Time: Fri Nov 15 10:53:58 1996 To: liberty@hollyent.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: 9 cents per minute, anywhere in America Cc: Bcc: liberty lists Dear Sir, Okay, Harry, now you have escalated, so I will escalate with you. For your information, and you had better take note of this, I have already filed an Affidavit of Non-Governmental Affiliation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1), and pursuant to Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in the United States District Court, Central District of California, Western Division, on April 5, 1996. I have this file-stamped document on my desk as I type this, so I am transcribing off the original. The case into which I filed this affidavit is UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. MARY ELIZABETH BRODERICK et al. [sic], Case Number CV-96-2141-CBM. You, sir, are now treading perilously close to libel, and I hereby demand that you cease and desist any further attempts on your part to use innuendo, false association, lies, deception, or fraud to defame me further. I have already had several important cases scuttled by persons known and unknown to my, in part by convincing my client(s) to believe that I am some kind of deep cover government agent. This is a lie, and I want it to stop. Do you understand what I have just written to you, or do you not understand what I have just written to you? I will be happy to make a scanned facsimile of this document available to anybody who politely requests it here. Thank you for your cooperation, and for your consideration. /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell Counselor at Law, federal witness and Citizen of Arizona state copy: Thomas H. Basham Federal Bureau of Investigation letter to FBI from Paul Mitchell follows: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Tucson [zip code exempt] ARIZONA REPUBLIC September 13, 1996 Mr. Thomas H. Basham Supervisory Senior Resident Agent Federal Bureau of Investigation U.S. Department of Justice 201 East Indianola Phoenix, Arizona 85012/tdc Subject: Criminal Misconduct by John M. Roll, United States District Court, Tucson Dear Mr. Basham: Thank you very much for your letter to Me, dated September 9, 1996, concerning alleged criminal misconduct by a Federal District Court Judge in Tucson, Arizona. In your letter, you stated that My letter to the FBI does not contain sufficient detail to determine whether a criminal investigation is warranted. You also requested that I submit, to the Tucson office of the FBI, further documentation of the alleged misconduct, to include names, dates, and any other facts that may be pertinent. To this end, enclosed please find all the pertinent materials currently in My possession and control. The thread of evidence you should follow concerns the events which occurred immediately after a federal grand jury subpoena was first served on New Life Health Center Company in Tucson, Arizona state ("New Life"). Pay particular attention to the fate of all the U.S. Mail which We transmitted directly to the grand jury Foreperson in response to their subpoena. I was retained by New Life at that time to answer the subpoena (see enclosed PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION, dated March 20, 1996) and to assist New Life with their civil defense. This PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was mailed to the Grand Jury Foreperson via Registered U.S. Mail, return receipt and restricted delivery both requested. The enclosed evidence will show that this PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was illegally intercepted by John M. Roll, who handed it to Robert L. Miskell in the office of the United States Attorney in Tucson. After investigating on Our own, and with the able assistance of the Postmaster, We decided to prepare and mail a FORMAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION to the same federal grand jury. This request was mailed to the Foreperson on April 28, 1996 (see enclosed). This FORMAL REQUEST was also intercepted by John M. Roll, who also handed it to Robert L. Miskell. We have reason to believe that the federal grand jury never saw this FORMAL REQUEST either. At a subsequent hearing on the matter, John M. Roll admitted, on the official court record, that he had intercepted this FORMAL REQUEST. He also said that he had not opened it, but that he had given it to Robert L. Miskell. At that same hearing, Robert L. Miskell admitted, on record, that he had received this FORMAL REQUEST from John M. Roll, and that the mail in question simply contained a formal request that the federal grand jury investigate possible violations of federal law by Robert L. Miskell. We inferred from Miskell's comments that he had, indeed, opened this mail, because he was correct about its contents. At this point, We felt it was necessary to place the Foreperson of the federal grand jury on the Proof of Service list for all subsequent pleadings which We planned to file in that case. All together, some twenty-five (25) different pleadings were then filed under My signature, or under signatures of Mine and Dr. Eugene A. Burns. Some of these pleadings are affidavits. All pleadings currently in My possession and control are enclosed, for your review. Counting all 25 pleadings, the PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION (26), and the FORMAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION (27), none of which were ever delivered to the federal grand jury Foreperson to whom they were mailed, We count 27 counts of mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice, and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above, committed by a conspiracy of persons including, but not limited to, John M. Roll, Janet Napolitano, Robert L. Miskell, and Evangelina Cardenas. Other likely accessories to these crimes include Robert A. Johnson, Robert H. Weare, and William M. McCool. At another hearing on the matter, John M. Roll complained that he had some 14 inches of pleadings to read in this case. But then, he immediately called a recess, and huddled for quite some time with his staff, both inside and outside the courtroom. When he came back into session, John M. Roll qualified his earlier statement by saying that he really had only 6 or 7 inches of pleadings in this case, but that he guaranteed, if We had filed them, he had read them. This statement was witnessed by Me and by My assistant Counsel, Neil Thomas Nordbrock, who is also a federal witness to perjury of oath by Robert L. Miskell in another case. Neil Nordbrock and I took his qualification to mean that John M. Roll had, in fact, intercepted all 25 pleadings which We had mailed to the grand jury Foreperson. You can measure their thickness yourself. I hope this response to your letter is satisfactory. If you should need any additional information, permit Me to recommend that you first contact Dr. Eugene A. Burns, Managing Director of New Life Health Center Company, 4500 East Speedway, Suite 27, Tucson, Arizona state. As of the moment I vacated the premises at New Life, Dr. Burns was in possession and control of all the documentary exhibits which were attached to the enclosed pleadings. These documentary exhibits include, for example, the Postmaster's response to our FOIA request for a certified copy of the Standing Delivery Order (USPS Form 3801) signed by the federal grand jury Foreperson in the New Life case. This response stated that there was no such document in existence, proving that the Foreperson had never authorized anyone else to accept or sign for U.S. Mail addressed to him/her. Thank you very much for your consideration. VERIFICATION I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the "United States," that the above statements of fact are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). Further Affiant sayeth naught. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness attachments: to FBI, Tucson copy: Bruce J. Gebhardt Special Agent in Charge copy: Thomas H. Basham Supervisory Senior Resident Agent c/o Federal Bureau of Investigation 1 South Church Avenue, Suite 600 Tucson, Arizona state 85701/tdc copy: Postmaster U.S. Post Office Downtown Station Tucson, Arizona # # # > >Can You Say Agent Provocateur ? >Harry > > > > > >The last user of box 1776 caused Postal Inspectors and FBI to come >around asking questions about her. Maybe no connection. Just a word >of caution. Of course a learned man such as yourself would check on >the legallity of such, I'm sure. >> > >>I was wondering that myself , After all the box number that the orig. gives >>"1776" is false. Sounds fishy to me . Use at your own risk. >> >>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, >>2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >> >>This is not his box number. >> >> >>> >>> > >>>You can make it fit in here. Just claim its a front for an FBI or BATF >>>sting operation authoorized and paid for by Clinton's telecommunication >>>act. Hmmm, I wonder if it really is? >>> >>>Russ > > > >"This year will go down in history.For the first time , a civilized nation >has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, >and the world will follow our lead into the future !" > Adolf Hitler > Berlin Daily > April 15, 1935 > > > "Freiheit stirbt in kleinen Teilen. " >---An appropriate German saying :" Freedom dies in small pieces ." > > > >======================================================================== >To subscribe: send a message to the Liberty@hollyent.com >with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems? > email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com >For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com >======================================================================== >via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail