Time: Fri Nov 22 22:47:52 1996 To: From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: OPERATION CABLE SPLICE Cc: Bcc: liberty lists <snip> >******************************************** >TOP SECRET >CODEWORD: CABLESPLICE >(This is a secret document being circulated among Top Government And UN. >people) > >An Aggressive Program to Counter The Disrupters Movement > >Recent efforts by The Disrupters Movement to gain political influence >are beginning to seriously and adversely affect public perceptions and >understanding of ongoing programs aimed at smoothing the transfer of >sovereignty and power from national governments to super-national >statist organizations unless such efforts are countered and discredited, >the task of creating a unified global government under UN control will >be far more difficult. The most dangerous element of The Disrupters >Movement are those that are part of the Christian Fundamentalist >majority. The following memorandum offers a set of policy prescriptions >designed to counter-act their, efforts, > >ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM > >Although there has always been opposition from groups and individuals >with a conservative, isolationist attitude, the recent growth of such >opposition, and the ability and organizational success of these groups >has raised serious concern in recent years. Unless steps are taken to >meet the challenge posed by The Disrupters Movement, it is possible that >these groups could make serious inroads into the public complacence >which has been so carefully nurtured over the past fifty Years, >The threat is two-fold. First, there is the traditional conservative >political threat, one which can be traced back to pre-W.W.II >isolationism and political conservatism. These groups are not of >particular concern as their organizing ability and numbers do not >suggest the capability for amassing significant political power. >It is the second category, the "Christian Fundamentalists," that pose >the greatest threat. These people are representative of a massive >population of Americans and if allowed to propagandize and organize that >base could present serious obstacles to further progress, > >I. Overt Programs; > >Overt programs to counter growing influence of Christian and other >groups should take various forms: > > A. An active effort aimed at promoting the benefits of global > organizations and institutions. Media stories, books, > conferences, and other means should be utilized to get the story > out in appropriate fashion. > > Appearances > > B. Appearances by political figures, well-known celebrities and > other influential figures at events connected to international > and super- national organizations and institutions. Of particular > use are events which involve "feel-good" operations such as > UNICEF, Feed the Children, Americare, etc. > > C. Promotion of peaceful uses of atomic energy, disarmament as a > necessary condition to peace and security, and tolerance and > acceptance of non-Christian faiths should be promoted > consistently but with enough subtlety so as not to turn off the > targeted populations. > > 1. Under no circumstances, however. should such efforts be > allowed to raise fears regarding those goals, nor should > they provide substantive evidence of the true objectives > of U.S.G. policy. > > 2. An important means of developing support for disarmament > and the reliance on the United Nations to impose global > order is through raising fears of nuclear weapons. By > playing up the danger of nuclear war, It should be > possible to generate considerable public support for > further movement towards the disarmament of national > states. This diverts attention from the real nature of > disarmament effort by portraying it as necessary to world > peace, rather than a step on the road to world > government. > > D. A massive attack on The Disrupters Movement, and especially > Christian religion groups. This assault would challenge them as > intolerant, hateful, exclusionist, and potentially dangerous. > Such a program would include the following: > > 1. Efforts should be made to falsely portray their > objectives as the creation of a religious theocracy and > the imposition of strict religious interpretation of the > Bible as the basis for political participation in "The > New Christian America." This can best be accomplished by > focusing on the most outrageous and extremist statements > and members, while down playing the more moderate > membership. > > 2. " Christian " groups should whenever possible be > portrayed as fringe elements of the country's religious > population, not especially numerous and certainly not > representative of "most" Christians. > > 3. At every opportunity these "Christian" groups should be > presented as vicious, intolerant, and especially as > anti-Semitic. The selective use of quotes, and if > necessary, the use of invented statements, can be most > effective means of accomplishing this task. > > Arrest > > 4. Arrest either on criminal charges or on mental Inquest > warrants certain members of The Disrupters Movement who > by their fanatical religious life-styles and/or their > EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS would be psychologically and > physically prepared to survive outside of the government > control. > > 5. Harassment on criminal charges or mental inquest warrants of those > who listen to and/or sympathize with The Disrupters Movement. > >II. Covert Programs: Covert programs may be equally as important, if not > more so, to countering the increasing effectiveness of The Disrupters > Movement. > > A. Infiltration of The Disrupters Movement by sympathetic agents is > an extremely useful tool in combating their efforts. > > 1. By carrying out extreme acts, and especially acts of > violence, such individuals can bring discredit and public > condemnation against The Disruption Movement. > > 2. By raising confusion , and care ful ly encouraging splits > and controversy within The Disrupters Movement, such > agents will be able to reduce the effectiveness and > coherency of those groups. > > B. Individuals who have been groomed to operate outside the usual > channels of political activity should be activated and placed in > positions in which they appear to be in opposition to USG policy. > > 1. These persons would speak out publicly in opposition to > our policies, but would be in fact be sympathetic to our > long term objectives. By carefully and selectively > providing false or misleading information, and > information of a seemingly scandalous or dramatic nature, > they would seem to be supporting the agenda of The > Disrupters Movement. But when the information the > promulgated was shown to be patently false, It would > further damage the credibility of the opposition. > > 2. The use of certain talk radio personalities along the > lines suggested in paragraph 1 has already proven quite > effective and further ventures along these lines could be > beneficial. > > 3. In extreme situations, it may become useful or even > necessary for these undercover assets to carry out > certain operations against members of The Disrupters > Movement who are interfering with CABLESPLICE. In some > cases, termination's with extreme prejudice may be called > for. > > Subversion > > C. Subversion and Elimination of the Second Amendment > > 1. One of the most critical efforts must be the removal of > firearms from individual control. The on-going long-term > program to accomplish this is to bear efforts along > current lines are advised. > > a. The use of "agent provocateurs," individuals who > are seemingly insane (but who are never taken > alive) who create highly publicized mass killings > with automatic weapons has been particularly > useful in molding public opinion. Similarly, the > regular use of random killings in large urban > areas as a way of creating a climate of fear and > violence has resulted in significant gains for > the gun-control point of view. Such programs are > extremely useful and should be continued and > possibly expanded. > > b. On-going efforts to gain small footholds in > gun-control are worthwhile as they open the door > to further controls later on. The importance of > eliminating the Second Amendment Right to Bear > Arms cannot be stressed too much. > > >III. DISINFORMATION PROGRAMS: > >These programs should be designed to carefully seed the media with false >and misleading information about long-term goals and plans, as well as >forged and deceptive details about The Disrupters Movement. > > A. Careful and selective placement of spurious and potentially > damaging news stories in the popular media is an excellent means > of raising doubts and fears of the population. Our opponents have > made good use of this technique, we should do likewise. > > B. One of the most effective disinformation programs has been the > selected use of "expose" books and stories, all reputedly written by > former government and super-government officials, but in fact developed > within the NSA and CIA. > > 1. Connections to actual government operations, and the bona > fides of such expose authors are deliberately vague in > order to make tracing and verifying their stories > difficult. > > 2. Although the books and information "exposed" would > seemingly be extremely critical of our long-term programs > and objectives, the contradictions contained within, the > difficulty of verifying either authors or details, and > the wild-eyed style verging on the Irrational would all > work to discredit and raise doubts. > > > The presentation > > 3. The presentation of fringe and extremist religious > doctrine and beliefs, or the presentation of Christian > religious beliefs in particularly dogmatic and intolerant > fashion, would help to turn popular opinion against The > Disrupter Movement. > > >IV. Other Propaganda Efforts > > A. Print Media/Publications > > 1. Appropriate use of popular media intended to discredit > and attack opponents is a fundamental tool of countering > The Disrupters Movement. > > 2. While control of the major media outlets is crucial to > such efforts, it is through "fringe" media publications > that the most damage can be done to The Disrupters > Movement. Continued use of assets within the counter > media can be beneficial. > > B. Electronic/Computer Systems: Electronic computer systems, > bulletin boards, and information superhighway in general is an > area of considerable importance to efforts to combat the > activities of The Disrupter Movement. The ability of opponents to > utilize computer bulletin boards to pass information and educate > people must be met with an active program of disinformation and > attack. > > 1. One means of countering the effectiveness of such > opposition efforts is the simple expedient of overloading > their bulletin boards. A single operator with one > computer can set a program in motion that will send out > thousands of messages. The sheer volume of such messages > is more then the content. Most people will give up rather > then read through hundreds and thousands of messages. > > 2. A second means of countering the opposition's use of > computer technology is through the careful placing of > disinformation agents. Such agents can take two forms: > > a. Agents may be placed who will simply argue > against the opposition, using delaying and > confusing tactics such as constantly demanding > references and "proof" of allegations, referring > to obscure and difficult to find documents as > evidence that the opposition is wrong, and > generally forcing the opposition to waste > tremendous amounts of time simply defending > itself from spurious and irrelevant attacks. > > Other > > b. Other agents have been placed with a more subtle > purpose mind. Such agents would take on the > persons WA attitudes of members of The Disrupters > Movement, but would present the opposition case > in ways that will ultimately discredit them. The > necessary effort to correct. the messages posted > by these agents, and the resulting appearance of > disarray within their camp should present > considerable opportunities for further assaults > on The Disrupters Movement. > > 3. In cases of computer networks where it is highly > imperative that the efforts of The Disrupters be > neutralized, coordinated assaults can be arranged using > aliases and multiple membership ID's to present a wide > array of negative and meddlesome messages. > > C. Diversionary efforts > > 1. Bread and Circuses > > a. Celebrities > > The use of celebrities is a proven means of > diverting attention from serious political > Issues. Moreover, the use of selected celebrity > figures as political spokesperson can be a very > effective means of getting our message across. > > b. Sports > > Sports are useful as a means of diverting > attention from serious political issues and > dulling the minds of the populace. By focusing > all their energies on sporting events, we can > prevent people from undertaking the intense and > serious study necessary to take effective > political action. > > c. Gambling > > The provision of numerous outlets for public > gambling serves multiple purposes; it serves to > keep the popular attention engaged on sporting > events, as well as what has become known as > "lottery fever. " Perhaps more important, > widespread gambling not only keeps the general > public poor, it provides needed income for our > own uses-- especially when allowed in the form of > state lotteries which purport to provide money > for education, senior citizens, or other popular > purposes. In fact, through the careful use of > accounting manipulation, much of the funds raised > are being diverted to support many of the other > programs and efforts described in this memo. > > Talk > > D. Talk Shows: Talk Shows serve a duel purpose: > > 1. By diverting attention from serious issues, such programs > dull the public intellect and prevent people from > focusing on real issues and problems. > > 2. By constantly presenting groups such as homosexuals, > feminists, etc. In a favorable light, and presenting > real "white supremacists" "religious zealots" and other > opponents unfavorably, these programs can serve to > reaffirm in the public mind which people are "good" and > which are "bad." > > >It is our belief that the above strategies.. if implemented effectively, can >be effective in countering and ultimately rendering ineffective the efforts >of The Disrupters Movement. > >***** END of document **** > > > > > >Gary Hunt wrote: > >Outpost of Freedom > Gary Hunt > November 19, 1996 > >I have, recently, posted "Informants Amongst Us" and "C3CM" to >demonstrate what means are used by government to create as much >confusion, criticism and division in the Constitutionalist Community as >possible. There are a few more pieces that I have become aware of in the >past seven or eight years. Operation Cablesplice is one of those 'items' >that, although subject to controversy, should be red for what is said, >not, necessarily, for where it comes from. >As you read the following 'document', consider that it may have been >written by someone other than the government, perhaps as a detraction, >perhaps as a spoof. In either event, the government surely has read the >document, and if they have not adopted the policies presented therein, >they are foolish enough to have relinquished power by now. >I first received a copy of Cablesplice back in the earlier days of >fax-networking. There were many (among them, myself) who felt that the >concepts of Cablesplice were being applied even then. The Internet, >however, has opened a whole new forum for the propagation of the time of >methods outlined in Cablesplice. >As most are aware, now, Marshall Richards, of the West Virginia militia, >was an informant. The means by which the government achieved 'control' >over Richards may be as outlines in "Informants Amongst Us", and is >definitely consistent with Cablesplice. >Nearly every recent 'bust' of patriots was achieved by an informant and >an active agent, working together. We can usually see these situations, >after the fact, but we know that they are there. >Let's look a little further. Look at the proliferation of >information/disinformation circulating, daily, on the Internet. Take, >for example, a recent claim that last Friday's (November 22) 20/20 >program was going to air some revealing interviews, with government >agents, that would blow the cover off of the government's involvement in >the OKC Bombing. After the program didn't air, excuses were made, and >blames laid. The bottom line, however, is that this is exactly what saps >the energy from the movement. Whether the issue be flying saucers, >comets striking earth, indictments (how many, how many times now?) >against Billary, or any other issue that is not directly relevant to the >cause, it is a drain. >Had Mike Kemp or the Georgia Militia, and soon the Viper militia, the >energy expended on them that is wasted on this irrelevant crud, perhaps >we would begin seeing change. >Start wondering what the Founders did before the events of April 19, >1775, hurled them into war. Were they as ill prepared as we are today? >The answer, quite frankly, is NO! They were prepared, and that >preparation did not come from bantering about, acting as if the >knowledge of all events was evil, and that each was an expert. They >organized themselves into Committees of Protection, Correspondence and >Safety, and they prepared themselves, mentally and physically, for what >they perceived to lie in their future. It is no surprise, when the true >history is read, that they were able to achieve what they did. And, >more, surprisingly, the odds against them were far worse than they are >against us, today. > >Now, read "CODEWORD -- OPERATION CABLESPLICE, and begin to understand >that the enemy uses his head. It is time that we start doing the same! > > > > If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of > servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home > from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch > down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget > that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams > > >>>>>> http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html 1-800-677-1207 ext. 1800 >############################################################################ > > > >TO RECEIVE email from ralph: send email to ralph@TeamInfinity.com and in >the Subject make sure your email address and the word GO-RALPH (no spaces) >is in the subject. > >TO STOP RECEIVING email from ralph: send email to ralph@TeamInfinity.com >and in the Subject make sure your email address and the word WHOA-RALPH >(no spaces) is in the subject. > > > > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail