Time: Fri Nov 15 10:55:15 1996
To:
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: 9 cents per minute, anywhere in America
Cc:
Bcc: liberty lists
Dear Sir,
Okay, Harry, now you have escalated,
so I will escalate with you.
For your information, and you
had better take note of this,
I have already filed an Affidavit
of Non-Governmental Affiliation,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1),
and pursuant to Rule 24(a) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
in the United States District Court,
Central District of California,
Western Division, on April 5, 1996.
I have this file-stamped document
on my desk as I type this, so I am
transcribing off the original.
The case into which I filed this
affidavit is UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V. MARY ELIZABETH BRODERICK et al. [sic],
Case Number CV-96-2141-CBM.
You, sir, are now treading perilously
close to libel, and I hereby demand
that you cease and desist any further
attempts on your part to use innuendo,
false association, lies, deception,
or fraud to defame me further.
I have already had several important
cases scuttled by persons known and
unknown to my, in part by convincing my
client(s) to believe that I am some
kind of deep cover government agent.
This is a lie, and I want it to stop.
Do you understand what I have just
written to you, or do you not understand
what I have just written to you?
I will be happy to make a scanned facsimile
of this document available to anybody
who politely requests it here.
Thank you for your cooperation, and
for your consideration.
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Counselor at Law, federal witness
and Citizen of Arizona state
copy: Thomas H. Basham
Federal Bureau of Investigation
letter to FBI from Paul Mitchell follows:
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA REPUBLIC
September 13, 1996
Mr. Thomas H. Basham
Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Department of Justice
201 East Indianola
Phoenix, Arizona 85012/tdc
Subject: Criminal Misconduct by John M. Roll,
United States District Court, Tucson
Dear Mr. Basham:
Thank you very much for your letter to Me, dated September
9, 1996, concerning alleged criminal misconduct by a Federal
District Court Judge in Tucson, Arizona.
In your letter, you stated that My letter to the FBI does
not contain sufficient detail to determine whether a criminal
investigation is warranted. You also requested that I submit, to
the Tucson office of the FBI, further documentation of the
alleged misconduct, to include names, dates, and any other facts
that may be pertinent. To this end, enclosed please find all the
pertinent materials currently in My possession and control.
The thread of evidence you should follow concerns the events
which occurred immediately after a federal grand jury subpoena
was first served on New Life Health Center Company in Tucson,
Arizona state ("New Life"). Pay particular attention to the fate
of all the U.S. Mail which We transmitted directly to the grand
jury Foreperson in response to their subpoena.
I was retained by New Life at that time to answer the
subpoena (see enclosed PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION, dated March 20,
1996) and to assist New Life with their civil defense. This
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was mailed to the Grand Jury Foreperson
via Registered U.S. Mail, return receipt and restricted delivery
both requested. The enclosed evidence will show that this
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was illegally intercepted by John M.
Roll, who handed it to Robert L. Miskell in the office of the
United States Attorney in Tucson.
After investigating on Our own, and with the able assistance
of the Postmaster, We decided to prepare and mail a FORMAL
REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION to the same federal grand jury. This
request was mailed to the Foreperson on April 28, 1996 (see
enclosed). This FORMAL REQUEST was also intercepted by John M.
Roll, who also handed it to Robert L. Miskell. We have reason to
believe that the federal grand jury never saw this FORMAL REQUEST
either.
At a subsequent hearing on the matter, John M. Roll
admitted, on the official court record, that he had intercepted
this FORMAL REQUEST. He also said that he had not opened it, but
that he had given it to Robert L. Miskell. At that same hearing,
Robert L. Miskell admitted, on record, that he had received this
FORMAL REQUEST from John M. Roll, and that the mail in question
simply contained a formal request that the federal grand jury
investigate possible violations of federal law by Robert L.
Miskell. We inferred from Miskell's comments that he had,
indeed, opened this mail, because he was correct about its
contents.
At this point, We felt it was necessary to place the
Foreperson of the federal grand jury on the Proof of Service list
for all subsequent pleadings which We planned to file in that
case. All together, some twenty-five (25) different pleadings
were then filed under My signature, or under signatures of Mine
and Dr. Eugene A. Burns. Some of these pleadings are affidavits.
All pleadings currently in My possession and control are
enclosed, for your review.
Counting all 25 pleadings, the PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
(26), and the FORMAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION (27), none of
which were ever delivered to the federal grand jury Foreperson to
whom they were mailed, We count 27 counts of mail fraud, 27
counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice,
and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above, committed
by a conspiracy of persons including, but not limited to, John M.
Roll, Janet Napolitano, Robert L. Miskell, and Evangelina
Cardenas. Other likely accessories to these crimes include
Robert A. Johnson, Robert H. Weare, and William M. McCool.
At another hearing on the matter, John M. Roll complained
that he had some 14 inches of pleadings to read in this case.
But then, he immediately called a recess, and huddled for quite
some time with his staff, both inside and outside the courtroom.
When he came back into session, John M. Roll qualified his
earlier statement by saying that he really had only 6 or 7 inches
of pleadings in this case, but that he guaranteed, if We had
filed them, he had read them. This statement was witnessed by Me
and by My assistant Counsel, Neil Thomas Nordbrock, who is also a
federal witness to perjury of oath by Robert L. Miskell in
another case. Neil Nordbrock and I took his qualification to
mean that John M. Roll had, in fact, intercepted all 25 pleadings
which We had mailed to the grand jury Foreperson. You can
measure their thickness yourself.
I hope this response to your letter is satisfactory. If you
should need any additional information, permit Me to recommend
that you first contact Dr. Eugene A. Burns, Managing Director of
New Life Health Center Company, 4500 East Speedway, Suite 27,
Tucson, Arizona state. As of the moment I vacated the premises
at New Life, Dr. Burns was in possession and control of all the
documentary exhibits which were attached to the enclosed
pleadings. These documentary exhibits include, for example, the
Postmaster's response to our FOIA request for a certified copy of
the Standing Delivery Order (USPS Form 3801) signed by the
federal grand jury Foreperson in the New Life case. This
response stated that there was no such document in existence,
proving that the Foreperson had never authorized anyone else to
accept or sign for U.S. Mail addressed to him/her.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
VERIFICATION
I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona
state and federal witness, hereby verify, under penalty of
perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without
the "United States," that the above statements of fact are true,
correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of My current
information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Further Affiant sayeth naught.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
attachments: to FBI, Tucson
copy: Bruce J. Gebhardt
Special Agent in Charge
copy: Thomas H. Basham
Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
c/o Federal Bureau of Investigation
1 South Church Avenue, Suite 600
Tucson, Arizona state 85701/tdc
copy: Postmaster
U.S. Post Office
Downtown Station
Tucson, Arizona
# # #
>
>Can You Say Agent Provocateur ?
>Harry
>
>
>
>
>
>The last user of box 1776 caused Postal Inspectors and FBI to come
>around asking questions about her. Maybe no connection. Just a word
>of caution. Of course a learned man such as yourself would check on
>the legallity of such, I'm sure.
>>
>
>>I was wondering that myself , After all the box number that the orig. gives
>>"1776" is false. Sounds fishy to me . Use at your own risk.
>>
>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell,
>>2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>
>>This is not his box number.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>
>>>You can make it fit in here. Just claim its a front for an FBI or BATF
>>>sting operation authoorized and paid for by Clinton's telecommunication
>>>act. Hmmm, I wonder if it really is?
>>>
>>>Russ
>
>
>
>"This year will go down in history.For the first time , a civilized nation
>has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient,
>and the world will follow our lead into the future !"
> Adolf Hitler
> Berlin Daily
> April 15, 1935
>
>
> "Freiheit stirbt in kleinen Teilen. "
>---An appropriate German saying :" Freedom dies in small pieces ."
>
>
>
>========================================================================
>To subscribe: send a message to the Liberty@hollyent.com
>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com
>For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com
>========================================================================
>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail