Time: Sat Nov 16 06:53:41 1996
To: joyce@mlode.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: question
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Hi Joyce,

We stipulate, formally, that federal citizens
have no standing to bring the challenges we
are making.  That is one concession.

Don't forget, we are as much a political
movement as a group of litigators.  The
SC has consistently ruled that the courts
are the alternative to violence, and that
they are set up to hear political matters,
as much as legal ones.  

In fact, SC has ruled that the Petition Clause
is the right conservative of all other rights.
That is a very powerful statement.

We want people to abandon federal citizenship
in droves, once they begin to see what you
have, and don't have, being a federal citizen.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

At 10:57 PM 11/15/96 -0800, you wrote:
>How does "the rule of necessity" affect the action you are about to
>take. I think I may have a case on that somewhere in my files. Want me
>to look?
>I've never been asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement before. Looks
>like this is going to be a new adventure for me.

No, it's not very formal.
I just need you to agree that
you will keep the documents
to yourself, and not disclose
them to anyone else, until
and unless you have prior
written authorization from me.
We would like you to consider
joining the Supreme Law Firm,
and this is our way of screening
you.  Okay?

/s/ Paul Mitchell


>Your work sounds both challenging and fascinating. I know of a few
>people who have attempted to do what you are doing. Unfortunately I
>don't know the outcome. Please be careful Paul. You are treading in very
>dangerous waters.

I am wearing the armor of faith.
A mighty fortress is our Maker,
the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords,
the beginning and end of all things.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


>I have not shared our dialog with anyone at this point, although I have
>mentioned to a fellow researcher that I am in contact with you. He has
>read your book and admires you greatly. He has retired. He doesn't like
>jails....

Who does?


>The one person I know who could really be of help to you has been broken
>by the system and is very bitter. I'm hoping he will heal in time and
>return to us.

Only one Power can do that.


 I must ask....Have you read "Which One are You" by the
>Informer?

Yes, five times.

 If not, perhaps I will copy the chapters one at a time and
>mail them to you. It's been a long time since I read it but it's a
>classic. Any person who challenges the court on any issue, especially
>taxes, should read it.

There are much better works,
and much better methods.

 
>I'm going to have a busy weekend. My library has outgrown its present
>quarters and needs to be moved.

Same here.  I am excited
about upgrading our telecomm
equipment.


 Then I have to reorganize my office.
>That is a herculean task.

I routinely sort all papers,
and put them in their own
manila folder and hanging
file folder, then into the
4-drawer filing cabinet they
go.  I can't stand stacked
papers:  impossible to find
anything without lengthy 
searching -- a huge waste of time.


 I can't afford any down time. I'm always in
>the middle of one project or another.

I can tell;  that's one of
the many things I like about you.


> What I really need is a vacation.

You're welcome to visit Arizona,
and use my private guest bedroom,
at any time.  We have a beautiful
pool, and the weather is great
this time of the year.  Stay away
during summer, though:  115 F.+.
Yeeeoooowww!


>I haven't quite recovered yet from my move and I can't seem to get
>organized...I never have enough time........
>By the way, do you know John Nelson?


I know John, but he does not know me.
I have very great respect for the
volume of work he produced several
years ago.  It was seminal, to say
the least.

/s/ Paul Mitchell
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail