Time: Sun Nov 24 18:32:32 1996
To: Liberty Law
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: OPERATION CABLE SPLICE
Cc:
Bcc:
>From: "Harvest" <harvest@whitemtns.com>
>To: <caji@pobox.com>
>Cc: [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Fw: OPERATION CABLE SPLICE
>Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 09:34:05 -0700
>
>
>Please post this everywhere on the Internet that you may think anyone would
>be interested... maybe we can save someone from falling for Gary Hunt's
>most recent disinformation project.
>
>Thank you,
>
>harvest@whitemtns.com
>
>----------
>> From: Harvest <harvest@whitemtns.com>
>> To: pmitch@primenet.com
>> Cc: caji@pobox.com
>> Subject: Re: OPERATION CABLE SPLICE
>> Date: Sunday, November 24, 1996 9:28 AM
>>
>>
>> Gary Hunt, government agent provocoteur, is at it again. He was in Waco
>> trying to sabotage efforts to save the Branch Davidians... he then went
>to
>> Connecticutt and called for Militias to march to combat the State when
>the
>> State tried to collect cigarrette tax from some people on private land
>they
>> claimed was an Indian Reservation who claimed to be Native Americans.
>The
>> land was NOT a reservation and the people were not Native Americans...
>one
>> was Black and the other was White. When the scam was exposed Hunt moved
>on
>> to more scams each attempting to get Militia members or Patriots involved
>> in activities sure to get them discredited or arrested.
>>
>> Hunt claims to be a penniless Florida surveyor who runs something called
>> "The Outpost of Freedom", a do-nothing, fundless, front for his
>activities.
>> Despite being broke Hunt travels all over the nation all the time
>turning
>> up at every supposed crises and drumming up the Militia to march out and
>> meet the enemy at every moment. Hunt has no visible means of support and
>> has admitted being "broke", yet always has money and travel funds.
>>
>> We are in possession of a video tape which shows Gary Hunt as a pall
>bearer
>> at the funeral of an ATF agent some years ago... we are in the possession
>> of a photograph which shows three ATF agents standing together... all
>> wearing ATF "T" shirts... one of the three is Gary Hunt. We are also in
>> possession of many witness affidavits that confirm by positive
>> identification that Gary Hunt was a guest at the Grand Continental Hotel
>in
>> Oklahoma City a full week before the bombing. We also have a video tape
>> taken by a local TV station that clearly shows Gary Hunt and a companion,
>> each carrying transmitters, walking swiftly away from the just bombed
>> building... Whoooooopssssss! They are clearly suprised and upset that
>they
>> are being filmed and show no surprise or concern for the dead and wounded
>> behind them.
>>
>> The so-called "Operation Cable Splice" document that Hunt has put out is
>an
>> obvious FAKE... FRAUD... PHONY... etc. Operation Cable Splice was a
>> CALIFORNIA NATIONAL GUARD exercise that took place over two decades ago.
>> It was not then and is not now a national or federal operation. You can
>> read about it in my book "Behold A Pale Horse".... as I am the one that
>> exposed the REAL "Cable Splice". It is so easy to prove a fake that I am
>> amazed at Hunt's sheer stupidity.
>>
>> Gary Hunt is again doing what the government pays him to do... and once
>> again the sheople are falling for it... hook, line, and sinker. Notice
>the
>> obvious target of this fake document... just like the last fake document
>> that Hunt put out the target appears to be me... and other effective
>radio
>> talk hosts. But like all of Hunt's bullshit... and totally unlike Gary
>> Hunt... it won't wash on me... I document and source everything on my
>> broadcasts.
>>
>> Don't get me wrong... there is some obvious honey in the fake document...
>> but I exposed that honey many years ago... Hegel would love Gary Hunt.
>>
>> Wake Up ! Hunt is ENEMY all the way.
>>
>> William Cooper
>> Director, Intelligence Service
>> Second Continental Army of the Republic
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >Outpost of Freedom
>> > > Gary Hunt
>> > > November 19, 1996
>> > >
>> > >I have, recently, posted "Informants Amongst Us" and "C3CM" to
>> > >demonstrate what means are used by government to create as much
>> > >confusion, criticism and division in the Constitutionalist Community
>as
>> > >possible. There are a few more pieces that I have become aware of in
>the
>> > >past seven or eight years. Operation Cablesplice is one of those
>'items'
>> > >that, although subject to controversy, should be red for what is said,
>> > >not, necessarily, for where it comes from.
>> > >As you read the following 'document', consider that it may have been
>> > >written by someone other than the government, perhaps as a detraction,
>> > >perhaps as a spoof. In either event, the government surely has read
>the
>> > >document, and if they have not adopted the policies presented therein,
>> > >they are foolish enough to have relinquished power by now.
>> > >I first received a copy of Cablesplice back in the earlier days of
>> > >fax-networking. There were many (among them, myself) who felt that the
>> > >concepts of Cablesplice were being applied even then. The Internet,
>> > >however, has opened a whole new forum for the propagation of the time
>of
>> > >methods outlined in Cablesplice.
>> > >As most are aware, now, Marshall Richards, of the West Virginia
>militia,
>> > >was an informant. The means by which the government achieved 'control'
>> > >over Richards may be as outlines in "Informants Amongst Us", and is
>> > >definitely consistent with Cablesplice.
>> > >Nearly every recent 'bust' of patriots was achieved by an informant
>and
>> > >an active agent, working together. We can usually see these
>situations,
>> > >after the fact, but we know that they are there.
>> > >Let's look a little further. Look at the proliferation of
>> > >information/disinformation circulating, daily, on the Internet. Take,
>> > >for example, a recent claim that last Friday's (November 22) 20/20
>> > >program was going to air some revealing interviews, with government
>> > >agents, that would blow the cover off of the government's involvement
>in
>> > >the OKC Bombing. After the program didn't air, excuses were made, and
>> > >blames laid. The bottom line, however, is that this is exactly what
>saps
>> > >the energy from the movement. Whether the issue be flying saucers,
>> > >comets striking earth, indictments (how many, how many times now?)
>> > >against Billary, or any other issue that is not directly relevant to
>the
>> > >cause, it is a drain.
>> > >Had Mike Kemp or the Georgia Militia, and soon the Viper militia, the
>> > >energy expended on them that is wasted on this irrelevant crud,
>perhaps
>> > >we would begin seeing change.
>> > >Start wondering what the Founders did before the events of April 19,
>> > >1775, hurled them into war. Were they as ill prepared as we are today?
>> > >The answer, quite frankly, is NO! They were prepared, and that
>> > >preparation did not come from bantering about, acting as if the
>> > >knowledge of all events was evil, and that each was an expert. They
>> > >organized themselves into Committees of Protection, Correspondence and
>> > >Safety, and they prepared themselves, mentally and physically, for
>what
>> > >they perceived to lie in their future. It is no surprise, when the
>true
>> > >history is read, that they were able to achieve what they did. And,
>> > >more, surprisingly, the odds against them were far worse than they are
>> > >against us, today.
>> > >
>> > >Now, read "CODEWORD -- OPERATION CABLESPLICE, and begin to
>> > >understand that the enemy uses his head. It is time that we start
>doing
>> the > >same!
>> > >
>> > >Gary Hunt
>>
>>
>>
>> > >********************************************
>> > >TOP SECRET
>> > >CODEWORD: CABLESPLICE
>> > >(This is a secret document being circulated among Top Government And
>UN.
>> > >people)
>> > >
>> > >An Aggressive Program to Counter The Disrupters Movement
>> > >
>> > >Recent efforts by The Disrupters Movement to gain political influence
>> > >are beginning to seriously and adversely affect public perceptions and
>> > >understanding of ongoing programs aimed at smoothing the transfer of
>> > >sovereignty and power from national governments to super-national
>> > >statist organizations unless such efforts are countered and
>discredited,
>> > >the task of creating a unified global government under UN control will
>> > >be far more difficult. The most dangerous element of The Disrupters
>> > >Movement are those that are part of the Christian Fundamentalist
>> > >majority. The following memorandum offers a set of policy
>prescriptions
>> > >designed to counter-act their, efforts,
>> > >
>> > >ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM
>> > >
>> > >Although there has always been opposition from groups and individuals
>> > >with a conservative, isolationist attitude, the recent growth of such
>> > >opposition, and the ability and organizational success of these groups
>> > >has raised serious concern in recent years. Unless steps are taken to
>> > >meet the challenge posed by The Disrupters Movement, it is possible
>that
>> > >these groups could make serious inroads into the public complacence
>> > >which has been so carefully nurtured over the past fifty Years,
>> > >The threat is two-fold. First, there is the traditional conservative
>> > >political threat, one which can be traced back to pre-W.W.II
>> > >isolationism and political conservatism. These groups are not of
>> > >particular concern as their organizing ability and numbers do not
>> > >suggest the capability for amassing significant political power.
>> > >It is the second category, the "Christian Fundamentalists," that pose
>> > >the greatest threat. These people are representative of a massive
>> > >population of Americans and if allowed to propagandize and organize
>that
>> > >base could present serious obstacles to further progress,
>> > >
>> > >I. Overt Programs;
>> > >
>> > >Overt programs to counter growing influence of Christian and other
>> > >groups should take various forms:
>> > >
>> > > A. An active effort aimed at promoting the benefits of global
>> > > organizations and institutions. Media stories, books,
>> > > conferences, and other means should be utilized to get the
>> story
>> > > out in appropriate fashion.
>> > >
>> > > Appearances
>> > >
>> > > B. Appearances by political figures, well-known celebrities and
>> > > other influential figures at events connected to
>> international
>> > > and super- national organizations and institutions. Of
>> particular
>> > > use are events which involve "feel-good" operations such as
>> > > UNICEF, Feed the Children, Americare, etc.
>> > >
>> > > C. Promotion of peaceful uses of atomic energy, disarmament as a
>> > > necessary condition to peace and security, and tolerance
>and
>> > > acceptance of non-Christian faiths should be promoted
>> > > consistently but with enough subtlety so as not to turn off
>> the
>> > > targeted populations.
>> > >
>> > > 1. Under no circumstances, however. should such efforts be
>> > > allowed to raise fears regarding those goals, nor
>> should
>> > > they provide substantive evidence of the true
>> objectives
>> > > of U.S.G. policy.
>> > >
>> > > 2. An important means of developing support for disarmament
>> > > and the reliance on the United Nations to impose
>> global
>> > > order is through raising fears of nuclear weapons.
>By
>> > > playing up the danger of nuclear war, It should be
>> > > possible to generate considerable public support
>for
>> > > further movement towards the disarmament of
>national
>> > > states. This diverts attention from the real nature
>> of
>> > > disarmament effort by portraying it as necessary to
>> world
>> > > peace, rather than a step on the road to world
>> > > government.
>> > >
>> > > D. A massive attack on The Disrupters Movement, and especially
>> > > Christian religion groups. This assault would challenge
>them
>> as
>> > > intolerant, hateful, exclusionist, and potentially
>dangerous.
>> > > Such a program would include the following:
>> > >
>> > > 1. Efforts should be made to falsely portray their
>> > > objectives as the creation of a religious theocracy
>> and
>> > > the imposition of strict religious interpretation
>of
>> the
>> > > Bible as the basis for political participation in
>> "The
>> > > New Christian America." This can best be
>accomplished
>> by
>> > > focusing on the most outrageous and extremist
>> statements
>> > > and members, while down playing the more moderate
>> > > membership.
>> > >
>> > > 2. " Christian " groups should whenever possible be
>> > > portrayed as fringe elements of the country's
>> religious
>> > > population, not especially numerous and certainly
>not
>> > > representative of "most" Christians.
>> > >
>> > > 3. At every opportunity these "Christian" groups should be
>> > > presented as vicious, intolerant, and especially as
>> > > anti-Semitic. The selective use of quotes, and if
>> > > necessary, the use of invented statements, can be
>> most
>> > > effective means of accomplishing this task.
>> > >
>> > > Arrest
>> > >
>> > > 4. Arrest either on criminal charges or on mental Inquest
>> > > warrants certain members of The Disrupters Movement
>> who
>> > > by their fanatical religious life-styles and/or
>their
>> > > EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS would be psychologically and
>> > > physically prepared to survive outside of the
>> government
>> > > control.
>> > >
>> > > 5. Harassment on criminal charges or mental inquest warrants of
>those
>> > > who listen to and/or sympathize with The Disrupters Movement.
>> > >
>> > >II. Covert Programs: Covert programs may be equally as important, if
>not
>> > > more so, to countering the increasing effectiveness of The
>> Disrupters
>> > > Movement.
>> > >
>> > > A. Infiltration of The Disrupters Movement by sympathetic agents is
>> > > an extremely useful tool in combating their efforts.
>> > >
>> > > 1. By carrying out extreme acts, and especially acts of
>> > > violence, such individuals can bring discredit and
>> public
>> > > condemnation against The Disruption Movement.
>> > >
>> > > 2. By raising confusion , and care ful ly encouraging splits
>> > > and controversy within The Disrupters Movement,
>such
>> > > agents will be able to reduce the effectiveness and
>> > > coherency of those groups.
>> > >
>> > > B. Individuals who have been groomed to operate outside the usual
>> > > channels of political activity should be activated and
>placed
>> in
>> > > positions in which they appear to be in opposition to USG
>> policy.
>> > >
>> > > 1. These persons would speak out publicly in opposition to
>> > > our policies, but would be in fact be sympathetic
>to
>> our
>> > > long term objectives. By carefully and selectively
>> > > providing false or misleading information, and
>> > > information of a seemingly scandalous or dramatic
>> nature,
>> > > they would seem to be supporting the agenda of The
>> > > Disrupters Movement. But when the information the
>> > > promulgated was shown to be patently false, It
>would
>> > > further damage the credibility of the opposition.
>> > >
>> > > 2. The use of certain talk radio personalities along the
>> > > lines suggested in paragraph 1 has already proven
>> quite
>> > > effective and further ventures along these lines
>> could be
>> > > beneficial.
>> > >
>> > > 3. In extreme situations, it may become useful or even
>> > > necessary for these undercover assets to carry out
>> > > certain operations against members of The
>Disrupters
>> > > Movement who are interfering with CABLESPLICE. In
>> some
>> > > cases, termination's with extreme prejudice may be
>> called
>> > > for.
>> > >
>> > > Subversion
>> > >
>> > > C. Subversion and Elimination of the Second Amendment
>> > >
>> > > 1. One of the most critical efforts must be the removal of
>> > > firearms from individual control. The on-going
>> long-term
>> > > program to accomplish this is to bear efforts along
>> > > current lines are advised.
>> > >
>> > > a. The use of "agent provocateurs," individuals who
>> > > are seemingly insane (but who are never
>taken
>> > > alive) who create highly publicized mass
>> killings
>> > > with automatic weapons has been
>particularly
>> > > useful in molding public opinion.
>Similarly,
>> the
>> > > regular use of random killings in large
>urban
>> > > areas as a way of creating a climate of
>fear
>> and
>> > > violence has resulted in significant gains
>> for
>> > > the gun-control point of view. Such
>programs
>> are
>> > > extremely useful and should be continued
>and
>> > > possibly expanded.
>> > >
>> > > b. On-going efforts to gain small footholds in
>> > > gun-control are worthwhile as they open the
>> door
>> > > to further controls later on. The
>importance
>> of
>> > > eliminating the Second Amendment Right to
>> Bear
>> > > Arms cannot be stressed too much.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >III. DISINFORMATION PROGRAMS:
>> > >
>> > >These programs should be designed to carefully seed the media with
>false
>> > >and misleading information about long-term goals and plans, as well as
>> > >forged and deceptive details about The Disrupters Movement.
>> > >
>> > > A. Careful and selective placement of spurious and potentially
>> > > damaging news stories in the popular media is an excellent
>> means
>> > > of raising doubts and fears of the population. Our
>opponents
>> have
>> > > made good use of this technique, we should do likewise.
>> > >
>> > > B. One of the most effective disinformation programs has been the
>> > > selected use of "expose" books and stories, all reputedly written
>by
>> > > former government and super-government officials, but in fact
>> developed
>> > > within the NSA and CIA.
>> > >
>> > > 1. Connections to actual government operations, and the bona
>> > > fides of such expose authors are deliberately vague
>> in
>> > > order to make tracing and verifying their stories
>> > > difficult.
>> > >
>> > > 2. Although the books and information "exposed" would
>> > > seemingly be extremely critical of our long-term
>> programs
>> > > and objectives, the contradictions contained
>within,
>> the
>> > > difficulty of verifying either authors or details,
>> and
>> > > the wild-eyed style verging on the Irrational would
>> all
>> > > work to discredit and raise doubts.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The presentation
>> > >
>> > > 3. The presentation of fringe and extremist religious
>> > > doctrine and beliefs, or the presentation of
>> Christian
>> > > religious beliefs in particularly dogmatic and
>> intolerant
>> > > fashion, would help to turn popular opinion against
>> The
>> > > Disrupter Movement.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >IV. Other Propaganda Efforts
>> > >
>> > > A. Print Media/Publications
>> > >
>> > > 1. Appropriate use of popular media intended to discredit
>> > > and attack opponents is a fundamental tool of
>> countering
>> > > The Disrupters Movement.
>> > >
>> > > 2. While control of the major media outlets is crucial to
>> > > such efforts, it is through "fringe" media
>> publications
>> > > that the most damage can be done to The Disrupters
>> > > Movement. Continued use of assets within the
>counter
>> > > media can be beneficial.
>> > >
>> > > B. Electronic/Computer Systems: Electronic computer systems,
>> > > bulletin boards, and information superhighway in general is
>> an
>> > > area of considerable importance to efforts to combat the
>> > > activities of The Disrupter Movement. The ability of
>> opponents to
>> > > utilize computer bulletin boards to pass information and
>> educate
>> > > people must be met with an active program of disinformation
>> and
>> > > attack.
>> > >
>> > > 1. One means of countering the effectiveness of such
>> > > opposition efforts is the simple expedient of
>> overloading
>> > > their bulletin boards. A single operator with one
>> > > computer can set a program in motion that will send
>> out
>> > > thousands of messages. The sheer volume of such
>> messages
>> > > is more then the content. Most people will give up
>> rather
>> > > then read through hundreds and thousands of
>messages.
>> > >
>> > > 2. A second means of countering the opposition's use of
>> > > computer technology is through the careful placing
>of
>> > > disinformation agents. Such agents can take two
>> forms:
>> > >
>> > > a. Agents may be placed who will simply argue
>> > > against the opposition, using delaying and
>> > > confusing tactics such as constantly
>> demanding
>> > > references and "proof" of allegations,
>> referring
>> > > to obscure and difficult to find documents
>as
>> > > evidence that the opposition is wrong, and
>> > > generally forcing the opposition to waste
>> > > tremendous amounts of time simply defending
>> > > itself from spurious and irrelevant
>attacks.
>> > >
>> > > Other
>> > >
>> > > b. Other agents have been placed with a more subtle
>> > > purpose mind. Such agents would take on the
>> > > persons WA attitudes of members of The
>> Disrupters
>> > > Movement, but would present the opposition
>> case
>> > > in ways that will ultimately discredit
>them.
>> The
>> > > necessary effort to correct. the messages
>> posted
>> > > by these agents, and the resulting
>appearance
>> of
>> > > disarray within their camp should present
>> > > considerable opportunities for further
>> assaults
>> > > on The Disrupters Movement.
>> > >
>> > > 3. In cases of computer networks where it is highly
>> > > imperative that the efforts of The Disrupters be
>> > > neutralized, coordinated assaults can be arranged
>> using
>> > > aliases and multiple membership ID's to present a
>> wide
>> > > array of negative and meddlesome messages.
>> > >
>> > > C. Diversionary efforts
>> > >
>> > > 1. Bread and Circuses
>> > >
>> > > a. Celebrities
>> > >
>> > > The use of celebrities is a proven means of
>> > > diverting attention from serious political
>> > > Issues. Moreover, the use of selected
>> celebrity
>> > > figures as political spokesperson can be a
>> very
>> > > effective means of getting our message
>> across.
>> > >
>> > > b. Sports
>> > >
>> > > Sports are useful as a means of diverting
>> > > attention from serious political issues and
>> > > dulling the minds of the populace. By
>> focusing
>> > > all their energies on sporting events, we
>can
>> > > prevent people from undertaking the intense
>> and
>> > > serious study necessary to take effective
>> > > political action.
>> > >
>> > > c. Gambling
>> > >
>> > > The provision of numerous outlets for public
>> > > gambling serves multiple purposes; it
>serves
>> to
>> > > keep the popular attention engaged on
>> sporting
>> > > events, as well as what has become known as
>> > > "lottery fever. " Perhaps more important,
>> > > widespread gambling not only keeps the
>> general
>> > > public poor, it provides needed income for
>> our
>> > > own uses-- especially when allowed in the
>> form of
>> > > state lotteries which purport to provide
>> money
>> > > for education, senior citizens, or other
>> popular
>> > > purposes. In fact, through the careful use
>of
>> > > accounting manipulation, much of the funds
>> raised
>> > > are being diverted to support many of the
>> other
>> > > programs and efforts described in this
>memo.
>> > >
>> > > Talk
>> > >
>> > > D. Talk Shows: Talk Shows serve a duel purpose:
>> > >
>> > > 1. By diverting attention from serious issues, such programs
>> > > dull the public intellect and prevent people from
>> > > focusing on real issues and problems.
>> > >
>> > > 2. By constantly presenting groups such as homosexuals,
>> > > feminists, etc. In a favorable light, and
>presenting
>> > > real "white supremacists" "religious zealots" and
>> other
>> > > opponents unfavorably, these programs can serve to
>> > > reaffirm in the public mind which people are "good"
>> and
>> > > which are "bad."
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >It is our belief that the above strategies.. if implemented
>effectively,
>> can
>> > >be effective in countering and ultimately rendering ineffective the
>> efforts
>> > >of The Disrupters Movement.
>> > >
>> > >***** END of document ****
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail