Time: Fri Nov 22 22:47:52 1996
To:
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: OPERATION CABLE SPLICE
Cc:
Bcc: liberty lists
<snip>
>********************************************
>TOP SECRET
>CODEWORD: CABLESPLICE
>(This is a secret document being circulated among Top Government And UN.
>people)
>
>An Aggressive Program to Counter The Disrupters Movement
>
>Recent efforts by The Disrupters Movement to gain political influence
>are beginning to seriously and adversely affect public perceptions and
>understanding of ongoing programs aimed at smoothing the transfer of
>sovereignty and power from national governments to super-national
>statist organizations unless such efforts are countered and discredited,
>the task of creating a unified global government under UN control will
>be far more difficult. The most dangerous element of The Disrupters
>Movement are those that are part of the Christian Fundamentalist
>majority. The following memorandum offers a set of policy prescriptions
>designed to counter-act their, efforts,
>
>ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM
>
>Although there has always been opposition from groups and individuals
>with a conservative, isolationist attitude, the recent growth of such
>opposition, and the ability and organizational success of these groups
>has raised serious concern in recent years. Unless steps are taken to
>meet the challenge posed by The Disrupters Movement, it is possible that
>these groups could make serious inroads into the public complacence
>which has been so carefully nurtured over the past fifty Years,
>The threat is two-fold. First, there is the traditional conservative
>political threat, one which can be traced back to pre-W.W.II
>isolationism and political conservatism. These groups are not of
>particular concern as their organizing ability and numbers do not
>suggest the capability for amassing significant political power.
>It is the second category, the "Christian Fundamentalists," that pose
>the greatest threat. These people are representative of a massive
>population of Americans and if allowed to propagandize and organize that
>base could present serious obstacles to further progress,
>
>I. Overt Programs;
>
>Overt programs to counter growing influence of Christian and other
>groups should take various forms:
>
> A. An active effort aimed at promoting the benefits of global
> organizations and institutions. Media stories, books,
> conferences, and other means should be utilized to get the story
> out in appropriate fashion.
>
> Appearances
>
> B. Appearances by political figures, well-known celebrities and
> other influential figures at events connected to international
> and super- national organizations and institutions. Of particular
> use are events which involve "feel-good" operations such as
> UNICEF, Feed the Children, Americare, etc.
>
> C. Promotion of peaceful uses of atomic energy, disarmament as a
> necessary condition to peace and security, and tolerance and
> acceptance of non-Christian faiths should be promoted
> consistently but with enough subtlety so as not to turn off the
> targeted populations.
>
> 1. Under no circumstances, however. should such efforts be
> allowed to raise fears regarding those goals, nor should
> they provide substantive evidence of the true objectives
> of U.S.G. policy.
>
> 2. An important means of developing support for disarmament
> and the reliance on the United Nations to impose global
> order is through raising fears of nuclear weapons. By
> playing up the danger of nuclear war, It should be
> possible to generate considerable public support for
> further movement towards the disarmament of national
> states. This diverts attention from the real nature of
> disarmament effort by portraying it as necessary to world
> peace, rather than a step on the road to world
> government.
>
> D. A massive attack on The Disrupters Movement, and especially
> Christian religion groups. This assault would challenge them as
> intolerant, hateful, exclusionist, and potentially dangerous.
> Such a program would include the following:
>
> 1. Efforts should be made to falsely portray their
> objectives as the creation of a religious theocracy and
> the imposition of strict religious interpretation of the
> Bible as the basis for political participation in "The
> New Christian America." This can best be accomplished by
> focusing on the most outrageous and extremist statements
> and members, while down playing the more moderate
> membership.
>
> 2. " Christian " groups should whenever possible be
> portrayed as fringe elements of the country's religious
> population, not especially numerous and certainly not
> representative of "most" Christians.
>
> 3. At every opportunity these "Christian" groups should be
> presented as vicious, intolerant, and especially as
> anti-Semitic. The selective use of quotes, and if
> necessary, the use of invented statements, can be most
> effective means of accomplishing this task.
>
> Arrest
>
> 4. Arrest either on criminal charges or on mental Inquest
> warrants certain members of The Disrupters Movement who
> by their fanatical religious life-styles and/or their
> EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS would be psychologically and
> physically prepared to survive outside of the government
> control.
>
> 5. Harassment on criminal charges or mental inquest warrants of those
> who listen to and/or sympathize with The Disrupters Movement.
>
>II. Covert Programs: Covert programs may be equally as important, if not
> more so, to countering the increasing effectiveness of The Disrupters
> Movement.
>
> A. Infiltration of The Disrupters Movement by sympathetic agents is
> an extremely useful tool in combating their efforts.
>
> 1. By carrying out extreme acts, and especially acts of
> violence, such individuals can bring discredit and public
> condemnation against The Disruption Movement.
>
> 2. By raising confusion , and care ful ly encouraging splits
> and controversy within The Disrupters Movement, such
> agents will be able to reduce the effectiveness and
> coherency of those groups.
>
> B. Individuals who have been groomed to operate outside the usual
> channels of political activity should be activated and placed in
> positions in which they appear to be in opposition to USG policy.
>
> 1. These persons would speak out publicly in opposition to
> our policies, but would be in fact be sympathetic to our
> long term objectives. By carefully and selectively
> providing false or misleading information, and
> information of a seemingly scandalous or dramatic nature,
> they would seem to be supporting the agenda of The
> Disrupters Movement. But when the information the
> promulgated was shown to be patently false, It would
> further damage the credibility of the opposition.
>
> 2. The use of certain talk radio personalities along the
> lines suggested in paragraph 1 has already proven quite
> effective and further ventures along these lines could be
> beneficial.
>
> 3. In extreme situations, it may become useful or even
> necessary for these undercover assets to carry out
> certain operations against members of The Disrupters
> Movement who are interfering with CABLESPLICE. In some
> cases, termination's with extreme prejudice may be called
> for.
>
> Subversion
>
> C. Subversion and Elimination of the Second Amendment
>
> 1. One of the most critical efforts must be the removal of
> firearms from individual control. The on-going long-term
> program to accomplish this is to bear efforts along
> current lines are advised.
>
> a. The use of "agent provocateurs," individuals who
> are seemingly insane (but who are never taken
> alive) who create highly publicized mass killings
> with automatic weapons has been particularly
> useful in molding public opinion. Similarly, the
> regular use of random killings in large urban
> areas as a way of creating a climate of fear and
> violence has resulted in significant gains for
> the gun-control point of view. Such programs are
> extremely useful and should be continued and
> possibly expanded.
>
> b. On-going efforts to gain small footholds in
> gun-control are worthwhile as they open the door
> to further controls later on. The importance of
> eliminating the Second Amendment Right to Bear
> Arms cannot be stressed too much.
>
>
>III. DISINFORMATION PROGRAMS:
>
>These programs should be designed to carefully seed the media with false
>and misleading information about long-term goals and plans, as well as
>forged and deceptive details about The Disrupters Movement.
>
> A. Careful and selective placement of spurious and potentially
> damaging news stories in the popular media is an excellent means
> of raising doubts and fears of the population. Our opponents have
> made good use of this technique, we should do likewise.
>
> B. One of the most effective disinformation programs has been the
> selected use of "expose" books and stories, all reputedly written by
> former government and super-government officials, but in fact developed
> within the NSA and CIA.
>
> 1. Connections to actual government operations, and the bona
> fides of such expose authors are deliberately vague in
> order to make tracing and verifying their stories
> difficult.
>
> 2. Although the books and information "exposed" would
> seemingly be extremely critical of our long-term programs
> and objectives, the contradictions contained within, the
> difficulty of verifying either authors or details, and
> the wild-eyed style verging on the Irrational would all
> work to discredit and raise doubts.
>
>
> The presentation
>
> 3. The presentation of fringe and extremist religious
> doctrine and beliefs, or the presentation of Christian
> religious beliefs in particularly dogmatic and intolerant
> fashion, would help to turn popular opinion against The
> Disrupter Movement.
>
>
>IV. Other Propaganda Efforts
>
> A. Print Media/Publications
>
> 1. Appropriate use of popular media intended to discredit
> and attack opponents is a fundamental tool of countering
> The Disrupters Movement.
>
> 2. While control of the major media outlets is crucial to
> such efforts, it is through "fringe" media publications
> that the most damage can be done to The Disrupters
> Movement. Continued use of assets within the counter
> media can be beneficial.
>
> B. Electronic/Computer Systems: Electronic computer systems,
> bulletin boards, and information superhighway in general is an
> area of considerable importance to efforts to combat the
> activities of The Disrupter Movement. The ability of opponents to
> utilize computer bulletin boards to pass information and educate
> people must be met with an active program of disinformation and
> attack.
>
> 1. One means of countering the effectiveness of such
> opposition efforts is the simple expedient of overloading
> their bulletin boards. A single operator with one
> computer can set a program in motion that will send out
> thousands of messages. The sheer volume of such messages
> is more then the content. Most people will give up rather
> then read through hundreds and thousands of messages.
>
> 2. A second means of countering the opposition's use of
> computer technology is through the careful placing of
> disinformation agents. Such agents can take two forms:
>
> a. Agents may be placed who will simply argue
> against the opposition, using delaying and
> confusing tactics such as constantly demanding
> references and "proof" of allegations, referring
> to obscure and difficult to find documents as
> evidence that the opposition is wrong, and
> generally forcing the opposition to waste
> tremendous amounts of time simply defending
> itself from spurious and irrelevant attacks.
>
> Other
>
> b. Other agents have been placed with a more subtle
> purpose mind. Such agents would take on the
> persons WA attitudes of members of The Disrupters
> Movement, but would present the opposition case
> in ways that will ultimately discredit them. The
> necessary effort to correct. the messages posted
> by these agents, and the resulting appearance of
> disarray within their camp should present
> considerable opportunities for further assaults
> on The Disrupters Movement.
>
> 3. In cases of computer networks where it is highly
> imperative that the efforts of The Disrupters be
> neutralized, coordinated assaults can be arranged using
> aliases and multiple membership ID's to present a wide
> array of negative and meddlesome messages.
>
> C. Diversionary efforts
>
> 1. Bread and Circuses
>
> a. Celebrities
>
> The use of celebrities is a proven means of
> diverting attention from serious political
> Issues. Moreover, the use of selected celebrity
> figures as political spokesperson can be a very
> effective means of getting our message across.
>
> b. Sports
>
> Sports are useful as a means of diverting
> attention from serious political issues and
> dulling the minds of the populace. By focusing
> all their energies on sporting events, we can
> prevent people from undertaking the intense and
> serious study necessary to take effective
> political action.
>
> c. Gambling
>
> The provision of numerous outlets for public
> gambling serves multiple purposes; it serves to
> keep the popular attention engaged on sporting
> events, as well as what has become known as
> "lottery fever. " Perhaps more important,
> widespread gambling not only keeps the general
> public poor, it provides needed income for our
> own uses-- especially when allowed in the form of
> state lotteries which purport to provide money
> for education, senior citizens, or other popular
> purposes. In fact, through the careful use of
> accounting manipulation, much of the funds raised
> are being diverted to support many of the other
> programs and efforts described in this memo.
>
> Talk
>
> D. Talk Shows: Talk Shows serve a duel purpose:
>
> 1. By diverting attention from serious issues, such programs
> dull the public intellect and prevent people from
> focusing on real issues and problems.
>
> 2. By constantly presenting groups such as homosexuals,
> feminists, etc. In a favorable light, and presenting
> real "white supremacists" "religious zealots" and other
> opponents unfavorably, these programs can serve to
> reaffirm in the public mind which people are "good" and
> which are "bad."
>
>
>It is our belief that the above strategies.. if implemented effectively, can
>be effective in countering and ultimately rendering ineffective the efforts
>of The Disrupters Movement.
>
>***** END of document ****
>
>
>
>
>
>Gary Hunt wrote:
>
>Outpost of Freedom
> Gary Hunt
> November 19, 1996
>
>I have, recently, posted "Informants Amongst Us" and "C3CM" to
>demonstrate what means are used by government to create as much
>confusion, criticism and division in the Constitutionalist Community as
>possible. There are a few more pieces that I have become aware of in the
>past seven or eight years. Operation Cablesplice is one of those 'items'
>that, although subject to controversy, should be red for what is said,
>not, necessarily, for where it comes from.
>As you read the following 'document', consider that it may have been
>written by someone other than the government, perhaps as a detraction,
>perhaps as a spoof. In either event, the government surely has read the
>document, and if they have not adopted the policies presented therein,
>they are foolish enough to have relinquished power by now.
>I first received a copy of Cablesplice back in the earlier days of
>fax-networking. There were many (among them, myself) who felt that the
>concepts of Cablesplice were being applied even then. The Internet,
>however, has opened a whole new forum for the propagation of the time of
>methods outlined in Cablesplice.
>As most are aware, now, Marshall Richards, of the West Virginia militia,
>was an informant. The means by which the government achieved 'control'
>over Richards may be as outlines in "Informants Amongst Us", and is
>definitely consistent with Cablesplice.
>Nearly every recent 'bust' of patriots was achieved by an informant and
>an active agent, working together. We can usually see these situations,
>after the fact, but we know that they are there.
>Let's look a little further. Look at the proliferation of
>information/disinformation circulating, daily, on the Internet. Take,
>for example, a recent claim that last Friday's (November 22) 20/20
>program was going to air some revealing interviews, with government
>agents, that would blow the cover off of the government's involvement in
>the OKC Bombing. After the program didn't air, excuses were made, and
>blames laid. The bottom line, however, is that this is exactly what saps
>the energy from the movement. Whether the issue be flying saucers,
>comets striking earth, indictments (how many, how many times now?)
>against Billary, or any other issue that is not directly relevant to the
>cause, it is a drain.
>Had Mike Kemp or the Georgia Militia, and soon the Viper militia, the
>energy expended on them that is wasted on this irrelevant crud, perhaps
>we would begin seeing change.
>Start wondering what the Founders did before the events of April 19,
>1775, hurled them into war. Were they as ill prepared as we are today?
>The answer, quite frankly, is NO! They were prepared, and that
>preparation did not come from bantering about, acting as if the
>knowledge of all events was evil, and that each was an expert. They
>organized themselves into Committees of Protection, Correspondence and
>Safety, and they prepared themselves, mentally and physically, for what
>they perceived to lie in their future. It is no surprise, when the true
>history is read, that they were able to achieve what they did. And,
>more, surprisingly, the odds against them were far worse than they are
>against us, today.
>
>Now, read "CODEWORD -- OPERATION CABLESPLICE, and begin to understand
>that the enemy uses his head. It is time that we start doing the same!
>
>
>
> If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of
> servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home
> from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch
> down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget
> that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams
>
>
>>>>>> http://TeamInfinity.com/urls.html 1-800-677-1207 ext. 1800
>############################################################################
>
>
>
>TO RECEIVE email from ralph: send email to ralph@TeamInfinity.com and in
>the Subject make sure your email address and the word GO-RALPH (no spaces)
>is in the subject.
>
>TO STOP RECEIVING email from ralph: send email to ralph@TeamInfinity.com
>and in the Subject make sure your email address and the word WHOA-RALPH
>(no spaces) is in the subject.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail