Time: Sat Nov 16 06:30:48 1996
To: joyce@mlode.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: documents
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Joyce,

Okay, let's try an experiment,
to see what happens.  I will send
a document to you in BinHex encoding,
which is my default.  All my documents
are written by MS-WORD for DOS, Version
5.0B, which is upward-compatible with
most Windows-based word processors.
The file I am sending you is VOLSTAD.DOC
the Petition to Congress re:  "IRS" --
an alias for Trust #62 in Puerto Rico.
If you can read and print this, we are
home free.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Here is the file in-line:

              FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION TO CONGRESS
                    FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES



Dear Representative/Senator ____________________________________:

     This is a formal Petition to Congress for redress of a major
grievance which I have with the federal government.

     Recent research  has disclosed  that the original motive for
Prohibition (the  Volstead Act),  was to  give oil  companies  an
unfair jump  on their  monopoly over  automotive fuels.  It  also
appears that the BATF were created to disperse an unlawful police
force  throughout   the  several   States,  under  the  guise  of
controlling commerce in alcohol.  Once the monopoly was in place,
Prohibition was  repealed, leaving  alcohol high  and dry  as the
preferred fuel  for automobiles, and leaving this unlawful police
force in place to extort money from the American People.

     This  research   also  proves  that  the  "Internal  Revenue
Service" [sic]  is actually  an alias  for  the  Federal  Alcohol
Administration domiciled  at Trust  #62 in  Puerto Rico, under an
Act of  Congress which  was held  to be unconstitutional in 1935.
The proof  is found, among other places, in all the references to
Title 27  which can  be found  in the  regulations for  Title 26.
None of  these regulations  is lawful,  because IRC 7851(a)(6)(A)
states that the provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the
day after  the date  of enactment of Title 26.  Unfortunately for
the federal government, Title 26, as such, has never been enacted
into positive  law, rendering  ALL the  enforcement provisions of
subtitle F  null and  void.   For example, the authority to issue
regulations in the first instance is found in subtitle F.

     From the  research cited  above, I have come to believe that
the United States federal government is now engaged in a criminal
syndicate of  extortion, perjury,  mail fraud, theft, conversion,
fraud, and  conspiracy involving  all of  the above.  I therefore
demand immediate  hearings on the relations between the "Internal
Revenue Service" and the Federal Alcohol Administration domiciled
in Puerto  Rico and operating elsewhere on this planet.  If these
hearings should  prove that the Internal Revenue Service is not a
lawful organization  within the  United States  Department of the
Treasury, then  it is time for a major shift in the wind, because
every piece  of mail  they are sending these days is one count of
mail fraud  by the  sender.  I think you will agree that We, as a
Nation, have a very big problem here.

     I will  look forward  to your  immediate  response  to  this
formal, verified  Petition for  Redress of  this major  grievance
which I,  and millions  of other  Americans, now have against the
United States  (federal government).  I never thought I would see
the day when I would be forced to define the "United States" as a
criminal enterprise, but sadly that day has now arrived.

                          VERIFICATION

     I hereby  certify, under  penalty of perjury, under the laws
of the  United States  of America,  without the  "United States",
that the  above statements  of fact  are true and correct, to the
best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me
God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Executed on the ___________ day of _______________________, 1996.

Signed and printed,






Citizen of __________________________ state
all rights reserved without prejudice


              First Amendment Petition to Congress
                 Follow These Fun Instructions:

1.   Make 12  copies of your original and save it.  You will need
     it tomorrow.   Don't  forget to  print these instructions on
     the back side, so others like you will know what to do.

2.   Complete 1 form for each U.S. Senator from your state, and 1
     for your  U.S. Representative.   If  you don't already know,
     their names  are available  at your  local  public  library;
     just ask the Librarians, they will be happy to help you.

3.   Post them via first class U.S. Mail, without return address,
     to the  House of  Representatives and  United States Senate,
     Washington, D.C. [zip code exempt].  They will get there.

4.   Give 3  blank forms  to each  of 3 others who are willing to
     follow through.   This will propagate faster than 2x2x2 = 8,
     because 3x3x3 = 27!

5.   Make as  many extras as you are willing to disseminate, e.g.
     state Governor,  county grand  jury  foreperson,  any  body,
     every body,  and then some (don't forget Mom).  You will get
     extra credit for doing this step.

6.   Print the  blank form  and instructions in local newspapers,
     flyers, electronic  bulletin board  systems, Internet email,
     any way,  every way,  best way you can think of (we may want
     to imitate  you, ok?).   Lots of extra credit for doing this
     step too.

7.   If you have a computer, get your  hands on the original file
     VOLSTAD.DOC  from   Paul  Andrew,   Mitchell,   B.A.,   M.S.
     (pmitch@primenet.com) written  in MS-WORD  for DOS,  Version
     5.0B, upward compatible with almost ALL word processors.

8.   Send $1  cash to Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., c/o 2509
     N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [zip code exempt],
     to support  additional research, writing, communication, and
     political action  like this.   This  is a  fee for  services
     tendered, rendered,  and retained.   Extra  funds mean extra
     credits.

9.   Call late  night talk  shows and  read the  First  Amendment
     Petition to  the hosts, right on the air.  Try reading it in
     the mirror  first, when  nobody is  looking or listening, to
     give yourself  confidence.   You might  also practice  it in
     speech classes,  to get  expert feedback  on subtle  things,
     like inflection,  emphasis, and  emotion.   Weeping  is  ok.
     This is a nationwide catharsis we must overcome.

10.  It is  perfectly okay  to use  a pen  name, if you need some
     additional privacy and security.

11.  Rejoice and  be glad, for the day of your deliverance is now
     at hand.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the FBI letter in-line:

                                      c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
                                         Tucson [zip code exempt]
                                                 ARIZONA REPUBLIC

                                               September 13, 1996

Mr. Thomas H. Basham
Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Department of Justice
201 East Indianola
Phoenix, Arizona 85012/tdc

Subject:  Criminal Misconduct by John M. Roll,
          United States District Court, Tucson

Dear Mr. Basham:

     Thank you  very much  for your letter to Me, dated September
9, 1996,  concerning alleged  criminal misconduct  by  a  Federal
District Court Judge in Tucson, Arizona.

     In your  letter, you  stated that  My letter to the FBI does
not contain  sufficient detail  to determine  whether a  criminal
investigation is warranted.  You also requested that I submit, to
the Tucson  office of  the  FBI,  further  documentation  of  the
alleged misconduct,  to include names, dates, and any other facts
that may be pertinent.  To this end, enclosed please find all the
pertinent materials currently in My possession and control.

     The thread of evidence you should follow concerns the events
which occurred  immediately after  a federal  grand jury subpoena
was first  served on  New Life  Health Center  Company in Tucson,
Arizona state ("New Life").  Pay particular attention to the fate
of all  the U.S.  Mail which We transmitted directly to the grand
jury Foreperson in response to their subpoena.

     I was  retained by  New Life  at that  time  to  answer  the
subpoena (see  enclosed PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION, dated March 20,
1996) and  to assist  New Life  with their  civil defense.   This
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION  was mailed to the Grand Jury Foreperson
via Registered  U.S. Mail, return receipt and restricted delivery
both requested.   The  enclosed  evidence  will  show  that  this
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION  was illegally  intercepted by  John  M.
Roll, who  handed it  to Robert  L. Miskell  in the office of the
United States Attorney in Tucson.

     After investigating on Our own, and with the able assistance
of the  Postmaster, We  decided to  prepare  and  mail  a  FORMAL
REQUEST FOR  INVESTIGATION to  the same federal grand jury.  This
request was  mailed to  the Foreperson  on April  28,  1996  (see
enclosed).   This FORMAL  REQUEST was also intercepted by John M.
Roll, who also handed it to Robert L. Miskell.  We have reason to
believe that the federal grand jury never saw this FORMAL REQUEST
either.

     At  a  subsequent  hearing  on  the  matter,  John  M.  Roll
admitted, on  the official  court record, that he had intercepted
this FORMAL REQUEST.  He also said that he had not opened it, but
that he had given it to Robert L. Miskell.  At that same hearing,
Robert L.  Miskell admitted, on record, that he had received this
FORMAL REQUEST  from John  M. Roll, and that the mail in question
simply contained  a formal  request that  the federal  grand jury
investigate possible  violations of  federal  law  by  Robert  L.
Miskell.   We inferred  from  Miskell's  comments  that  he  had,
indeed, opened  this mail,  because  he  was  correct  about  its
contents.

     At this  point, We  felt  it  was  necessary  to  place  the
Foreperson of the federal grand jury on the Proof of Service list
for all  subsequent pleadings  which We  planned to  file in that
case.   All together,  some twenty-five  (25) different pleadings
were then  filed under  My signature, or under signatures of Mine
and Dr. Eugene A. Burns.  Some of these pleadings are affidavits.
All  pleadings   currently  in  My  possession  and  control  are
enclosed, for your review.

     Counting all  25  pleadings,  the  PRIVILEGED  COMMUNICATION
(26), and  the FORMAL  REQUEST FOR  INVESTIGATION (27),  none  of
which were ever delivered to the federal grand jury Foreperson to
whom they  were mailed,  We count  27 counts  of mail  fraud,  27
counts of  jury tampering,  27 counts  of obstruction of justice,
and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above, committed
by a conspiracy of persons including, but not limited to, John M.
Roll,  Janet   Napolitano,  Robert  L.  Miskell,  and  Evangelina
Cardenas.   Other likely  accessories  to  these  crimes  include
Robert A. Johnson, Robert H. Weare, and William M. McCool.

     At another  hearing on  the matter,  John M. Roll complained
that he  had some  14 inches  of pleadings  to read in this case.
But then,  he immediately  called a recess, and huddled for quite
some time  with his staff, both inside and outside the courtroom.
When he  came back  into session,  John  M.  Roll  qualified  his
earlier statement by saying that he really had only 6 or 7 inches
of pleadings  in this  case, but  that he  guaranteed, if  We had
filed them, he had read them.  This statement was witnessed by Me
and by My assistant Counsel, Neil Thomas Nordbrock, who is also a
federal witness  to perjury  of oath  by  Robert  L.  Miskell  in
another case.   Neil  Nordbrock and  I took  his qualification to
mean that John M. Roll had, in fact, intercepted all 25 pleadings
which We  had mailed  to the  grand jury  Foreperson.    You  can
measure their thickness yourself.

     I hope this response to your letter is satisfactory.  If you
should need  any additional  information, permit  Me to recommend
that you  first contact Dr. Eugene A. Burns, Managing Director of
New Life  Health Center  Company, 4500  East Speedway,  Suite 27,
Tucson, Arizona  state.   As of the moment I vacated the premises
at New  Life, Dr.  Burns was in possession and control of all the
documentary  exhibits   which  were   attached  to  the  enclosed
pleadings.   These documentary exhibits include, for example, the
Postmaster's response to our FOIA request for a certified copy of
the Standing  Delivery Order  (USPS  Form  3801)  signed  by  the
federal grand  jury Foreperson  in  the  New  Life  case.    This
response stated  that there  was no  such document  in existence,
proving that  the Foreperson  had never authorized anyone else to
accept or sign for U.S. Mail addressed to him/her.

     Thank you very much for your consideration.

                          VERIFICATION
                                
     I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A., M.S.,  Citizen of  Arizona
state and  federal  witness,  hereby  verify,  under  penalty  of
perjury, under  the laws of the United States of America, without
the "United  States," that the above statements of fact are true,
correct, complete,  and not misleading, to the best of My current
information, knowledge,  and belief,  so help Me God, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 1746(1).

Further Affiant sayeth naught.


Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness


attachments:  to FBI, Tucson

copy:  Bruce J. Gebhardt
       Special Agent in Charge

copy:  Thomas H. Basham
       Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
       c/o Federal Bureau of Investigation
       1 South Church Avenue, Suite 600
       Tucson, Arizona state 85701/tdc

copy:  Postmaster
       U.S. Post Office
       Downtown Station
       Tucson, Arizona


                             #  #  #




At 10:31 PM 11/15/96 -0800, you wrote:
>I'm afraid I don't know the first thing about any of the formats you
>spoke about. I have the docs on disk. Perhaps somewhere along the line I
>will become a bit more knowlegeable about those types of things and I
>will be able to read them then. I don't think they are extremely
>important to me at this time. Yes Paul, I am the typical woman when it
>comes to computer technology. I'm basicly computer illiterate and as you
>have pointed out so well, I don't  spell to good either.
>
>
>
>Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>> 
>> fbi.doc I recall;
>> trust.doc I do not recall.
>> Can you be more specific?
>> I can encode in BinHex, MIME, or Uuencode.
>> Please choose one.  I default to BinHex.
>> 
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> 
>> At 08:00 PM 11/15/96 -0800, you wrote:
>> >Paul....In of your posts you sent two documents in Macintosh format. I
>> >would very much like to read them but I am unable to convert them. One
>> >of them is a "trust doc" the other is "fbi doc." Any possibility you
>> >could resend them in a format I could read? I'm appreciate it.
>> >  Joyce
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> ===========================================================
>> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>> ===========================================================
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail