Time: Fri Nov 22 20:14:02 1996
To: phyllis keys <pkeys@qn.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: USDC v. DCUS
Cc:
Bcc:
At 11:09 AM 11/19/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Mr. Mitchell,
> After reading your material on the Federal grand jury and the U.S.
>District Court and District Court of the U.S., I am wondering whether I have
>any recourse.
Yes you do. Final Notice and Demand
for proof of power, standing, and
jurisdiction, with a 5 day deadline.
Upon default, you remove the action
into the DCUS, and reverse roles:
you become plaintiff, they become
defendants, including the USDC
judge as "Doe Number One."
I was charged with 7201, grand jury indictment, I could never
>get a copy of the evidence presented to the grand jury.
> Do you have any suggestions?
File FOIA request for the regulations
which promulgate 7201; that will
vault you into the DCUS.
Also, file FOIA request for regulations
which promulgate Jury Selection and
Service Act, 28 U.S.C. 1861 - 1865
(same years as Civil War).
Plea in Abatement is the correct
procedure for challenging a faulty
grand jury indictment.
We have a general-purpose challenge
to the federal Jury Selection and
Service Act, complete with a Motion to
Stay proceedings, pending final
resolution of our challenge.
I would much prefer that you retain
me for $500 @$75 to guide you through
the whole process. This buys you
7 hours + 1 free hour.
Otherwise, I must focus my time on
paying clients, and I may not be
available to you if and when you
need me.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
P.S. USDC has no criminal jurisdiction
whatsoever.
> Let me know when the next update or edition of The Federal Zone comes out
>and I will send you a check for it.
> Is the Justice Department exempt from answering FOIA's?
No, definitely not.
They are executive branch,
and they are specifically
NOT exempt. There are
specific exemptions in
the FOIA itself, however.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
>Thank you,
> Robert Keys
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail