Time: Fri Nov 15 19:41:03 1996
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Orlin Grabbe versus Joseph Famularo
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Orlin,

You tell 'em, man!

/s/ Paul Mitchell

P.S.  See "The Kick-Back Racket"
at URL http://www.supremelaw.com



At 07:24 PM 11/15/96 -0500, you wrote:
>
>->  SearchNet's   snetnews   Mailing List
>
>Kalliste Inc.
>1475 Terminal Way, Suite E
>Reno, NV  89502
>Tel.: (702) 333-1139                                                         
>Fax:  (702) 329-0852
>							
>November 15, 1996
>
>Joseph L. Famularo
>United States Attorney
>Eastern District of Kentucky
>P.O. Box 3077
>Lexington, KY 40596-3077
>Tel.: (606) 233-2661
>Fax : (606) 233-2666
>
>Re:  Case Number 96-6101M   
>United States v. Chalmer C. Hayes a.k.a. Chuck Hayes 
>a.k.a. Charles Hayes
>
>Dear Mr. Famularo:
>
>	I am writing to you because you referred to my 
>Worldwide Web Page (http://www.aci.net/kalliste/) in 
>District Court before U.S. Magistrate Judge J. B. Johnson, 
>Jr., on Friday, October 25, 1996.  
>
>	You claimed that Chuck Hayes and I were the 
>same person, that Chuck Hayes wrote articles under the 
>"pen name" of  J. Orlin Grabbe, and that information on 
>my web page was evidence that Chuck Hayes was a 
>menace to society and should not be released on bail.
>
>	First of all, I am not Chuck Hayes, and neither is 
>he Orlin Grabbe.  Your facts are wrong and your 
>investigative work is extraordinarily sloppy.  Thousands of 
>people know who I am, know me as the author of the 
>leading MBA textbook in international finance 
>(International Financial Markets), so that even a casual 
>effort at research would have separated our identities.
>
>	Secondly, I am surprised at your contempt for the 
>U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  Do you not 
>believe in my freedom to publish on my Worldwide Web 
>page information that others can read as they choose, or 
>ignore as they choose?  Do you believe in freedom of 
>speech and that Congress shall make no law abridging that 
>right?  Which part of "no law" do you not understand?
>
>	Thirdly, the theme of many of the articles on my 
>Web Page--which you claimed was evidence of social 
>menace--involves drug-money laundering and the attendant 
>political corruption.  Why don't you want people to pay 
>attention to drug-money laundering?  Why don't you want 
>people to pay attention to political corruption?  Is it 
>because you have some personal fears in this regard if they 
>do so?  What do you have to hide, Mr. Famularo?  Who is 
>paying you, and what are they paying you for?
>
>	Fourthly, I have read the interesting affidavit of 
>David R. Keller, FBI agent, which you also introduced 
>into evidence.  In this affidavit, Keller affirms that an 
>(unidentified) uncover agent of the FBI made an interstate 
>call offering to kill John Anthony Hayes, the son of Chuck 
>Hayes.  Do you know that such a phone call is in violation 
>of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1958?  Are you 
>going to indict and prosecute this uncover agent of the FBI 
>for criminal violation of the U.S. Code?  Or was this 
>undercover agent perhaps lying?  If  he was, are you going 
>to prosecute him for perjury?  If not, why not?  Surely you 
>don't believe that you can just pick and choose your targets 
>of prosecution on some politically partisan basis?  Or do 
>you believe that?  Is your pursuit of Chuck Hayes little 
>more than a political act?
>
>	Fifthly, according to an investigator who spoke to 
>me, you also told Chuck Hayes' ex-wife Guiomar that 
>Chuck Hayes and I are the same person.  Why did you do 
>that?  Are you engaged in witness tampering?  Why are 
>you talking to Hayes' family at all?  Is it because John 
>Anthony Hayes and Guiomar are involved in an 
>inheritance dispute with Chuck Hayes, and you promised 
>them help in return for their cooperation in constructing 
>charges against Chuck Hayes?  Did you obtain documents 
>from John Anthony Hayes and send them to Alabama with 
>Chuck Hayes' postal return address on them?  Are you 
>guilty of falsifying evidence in a similar manner to the way 
>you have falsified my identity?
>
>	I expect to receive your prompt written reply to 
>these questions.
>
>		    Very truly yours,
>				
>			(signed)
>			
>		    J. Orlin Grabbe
>
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>->  Posted by: KALLISTE@delphi.com
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail