Time: Sat Nov 16 06:30:48 1996
To: joyce@mlode.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: documents
Cc:
Bcc:
Joyce,
Okay, let's try an experiment,
to see what happens. I will send
a document to you in BinHex encoding,
which is my default. All my documents
are written by MS-WORD for DOS, Version
5.0B, which is upward-compatible with
most Windows-based word processors.
The file I am sending you is VOLSTAD.DOC
the Petition to Congress re: "IRS" --
an alias for Trust #62 in Puerto Rico.
If you can read and print this, we are
home free.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
Here is the file in-line:
FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION TO CONGRESS
FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
Dear Representative/Senator ____________________________________:
This is a formal Petition to Congress for redress of a major
grievance which I have with the federal government.
Recent research has disclosed that the original motive for
Prohibition (the Volstead Act), was to give oil companies an
unfair jump on their monopoly over automotive fuels. It also
appears that the BATF were created to disperse an unlawful police
force throughout the several States, under the guise of
controlling commerce in alcohol. Once the monopoly was in place,
Prohibition was repealed, leaving alcohol high and dry as the
preferred fuel for automobiles, and leaving this unlawful police
force in place to extort money from the American People.
This research also proves that the "Internal Revenue
Service" [sic] is actually an alias for the Federal Alcohol
Administration domiciled at Trust #62 in Puerto Rico, under an
Act of Congress which was held to be unconstitutional in 1935.
The proof is found, among other places, in all the references to
Title 27 which can be found in the regulations for Title 26.
None of these regulations is lawful, because IRC 7851(a)(6)(A)
states that the provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the
day after the date of enactment of Title 26. Unfortunately for
the federal government, Title 26, as such, has never been enacted
into positive law, rendering ALL the enforcement provisions of
subtitle F null and void. For example, the authority to issue
regulations in the first instance is found in subtitle F.
From the research cited above, I have come to believe that
the United States federal government is now engaged in a criminal
syndicate of extortion, perjury, mail fraud, theft, conversion,
fraud, and conspiracy involving all of the above. I therefore
demand immediate hearings on the relations between the "Internal
Revenue Service" and the Federal Alcohol Administration domiciled
in Puerto Rico and operating elsewhere on this planet. If these
hearings should prove that the Internal Revenue Service is not a
lawful organization within the United States Department of the
Treasury, then it is time for a major shift in the wind, because
every piece of mail they are sending these days is one count of
mail fraud by the sender. I think you will agree that We, as a
Nation, have a very big problem here.
I will look forward to your immediate response to this
formal, verified Petition for Redress of this major grievance
which I, and millions of other Americans, now have against the
United States (federal government). I never thought I would see
the day when I would be forced to define the "United States" as a
criminal enterprise, but sadly that day has now arrived.
VERIFICATION
I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws
of the United States of America, without the "United States",
that the above statements of fact are true and correct, to the
best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me
God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Executed on the ___________ day of _______________________, 1996.
Signed and printed,
Citizen of __________________________ state
all rights reserved without prejudice
First Amendment Petition to Congress
Follow These Fun Instructions:
1. Make 12 copies of your original and save it. You will need
it tomorrow. Don't forget to print these instructions on
the back side, so others like you will know what to do.
2. Complete 1 form for each U.S. Senator from your state, and 1
for your U.S. Representative. If you don't already know,
their names are available at your local public library;
just ask the Librarians, they will be happy to help you.
3. Post them via first class U.S. Mail, without return address,
to the House of Representatives and United States Senate,
Washington, D.C. [zip code exempt]. They will get there.
4. Give 3 blank forms to each of 3 others who are willing to
follow through. This will propagate faster than 2x2x2 = 8,
because 3x3x3 = 27!
5. Make as many extras as you are willing to disseminate, e.g.
state Governor, county grand jury foreperson, any body,
every body, and then some (don't forget Mom). You will get
extra credit for doing this step.
6. Print the blank form and instructions in local newspapers,
flyers, electronic bulletin board systems, Internet email,
any way, every way, best way you can think of (we may want
to imitate you, ok?). Lots of extra credit for doing this
step too.
7. If you have a computer, get your hands on the original file
VOLSTAD.DOC from Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
(pmitch@primenet.com) written in MS-WORD for DOS, Version
5.0B, upward compatible with almost ALL word processors.
8. Send $1 cash to Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., c/o 2509
N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [zip code exempt],
to support additional research, writing, communication, and
political action like this. This is a fee for services
tendered, rendered, and retained. Extra funds mean extra
credits.
9. Call late night talk shows and read the First Amendment
Petition to the hosts, right on the air. Try reading it in
the mirror first, when nobody is looking or listening, to
give yourself confidence. You might also practice it in
speech classes, to get expert feedback on subtle things,
like inflection, emphasis, and emotion. Weeping is ok.
This is a nationwide catharsis we must overcome.
10. It is perfectly okay to use a pen name, if you need some
additional privacy and security.
11. Rejoice and be glad, for the day of your deliverance is now
at hand.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the FBI letter in-line:
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA REPUBLIC
September 13, 1996
Mr. Thomas H. Basham
Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Department of Justice
201 East Indianola
Phoenix, Arizona 85012/tdc
Subject: Criminal Misconduct by John M. Roll,
United States District Court, Tucson
Dear Mr. Basham:
Thank you very much for your letter to Me, dated September
9, 1996, concerning alleged criminal misconduct by a Federal
District Court Judge in Tucson, Arizona.
In your letter, you stated that My letter to the FBI does
not contain sufficient detail to determine whether a criminal
investigation is warranted. You also requested that I submit, to
the Tucson office of the FBI, further documentation of the
alleged misconduct, to include names, dates, and any other facts
that may be pertinent. To this end, enclosed please find all the
pertinent materials currently in My possession and control.
The thread of evidence you should follow concerns the events
which occurred immediately after a federal grand jury subpoena
was first served on New Life Health Center Company in Tucson,
Arizona state ("New Life"). Pay particular attention to the fate
of all the U.S. Mail which We transmitted directly to the grand
jury Foreperson in response to their subpoena.
I was retained by New Life at that time to answer the
subpoena (see enclosed PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION, dated March 20,
1996) and to assist New Life with their civil defense. This
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was mailed to the Grand Jury Foreperson
via Registered U.S. Mail, return receipt and restricted delivery
both requested. The enclosed evidence will show that this
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was illegally intercepted by John M.
Roll, who handed it to Robert L. Miskell in the office of the
United States Attorney in Tucson.
After investigating on Our own, and with the able assistance
of the Postmaster, We decided to prepare and mail a FORMAL
REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION to the same federal grand jury. This
request was mailed to the Foreperson on April 28, 1996 (see
enclosed). This FORMAL REQUEST was also intercepted by John M.
Roll, who also handed it to Robert L. Miskell. We have reason to
believe that the federal grand jury never saw this FORMAL REQUEST
either.
At a subsequent hearing on the matter, John M. Roll
admitted, on the official court record, that he had intercepted
this FORMAL REQUEST. He also said that he had not opened it, but
that he had given it to Robert L. Miskell. At that same hearing,
Robert L. Miskell admitted, on record, that he had received this
FORMAL REQUEST from John M. Roll, and that the mail in question
simply contained a formal request that the federal grand jury
investigate possible violations of federal law by Robert L.
Miskell. We inferred from Miskell's comments that he had,
indeed, opened this mail, because he was correct about its
contents.
At this point, We felt it was necessary to place the
Foreperson of the federal grand jury on the Proof of Service list
for all subsequent pleadings which We planned to file in that
case. All together, some twenty-five (25) different pleadings
were then filed under My signature, or under signatures of Mine
and Dr. Eugene A. Burns. Some of these pleadings are affidavits.
All pleadings currently in My possession and control are
enclosed, for your review.
Counting all 25 pleadings, the PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
(26), and the FORMAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION (27), none of
which were ever delivered to the federal grand jury Foreperson to
whom they were mailed, We count 27 counts of mail fraud, 27
counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice,
and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above, committed
by a conspiracy of persons including, but not limited to, John M.
Roll, Janet Napolitano, Robert L. Miskell, and Evangelina
Cardenas. Other likely accessories to these crimes include
Robert A. Johnson, Robert H. Weare, and William M. McCool.
At another hearing on the matter, John M. Roll complained
that he had some 14 inches of pleadings to read in this case.
But then, he immediately called a recess, and huddled for quite
some time with his staff, both inside and outside the courtroom.
When he came back into session, John M. Roll qualified his
earlier statement by saying that he really had only 6 or 7 inches
of pleadings in this case, but that he guaranteed, if We had
filed them, he had read them. This statement was witnessed by Me
and by My assistant Counsel, Neil Thomas Nordbrock, who is also a
federal witness to perjury of oath by Robert L. Miskell in
another case. Neil Nordbrock and I took his qualification to
mean that John M. Roll had, in fact, intercepted all 25 pleadings
which We had mailed to the grand jury Foreperson. You can
measure their thickness yourself.
I hope this response to your letter is satisfactory. If you
should need any additional information, permit Me to recommend
that you first contact Dr. Eugene A. Burns, Managing Director of
New Life Health Center Company, 4500 East Speedway, Suite 27,
Tucson, Arizona state. As of the moment I vacated the premises
at New Life, Dr. Burns was in possession and control of all the
documentary exhibits which were attached to the enclosed
pleadings. These documentary exhibits include, for example, the
Postmaster's response to our FOIA request for a certified copy of
the Standing Delivery Order (USPS Form 3801) signed by the
federal grand jury Foreperson in the New Life case. This
response stated that there was no such document in existence,
proving that the Foreperson had never authorized anyone else to
accept or sign for U.S. Mail addressed to him/her.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
VERIFICATION
I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona
state and federal witness, hereby verify, under penalty of
perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without
the "United States," that the above statements of fact are true,
correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of My current
information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Further Affiant sayeth naught.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
attachments: to FBI, Tucson
copy: Bruce J. Gebhardt
Special Agent in Charge
copy: Thomas H. Basham
Supervisory Senior Resident Agent
c/o Federal Bureau of Investigation
1 South Church Avenue, Suite 600
Tucson, Arizona state 85701/tdc
copy: Postmaster
U.S. Post Office
Downtown Station
Tucson, Arizona
# # #
At 10:31 PM 11/15/96 -0800, you wrote:
>I'm afraid I don't know the first thing about any of the formats you
>spoke about. I have the docs on disk. Perhaps somewhere along the line I
>will become a bit more knowlegeable about those types of things and I
>will be able to read them then. I don't think they are extremely
>important to me at this time. Yes Paul, I am the typical woman when it
>comes to computer technology. I'm basicly computer illiterate and as you
>have pointed out so well, I don't spell to good either.
>
>
>
>Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> fbi.doc I recall;
>> trust.doc I do not recall.
>> Can you be more specific?
>> I can encode in BinHex, MIME, or Uuencode.
>> Please choose one. I default to BinHex.
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>> At 08:00 PM 11/15/96 -0800, you wrote:
>> >Paul....In of your posts you sent two documents in Macintosh format. I
>> >would very much like to read them but I am unable to convert them. One
>> >of them is a "trust doc" the other is "fbi doc." Any possibility you
>> >could resend them in a format I could read? I'm appreciate it.
>> > Joyce
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ===========================================================
>> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>> ===========================================================
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail