:  GOFER IT!
>("fer" is "to carry" in Latin).
>
>I am standing by.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>attachment:  "Karma and the Federal Courts"
>
>
>At 09:38 AM 11/13/96 U, you wrote:
>>=======================================================================
>>LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
>>Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
>>=======================================================================
>>
>>------------------------------
>>From: libertylaw@www.ultimate.org
>>
>>=======================================================================
>>LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
>>Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
>>=======================================================================
>>all federal judges are disqualified to
>>      preside, since they all currently pay income taxes
>>      on their compensation, in direct violation of 
>>      Article III;  Chief Justice Rehnquist is struggling
>>      with a massive legal conundrum..
>>
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>John replies:  Also to be noted that all judges, justices who are currently
>>paid in FRNs are having their compensation deminished by the fact that
>>inflation of the rehypothicated international debt-credit obligations reduce
>>their effective value.  Only judges and justices who are compensated with the
>>lawful money [coin of the realm] of the United States of America as specifed
>>in the coinage act of 1793 and 31 USC Sec. 5112, meet the qualification of
>>non-diminshed compensation.  Justices of Article III courts must also meet
>the
>>following:
>>
>>Appointed by the Presidenet with the advise and consent of the Senate.  [I
>lot
>>of federal commisioners and USDC judges meet this one qualification]
>>
>>For a life tenure.
>>
>>Office held in good behavior. [Most of the crminals in black bat suits fail
>>this one!!]
>>
>>So diminishing of compensation through taxes is just one way their pay falls
>>short of the art III criteria.
>>
>>John Edward
>>
>>At 01:00 AM 11/10/96 -0800, you wrote:
>>>=======================================================================
>>>LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
>>>Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
>>>=======================================================================
>>>I have had great difficulty in figuring out the fourteenth amendment and
>>>how it fits in the the dual citizenship that is required to be "sovereign
>>>people" as described in great detail in the Dred Scott case.  I think I
>>>have finally got it thanks to a great book that unfortunately I do not
>>>"own", but have the use of until I can find one at a old book store and
>>>shall because of the my "greed" remain unnamed at present and shall be
>>>named "Book".
>>>
>>>The Dred Scott case explains in great detail that you must first be a
>>>"citizen of a State" and therefore if of the correct class of citizen, you
>>>are a "citizen of the United States".  I could not figure out the how the
>>>fourteenth amendment sidestepped this provision, as on the first glance, it
>>>appears to be correct, which I absolutely knew was impossible.
>>>
>>>Its wording is as follows:
>>>
>>>
>>>                                Amendment XIV
>>>                                    [1868]
>>>
>>>"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
>>>subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and
>>>of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law
>>>which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United
>>>States;nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
>>>property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
>>>jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
>>>
>>>In 1866 Statutes at Large chapter 31,
>>>
>>>"That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign
>>>power, excluding Indians not; taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of
>>>the United States;"
>>>
>>>1)  Al persons born ....in the United States - 14th amendment and declared
>>>by Congress.
>>>2)  All persons naturalized in the United States - 14th amendment and
>>>declared by Congress
>>>3)  are citizens of the United States - 14th amendment
>>>4)  are citizens ...of the State wherein they reside - 14th amendment
>>>5) Who is a citizen of "the State" wherein they reside?  In Dred Scott case
>>>the wording is citizen of "a State".  Now comes the "Book" with a
>>>definition of "the State".
>>>
>>>>From the "Book" - [under the heading of state] "Papal States.--the States.
>>>1. [Gt. Brit. & Canada] The United States.  2. Formerly, the Netherlands;
>>>the United Provinces."
>>>
>>>>From this I would be able to conclude that "the States" is the Papal
>>>States.  Above this is the heading of state is the following:
>>>"States of the Church, a part of Central Italy which, before the
>>>unification of Italy in 1870, was under the sovereignty of the Pope.  It
>>>included Rome, the Romagna, Umbria, the March of Ancona, and the towns of
>>>Bologna, Perugia, and Vierbo;  capital, Rome.  Compare DONATION OF PEPIN."
>>>
>>>[Interesting time in that 1871, 1874, and 1878 are the formation of a
>>>corporate government [corporation(s)]
>>>
>>>in the District of Columbia]
>>>
>>>>From the "Book"
>>>"Donation of Pepin", the grant by Pepin, king of the Franks, father of
>>>Charlemagne, of Ravenna, Emilia, and other territory captured from the
>>>Lombards in 755."
>>>
>>>It just goes on and on.
>>>
>>>Treaties with Italy, 1869. s/l Volume 18 part 2 pg 439 -  One of the
>>>Parties was the Grand Cordon of his Order of the Saints Maurice and
>>>Lazarus.  Another complete story, but this is not the plain Jane
>>>government.
>>>>From the "Book"
>>>
>>>Cordon is a ornamental lace, cord or ribbon worn to secure something in
>>>place, for adornment, as an indication of rank, or used as a heraldic
>>>bearing.  The cord worn as a girdle by a Franciscan friar.
>>>
>>>Orders - from the "Book" - St. Maurice and St. Lazarus (10/6 1424) Amadeus
>>>VI.; service to the state, especially charities; white enameled cross
>>>botone against an S-pointed green cross.
>>>
>>>And again in Treaties with Italy, 1869 s/l Volume 18 part 2 page 439 we see
>>>in Article I "There shall be between the territories of the high
>>>contracting parties a reciprocal liberty of commerce and navigation."  What
>>>happened to the words of Untied States of American and Italy here?????
>>>
>>>Article II
>>>"The citizens of each of the high contracting parties shall have liberty to
>>>travel in "the States" and territories of the other territories of the
>>>other, to carry on trade, wholesale and retail, to hire and occupy houses
>>>and warehouses, to employ agents of their choice, and generally to do
>>>anything incident to or necessary for trade, upon the same terms as the
>>>natives of the country, submitting themselves to the laws there
>>>established."
>>>
>>>Article XII
>>>"The high contracting parties agree that , in the unfortunate event of a
>>>war between them, the private property of their respective citizens and
>>>subjects, with the exception of contraband of war, shall be exempt from
>>>capture or seizure, on the high seas or elsewhere, by the armed vessels or
>>>by the military forces of either party;  it being understood that this
>>>exemption shall not extend to vessels and their cargoes which may attempt
>>>to tenter a port blockaded by the naval forces of either party.\
>>>
>>>This sure reads to me as though the "high contracting parties" are
>>>different than the "party".  This reads very different from the actual
>>>citizens of each country or "State".  And "high Contracting parties" does
>>>not seem to be used in contracts with other countries!  Why?
>>>
>>>The "high contracting parties" is the Pope and his folks.  So much more on
>>>this in the treaties that points as more prima facie evident of same.
>>>
>>>Now we add the "Office of Governor" and the legatees, legate and walla, the
>>>Roman Catholic Church again.  It is all fitting.
>>>
>>>Next we add a certificate of birth, that is changed from the form that
>>>parents fill out on the "worksheet" in a previous post, to Birth
>>>Certificate from Bouvier 1843 "and those given to aliens that they have
>>>been naturalized"
>>>
>>>And for a little spice, again from the "Book"
>>>Legal - a legal reversion See reversion
>>>
>>>Reversion - The right of redemption of an estate that is security for a
>>>debt or judgment.  The residue of an estate left in the grantor [England?
>>>or the sovereign - Pope?], to commence in possession at a determination of
>>>a particular estate created by him.  The returning of lands to the
>>>possession of the grantor or of his heirs, on the determination of a
>>>particular estate created by him.
>>>
>>>We be in Deep do do folks,
>>>
>>>We now have "the State", "this state", "other state" and "another state".
>>>This is getting difficult to tell who is on first.  "original States" and
>>>"several States" are seemingly the only good ones out there!
>>>
>>>I would say a prayer tonight, but I don't think in any manner with the
>>>"Vatican" in mind though.
>>>
>>>the best
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Ralph Kermit, Winterrowd
>>>citizen of the United States nunc pro tunc
>>>Citizen of the State of Kansas (equal footing with the original States)
>>>domiciled in the Territory of Alaska
>>>Born of natural born parents of the Posterity
>>>Sovereign State in Fact
>>>
>>>If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better
>>>than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not
>>>your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May
>>>your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget ye were our
>>>countrymen.
>>>                Samuel Adams
>>>
>>>Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains
>>>and slavery?  Forbid it, Almighty God!  I know not what course others may
>>>take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death.
>>>        Patrick Henry:  Speech in the Virginia Convention, March 23,1775
>>>
>>>My Homepage is:  http://www.alaska.net/~winter/jefferson.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>===========================================================
>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>===========================================================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>******************* NOTE *******************
>There may be important message content
>contained in the following MIME Information.
>********************************************
>
>
>------------------ MIME Information follows ------------------
>
>=======================================================================
>LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
>Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
>=======================================================================
>--=====================_847913464==_
>
><<<<<< See above "Message Body" >>>>>>
>
>--=====================_847913464==_
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="KARMACTS.ASC"
>
>
>--=====================_847913464==_
>
>
>===========================================================
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>===========================================================
>
>--=====================_847913464==_--
>
>
>
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail