Time: Fri Nov 22 20:04:49 1996 To: rharris@mail.telis.org From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Re: Wallens questions & more Cc: Bcc: At 10:14 PM 11/18/96 -0700, you wrote: >Dear Paul, > >Thank you for the notice of ilrg; I went there and looked, got a copy of >the USConstitution from them, as well as some inedexes. > >1..I had been going to ask you where to get VALID copies of the American >Constitution, as amended. This is a highly political question, which the courts are trying to avoid like the plague. There IS no "valid copy of the American Constitution" at the present time. > Do you trust ILRG as a source for one? They're probably as good as any other. > >2. In SWORNAFF.DOC, the quote from the INS Comissionner seems to >contradict the issue raised in "The Day Our Country Was Stolen" by L. C. Lyon >about the 14th Amendment (sic) making all people, at time of naturalization, >into US citizens. I know. Isn't that contradiction really revealing? A statement from deep within INS contradicts what the courts have been saying all along about federal citizenship! /s/ Paul Mitchell > >I still think I am a California Citizen BY the fact of my birth in California. That is correct; you are a "Citizen of California state". > >3> Sharing the wealth: As I read these Wallens papers I think of people >who would be interested in the contents. What are the conditions upon my >sharing them with other people? I would prefer that you hold off, until I can prepare the press release announcing my upcoming subscription service. Since she was led to believe a vicious lie that I am some kind of government agent, and relied upon this lie to refuse payment of my $3,100 invoice, I must find a way to recoup that loss. I will do so, in part, by selling electronic subscriptions, very much like the service I am providing to you. /s/ Paul Mitchell Do you have a standard agreement / reply >for this question? Not yet. Please be patient. The Post Office is now opening my first class mail. Today, my postmaster brought a ripped package to my attention; it had been mailed from the U.S. Supreme Court! /s/ Paul Mitchell What has occurred to me is to send 1 or 2 or 3 to >someone and if they want more then to suggest that they contract with you >to get them, much as I did. > >4. What are the replies to the various submissions, affidavits, and >"Notice and Demand..." that have been served on the court? Judge put Sheila in prison. Ninth Circuit has docketed the Judicial Complaint form which I filed against him. > >I gather that this is a case in progress and the statements of fact boggle my >mind. This is typical, Reed. I think I'll have to read many of them several times. Thus I wonder >what the replies are. Mostly silence from the U.S. Attorneys. We got confirmation from DOJ today that Nora Manella in the office of the U.S. Attorneys in Los Angeles has no credentials. /s/ Paul Mitchell > >5. Richard MacDonald's BBS, which is given some detail in COUNPA1.DOC, >says that it runs at 2400 baud, very slow. I'll log in and discover if he >has another rate for "subscribers". That is old news. He is using U.S. Robotics 28.8 modems now. > >6. As I recall, you once talked about persuing a case for an immigrant to register >to vote, or maybe for a state Citizen to regiuster to vote as an American >Citizen rather than a US citizen. How does one go about that? I have a press release on my own failed attempts to register as a Citizen of Arizona state for the general election which just passed. I can provide this to you, upon request. /s/ Paul Mitchell and is it >worth it? The United States is now terrified that we have proven the Jury Selection and Service Act to be unconstitutional. This proof relies heavily on the cases which prove that there are two classes of citizenship. Seems that We the People "about 1% of the population" don't have >many valid canidates. Can we reverse the course of the how "Our Country Was >Stolen" without voting? We have three votes: voting booth grand jury trial jury There are 2 others we must also address. That is why the JSSA is so crucial. /s/ Paul Mitchell > >7. I hear many people talking in favor of the govt providing a "safety >net" for the poor of the country and others worried that the govt is >spending too much on welfare, (not corporate, the other kind). My feelings >are in favor of the safety net partly because rich corporations and govt have >created the poverty class. Also, I was on AFDC (welfare) once, on Unempoloyment >Insurance once, and my computer training program wasa paid by California >Dept. of Re-habilitation. I don't ever want to be on any of them again but >it is hard for me to not be grateful for their being there when I needed >them. I am sure that you are one of their most famous success stories by now! Congratulations. Have you considered paying them back for the subsidies? /s/ Paul Mitchell > >8. Seems one typo, COUNPA1, page 17, line 20 "In is in such..." >> "It is in..." >(I think I'm good as a proof-reader.) probably. Thanks. /s/ Paul Mitchell > >Blessings, Thanks, I need them very much right now. The telephone installer was totally rude and obnoxious today: he left for more than 2 hours, and did not bother to tell me he would be gone so long. After I called trouble, to track him down, he came storming back into my apartment, ready to strangle me. He got so bad, I had to demand that he leave. It was very ugly. I called trouble again, and got a very sympathetic operator. She listened to the entire story, and even had a few to tell me. It was just no good that the guy would not ask me if I would be inconvenienced if he could not get the phones working right away. He was arrogant, and lacked consideration. I tried to tell him that I have an innocent client in Alabama who may die in prison, but he would not let me speak. When he left, all the phones were still not working. Now I must worry about phone taps. I can't believe that it would take 2+ HOURS to hookup 3 lines, particularly when the apartment was occupied as recently as two weeks ago. /s/ Paul Mitchell >Reed >---------------<O>--------------- >Reed Harris >e-mail: rharris@mail.telis.org >------------<O>---<O>------------ > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail