Time: Sun Nov 24 18:32:32 1996 To: Liberty Law From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: OPERATION CABLE SPLICE Cc: Bcc: >From: "Harvest" <harvest@whitemtns.com> >To: <caji@pobox.com> >Cc: [address in tool bar] >Subject: Fw: OPERATION CABLE SPLICE >Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 09:34:05 -0700 > > >Please post this everywhere on the Internet that you may think anyone would >be interested... maybe we can save someone from falling for Gary Hunt's >most recent disinformation project. > >Thank you, > >harvest@whitemtns.com > >---------- >> From: Harvest <harvest@whitemtns.com> >> To: pmitch@primenet.com >> Cc: caji@pobox.com >> Subject: Re: OPERATION CABLE SPLICE >> Date: Sunday, November 24, 1996 9:28 AM >> >> >> Gary Hunt, government agent provocoteur, is at it again. He was in Waco >> trying to sabotage efforts to save the Branch Davidians... he then went >to >> Connecticutt and called for Militias to march to combat the State when >the >> State tried to collect cigarrette tax from some people on private land >they >> claimed was an Indian Reservation who claimed to be Native Americans. >The >> land was NOT a reservation and the people were not Native Americans... >one >> was Black and the other was White. When the scam was exposed Hunt moved >on >> to more scams each attempting to get Militia members or Patriots involved >> in activities sure to get them discredited or arrested. >> >> Hunt claims to be a penniless Florida surveyor who runs something called >> "The Outpost of Freedom", a do-nothing, fundless, front for his >activities. >> Despite being broke Hunt travels all over the nation all the time >turning >> up at every supposed crises and drumming up the Militia to march out and >> meet the enemy at every moment. Hunt has no visible means of support and >> has admitted being "broke", yet always has money and travel funds. >> >> We are in possession of a video tape which shows Gary Hunt as a pall >bearer >> at the funeral of an ATF agent some years ago... we are in the possession >> of a photograph which shows three ATF agents standing together... all >> wearing ATF "T" shirts... one of the three is Gary Hunt. We are also in >> possession of many witness affidavits that confirm by positive >> identification that Gary Hunt was a guest at the Grand Continental Hotel >in >> Oklahoma City a full week before the bombing. We also have a video tape >> taken by a local TV station that clearly shows Gary Hunt and a companion, >> each carrying transmitters, walking swiftly away from the just bombed >> building... Whoooooopssssss! They are clearly suprised and upset that >they >> are being filmed and show no surprise or concern for the dead and wounded >> behind them. >> >> The so-called "Operation Cable Splice" document that Hunt has put out is >an >> obvious FAKE... FRAUD... PHONY... etc. Operation Cable Splice was a >> CALIFORNIA NATIONAL GUARD exercise that took place over two decades ago. >> It was not then and is not now a national or federal operation. You can >> read about it in my book "Behold A Pale Horse".... as I am the one that >> exposed the REAL "Cable Splice". It is so easy to prove a fake that I am >> amazed at Hunt's sheer stupidity. >> >> Gary Hunt is again doing what the government pays him to do... and once >> again the sheople are falling for it... hook, line, and sinker. Notice >the >> obvious target of this fake document... just like the last fake document >> that Hunt put out the target appears to be me... and other effective >radio >> talk hosts. But like all of Hunt's bullshit... and totally unlike Gary >> Hunt... it won't wash on me... I document and source everything on my >> broadcasts. >> >> Don't get me wrong... there is some obvious honey in the fake document... >> but I exposed that honey many years ago... Hegel would love Gary Hunt. >> >> Wake Up ! Hunt is ENEMY all the way. >> >> William Cooper >> Director, Intelligence Service >> Second Continental Army of the Republic >> >> >> >> ************************************************ >> > > >> > > >> > >Outpost of Freedom >> > > Gary Hunt >> > > November 19, 1996 >> > > >> > >I have, recently, posted "Informants Amongst Us" and "C3CM" to >> > >demonstrate what means are used by government to create as much >> > >confusion, criticism and division in the Constitutionalist Community >as >> > >possible. There are a few more pieces that I have become aware of in >the >> > >past seven or eight years. Operation Cablesplice is one of those >'items' >> > >that, although subject to controversy, should be red for what is said, >> > >not, necessarily, for where it comes from. >> > >As you read the following 'document', consider that it may have been >> > >written by someone other than the government, perhaps as a detraction, >> > >perhaps as a spoof. In either event, the government surely has read >the >> > >document, and if they have not adopted the policies presented therein, >> > >they are foolish enough to have relinquished power by now. >> > >I first received a copy of Cablesplice back in the earlier days of >> > >fax-networking. There were many (among them, myself) who felt that the >> > >concepts of Cablesplice were being applied even then. The Internet, >> > >however, has opened a whole new forum for the propagation of the time >of >> > >methods outlined in Cablesplice. >> > >As most are aware, now, Marshall Richards, of the West Virginia >militia, >> > >was an informant. The means by which the government achieved 'control' >> > >over Richards may be as outlines in "Informants Amongst Us", and is >> > >definitely consistent with Cablesplice. >> > >Nearly every recent 'bust' of patriots was achieved by an informant >and >> > >an active agent, working together. We can usually see these >situations, >> > >after the fact, but we know that they are there. >> > >Let's look a little further. Look at the proliferation of >> > >information/disinformation circulating, daily, on the Internet. Take, >> > >for example, a recent claim that last Friday's (November 22) 20/20 >> > >program was going to air some revealing interviews, with government >> > >agents, that would blow the cover off of the government's involvement >in >> > >the OKC Bombing. After the program didn't air, excuses were made, and >> > >blames laid. The bottom line, however, is that this is exactly what >saps >> > >the energy from the movement. Whether the issue be flying saucers, >> > >comets striking earth, indictments (how many, how many times now?) >> > >against Billary, or any other issue that is not directly relevant to >the >> > >cause, it is a drain. >> > >Had Mike Kemp or the Georgia Militia, and soon the Viper militia, the >> > >energy expended on them that is wasted on this irrelevant crud, >perhaps >> > >we would begin seeing change. >> > >Start wondering what the Founders did before the events of April 19, >> > >1775, hurled them into war. Were they as ill prepared as we are today? >> > >The answer, quite frankly, is NO! They were prepared, and that >> > >preparation did not come from bantering about, acting as if the >> > >knowledge of all events was evil, and that each was an expert. They >> > >organized themselves into Committees of Protection, Correspondence and >> > >Safety, and they prepared themselves, mentally and physically, for >what >> > >they perceived to lie in their future. It is no surprise, when the >true >> > >history is read, that they were able to achieve what they did. And, >> > >more, surprisingly, the odds against them were far worse than they are >> > >against us, today. >> > > >> > >Now, read "CODEWORD -- OPERATION CABLESPLICE, and begin to >> > >understand that the enemy uses his head. It is time that we start >doing >> the > >same! >> > > >> > >Gary Hunt >> >> >> >> > >******************************************** >> > >TOP SECRET >> > >CODEWORD: CABLESPLICE >> > >(This is a secret document being circulated among Top Government And >UN. >> > >people) >> > > >> > >An Aggressive Program to Counter The Disrupters Movement >> > > >> > >Recent efforts by The Disrupters Movement to gain political influence >> > >are beginning to seriously and adversely affect public perceptions and >> > >understanding of ongoing programs aimed at smoothing the transfer of >> > >sovereignty and power from national governments to super-national >> > >statist organizations unless such efforts are countered and >discredited, >> > >the task of creating a unified global government under UN control will >> > >be far more difficult. The most dangerous element of The Disrupters >> > >Movement are those that are part of the Christian Fundamentalist >> > >majority. The following memorandum offers a set of policy >prescriptions >> > >designed to counter-act their, efforts, >> > > >> > >ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM >> > > >> > >Although there has always been opposition from groups and individuals >> > >with a conservative, isolationist attitude, the recent growth of such >> > >opposition, and the ability and organizational success of these groups >> > >has raised serious concern in recent years. Unless steps are taken to >> > >meet the challenge posed by The Disrupters Movement, it is possible >that >> > >these groups could make serious inroads into the public complacence >> > >which has been so carefully nurtured over the past fifty Years, >> > >The threat is two-fold. First, there is the traditional conservative >> > >political threat, one which can be traced back to pre-W.W.II >> > >isolationism and political conservatism. These groups are not of >> > >particular concern as their organizing ability and numbers do not >> > >suggest the capability for amassing significant political power. >> > >It is the second category, the "Christian Fundamentalists," that pose >> > >the greatest threat. These people are representative of a massive >> > >population of Americans and if allowed to propagandize and organize >that >> > >base could present serious obstacles to further progress, >> > > >> > >I. Overt Programs; >> > > >> > >Overt programs to counter growing influence of Christian and other >> > >groups should take various forms: >> > > >> > > A. An active effort aimed at promoting the benefits of global >> > > organizations and institutions. Media stories, books, >> > > conferences, and other means should be utilized to get the >> story >> > > out in appropriate fashion. >> > > >> > > Appearances >> > > >> > > B. Appearances by political figures, well-known celebrities and >> > > other influential figures at events connected to >> international >> > > and super- national organizations and institutions. Of >> particular >> > > use are events which involve "feel-good" operations such as >> > > UNICEF, Feed the Children, Americare, etc. >> > > >> > > C. Promotion of peaceful uses of atomic energy, disarmament as a >> > > necessary condition to peace and security, and tolerance >and >> > > acceptance of non-Christian faiths should be promoted >> > > consistently but with enough subtlety so as not to turn off >> the >> > > targeted populations. >> > > >> > > 1. Under no circumstances, however. should such efforts be >> > > allowed to raise fears regarding those goals, nor >> should >> > > they provide substantive evidence of the true >> objectives >> > > of U.S.G. policy. >> > > >> > > 2. An important means of developing support for disarmament >> > > and the reliance on the United Nations to impose >> global >> > > order is through raising fears of nuclear weapons. >By >> > > playing up the danger of nuclear war, It should be >> > > possible to generate considerable public support >for >> > > further movement towards the disarmament of >national >> > > states. This diverts attention from the real nature >> of >> > > disarmament effort by portraying it as necessary to >> world >> > > peace, rather than a step on the road to world >> > > government. >> > > >> > > D. A massive attack on The Disrupters Movement, and especially >> > > Christian religion groups. This assault would challenge >them >> as >> > > intolerant, hateful, exclusionist, and potentially >dangerous. >> > > Such a program would include the following: >> > > >> > > 1. Efforts should be made to falsely portray their >> > > objectives as the creation of a religious theocracy >> and >> > > the imposition of strict religious interpretation >of >> the >> > > Bible as the basis for political participation in >> "The >> > > New Christian America." This can best be >accomplished >> by >> > > focusing on the most outrageous and extremist >> statements >> > > and members, while down playing the more moderate >> > > membership. >> > > >> > > 2. " Christian " groups should whenever possible be >> > > portrayed as fringe elements of the country's >> religious >> > > population, not especially numerous and certainly >not >> > > representative of "most" Christians. >> > > >> > > 3. At every opportunity these "Christian" groups should be >> > > presented as vicious, intolerant, and especially as >> > > anti-Semitic. The selective use of quotes, and if >> > > necessary, the use of invented statements, can be >> most >> > > effective means of accomplishing this task. >> > > >> > > Arrest >> > > >> > > 4. Arrest either on criminal charges or on mental Inquest >> > > warrants certain members of The Disrupters Movement >> who >> > > by their fanatical religious life-styles and/or >their >> > > EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS would be psychologically and >> > > physically prepared to survive outside of the >> government >> > > control. >> > > >> > > 5. Harassment on criminal charges or mental inquest warrants of >those >> > > who listen to and/or sympathize with The Disrupters Movement. >> > > >> > >II. Covert Programs: Covert programs may be equally as important, if >not >> > > more so, to countering the increasing effectiveness of The >> Disrupters >> > > Movement. >> > > >> > > A. Infiltration of The Disrupters Movement by sympathetic agents is >> > > an extremely useful tool in combating their efforts. >> > > >> > > 1. By carrying out extreme acts, and especially acts of >> > > violence, such individuals can bring discredit and >> public >> > > condemnation against The Disruption Movement. >> > > >> > > 2. By raising confusion , and care ful ly encouraging splits >> > > and controversy within The Disrupters Movement, >such >> > > agents will be able to reduce the effectiveness and >> > > coherency of those groups. >> > > >> > > B. Individuals who have been groomed to operate outside the usual >> > > channels of political activity should be activated and >placed >> in >> > > positions in which they appear to be in opposition to USG >> policy. >> > > >> > > 1. These persons would speak out publicly in opposition to >> > > our policies, but would be in fact be sympathetic >to >> our >> > > long term objectives. By carefully and selectively >> > > providing false or misleading information, and >> > > information of a seemingly scandalous or dramatic >> nature, >> > > they would seem to be supporting the agenda of The >> > > Disrupters Movement. But when the information the >> > > promulgated was shown to be patently false, It >would >> > > further damage the credibility of the opposition. >> > > >> > > 2. The use of certain talk radio personalities along the >> > > lines suggested in paragraph 1 has already proven >> quite >> > > effective and further ventures along these lines >> could be >> > > beneficial. >> > > >> > > 3. In extreme situations, it may become useful or even >> > > necessary for these undercover assets to carry out >> > > certain operations against members of The >Disrupters >> > > Movement who are interfering with CABLESPLICE. In >> some >> > > cases, termination's with extreme prejudice may be >> called >> > > for. >> > > >> > > Subversion >> > > >> > > C. Subversion and Elimination of the Second Amendment >> > > >> > > 1. One of the most critical efforts must be the removal of >> > > firearms from individual control. The on-going >> long-term >> > > program to accomplish this is to bear efforts along >> > > current lines are advised. >> > > >> > > a. The use of "agent provocateurs," individuals who >> > > are seemingly insane (but who are never >taken >> > > alive) who create highly publicized mass >> killings >> > > with automatic weapons has been >particularly >> > > useful in molding public opinion. >Similarly, >> the >> > > regular use of random killings in large >urban >> > > areas as a way of creating a climate of >fear >> and >> > > violence has resulted in significant gains >> for >> > > the gun-control point of view. Such >programs >> are >> > > extremely useful and should be continued >and >> > > possibly expanded. >> > > >> > > b. On-going efforts to gain small footholds in >> > > gun-control are worthwhile as they open the >> door >> > > to further controls later on. The >importance >> of >> > > eliminating the Second Amendment Right to >> Bear >> > > Arms cannot be stressed too much. >> > > >> > > >> > >III. DISINFORMATION PROGRAMS: >> > > >> > >These programs should be designed to carefully seed the media with >false >> > >and misleading information about long-term goals and plans, as well as >> > >forged and deceptive details about The Disrupters Movement. >> > > >> > > A. Careful and selective placement of spurious and potentially >> > > damaging news stories in the popular media is an excellent >> means >> > > of raising doubts and fears of the population. Our >opponents >> have >> > > made good use of this technique, we should do likewise. >> > > >> > > B. One of the most effective disinformation programs has been the >> > > selected use of "expose" books and stories, all reputedly written >by >> > > former government and super-government officials, but in fact >> developed >> > > within the NSA and CIA. >> > > >> > > 1. Connections to actual government operations, and the bona >> > > fides of such expose authors are deliberately vague >> in >> > > order to make tracing and verifying their stories >> > > difficult. >> > > >> > > 2. Although the books and information "exposed" would >> > > seemingly be extremely critical of our long-term >> programs >> > > and objectives, the contradictions contained >within, >> the >> > > difficulty of verifying either authors or details, >> and >> > > the wild-eyed style verging on the Irrational would >> all >> > > work to discredit and raise doubts. >> > > >> > > >> > > The presentation >> > > >> > > 3. The presentation of fringe and extremist religious >> > > doctrine and beliefs, or the presentation of >> Christian >> > > religious beliefs in particularly dogmatic and >> intolerant >> > > fashion, would help to turn popular opinion against >> The >> > > Disrupter Movement. >> > > >> > > >> > >IV. Other Propaganda Efforts >> > > >> > > A. Print Media/Publications >> > > >> > > 1. Appropriate use of popular media intended to discredit >> > > and attack opponents is a fundamental tool of >> countering >> > > The Disrupters Movement. >> > > >> > > 2. While control of the major media outlets is crucial to >> > > such efforts, it is through "fringe" media >> publications >> > > that the most damage can be done to The Disrupters >> > > Movement. Continued use of assets within the >counter >> > > media can be beneficial. >> > > >> > > B. Electronic/Computer Systems: Electronic computer systems, >> > > bulletin boards, and information superhighway in general is >> an >> > > area of considerable importance to efforts to combat the >> > > activities of The Disrupter Movement. The ability of >> opponents to >> > > utilize computer bulletin boards to pass information and >> educate >> > > people must be met with an active program of disinformation >> and >> > > attack. >> > > >> > > 1. One means of countering the effectiveness of such >> > > opposition efforts is the simple expedient of >> overloading >> > > their bulletin boards. A single operator with one >> > > computer can set a program in motion that will send >> out >> > > thousands of messages. The sheer volume of such >> messages >> > > is more then the content. Most people will give up >> rather >> > > then read through hundreds and thousands of >messages. >> > > >> > > 2. A second means of countering the opposition's use of >> > > computer technology is through the careful placing >of >> > > disinformation agents. Such agents can take two >> forms: >> > > >> > > a. Agents may be placed who will simply argue >> > > against the opposition, using delaying and >> > > confusing tactics such as constantly >> demanding >> > > references and "proof" of allegations, >> referring >> > > to obscure and difficult to find documents >as >> > > evidence that the opposition is wrong, and >> > > generally forcing the opposition to waste >> > > tremendous amounts of time simply defending >> > > itself from spurious and irrelevant >attacks. >> > > >> > > Other >> > > >> > > b. Other agents have been placed with a more subtle >> > > purpose mind. Such agents would take on the >> > > persons WA attitudes of members of The >> Disrupters >> > > Movement, but would present the opposition >> case >> > > in ways that will ultimately discredit >them. >> The >> > > necessary effort to correct. the messages >> posted >> > > by these agents, and the resulting >appearance >> of >> > > disarray within their camp should present >> > > considerable opportunities for further >> assaults >> > > on The Disrupters Movement. >> > > >> > > 3. In cases of computer networks where it is highly >> > > imperative that the efforts of The Disrupters be >> > > neutralized, coordinated assaults can be arranged >> using >> > > aliases and multiple membership ID's to present a >> wide >> > > array of negative and meddlesome messages. >> > > >> > > C. Diversionary efforts >> > > >> > > 1. Bread and Circuses >> > > >> > > a. Celebrities >> > > >> > > The use of celebrities is a proven means of >> > > diverting attention from serious political >> > > Issues. Moreover, the use of selected >> celebrity >> > > figures as political spokesperson can be a >> very >> > > effective means of getting our message >> across. >> > > >> > > b. Sports >> > > >> > > Sports are useful as a means of diverting >> > > attention from serious political issues and >> > > dulling the minds of the populace. By >> focusing >> > > all their energies on sporting events, we >can >> > > prevent people from undertaking the intense >> and >> > > serious study necessary to take effective >> > > political action. >> > > >> > > c. Gambling >> > > >> > > The provision of numerous outlets for public >> > > gambling serves multiple purposes; it >serves >> to >> > > keep the popular attention engaged on >> sporting >> > > events, as well as what has become known as >> > > "lottery fever. " Perhaps more important, >> > > widespread gambling not only keeps the >> general >> > > public poor, it provides needed income for >> our >> > > own uses-- especially when allowed in the >> form of >> > > state lotteries which purport to provide >> money >> > > for education, senior citizens, or other >> popular >> > > purposes. In fact, through the careful use >of >> > > accounting manipulation, much of the funds >> raised >> > > are being diverted to support many of the >> other >> > > programs and efforts described in this >memo. >> > > >> > > Talk >> > > >> > > D. Talk Shows: Talk Shows serve a duel purpose: >> > > >> > > 1. By diverting attention from serious issues, such programs >> > > dull the public intellect and prevent people from >> > > focusing on real issues and problems. >> > > >> > > 2. By constantly presenting groups such as homosexuals, >> > > feminists, etc. In a favorable light, and >presenting >> > > real "white supremacists" "religious zealots" and >> other >> > > opponents unfavorably, these programs can serve to >> > > reaffirm in the public mind which people are "good" >> and >> > > which are "bad." >> > > >> > > >> > >It is our belief that the above strategies.. if implemented >effectively, >> can >> > >be effective in countering and ultimately rendering ineffective the >> efforts >> > >of The Disrupters Movement. >> > > >> > >***** END of document **** >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail