Time: Sat Nov 16 06:30:48 1996 To: joyce@mlode.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: documents Cc: Bcc: Joyce, Okay, let's try an experiment, to see what happens. I will send a document to you in BinHex encoding, which is my default. All my documents are written by MS-WORD for DOS, Version 5.0B, which is upward-compatible with most Windows-based word processors. The file I am sending you is VOLSTAD.DOC the Petition to Congress re: "IRS" -- an alias for Trust #62 in Puerto Rico. If you can read and print this, we are home free. /s/ Paul Mitchell Here is the file in-line: FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION TO CONGRESS FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES Dear Representative/Senator ____________________________________: This is a formal Petition to Congress for redress of a major grievance which I have with the federal government. Recent research has disclosed that the original motive for Prohibition (the Volstead Act), was to give oil companies an unfair jump on their monopoly over automotive fuels. It also appears that the BATF were created to disperse an unlawful police force throughout the several States, under the guise of controlling commerce in alcohol. Once the monopoly was in place, Prohibition was repealed, leaving alcohol high and dry as the preferred fuel for automobiles, and leaving this unlawful police force in place to extort money from the American People. This research also proves that the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic] is actually an alias for the Federal Alcohol Administration domiciled at Trust #62 in Puerto Rico, under an Act of Congress which was held to be unconstitutional in 1935. The proof is found, among other places, in all the references to Title 27 which can be found in the regulations for Title 26. None of these regulations is lawful, because IRC 7851(a)(6)(A) states that the provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the day after the date of enactment of Title 26. Unfortunately for the federal government, Title 26, as such, has never been enacted into positive law, rendering ALL the enforcement provisions of subtitle F null and void. For example, the authority to issue regulations in the first instance is found in subtitle F. From the research cited above, I have come to believe that the United States federal government is now engaged in a criminal syndicate of extortion, perjury, mail fraud, theft, conversion, fraud, and conspiracy involving all of the above. I therefore demand immediate hearings on the relations between the "Internal Revenue Service" and the Federal Alcohol Administration domiciled in Puerto Rico and operating elsewhere on this planet. If these hearings should prove that the Internal Revenue Service is not a lawful organization within the United States Department of the Treasury, then it is time for a major shift in the wind, because every piece of mail they are sending these days is one count of mail fraud by the sender. I think you will agree that We, as a Nation, have a very big problem here. I will look forward to your immediate response to this formal, verified Petition for Redress of this major grievance which I, and millions of other Americans, now have against the United States (federal government). I never thought I would see the day when I would be forced to define the "United States" as a criminal enterprise, but sadly that day has now arrived. VERIFICATION I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the "United States", that the above statements of fact are true and correct, to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). Executed on the ___________ day of _______________________, 1996. Signed and printed, Citizen of __________________________ state all rights reserved without prejudice First Amendment Petition to Congress Follow These Fun Instructions: 1. Make 12 copies of your original and save it. You will need it tomorrow. Don't forget to print these instructions on the back side, so others like you will know what to do. 2. Complete 1 form for each U.S. Senator from your state, and 1 for your U.S. Representative. If you don't already know, their names are available at your local public library; just ask the Librarians, they will be happy to help you. 3. Post them via first class U.S. Mail, without return address, to the House of Representatives and United States Senate, Washington, D.C. [zip code exempt]. They will get there. 4. Give 3 blank forms to each of 3 others who are willing to follow through. This will propagate faster than 2x2x2 = 8, because 3x3x3 = 27! 5. Make as many extras as you are willing to disseminate, e.g. state Governor, county grand jury foreperson, any body, every body, and then some (don't forget Mom). You will get extra credit for doing this step. 6. Print the blank form and instructions in local newspapers, flyers, electronic bulletin board systems, Internet email, any way, every way, best way you can think of (we may want to imitate you, ok?). Lots of extra credit for doing this step too. 7. If you have a computer, get your hands on the original file VOLSTAD.DOC from Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (pmitch@primenet.com) written in MS-WORD for DOS, Version 5.0B, upward compatible with almost ALL word processors. 8. Send $1 cash to Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [zip code exempt], to support additional research, writing, communication, and political action like this. This is a fee for services tendered, rendered, and retained. Extra funds mean extra credits. 9. Call late night talk shows and read the First Amendment Petition to the hosts, right on the air. Try reading it in the mirror first, when nobody is looking or listening, to give yourself confidence. You might also practice it in speech classes, to get expert feedback on subtle things, like inflection, emphasis, and emotion. Weeping is ok. This is a nationwide catharsis we must overcome. 10. It is perfectly okay to use a pen name, if you need some additional privacy and security. 11. Rejoice and be glad, for the day of your deliverance is now at hand. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Here is the FBI letter in-line: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Tucson [zip code exempt] ARIZONA REPUBLIC September 13, 1996 Mr. Thomas H. Basham Supervisory Senior Resident Agent Federal Bureau of Investigation U.S. Department of Justice 201 East Indianola Phoenix, Arizona 85012/tdc Subject: Criminal Misconduct by John M. Roll, United States District Court, Tucson Dear Mr. Basham: Thank you very much for your letter to Me, dated September 9, 1996, concerning alleged criminal misconduct by a Federal District Court Judge in Tucson, Arizona. In your letter, you stated that My letter to the FBI does not contain sufficient detail to determine whether a criminal investigation is warranted. You also requested that I submit, to the Tucson office of the FBI, further documentation of the alleged misconduct, to include names, dates, and any other facts that may be pertinent. To this end, enclosed please find all the pertinent materials currently in My possession and control. The thread of evidence you should follow concerns the events which occurred immediately after a federal grand jury subpoena was first served on New Life Health Center Company in Tucson, Arizona state ("New Life"). Pay particular attention to the fate of all the U.S. Mail which We transmitted directly to the grand jury Foreperson in response to their subpoena. I was retained by New Life at that time to answer the subpoena (see enclosed PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION, dated March 20, 1996) and to assist New Life with their civil defense. This PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was mailed to the Grand Jury Foreperson via Registered U.S. Mail, return receipt and restricted delivery both requested. The enclosed evidence will show that this PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION was illegally intercepted by John M. Roll, who handed it to Robert L. Miskell in the office of the United States Attorney in Tucson. After investigating on Our own, and with the able assistance of the Postmaster, We decided to prepare and mail a FORMAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION to the same federal grand jury. This request was mailed to the Foreperson on April 28, 1996 (see enclosed). This FORMAL REQUEST was also intercepted by John M. Roll, who also handed it to Robert L. Miskell. We have reason to believe that the federal grand jury never saw this FORMAL REQUEST either. At a subsequent hearing on the matter, John M. Roll admitted, on the official court record, that he had intercepted this FORMAL REQUEST. He also said that he had not opened it, but that he had given it to Robert L. Miskell. At that same hearing, Robert L. Miskell admitted, on record, that he had received this FORMAL REQUEST from John M. Roll, and that the mail in question simply contained a formal request that the federal grand jury investigate possible violations of federal law by Robert L. Miskell. We inferred from Miskell's comments that he had, indeed, opened this mail, because he was correct about its contents. At this point, We felt it was necessary to place the Foreperson of the federal grand jury on the Proof of Service list for all subsequent pleadings which We planned to file in that case. All together, some twenty-five (25) different pleadings were then filed under My signature, or under signatures of Mine and Dr. Eugene A. Burns. Some of these pleadings are affidavits. All pleadings currently in My possession and control are enclosed, for your review. Counting all 25 pleadings, the PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION (26), and the FORMAL REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION (27), none of which were ever delivered to the federal grand jury Foreperson to whom they were mailed, We count 27 counts of mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice, and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above, committed by a conspiracy of persons including, but not limited to, John M. Roll, Janet Napolitano, Robert L. Miskell, and Evangelina Cardenas. Other likely accessories to these crimes include Robert A. Johnson, Robert H. Weare, and William M. McCool. At another hearing on the matter, John M. Roll complained that he had some 14 inches of pleadings to read in this case. But then, he immediately called a recess, and huddled for quite some time with his staff, both inside and outside the courtroom. When he came back into session, John M. Roll qualified his earlier statement by saying that he really had only 6 or 7 inches of pleadings in this case, but that he guaranteed, if We had filed them, he had read them. This statement was witnessed by Me and by My assistant Counsel, Neil Thomas Nordbrock, who is also a federal witness to perjury of oath by Robert L. Miskell in another case. Neil Nordbrock and I took his qualification to mean that John M. Roll had, in fact, intercepted all 25 pleadings which We had mailed to the grand jury Foreperson. You can measure their thickness yourself. I hope this response to your letter is satisfactory. If you should need any additional information, permit Me to recommend that you first contact Dr. Eugene A. Burns, Managing Director of New Life Health Center Company, 4500 East Speedway, Suite 27, Tucson, Arizona state. As of the moment I vacated the premises at New Life, Dr. Burns was in possession and control of all the documentary exhibits which were attached to the enclosed pleadings. These documentary exhibits include, for example, the Postmaster's response to our FOIA request for a certified copy of the Standing Delivery Order (USPS Form 3801) signed by the federal grand jury Foreperson in the New Life case. This response stated that there was no such document in existence, proving that the Foreperson had never authorized anyone else to accept or sign for U.S. Mail addressed to him/her. Thank you very much for your consideration. VERIFICATION I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the "United States," that the above statements of fact are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). Further Affiant sayeth naught. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness attachments: to FBI, Tucson copy: Bruce J. Gebhardt Special Agent in Charge copy: Thomas H. Basham Supervisory Senior Resident Agent c/o Federal Bureau of Investigation 1 South Church Avenue, Suite 600 Tucson, Arizona state 85701/tdc copy: Postmaster U.S. Post Office Downtown Station Tucson, Arizona # # # At 10:31 PM 11/15/96 -0800, you wrote: >I'm afraid I don't know the first thing about any of the formats you >spoke about. I have the docs on disk. Perhaps somewhere along the line I >will become a bit more knowlegeable about those types of things and I >will be able to read them then. I don't think they are extremely >important to me at this time. Yes Paul, I am the typical woman when it >comes to computer technology. I'm basicly computer illiterate and as you >have pointed out so well, I don't spell to good either. > > > >Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote: >> >> fbi.doc I recall; >> trust.doc I do not recall. >> Can you be more specific? >> I can encode in BinHex, MIME, or Uuencode. >> Please choose one. I default to BinHex. >> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> At 08:00 PM 11/15/96 -0800, you wrote: >> >Paul....In of your posts you sent two documents in Macintosh format. I >> >would very much like to read them but I am unable to convert them. One >> >of them is a "trust doc" the other is "fbi doc." Any possibility you >> >could resend them in a format I could read? I'm appreciate it. >> > Joyce >> > >> > >> >> =========================================================== >> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >> =========================================================== > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail